
just so much material to identify UKIP as a substandard mental status from this one clip.
Bring on the clowns!
Dog panting is an added bonus.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 23:34, Reply)

She clearly had a bad experience watching Terrahawks as a child and now equates negroids with zeroids, placing herself in the role of persecuted space witch Zelda (I can see the resemblance).
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZC9B0YJ8W8
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 0:50, Reply)

www.express.co.uk/news/uk/557397/Gypsy-grandad-buried-next-to-Muslim-grave-creates-family-war
Gypsies Muslims Gypsies Muslims Gypsies Head Muslims Explodes
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 1:27, Reply)

we can easily spot all the thick selfish fuckers before they get chance to do any real damage.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:05, Reply)

David Kassan, access via a $5 kickstarter donation.
A pretty good deal if you're interested, he's a fantastic artist.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 23:29, Reply)

Unless you edit ;)
Also, fuck ISIL/ISIS
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 22:38, Reply)

There are 43 less dead, and 280 less maimed men, women and children
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 23:28, Reply)

A-10 Hits Taliban In Treeline Some ace footage of these ultra-conservative fascist cunts taken out
Some not so ace footage of the cuntish Taliban attacking other muslims whilst they are worshiping in a mosque www.funker530.com/video-of-suicide-bomber-that-killed-20-at-mosque/ because they are utter cunts
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 1:21, Reply)

This is the beer barrel that would not die.
(Filmed in Britain's oldest brewery, making beer since 1550, now ghosts and soon luxury flats)
Cheers.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 21:08, Reply)

A keg is a pressurised vessel and a barrel is both a term of volume (36gallons) and also a name for a cask of that size.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 10:48, Reply)

So glad this local employer is finally disappearing and we are getting more luxury flats - it's a nightmare for buy to let landlords to find anything suitable these days...
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 17:57, Reply)

because the developers (Chinese state-owned) have failed to fulfill the Cultural Legacy side of the deal - which is why I was there filming/archiving the place before it got demolished - Wandsworth Council's man in the planning dept., who thinks there's more to life than luxury flats, has withdrawn the re-development deal for the whole project, thereby swizzing the developers out of £600m. He's a hero, though it's a shame for anyone looking forward to a grandstand view of the junction of the South Circular and Garrett Lane, and the lovely new TK Maxx.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 19:47, Reply)

being the link to his latest efforts, obviously there will be a different cartoon on subsequent days
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 20:10, Reply)

so I was surprised to see that. But also News stories about how the Times and the Guardian had been influenced editorially by their major advertisers.
All a bit pathetic really.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 20:31, Reply)

Its 'hard' news coverage, reportage of stuff that was actually happening, in the Gradgrindian sense, was unrivalled by absolutely no one. Ok, you never liked the editorial, comment or opinion stuff. Fair enough. But they used to never confuse reportage with editorialising. Now it is utter toilet. Thin, weak and feeble. This has happened in the last four to five years. It's a tragedy for British media. I used to buy it literally daily. I can count on two hands the number of times I've bought it in the last two years. But pissflaps likes the cricket coverage.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 20:47, Reply)

but is very dull www.b3ta.com/links/Peter_Obourne_explains_why_the_Telegraph_a_once_respectable_paper_is_now_utter_dogshit
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 21:04, Reply)

but The Sunday Sport's response was amusing
twitter.com/thesundaysport/status/569150330329571329
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 20:49, Reply)

Personally I find the thought of Telegraph readers hating the BBC even more for it quite arousing.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 7:28, Reply)

that Russia has a fighter jet industry worthy of the name. They've been buying Sukhois for years and are jointly funding development of this:

( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 17:56, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INS_Vikramaditya
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 18:39, Reply)

As a prime bit of land it could get back at the West
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 21:18, Reply)

( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 17:53, Reply)

Woo! We're number one! We're number one!
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 18:37, Reply)

I feel awful gullible.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 19:29, Reply)

And full of compliments. I loved the video. Saw this the other day and didn't realize you posted it here first. Good job!
( , Wed 11 Mar 2015, 22:30, Reply)

Then enjoy this 1969 Tektronic film (not a video, 16mm film) about printed circuits boards.
What next? Telephones with buttons?
Getoutofhere! "turns dial"
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 16:58, Reply)

Strangely the wife was not that impressed.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 19:53, Reply)

Didn't like it that we all had to die too :-(
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 17:06, Reply)

If they are not making commercial use or selling them, I'm not that bothered. On the other hand, what would really piss me off is someone uploading shite and put my name on it.
Amateur snappers seem to get really bent out of shape over what they call "image theft", but in my book it only amounts to theft if they are being used commercially and hence owe me money.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:41, Reply)

"Oh what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive."
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 15:41, Reply)

The crazy lady or the guy who goes to such efforts to expose the fraud ,you can almost hear the 'thump.thump,thump...' sound of him knocking one out at every paragraph.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 0:40, Reply)

It made me feel a bit bad. I steal photos all the time. Everyday. But I do not watermark them nor claim them as my own, just steal them and make them do unintended things. For fun.
I also see my own photographs all over the place on other peoples' sites.
These people Stacy and Bill, are demented and apparently perfect for each other.
Can you imagine carrying an oversized Louis Vuitton shopping bag and seeking some random somebody's Escalade in a parking lot to be photographed in front of to pretend is one's own to project an image of unearned wealth out of reach? Why else do that? Then bang on about how many pairs of expensive imaginary shoes you own, and isn't everybody reading just so jealous? All coming from photographers who must steal photos to promote themselves. I did not realize how many people out there are more toxic and damaged than my little sister.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 1:17, Reply)

*The Belgian Placebo, not the annoying Placebo from England with the frontman you want to hit with a shitty stick.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:07, Reply)

I liked Placebo to begin with - especially Without You I'm Nothing. Went off them and checked out their new stuff recently and it's all happy :o(
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 16:01, Reply)

( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 16:06, Reply)

they met at an international school in europe.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 20:12, Reply)

Average albums with some fucking gems in them.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 21:24, Reply)

both.
this was a good one www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHQngnnHE_0
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 16:06, Reply)

Scientology have set up a reputation management Twitter feed and are banging on about a documentary maker using fake ants*.
twitter.com/FreedomEthics
(* Before anyone else says it - "Fants".)
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:47, Reply)

They're propper butthurt about that aren't they youtube.com/watch?v=vfI54h4Jhdk
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 20:48, Reply)

5 races where you can get pissed on the move.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 11:21, Reply)

Running goes against pretty much everything I stand for, which, generally, is sitting down.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:19, Reply)

now not so much, but when I did I would always have a couple of beers before, on the odd occasions that I didn't, I ran slower and less far.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 13:34, Reply)

You'll probably appreciate this
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 16:21, Reply)

I don't get running and I don't get swimming, which is slower and wetter. Both seem to involve using a lot of energy to end up at the same place you started from.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 17:08, Reply)

There used to be an annual 'beer race' (I think it got banned in the late 1980's) where groups of students tied together three-legged-race style would run around a four mile course including about 15 pubs drinking a minimum of half a pint in each one. Watching competitors stagger to the finish line was probably more fun than taking part.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:20, Reply)

I think we gave up on the three-legged bit pretty early on though.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:55, Reply)

With a cheeky glint in his eye. He's been very quiet recently.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 10:41, Reply)

a deed of variation. It's what the Milliband brothers have used to avoid paying inheritance tax on their parents property. Capital gains tax would still apply, but it's an effective and legal means of cutting a future tax bill. Or in other words it's tax avoidance.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 11:17, Reply)

What I resent about it is he is being very disingenuous and dishonest about it. He says that he paid tax on what he inherited and that's that. But the fact remains he went out of his way to make an arrangement that significantly reduced the amount of tax he was liable for. The guardian even found an accountant from KPMG or PWC or one of the big five to write an article to say that probably didn't save any money. All bollocks. Why pay an accountant and a lawyer to make the arrangement then? What's the point of that? Why not just let probate take its course? Boris Johnson made public his tax returns when Ken Livingstone suggested he was a tax dodger, Ed Milliband should publish his.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 11:34, Reply)

Who on earth wants to pay as much tax as possible? This is why I frown at people who get all flustered with corporations and people who use tax loop holes, they are just being careful with their finances.
I should probably watch the link at this stage
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:00, Reply)

I agree with you up to a point. I think what Starbucks did, and what eBay, Amazon, Google, Apple and many others do is pretty disgusting and although technically legal, transparently dishonest.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:06, Reply)

Probably not the right time to mention that I personally make what would be on a global scale considered to be a lot of money. I went to a tax planning seminar once (it was at a business meeting I was attending anyway) and this chap was going through all the mechanisms available to save paying tax. I pointed out that I felt that paying my dues to society was what a true citizen should do; I thought I was going to be lynched as a pinko troublemaker!
A harsher analysis by some like minded colleagues determined that up to 50% most of us would be happy to pay up, but once more than half of what you work for goes to the state, most high earners begin to feel resentful.
The interesting thing is that at either end of the earnings spectrum the same argument ensues, which revolves around 'to each according to his need, from each according to his ability'. Many look at avoiders and evaders at the top and think they are sponging off society, many also look at 'benefit scroungers' and think the same thing.
There may therefore be people across the whole spectrum who take offence at people who have a sense of entitlement from society, without a sense of responsibility to look after it.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:12, Reply)

Is the gray area. I'm not particularly fond of the super rich moaning about their wealth because ultimately I find it pretty distasteful some people get distracted in their lives of luxory when so many humans around them find the entire experience a very hard slog.
It would be much easier if everything was laid open without holes for people to hide their trinkets and gold coins in, so we could either agree with it or disagree with our contributions for the welfare of the whole herd.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:20, Reply)

People don't get paid according to how useful their work is to society, and it's certainly not a meritocracy. However, few people would admit that they don't deserve all their stuff or that their work is ultimately selfish.
Presumably that mentality goes all the way to the top.
At least there can be some logic to taxation. There seems to be very little to wages.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:55, Reply)

Unfortunately this only counts if someone else is paying you. If you are deciding for yourself what you should be paid, the sky is indeed no longer the limit.
Chief execs get together and form pay committees to decide what they are worth, then as another round of senior exec pay excess occurs, the rot spreads to the state sector where execs start talking about 'comparable salaries' and we end up with town council leaders, NHS managers, civil servants being paid the same as private sector chiefs.
The ultimate though are the people who literally print money. The banking sector no longer lends out what it has, it lends out for interest about 10 times or more than what it has - they are literally making money and paying each other ridiculous bonuses to lend the money out, then charging fees for arranging of lending out money they don't have in the first place, topped off by a bonus for thinking it all up.
I like to think I've worked hard for most of my life; 16 years of training, 120 hour regular working weeks with studying for exams on top, and now being paid pretty well. I still earn a fraction of what those cunts do though!
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 13:19, Reply)

Where I work we have problems recruiting people because the banks offer to pay them a fortune. We simply can't compete.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 13:46, Reply)

My dad was down pit for 22 hours a day
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:26, Reply)

I said that I worked hard, not my dad. My father was an engineer who worked on the shop floor at Leyland Truck and Bus, his father was a garage mechanic. On my mum's side mainly low rank soldiers and indeed a grandfather who spent many years down the pits in Nottighamshire!
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:46, Reply)

but not a good position from which to climb on to your high horse.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:23, Reply)

A 'loop hole' tax avoidance scheme means that a person or business has dodged paying tax that the government intended that they should pay, by using a tax rule for a purpose that it was not intended. Quite legal it is true, but still cheating. Legal cheating but cheating nonetheless.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:54, Reply)

Is it in the rules? Yes. Therefore it isn't cheating.
If the rules are wrong then maybe that's where the focus should be, but I don't see why anyone should have a moral obligation to pay more tax than what is due - be they in a position of public office or not.
Holy shit, I just defended Ed Milliband. I think I need a stiff drink.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:28, Reply)

Some of the dodges remind me a bit of hacking. Any system with that much beurocracy is going to have a lot of unintended exploits.
People are employed to find loopholes in a system, and then time and money have to be spent fixing those loopholes.
The tax system is like shit code.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 15:05, Reply)

My wife's extended family owns a large business. They are extremely careful about not avoiding taxes because
a) most of them think they should pay a fair share and
b) should they be found out the bad publicity would do them a lot of harm
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:56, Reply)

If you've ever been self employed you'll know, you can't avoid tax.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 13:02, Reply)

Put your savings into tax-avoiding ISA's
Put as much of your income into a pension scheme as you can.....but make sure it is one that returns all your fund to your beneficiaries (inheritance tax exempt ) if you die before retiring (company pension schemes often dont ).
Buy the most expensive house you can afford ( CGT exempt when you sell it )
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 13:53, Reply)

Putting money into an ISA or pension scheme is the INTENDED function of those tax breaks, they are not 'loopholes'.
A tax avoidance scheme uses *unintentional* loopholes in tax law, and hence they are in effect cheating the system because the government did not intend that they be excused tax.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:59, Reply)

All the loopholes were put in the tax laws deliberately by the polititions etc to benefit their pals.....not supposed to be used by the others.
It's like all the software flaws are put there deliberately to allow govt intrusions .....not meant to be used by hackers.
"Security updates " do 2 jobs, 1) plug the flaw being used by hackers and 2) open up a brand new flaw for govt intrusions
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 17:38, Reply)

Tax law is ferociously complicated and corporate tax law is complexity squared. Add to that the fact that the resources of tax dodgers are far in excess of what is available to the legislators, it comes as no surprise that loopholes can always be found. Were the loopholes put there intentionally? It is a bit like Bertrand Russell's teapot, there is no way of disproving it, however it is somewhat unlikely. Government departments are disorganised and dysfunctional and at best they struggle to perform the tasks they are allocated, adding some tinfoil hat hidden agenda conspiracy would be utterly impractical.
( , Sun 22 Feb 2015, 15:57, Reply)

That's another one of the lies spouted around this subject. A deed of variation is the perfect example of what utter bullshit that is. All you need is to own a property and write a will and you can have the beneficiaries of your will dodge tax too.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 13:54, Reply)

but property ownership doesn't make someone super rich. I own a flat in London and I don't really have a pot to piss in. If I'd stuck to renting I'd have a better car, nicer clothes and just more clothes, and I'd be much better travelled, but it seemed like the right thing to do at the time.
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 16:10, Reply)

and moan at you for committing the heinous crime of putting up a poster using Blu Tac!
My mortgage repayments are cheaper than if I rented a property of a similar size. In fact I'd be lucky to afford flat in one of the more "entertaining" areas of my town
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 20:32, Reply)

You reckon they're going to pay tax on that?
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 14:09, Reply)

RL Burnside's "The Criminal Inside Me"
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 7:46, Reply)

"I didn't mean to kill nobody. I just meant to shoot the sonofabitch in the head and two times in the chest. Him dying was between him and the Lord."
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 8:15, Reply)

( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 12:49, Reply)

"Get out of Sneinton and give me your phone and wallet immediately or you're done for."
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 17:01, Reply)

And by god we will laugh a lot
( , Sat 21 Feb 2015, 0:44, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »