b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 39467 (Older | Newer)

[challenge entry]
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:29, archived)
# :)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:29, archived)
# I voted the other one
I refused to be swayed by tweeted suggestions :)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:30, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:34, archived)
# *orders t-shirt*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:35, archived)
# 'orders twelvety'
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:35, archived)
# *wants kitten t-shirt*

*makes do with this*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:38, archived)
# Kittens in MC Hammer pants FTW
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:45, archived)
# haha I like it :D
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:48, archived)
# I have just ordered this on a t-shirt
used Vista print and it cost 9 quid including delivery. Probably not the cheapest in the world but was easy to use.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 14:18, archived)
# haha! :D
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:32, archived)
# :D
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:32, archived)
# BEANZ MEANZ VOTEZ!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:35, archived)
# I voted for Lesbian Ninja Vampire Bitch Commandos.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:48, archived)
# And you were right to do so.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 11:00, archived)
# *votes for all three*
That's the way it works, isn't it?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:57, archived)
[challenge entry] In the midst of the confusion, the Mathematician's Revolutionary Collective will prevail!!!!!!

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:26, archived)
# but...but...but...
*head explodes*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:27, archived)
# Hang on, isn't pi an irrational number?
(once read a book on maths a long time ago, not at all sure about it)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:29, archived)
# They're all not what they're supposed to be
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:31, archived)
# Ha I am massively dense today!
Soz, four hours' sleep
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:33, archived)
# ...and you fell into my trap!
I win. Mathematicians now rule the world!

Probably.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:31, archived)
# do you work it out with a pencil?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:49, archived)
# For X==1 to n;
Vote X;
End;
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:30, archived)
# Errrrrmmmmm....
"Whole numbers" is not a strict mathematical term, and can be said to mean the same as integers. Rational numbers can be expressed as fractions, which pi can't. Pi is an irrational number. FAIL
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:50, archived)
# 1.2 isn't a whole number
i think it's intended
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:55, archived)
[challenge entry] 'ning /board
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:15, archived)
# careful now
hahahahahaha!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:16, archived)
# ^this^
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:16, archived)
# Also
*clicks*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:18, archived)
# ^ Them
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:19, archived)
# Down with this sort of thing
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:16, archived)
# ;D
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:17, archived)
# something with this sort of thing
I cant decide
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:26, archived)
[challenge entry] Morning all.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:11, archived)
# ...
old...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:15, archived)
[challenge entry] lack of lol, but
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:59, archived)
# Very nicely done Toasty.
:D
*clicks*

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:01, archived)
# so are you saying if you have an orange complexion your vote is disqualified
and by orange do you mean brown and yellow...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:02, archived)
# red and yellow make orange, not brown
you racist
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:04, archived)
# unless your using plasticine
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:05, archived)
# brown and yellow with plasticine makes "tan"
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:07, archived)
# tan is not a colour I recognise
please describe it in more detail
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:09, archived)
# Is this what you mean....?

Orange green and purple.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:09, archived)
# It really is that simple
I get the feeling most round these parts are 'Yes' types.

Is that cos we're all a bunch of pinko tree-hugging Marxists?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:05, archived)
# I get the feeling most people are yes types
once they stop listening to the nonsense being shoved through their letterboxes and tv sets
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:06, archived)
# Most people I speak to about it are yes types
So why do I have the horrible feeling the nos are going to win on the day?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:07, archived)
# because the fear campaign (pushed by the no's) always carries more pressure
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:08, archived)
# This all over
Fear wions everytime

Probably old news but I just found out the No campaign is run by the Chief exec of the Taxpayers Alliance... but I can't find any info on how they are funded
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:10, archived)
# I meant, the No To AV mob
Gideon had a pop at the funding of the Yes group the other day
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:16, archived)
# They're kind of open about it
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:24, archived)
# Ace, obviously my detective skills are running low on gas today
So... rich, tax dodging, tory supporters then
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:33, archived)
# Yep, corrupt and shady bastards to a man
keep a note of the names for when the revolution comes
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:58, archived)
# ^ interesting, thanks
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:28, archived)
# And a lot of the yes types can't be bothered to vote.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:11, archived)
# So...
we're voting to change a sytem where poeple feel their vote doesn't matter.
And it's going to be scuppered because people will think their vote doesn't matter?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:17, archived)
# most people I speak to (other than on t'webs)
are going to vote no because they don't think the current system is broken. Sadly they're right, it's not broken, it just could be better. People are too complacent to vote for better.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 11:24, archived)
# ^ How very informative...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:07, archived)
# simplistic
so the views of the orange minority are not important and many people only voted purple as a second choice maybe not fully understanding the voting system and then we have the people who didn't vote (well of course they're not important because they choose not to vote, right?)

All in all whatever the voting system it will never be truly fair or truly representative until we have a 1 vote equal 1 vote system and not (let's say) that an area in Manchester which has 10 times the population of some country village both have 1 MP each.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:09, archived)
# it's an improvement on the current method, so I'm in favour of it
simplistic view, yes
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:13, archived)
# It's not really an improvement just a move to make the first past the post system look fairer
which it obviously isn't - it disqualifies political parties that fall below a certain threshold so we still end up with the 3 party state whatever we do and will never hear the voice of the minority parties who may or may not have legitimate concerns with the way things are run.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:16, archived)
# I disagree
I think it encourages people to be more honest when they vote.
Rather than just thinking, well I want to vote X, but he won't win so I'll vote Y instead.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:19, archived)
# I find that the majority of times I go to vote I have very little choice as someone who is a Socialist
even if we have anything near a socialist party standing I will more than likely vote for them even if sometimes some of their policies put my teeth on edge but regardless of having a second vote who the hell am I going to vote as a second choice knowing full well that my first choice will fail ensuring that only my second choice counts for anything - that isn't fair.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:24, archived)
# it's all about the statistics.
It will embolden parties (and their investors) when they see who voted for who as their first choice. Like toasty said, much less tactical voting will (should, maybe) occur so parties will get a more accurate picture of their popularity. They still won't get any power, but with more votes, parties should get more investment, making them stronger runners in the future.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 11:43, archived)
# it highlights other parties
and gives them a greater chance to compete (people aren't as likely to waste their vote voting tactically against the ones they fear will get in)

Of course it won't give everyone what they want because some people will vote for the extremist non party - which the majority, quite rightly won't be in favour of. But I would hope it broadens the political spectrum a bit, which can only be a good thing.

I think this will do wonders for the green party, not sure its entirely a good thing, but we'll see, can't be any worse than etc etc
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:22, archived)
#
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:18, archived)
# I can't click on point one
so have this *click* instead
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:21, archived)
# I'll be voting for it because I believe it's fair
and also because it seems to really bother the major parties.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:21, archived)
# Regardless of colour
I really donโ€™t think that Jelly Babies should have the vote
:)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:28, archived)
[challenge entry] bindun?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:48, archived)
# erotic oil wrestle?
*shudder*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:48, archived)
# correct
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:49, archived)
# As long as you ignite the oil.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:49, archived)
# LIBYAN OIL!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:53, archived)
# Hahaha!
Mind if I pop this here....?

*hangs head in shame*


(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:49, archived)
# haha
er - yes?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:53, archived)
# *raspberries*
:D

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:54, archived)
# Vicar of Dibley: Too Hot for TV?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:59, archived)
#
hot fat
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:00, archived)
# hot french bondage action.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 11:55, archived)
[challenge entry] I'm a little confused about the voting process...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:48, archived)
# It's as simple as that.
:D

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:50, archived)
# I'd like to know how a Norfolk AV vote would go can they count past 1?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:52, archived)
# Leave Norfolk alone!
We use our fingers to count. So from a very early age we can all count as far as 12.
:D

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:54, archived)
# Does that include the dead fetus conjoined twin's fingers?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:56, archived)
# Webbed fingers count as one.....
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:04, archived)
# clever
(, Tue 19 Apr 2011, 18:05, archived)
[challenge entry] In my dirty, asian babe obsessed mind, all that AV means to me is 'adult video', as used in Japan.
As for Ultraman? I dunno. He's just ace.


EDIT - ninja edited for all you office folk.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:22, archived)
# No to nsfw
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:25, archived)
# Libyans!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:26, archived)
# picture if porn looks like porn
might be a bit nsfw for some
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:26, archived)
# Sozzles.
I did censor out the hairy bit, but i see what you mean. Reccomended course of action? Censorship, or spam the board to push it down?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:27, archived)
# censorship
spamming to push it down is annoying.

Whack a great big "censored" stamp across it
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:28, archived)
# link or censorship
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:29, archived)
# hard to tell without ruining the joke
I'd find a less saucy image for the box I think that still looks slightly suggestive
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:29, archived)
# To me
AV means Richer Sounds and rows with the wife about buying more shiny black boxes to go under the telly
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:29, archived)
# Say No to seams on corporate Web Sites!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:31, archived)
# the car on the right is falling into a hole
and no one casts a shadow, and the windows on the cars are all white and the girl on the left
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:33, archived)
# The sturdy girl is pushing it in...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:35, archived)
# what makes it worse is a lot of the pics on the site are nicked
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:37, archived)
# Seams and Nicked pics.....
A bit like b3ta then?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:41, archived)
# but with less punnage
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:00, archived)
# A masterpiece of web design!
:D

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:33, archived)
# It would make me buy from them.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:34, archived)
# follow the link to the web designers - Alden PC
their strapline: "we know what we're doing"
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:41, archived)
# Hahahaha!
Only ยฃ25 per hour
100% satisfaction guaranteed
:D

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:53, archived)
# Ha ha ha...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:08, archived)
# Ahah - the perspective on those cars are nearly as well matched as the box on my pic!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:38, archived)
# and Say Yes to AV Cyclecars!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:39, archived)
# i see yours and i raise you
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:45, archived)
# Nice...
Needs more reference to AV though?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 10:09, archived)
# Is he
doing a lava poo?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 13:14, archived)
[challenge entry] Yay for political stereotypes!


With sincere apologies to all involved ...

EDIT: lets try that again
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:57, archived)
# Very good!

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:02, archived)
# I think I'm pro .AVI but I quite like the idea of .MOV too
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:07, archived)
# Hahaha
Surely the one on the right isn't old enough to vote
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:10, archived)
# I'm voting yes to AV
Wouldn't be able to watch DVDs otherwise!

:)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:17, archived)
# I'm voting yes to AV and as my second choice voting no to AV
or is it the otherway around?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:20, archived)
# Hahahahah this going viral in 5 ... 4 ...
As far as I can gather the whole Yes/No to AV thing is just another pretty, meaningless sideshow to distract us from the continuation of our land- and resource-grab missions in Africa and the Middle East.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:29, archived)
# Hahahaha!
Nicely.
:D

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:34, archived)
# The Mirror?
(, Mon 18 Apr 2011, 12:50, archived)
# NING B3TA and Happy Birthday Sarah Michelle Gellar
I have spent around 2 hours 'researching' her and I am about to know another one out any minute.

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:46, archived)
# Ooooh i do like that photo
*goes off to find non-filtad version*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:04, archived)
# * Click the 'researching' link
also..
original
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:13, archived)
# I say
Twins
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:27, archived)
# Big nose
but she has got nice Bobblers.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:26, archived)
# Yes...
* Would though, ay?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:33, archived)
# She's got a massive package
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 11:56, archived)
#
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:12, archived)
# i blame brussels
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:43, archived)
# Fucking bastard raptors
coming over here nicking our dinosuars jobs
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:47, archived)
# A shit off would be an excellent way of getting someone into power
flinging shit at the opposition, and the one with least shit on them gets the job.
Oh, hang on... That's what we do now
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:48, archived)
# I think we need more shouty dinosaurs
and less old-school-tie-stuck-in-their-ways reactionary polticians!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:10, archived)
# This is exactly correct in all the recommended areas.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:31, archived)
[challenge entry] Ning B3ta!
Binaway for a bit.
Challenge sounds a bit dull, so have this.

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 7:58, archived)
# That's what you get with the current First past the post system
which is less likely with AV
So change your end line to "for fucks sake vote AV" and jobs a good'un

With AV, if there were only those 3 parties and those initial results -
Conservative were least voted for so they would have been disqualified.
The votes from the conservative favouring members of the public would then be reassessed to see who they preferred as their second choice, Labour or Lib Dem.
Those figures would be added to the Labour and Lib Dem totals and one of them would be over 50%, providing the country with a winner the majority were happy with.

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:01, archived)
# Yes but,
If, after making your first choice, the other two candidates were complete cunts,
would you have the option of abstaining from 2nd and 3rd choices, or would you be compelled to vote for someone you had absolutely no faith in,
thereby theoretically getting the government you DIDN'T want.
Personally, I won't be voting for any of the 3 major parties.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:11, archived)
# yes you would
If there are 10 people running you don't have to mark 1-10, you could stop at any point to show your hatred of the remainder (I think)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:15, archived)
# Yep
if you want, you can just write "1" next to your first choice, and stop there.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:19, archived)
# Isn't this what most people will, in all probability do,
thereby rendering AV pointless?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:30, archived)
# it's what some people will do
thereby rendering their chance of a result they aren't 100% against pointless
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:36, archived)
# It's what a minority will do
and that minority are mostly likely voting for fringe/extreme parties.

Like the Conservatives.

Boom boom!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:05, archived)
# We've got a government no one voted for now
so what's the problem...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:05, archived)
[challenge entry] crap, but it's the gay shift and it's slow

I'm not having a go at people who've made pics like this, as some of them are very good.
The compo just seems limited and a bit shite really. How DO we vote for these compos?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:45, archived)
# I'd be pretty surprised if the votes on img challenges were more than a bellwether.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:53, archived)
# had to google that one
e

maybe we should lobby to get an alternative voting system
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 5:01, archived)
# Now that's just crazy talk.
Crazy.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 5:07, archived)
# Man I'd completely forgotten about that word.
I had to look it up to make sure I had the meaning correct. I doubt I've seen it used more than a couple dozen times.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 5:06, archived)
# right!
b3ta, entertaining AND educational!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 5:07, archived)
# Just had a quick look through the first few compo entries and...
I have to agree... PLEASE, NOT A WHOLE WEEK OF VOTING SLIPS!"
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 7:12, archived)
# ^This
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 7:17, archived)
# ^ agreed
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 7:32, archived)
# Come on, this is perfect for you, isn't it?
How about:

Jedi hand movement - all the second preference votes fly across the screen onto the other pile. Hilarious!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:21, archived)
# * Ponders
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:54, archived)
# i look forward to topical compos like this.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:58, archived)
# We should probably have a morartorium
on rabidly pointing out the flaws in everyone's arguments too, in order to allow at least a little comedy to flourish.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:06, archived)
# ok, you go first
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:56, archived)
# Oh shit
I might have guessed!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:19, archived)
# What's the Gay Shift?
Please enlighten me.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:41, archived)
#
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:52, archived)
[challenge entry] Sneetches
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:25, archived)
# Arf!
and then I thought:

Except in Nazi Germany.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:30, archived)
# I reckon Dr Seuss was against genocide. What with being Jewish himself.
Have you not read the Sneetches? Fucking masterpiece. Which I've just crudely detourned.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:34, archived)
# I see.
Walking on the beaches looking at the Sneetches.

Sorry.

Edit: Although you do get to spend the rest of your day with The Stranglers.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:38, archived)
# hahaha!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:41, archived)
# He did a lot of anti-Axis propaganda cartoons
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:04, archived)
# So, would the AV be Sylvester McMonkey McBean?
Despite who you vote for you don't actually know who you're voting for
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:37, archived)
# Whatever you do, the fucking spiv wins.
In the Sneetches' case, Sylvester McMonkey McBean.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:40, archived)
# it's always going to be the case, regardless of what system is used
edit - i realise that's pretty much excatly what you said :/

My wife took the Mertle the Turtle book as a teachihng aid for class this week.

She teaches international security and politics :D
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:59, archived)
# She's right to do so.
Seuss is a superb Trojan horse for communicating complex ideas to people who don't really want to hear complex ideas.
He's utterly on it.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:05, archived)
# you're absolutely right
and nicely put
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:42, archived)
# Here, have another G 'n' T, old chap
*clinx*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:49, archived)
# lovely, don't mind if i do
*surreptitiously swaps GnT for a bourbon*

lovely!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:56, archived)
# Down the hatch!
*tips G 'n' T into pot plant, cracks open the Wild Turkey instead*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 5:09, archived)
# *offers cuban*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 5:24, archived)
# *Realises sea tramp's fallen into a drunken stupor. Pinches wallet and scarpers*
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 7:33, archived)
# Is this
from "The Twat in the Hat"?
(, Fri 15 Apr 2011, 22:39, archived)
[challenge entry] Hmm, tricky one.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:18, archived)
#
oh good, that's the side I part my hair on too. I'd hate to think I'd been getting it wrong all these years.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:18, archived)
# Yes!
He should consider a new career.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:25, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 2:46, archived)
# YES to this
as I watch le debat des chefs Canadiens
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 2:51, archived)
# Yay!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 2:58, archived)
# Where's the box for
"angry villagers massing around the castle with pitchforks and flaming torches"?
Bah. Another wasted trip to the local primary school.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:04, archived)
# This is probably closer than you think.
Except for the primary school part.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:06, archived)
# Haha,
"DUBIOUS BROWN SHADOW MEDDLES IN OUR REFERENDUMS"
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:11, archived)
# I wouldn't dare
(although they're also my referendums) They have moats to stop just that kind of thing. Oh, and they have armed henchmen.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:17, archived)
# What, just the one?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:25, archived)
# Primary school trip?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:31, archived)
# Armed henchman.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:35, archived)
# /edit/
I don't know what you mean.


(Oops!)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:40, archived)
# No need to apologise.
Ninja-editing to make somebody else look like the cunt seems to be acceptable these days.
Christ, I hope so. I do it often enough ;)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:44, archived)
# at least I owned up to it
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:47, archived)
# However the point stands.
Anyone in the UK with a gun works for the people that can't be voted out of government.

The rest are the police and the army.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:49, archived)
# It's a teasing policy conundrum:
anybody who could countenance shooting people must, surely, be kept from access to firearms.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:54, archived)
# Indeed.
Now how could that be managed?

(...rant deleted...)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:00, archived)
# At gunpoint.
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:33, archived)
# But we want the pretty pictures and sound.
:)
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:05, archived)
[challenge entry] Also, er...
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:11, archived)
# Funny Fucker!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:19, archived)
# this makes me all mimsy!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 4:15, archived)
# This is fantastic.
*clicks*

(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:27, archived)
# This
just about sums it up
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:42, archived)
# O frabjous day!
Callooh! Callay!

And also - very good. Please accept this sugar-coated click.
(, Fri 15 Apr 2011, 22:15, archived)
# and who made you an authority on this?
oh, right... (chortles)
(, Sat 16 Apr 2011, 2:55, archived)
# this is good
:D
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 6:22, archived)
[challenge entry] BRRRRRRRRR
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 2:44, archived)
# Wouldn't a frier be hot?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 3:20, archived)
# What has a frier got to do with anything?
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 8:21, archived)
# Purple letters are purple
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 9:28, archived)
# If it was meant to say frier, I'd have written frier
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 12:29, archived)
# OST? I don't get it!
(, Thu 14 Apr 2011, 12:57, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds