b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 22577 (Older | Newer)

# His job is done
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:12, archived)
# Hello new person,
have a woo.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:49, archived)
[challenge entry] Punnage and fluff
Clive Kittie

Sod it...EDIT: Compo'd.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:10, archived)
# LOL
wooage
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:10, archived)
# cute
Funny how you have to watch it for ages to see the animation. :)
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:11, archived)
[challenge entry] thats cute but this is just scary


should be compo'd
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:28, archived)
# omg!
that's hilarious!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:31, archived)
# Compo it!
And very very hard!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:35, archived)
# i love clive!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:11, archived)
# Fluff!
Love it.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:38, archived)
# Aaaaaaaaaah.
Where did you find that cat?
Can I see the original?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:48, archived)
# find here
www.militiadesign.com/b3takit/page3.htm

+ lots of useful b3ta (meme) stuff!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 13:00, archived)
# lost their edge ?
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

yes, in my opinion
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:01, archived)
# He'd also be usefull for unblocking the sink!
I was looking for a dalek pic last nioght and did an image search on Yahoo - I'm looking forward to tonight's episode!
uk.search.yahoo.com/search/images?fr=slv1-&p=dalek
1st pic!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:05, archived)
# I don't watch it because I'm at work then it's on.
But I have a question.
How can there be a "last dalek" if they travel through time, surely he can go back to a time where there are more daleks? Or, was it just that that was the last dalek for the time period?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:11, archived)
# Arrgh - time travel fecks with your head!
If you go back in time and kill your parents before you were born what would happen?

Because if you did that then you would never have existed to go back in time and do it, so they would still be alive, so you would exist to go back and kill them, so you wouldn't ....
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:19, archived)
# Well, if you accept the concept of multiple universes, in which each moment in time is a seperate universe,
what happens is that you don't go back to any of the moments in time which led to your birth, since by definition your parents survived through all those moments; instead, you go to a moment (a parallel universe) which differs in the important respect that you arrive in it as a time traveller and kill those versions of your parents. But you still exist afterwards, as do the versions of your parents who gave birth to you. It's just that other version of you in the universe/time thread you travelled to who is never born.
BBC news has a bad article about time travel which proclaims excitedly that a new model "permits time travel". What this model tries to do is produce a concept of quantum time travel which doesn't involve multiple universes; there is only one time thread in this model and consequently it has to contain a sort of fatalistic element where you simply can't kill your parents, for reasons that aren't specified. But the multiverse model of time travel has been around for ages, maybe ten years now.
and it would ruin every Dr. Who plot
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:28, archived)
# If you want silly alternative universe movies
you can't go past "what the bleep do we know"

new age wank with lots of "experts"

great to watch after consuming mind altering substances (alegedly)
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:41, archived)
# I know what you mean. I rather hope the new age ended in 1999.
Multiple universes make more sense to me than a single thread of time, though, since there blatently are multiple alternative things that can happen in the future which are all physically allowed. I see no reason why the course of events which we perceive as having happened should have special status over alternative courses of events, or why now should have special status over the past, apart from the relationship between the moment we call "now" and our memories. Apart from what our individual, subjective memories tell us about our position in time, all physically possible things ought to exist as definitely as those things that exist "now".
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 13:07, archived)
# i knew you were going to say that
.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 13:19, archived)
# Other views put forwards.
You are an impartial bystander that has no effect on anything or one.
You can only go one direction, if you go back you cannot go forwards, or the other way.
Everything is predetermined, so if you go back and kill someone, it'll turn out that you were supposed to anyway, and even if it hadn't happened in "your present" you wouldn't know, because it would have happened in your past and you'd just think they had before but now you know who did it.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:43, archived)
# At least 10 years.
It's derived from the Everett, Wheeler, Graham multi-verse interpretation of Quantum mechanics (ie, every quantum event which could go either way creates multiple universes where one has one outcome and one has another).
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 13:05, archived)
# Oh yes.
It was popular 35 years ago, and backed up by the double-slit experiment, and still most people intuitively decide that multiple universes are bullshit. But it sounds more reasonable to me than 17 dimensions or fate.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 13:17, archived)
# Paradox
Steam driven boy by John Sladek has a guy becoming his own family, can't remember exactly how.

Generally speaking that's why time travel is so hard to conceive, because of all the problems it brings up.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:28, archived)
# you would instantly and irrevocably
be turned ino a fish
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 13:31, archived)
# It was a time war.
They were wiped out everywhere and everywhen. It's kind of complicated.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:37, archived)
# Google's results are even better
images.google.be/images?q=dalek
second one, obviously
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:15, archived)
# Woo
to 70's dalek pron!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:16, archived)
# .
this pic lifted straight from the BBC frontpage
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:28, archived)
# just because
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:53, archived)
# Arrrrg!
websense has now decided to block your images now, give it a week and i won't be able to see any pictures on b3ta :(
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:56, archived)
# blimey, websense blocks me
i feel like i've finally made it as an internet pest
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:57, archived)
# what's the url, i'll tell you what they object to, ah this again
Reason:
The Websense category "Personal Web Sites" is filtered.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

URL:
www.glastonbridge.co.uk/

(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:58, archived)
# i'm not a personal website
I'M AN EMPIRE. AN EMPIRE, I TELL YOU!

*vanishes in a paranoid delusion*
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:02, archived)
# How Wicket got his name..


Howsat!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:52, archived)
# is that ..
warwickshire ?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:02, archived)
# Warwickshire won by 250 runs.
hehe. He's lucky it was LBW..
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:06, archived)
# Watch out he...
...doesn't start humping the batsman's leg.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:15, archived)
# It's Beecha Wawa for a reason..
Beecha Wawa or Beech the Wowa (Ewokese/English)

Pronoun. 'Bee'-'Cha'-'Waa'-'Waa'.
Adj. Beecha Fouka, Ibeecha-Haha.

- To admire the beech-made cricket bat whilst getting thumped vigourously in the noggin by the ball.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:26, archived)
#
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:38, archived)
# Ooh I like these 3d thingies
and that one works particularly well.

wooage
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:42, archived)
# teh fear !
woo!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:42, archived)
# Argh!
teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:42, archived)
# Argh!
teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear!teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear!teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear! teh fear!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:43, archived)
# On the rock face
What are the bits that flash on and off?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:44, archived)
# it's a tree
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:45, archived)
# That's a funny looking tree.
Not the tree at the right, the 3 spots on the rock that are in one frame but not the other.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:49, archived)
# do you mean the big thing with the tent on?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:50, archived)
# Sorry.
Never mind, the 3 spots on the tree. I thought you were sating the spots were a tree, not a big tree on its side instead of a rock.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:52, archived)
# all is well then
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:53, archived)
# 3D rocks
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:45, archived)
# And
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:45, archived)
# huzzah
cleaned room and rediscovered my quo and jethro tull cds. they am the greatest

maybe the quo a little greater though

/dances around room manically


woo to the pic also by they way. utterley hatstand
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:46, archived)
# woo
teh fear.

/runs
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:46, archived)
# ARGH!

Click for readable


There's just not enough use of The Fear these days, seems that everything is Quo.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:47, archived)
# ARGH!
*jumps through window*
*climbs back in*
*reports*
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:48, archived)
# that is amazing,
and terrifying... i feel like i've gone back in time and mime
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 13:16, archived)
# batman 2.....




(watched it last night, and loved it / reccomended viewing)
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:35, archived)
# Tim Burton's Batman
Will always have a special place in my heart. If only the film Catwoman had had his version in. I'm actually looking forwards to the remake of Charlie and the chocolate factory just because he's directing it.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:39, archived)
# Haha
I saw it at the premiere in Paris, and I wholeheartedly recommend it as well.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:43, archived)
[challenge entry] lovely markings..
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

rare sighting of Amedela fish -
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:27, archived)
# hehehe
you assume too much
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:44, archived)
# catch them and eat them
and roast this:

(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:09, archived)
# Stick Man was getting both infuriated and confused...
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:25, archived)
# Hehe
Zot!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:28, archived)
# ha ha
stick man throws like a girl !!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:29, archived)
# Haha
Woo!
Does it tile?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:30, archived)
# Yes
Just take the "Zot" sound effects out.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:36, archived)
#
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:37, archived)
#
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:44, archived)
# that's brill
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:53, archived)
# haha!

excellent!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:01, archived)
# Genius!
Stick Man had it coming to him.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 12:54, archived)
# MJ's working with zombies..


would eventually help him fit permanently into the cast of Thriller..
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:19, archived)
# ...
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:09, archived)
# hahaha,
that's a goodun.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:18, archived)
# Flipper's day off..


Flipper always liked acrobatic Jetskiing with his pal.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:45, archived)
# blimey
half an hour between posts, thats gotta be a record.

and woo to jet-ski dolphins!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:47, archived)
# yes
I heard it's good weather out there in The Real World™
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:45, archived)
[challenge entry] Sometimes, DogOfShoes would stay up and dance all night with its master
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:14, archived)
# ha ha ha!
we have a winner!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:15, archived)
# haha
ace!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:28, archived)
# pfffffffft
!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:29, archived)
# Arf!
arf, arf, w00t ...

and rar!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:43, archived)
# Hahaha
Winner!
Woo!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:45, archived)
# Winner..
Woo, Yay, Woot.. sir.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:48, archived)
# Huzzah!

(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:04, archived)
# Dick
Beattie!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:33, archived)
# hahaha
arf!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:34, archived)
# top hole!
that's ace.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:16, archived)
# HOUPLA
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:32, archived)
# WOO
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:34, archived)
#
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:38, archived)
# AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
this made me laugh like a loon!!!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:41, archived)
# hhahaha!
that's silly
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:48, archived)
# that's fucking
ace
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:59, archived)
# Pffft
brilliant!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:06, archived)
# ahahahaha
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:19, archived)
[challenge entry] Pearoast
forgot to put in comp.
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:24, archived)
# If you posted it before
you could make the old one a compo entry
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:28, archived)
# Indeed
Especially as this was yesterday just after the compo came out.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:29, archived)
# Is it real?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:59, archived)
# No bridge
No shark, no helicopter, it's a fake
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:09, archived)
# awww
kitty is all locked up :(
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:07, archived)
# LET THEM GO
you monster!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:09, archived)
# Oh, in the intrests of jacking a thread
anybody got a linkback to the original "your all gay" post?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:11, archived)
# It was reverend dan
you could search for youself (not to be rude, but I don't know where it is). If you just want to see the animation google it.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:20, archived)
# yes, google it.
google is wonderful at finding all sorts of things.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:23, archived)
# Amazingly...
.. that site had me going for a few seconds...
:o(
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:58, archived)
# nah Dan made the fabbo animation
I think the original "your all gay" post went to the same special place as "GAZ IM ME!" - the post was deemed a proper threadwaste and deleted, but only after becoming part of b3ta folklore

my personal favourite was the series of "your face sold here"
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:54, archived)
# have you
consulted
glassco.cx/
?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:23, archived)
# shouldn't that
be spelled 'you're all gay'?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:36, archived)
# Oh, piss off, you pedantic bastard!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:41, archived)
# I'm the only thing
stopping this board from dropping
into the abyss of barbarism and
anarchy.

/oscar wilde
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:03, archived)
# It's trying to escape!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:14, archived)
# Kill it
Kill it now!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:31, archived)
# this thread needs a picture

yes it's a repost.
i've just got up, the board's so slow i think i'll go back to bed. most offers gratefully received.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 11:47, archived)
# CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS
FIELD OF VISION: EXTREMES
@
Institute for New Media
Frankfurt a.M. / Germany

9 – 16 October 2005

DEADLINE: 15 September 2005

INFO: www.field-of-vision.net/Extremes

DESCRIPTION
Following the success of Field of Vision: New York,
Field of Vision: Extremes will be the second in this series of combined internet / physical world events. This time the organizing artists are inviting everyone to submit images visualizing the ‘extremes’ of our world as they see it.

CRITERIA
We are especially interested in images (or pairs of images) showing the ‘extreme’ in contrast to its opposite: Good–bad, rich–poor, free–oppressed, modern–old fashioned, blue–orange, left–right, hot–cold, organized–chaotic, advanced–primitive, peaceful–violent, dark–light …or any other contrast you can think of. All images are printed out postcard size and a selection of about 500 will be assembled on location into a billboard format collage.

MEDIA
Photographs, pictures downloaded from the internet or magazine cuttings, small artworks for example paintings, scanned objects, drawings, collages and electronically generated imagery are all acceptable but must be digitised and sent as e-mail attachments or uploaded to our server.

GUIDELINES
• You can submit as many images as you like
• File format: .jpeg, .gif, .png
• File size: max 1 megabyte per image

SUBMIT TO: [email protected]

www.field-of-vision.net/Extremes/Upload

If you wish to be credited include your name, city and country. Successful entries will be notified by e-mail and presented on the project web site.

ORGANIZING ARTISTS, FOV EXTREMES:
Paul Dacey / USA
Alison Dalwood / UK
Raul Moarquech Ferrera-Balanquet / Cuba / USA / México
The Gao Brothers / China
Stephan Hausmeister / Germany / UK
Iratxe Hernández Simal / Spain
Jenny Kao-Yuan / Taiwan / USA
Günter Ku / Taiwan
Chapman Kuo / Taiwan
Gautam Narang / India / UK
Andrey Vrabchev / Bulgaria
Michael Wright / UK

Field of Vision is a series of events organized by
DIGITAL ART PROJECTS in collaboration with the
Institute for New Media, Frankfurt a.M. / Germany
and support from:

• a-n The Artist Information Company / UK
• artistsprinting, London / UK
• EAST 05, Norwich School of Art and Design / UK
• Faculty of Art and Design, University of Hertfordshire / UK
• Greenwood Global Media Corp, New York / USA
• Kunstverein Grafschaft Bentheim, Neuenhaus / Germany
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:00, archived)
# SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM
:O)
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:02, archived)
# With some Ham and Jam and Cam Alot!!
Ace
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:06, archived)
# I HAVE TO PUSH THE PRAM A LOOOOOOT!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:10, archived)
# Horray!
In war we're tough and able
Quite indefatigable
Between our quests we sequin vests
And impersonate Clark Gable
It's a busy life in Camelot
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:48, archived)
# Woo extreme-ness
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

I should win!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:05, archived)
# In the competition of Instant Extreme Generation
you win
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:08, archived)
# Woo
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:10, archived)
# Win
To the max!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:25, archived)
# woo
*skanks*
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:47, archived)
# Why does
an Institute for New Media have
one of the lamest web pages I've
ever seen?

Isn't the internet new media?

(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:11, archived)
# its artistic
which is BY DEFINITION lame.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:12, archived)
# And all the examples are lame too
Though there is a pair of mr Ts hands that make me think of goatse.cx
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:15, archived)
# describe the lame-ness
I have a common condition where I just dont want to click on THAT particular link.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:13, archived)
# I can't really explain

suffice to say, all it's missing
is one of those "this site under
construction" gifs.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:17, archived)
# You know, at work the other day
we had to conduct tests on some spam which had arrived straight from the spam factory. We only needed ten grams but they sent us a huge lump which was shaped in section like a can of spam, but was about a meter and a half long.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:24, archived)
# so you
feasted like the Gods at Valhalla?
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:34, archived)
# I heard
theres a little spam left in every one after death. So really you gain 10 grams while the Gods remain spamless.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:38, archived)
#
• You can submit as many images as you like
• File format: .jpeg, .gif, .png
• File size: max 1 megabyte per image


/ imagines perl script+google images
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:42, archived)
# hahahahahhahaa

edit: which is why I`m re-writing my little smiths page to allow upload submissions using one of those captcha thingies!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:48, archived)
# yeah I noticed
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

I would submit a picture but I know
nothing about the smiths.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:58, archived)
# hahaha
get to fuck!

I haven`t put one of those stupid GIFs on a web site since I was at uni (a long time ago)

.. and at NO point did I have a shitty little rainbow coloured line that colour cycled!

:D

edit: but boy does my web site look sexy.. mmm mm sexy sexy

.. or maybe not
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:04, archived)
# I remember people bitching about those
things back when Mozilla was
the only browser in existence.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 10:07, archived)
[challenge entry] Dave
gormans baby racoon was just getting way too human...
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:51, archived)
# Arf!
Chuffin' woo!

Yay!

Houpla!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:52, archived)
# that's awesome
everyone should go here and look at this guy's pictures:
www.markbodnar.com/index.html
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:57, archived)
# Did this guy do the artwork for
the last zelda game? It's very similar

/edit: just looked at the site. he obv didnt
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:59, archived)
# WOO!
although dave gorman pisses me off! :o)
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:04, archived)
# .
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:46, archived)
# ZOMG!!!11one1~
Is it real???!!
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:48, archived)
# course not
they didn't have sharks back in those days, see
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:48, archived)
# Or bridges.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:04, archived)
# woo
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:59, archived)
# nicely done
much wooping and yayage
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:04, archived)
# "Five foot nine, I didn't know they stacked mash that high."
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 8:45, archived)
# arf!

I'll take two, with extra sour cream.
*glances at waist*
Alright, one.
(, Sat 18 Jun 2005, 9:04, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds