
I counted at least fifteen jumping girls. they've leavened it slightly with five jumping strapping young lads for the ladies/gays.
Telegraph is normally a challenger, but poor by comparison so far. There's still time...
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:29, Reply)

Daily Mail
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:34, Reply)

Daily Mail wrote by
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:49, Reply)

Sorry. Pet hate.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:10, Reply)

People know what it is. It's an article in the Daily Mail. They can look at it or not look at it. You don't want to click on a link, don't. I can't be arsed screengrabbing several pages worth and posting it elsewhere.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:13, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:16, Reply)

back then we could get anrry about the Mail without giving them advertising pennies.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:18, Reply)

Fay Bentons is a bit of a twat though, you need to be careful around her.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:24, Reply)

To be honest, I didn't read the title, just saw red mist when I hovered over the link. I've calmed down now. Can I come out of the sin bin?
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:30, Reply)

I've learnt my lesson. I can honestly say I'm a changed man. No longer a danger to the /links board. Absolutely rehabilitated.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:51, Reply)

Not everybody's cup of tea, some of these are great though.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:11, Reply)

like these... 3.bp.blogspot.com/-dJ6a8Zt_joI/TdlFskEF5-I/AAAAAAAABMI/D4_kfeXEXcs/s1600/image-upload-15-786034.jpg
MEGAEDIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I found some photos! :D

www.cyclestreets.net/photomap/tags/knitting/
plus it looks like the same person did a lamppost too (it's about 50 metres away from the bike things)
www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Home/Guerilla-knitter-makes-jumpers-for-lampposts-12062012.htm
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:39, Reply)

Excellent, i like how these little things can bring a smile to someones face, especially the more creative ones like the first picture in this link, something people will have walked by so many times they no longer glanced at it, add a few lines and it makes you smile like a loon.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:42, Reply)

You should leave a little note by them saying thankyou.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:56, Reply)

Bike racks, and hats for post boxes.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 13:06, Reply)

Some right old sorts there ... :)
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:06, Reply)

Remind me, how long have we put the filthy shit sucking bankers that have scuppered the world economy away for?
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:19, Reply)

To motivate them to 'not do it again'. Problem solved.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:22, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:12, Reply)

Current affairs and music are both popular here, right?
(Hope it's not fashionable to bash folk music on here, I know it's an easy target.)
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:56, Reply)

"recorded in the left wing of his devonshire mansion"
made me smile
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:24, Reply)

Then I stopped smiling when I clicked that it was about the Hillsborough disaster as much as the current sleaze.
Grim stuff.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:54, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:41, Reply)

If you're in Bristol, Warrens Gourmet Burger Company.
( , Sat 18 Aug 2012, 13:59, Reply)

but it looks as though he needs to hold off on the burgers for a while.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:50, Reply)

Where I've lasted more than 15 seconds. I like this!
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 15:31, Reply)

But strikes me more as "100 that I could find" rather than "100 greatest"
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:13, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:04, Reply)

I didnt watch the synch swimming because it's silly but then I found this and I've changed my mind. It's still silly but it's also fucking amazing.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 8:13, Reply)

When it was on and it blew my mind! Amazing.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 8:37, Reply)

Spain's gold-winning sea-monster-themed routine was incredible (here's their preparation routine).
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:41, Reply)

Yes, Usain Bolt ran a little bit faster than he's ever done before, but how many replays do we really need to see?
Things like synchronised swimming and diving, parallel bars and any other kind of gymnastic event, where things could go wrong but could go very, very right, are captivating. To me, at least.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:02, Reply)

ohh you've made me think. I may have to change my stance; I used to think that sports that were fast, strong, jumpy, throwy or endurancey were the 'pure' ones...but I can now see that the creative sports involve all of those skills put together.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:42, Reply)

My rant excludes dressage, obviously. In order to do well in the dressage it seems you need to train a horse, then let it do it's thing while you wear formal dress and cry into your gloves. Tossers.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 13:25, Reply)

It's just poncing about in the water.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:24, Reply)

(not that I know, just assuming it's way hard)
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:44, Reply)

who, unknown to me used to be a synch-swimmer .... she had a right old go at me :D
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:49, Reply)

Also, dressage. Just what is the point of making horses mince?
Bring back welly wanging.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:50, Reply)

I really thought it was a Chris Morris piss-take for a few minutes.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:55, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:09, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:22, Reply)

As if you didn't look poncy enough dressed up on a horse...you have to do THAT?!
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:16, Reply)

a proper dressage pie if you don't mince the horses first?
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:29, Reply)

I usually enter a team into local competitions, every time I think my heart is going to explode.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:35, Reply)

The bulkier the better and preferably obscuring the runner's vision too.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:43, Reply)

check out the lardy lad on the end
Edit: actually not that lardy, I think he could beat me to a pulp.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:46, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:01, Reply)

The fat w.anchor.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:02, Reply)

www.slate.com/articles/technology/gaming/2006/10/830.html
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:27, Reply)

Haha
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:03, Reply)

Some nice photos, i love photo number 4.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 7:22, Reply)


So far $237,000. I donated five quid. Why don't you.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 5:37, Reply)

this is an article about some of the stuff he invented , it is a trifle long and there are no pretty pictures or pop ups for granny porn or gun sales, theres no blood and no death so this will limit the appeal some what but have a read and be incredulous at his achievements
uncletaz.com/library/scimath/tesla/teslainv.html
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 8:06, Reply)

I know 'cos i've been there, they have Giant Tesla coils that they operate to make fluorescent light tubes glow in your hands and rudimentary RC Boats and all sorts of goodies.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:07, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:41, Reply)

and turn it into a museum. If they don't some corporate fuckwit'll knock it down and turn it into a shopping mall.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 13:58, Reply)

Oh dear, what a pity, never mind.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 3:15, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 8:04, Reply)

It's not like respect for that notion is a vital cornerstone of international diplomacy. Someone's been accused (not charged, let alone found guilty) of lying about whether he was wearing a johnny, that's clearly more important than the laws that exist to stop tense situations boiling over into wars.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:50, Reply)

add a "secret" in there
And that wars can be averted if two apposing sides can comunicate without fear of those communications being broadcast to the whole world.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:59, Reply)

So WikiLeaks must be completely irrelevant to why our government's thinking of dragging him out of the embassy.
That's all about the actual alleged crime, the disappearing rubber.
Of course.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:09, Reply)

What I do know is that those communications need to be secret for the whole diplomatic system to work.
Now you might not think it serious to fuck a couple of girls lying to them about using protection the Swedes do.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:14, Reply)

... unless he can actually produce reasonably convincing evidence that that will lead to massive infringements of his human rights (being the whole point of seeking asylum).
However, it seems to me that he wouldn't be being pursued anywhere near so vigorously if he wasn't the figurehead of WikiLeaks. If this was some random guy no-one had heard of, I very much doubt the government would be thinking of infringing on ambassadorial privilege to nick him. And that just isn't on in my book, because WikiLeaks isn't criminal.
And I'm not convinced that it's immoral, either. The bureaucrats etc who handle the stuff and decide to leak it, they're the ones being (arguably) naughty. The people who receive the leaks and publish them... well, it was never their job to keep the information secret in the first place, so I don't see the problem.
Sure, it'd be Good if they were a bit more selective about which leaks they published, but I'd consider their indiscriminate approach Neutral, not Evil. In the absence of WikiLeaks, people could still indiscriminately bung stuff on bittorrent and file lockers and pastebins.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:32, Reply)

And what about the rights of the two women accusing him?
If he hadn't been the head of wikileaks and gotten lots of support and money from media darlings he would have been given a simple trial here and put on a plane to StockHolm.
Because of who he is he's managed to take it the full length of the legal system here and now that it's not gone the way he want's he's trying to run away.
It wasn't the bureaucrats that leaked it. It was Bradley after being chatted up by Assange and promptly left in the gutter by him.
As for being selective, they're choosing what to leak.
The whole file is leaked but it's encrypted.
Sure it's probably been decrypted by most nations with a basic cyber division like China, N Korea, Iran etc but you and me the proles have to wait and be drip fed it to sell newspapers.
I would hate to be an informant named in any of those papers right now.
Not knowing when your doors going to get kicked in.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:43, Reply)

Those duties are, in my mind, vastly more important than what happens to any one individual. If Hitler had been found hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy, I'd still stick to that. If the government breaks the rules when it feels like it, what's the point of having rules?
All the rest is kinda beside the point, IMO, but I guess it'd be rude of me to not address your points...
Your first bit, we seem to be in vigorous agreement: "I completely agree that, if there's reasonable suspicion that he broke Swedish law, he should go there to face trial". As you say, it's Sweden not Sudan, so the odds of him producing "reasonably convincing evidence that that will lead to massive infringements of his human rights" are slim to none.
I don't think any of us are in a position to say one-way-or-the-other whether he'd have managed to flee to an embassy to seek asylum if he was just a randomer. There's too many factors at work.
re: bureaucrats, I said "bureaucrats etc". Manning is in the "etc". And it's not like everything ever leaked to WikiLeaks came from Manning, so some may well have come from bureaucrats. I'll grant that it may have been a poor choice of words on my part, but that's incidental.
and re: encryption... well, I don't know how it's encrypted, but there is freely-available open-source encryption out there that, with long enough keys, would require a computer made up of every atom in the universe more time than the universe's expected lifespan to crack. So it might be genuinely unbreakable without the key.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:22, Reply)

And the rules seem to allow for in extreme circumstances for an embassy to be entered into and an individual taken, but all sources seem to play down this actually happening.
What seems to have happened is the U.K Government made them aware of this in case the diplomatics got all their knowledge of international diplomacy from "Lethal Weapon 2" and Ecuador promptly released this message.
The whole "Computer taking years" to break an encryption is based on brute forcing a code.
You work smarter than that and you can guarantee every world nation is working hard to break it
and a lot probably already have and shared it with others.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:53, Reply)

And I maintain: as long as he stays in the embassy, I don't see how he's anyone's problem but Ecuador's. So why piss off the international community just to make him our problem again?
And the "computer taking years to break modern encryption" thing is based on the fact that modern cryptographic algorithms have been very thoroughly studied, by many academics and hackers and security professionals and so on and so on, and we can base time estimates off the most efficient cracking algorithm all these experts have found in all their years of study.
Sure, as far as I know, it's effectively impossible to prove that more efficient cracking algorithms don't exist, but the odds of someone having found one (that no-one else has found and published), and successfully kept it a secret, are vanishingly small.
If someone wanted to encrypt something in a way that was unbreakable in this universe, I assure you that it is possible.
[edit] I almost forgot: One-time pads are completely unbreakable, even if you had infinite computing power -- there is inherently no possibility of a cracking algorithm. You just need a key of high-quality entropy, with as many bits as the data you want to encrypt. I'm sure WikiLeaks could manage that.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:15, Reply)

Until someone found out a number in the process that was supposed to be random churned out "4" every time.
Ok, the wikileaks "insurance file" containing all the uncensored documents including names of informants in hostile countries was sent all around the internet a few years ago.
Have a look it'll be on the torrents. there's now thousands of copies.
It's encrypted with a 256bit AES key.
That's a string of 256 characters and strong encryption indeed.
Now, this one file holds the mother of all intelligence gathering.
A nation that can access this will be very happy indeed.
You can guarantee everyone's working on accessing it.
Problem is human error can defeat the strongest encryption.
The key he distributed to key followers will be written down, talked about, saved on a computer in a folder marked "super secret passwords" whatever.
Assange bet the life of a lot of people on that simple bit of encryption.
You can talk about one time pads but he didn't use them he used a very public way to insure he's not bumped off. In fact I can well imagine many foreign powers happily killing him so his followers release the code.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:52, Reply)

As you say, that's strong encryption indeed, modulo non-technical weaknesses such as human error. We can but wait and see whether WikiLeaks screwed up in such a way.
And we can but wait and see whether they were bluffing about the contents. If not, then, as you say, they have indeed "bet the life of a lot of people" on it, and letting the key get out (deliberately or though error) would be pretty damn irresponsible however you slice it.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 13:06, Reply)

That's true enough. But there wouldn't need to be: he'd have been extradited quickly and efficiently, stood trial, been found innocent or guilty, and be well on the way to having served his sentence by now.
I don't know about Wikileaks' legal status; but its moral status isn't so obvious as you see to imagine. For sure, the people who do the actual leaking may well have committed a crime in their own right - but that doesn't exonerate Wikileaks. By analogy, if you steal a car, and I know it to be stolen when I sell it on your behalf, then it's no defence for me to insist that selling a car is perfectly legal.
And as for their approach being neutral... well, maybe. But there's a difference between responsible and rash neutrality. WL seems to me often to be rash, and founded on the dubious premise not only that there's never any need for information to be regulated, but that it should never be regulated. That's insane.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:51, Reply)

I can't say one way or the other what would have happened if he wasn't a celebrity - maybe he'd have been dealt with very efficiently, as you say... but he may still have managed to sneak off to the Ecuadorian embassy, and if he had, we wouldn't be considering pissing off Ecuador by burning the rulebook to get him out.
I would've expected a response more along the lines of "okay, Ecuador can deal with him; we'll stick a van of bobbies outside to knick him if he leaves, but aside from that, he's not our problem".
Your car analogy... well, I'm never comfortable with analogies between material theft and information "theft". If I may answer it with another analogy: if the cables had been leaked straight to the papers, would you have taken issue to them publishing (at least some of) them? It's my understanding that that's what the press is expected to do with leaks it receives, and I don't think there's a clear distinction between "the press" and "some guy with a website" any more.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:09, Reply)

but there's a public interest defence. Note that it's a defence, not an exception, and the publisher would therefore have to be able to show such an interest. Maybe there's such a defence for some of the stuff WL publishes; but that alone won't justify their approach across the board.
Note, too, that my analaogy was to the moral claim, rather than the legal one.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:20, Reply)

To clarify my position:
I'm ambivalent about WikiLeaks, insufficiently informed to pass judgement on them, and too apathetic to rectify that.
I think Assange is a tit, and I suspect his recent Sweden-dodging antics are a sign of either narcissism or paranoia; but I'm not going to say any more than "I suspect" on that, as I have no way of knowing for sure.
I don't care to defend WikiLeaks or Assange, really.
All I want to defend here is that diplomatic immunity is vastly more important than anyone involved in this pantomime of bullshit. The government should stay the fuck out of other countries' embassies, period.
As long as he stays on Ecuadorian turf, he's Ecuador's problem, not ours. If he leaves the building (or they kick him out), by all means, nick him then. If he does so in a diplomatic vehicle, follow it 'til he gets out (and then nick him) or it leaves the country (and then he's not our problem any more).
That's how embassies and asylum-seeking are meant to work.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:44, Reply)

and think he should be extradited to Sweden, the problem is that if he goes to Sweden, he'll probably be extradited to America, and then they'll chuck him in a deep dark hole without chance of a fair trial and hope the world forgets about him (like they did with Bradley wassisname), so he does sort of have a point.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:53, Reply)

I'm not convinced that he shouldn't answer for what he's done.
His actions have screwed the whole diplomatic system over.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:03, Reply)

the documents they published are in the wild, and the diplomatic system still works.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:09, Reply)

Unless you're a diplomatic you've got no way to know that people have trust again in the system.
And seeing as it's been credited for kicking off the arab spring (how many people have died in that?) I can expect a lot of people are going to clam up until they have confidence in it again.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:17, Reply)

Anyway I said it had been "screwed over" not that it had stopped working.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:21, Reply)

by asking the question "how do you know it's working?".
Your other point "unless you're a diplomatic" you cannot know it's working. By your own argument, you cannot expect that people will clam up "unless you are a diplomatic". I could point to Craig Murray as a case in point. The UK still has diplomatic relations with Uzbekistan.
I'll also wager that revolution in Arab countries had more to do with education and access to the internet.
I don't particularly like Julian Assange. I'd like to see him stand trial for the charges, and either be jailed for them, or see his name cleared. I'm not a particular supporter of Wikileaks either. My point would be that the law should be applied fairly, and should be applicable to all parties.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:20, Reply)

I asked "how do you know it's working?" because I inferred from your comment "the documents they published are in the wild, and the diplomatic system still works." that you thought my previous comment of the system being screwed was in error and everything was hunky dory.
I can assume that a system built of secrecy and trust may well have suffered a set-back when that trust and secrecy is blown out of the water.
Can you point at "Craig Murray" as a case a little harder because i'm not sure of your point other than to highlight governments don't like it when diplomats are indiscrete.
I'ld take that wager and so will Assange seeing as he and the left wing press are linking the Wikileak publications to the Arab spring.
They've had education and internet in Arab countries for a long time.
But I grant you they did get the information from the internet.
If the law is to be applied fairly to all parties then he should abide by the countless extradition trials he's gone though here and face his accusers in a Swedish court and not break the bail conditions he agreed upon to avoid being held on remand.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:38, Reply)

the US needs to learn that it does not have jurisdiction over the whole fucking world, and the UK needs to stop being a pathetic little bitch.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 8:42, Reply)

How bad's a sex crime in Sweden anyway?
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:06, Reply)

it was a crime with sex involved.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:22, Reply)

this will surely make Ecuador decide against granting asylum to Assange
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:37, Reply)

Well...
I guess it would mean we don't have to worry about him any more. Damn. That would suck.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:48, Reply)

he really should stop being such a cowardly little tosser and go and clear his name and reputation
If you go around making public nation's state secrets, expect the worst. The guy has been an idiot. It is not always best the public are aware of everything.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:06, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:18, Reply)

I really can't. Self-righteous little tosser who I'd quite happily take on in an arse kicking contest.
But even I realise that the charges from Sweden are a pile of crap. One of the girls involved even blogged about how amazing Assange was *after* she'd slept with him.
Cheers
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:28, Reply)

You with me??
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:35, Reply)

you j=hold him down and I'll kick him.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:31, Reply)

They are one of the least likely countries in the world to deport someone to another country where they might face torture or a death penalty aren't they?
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:43, Reply)

because the yanks will probably just have another "inmate attack him"
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:47, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:51, Reply)

and isn't this what a trial is for?
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:44, Reply)

Wouldn't it make more sense for Assange to spend all this energy fighting the Swedish charges, than fighting against having to face them? Irrespective of his guilt, this saga doesn't look good for him.
And it's not as if he won't get a fair trial in Sweden. It's Sweden, not Sudan, ffs.
The UK is being pathetic here. The legislation mentioned here was never intended to be used in situations like this. It's almost as if the government has been looking out of the window for the past three weeks, and thinking "The rest of the world suddenly seems to love Britain. How can we end that? I KNOW...!"
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:22, Reply)

I don't know the first thing about water-polo (despite my brother having played for almost 20 years), but it was fun all the same. Hurrah!
I'd thought about taking a flag to wave... but since the only flag I own is that of the erstwhile USSR, I thought better of it. Didn't want to get thrown out, after all.
And watching Mo Farah on a big screen at Greenwhich Old Naval College the night before is something I'll remember for a long, long time.
I'm still on an Olympic high. Woot!
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:45, Reply)

So many of my friends, real cynics about it, got quite carried away by it all.
I'm off to the Paralympics soon, can't wait, it's amazing, cheesy to say but everyone is a winner in them considering what they've overcome to get there, you should get tickets, everyone should.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:51, Reply)

Really wish I'd made the effort to go to the games now. I'll just have to get along to them next year I guess.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:08, Reply)

Kind of a shame that they'll be up against *yawn* soccerball for attention.
But there's apparently a documentary about their origins on telly this evening: I might have to make a point of watching it.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:13, Reply)

There was some real emotion shown in the Olympics, hardly surprising if you train for so many years and maybe have only seconds to prove yourself, they don't get to play a couple of times a week like footballers do, a bad day for some of those athletes in the Olympics means having to train for another four years to prove themselves in Rio.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:19, Reply)

Lacks sheep gurls and escalators but fun none the less.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 0:48, Reply)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjn9mSREyzg
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 13:36, Reply)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7RSryuJAwE
This video was taken on the 7th of december 2007 in "Raz de Sein" at the western tip of France, in Brittany, on a (very) stormy day.
Those lighthouses isolated in the open sea are/were called "Hells" because of the roughness of living conditions inside these isolated buildings, frequently harassed by the elements.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 1:07, Reply)

You go ON the water, not through it!
I think I shall need the larger of my two umbrellas
(epic vid!)
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 13:33, Reply)

Great shots though. I can't imagine what it would be like to be on that ship.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 22:07, Reply)

And I'm sure 50 Cent will see the funny side of this too.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:42, Reply)

I love how he is choking back the laughs halfway through :D
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:54, Reply)

I promise it's not spam. No idea who it is but it makes me chuckle like a twat every time. (edit: ah, just saw the end slate so it's a kind of advert after all, sorry)
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 0:19, Reply)

I've watched this about 7 times over now and I'm still laughing like a drain. Hope the chap's stage show is a success.
Have some more Chap-Hop old boy.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 0:47, Reply)

I just wondered if the OP had summat to do with it is all.
Apparently not!
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 8:36, Reply)

Just generally commenting on my view of spam on these hallowed boards :)
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:13, Reply)

Which is a contradiction in terms, I know, but still...
Actually, my mate Chris back in Uni made excellent toasted spam sandwiches. I have no idea how he made them so delicious.
After further thought, it may have been due to the fact that the only time I ate them was when I was intoxicated. Yeah, I'm sure that's it.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 4:15, Reply)

I can already tell its Edinburgh. Sine & Yeah.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 12:17, Reply)

They don't want her to blow away, never mind debris flying at 85 mph.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:37, Reply)

school of hurricane reporting has gone international... you must stand in the storm it and shout unintelligibly at the camera, while saying "stay indoors people"
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:44, Reply)

in the background. A nice counterpoint
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 0:07, Reply)

Some young lad talking about his first love and being a bit sweary about it. Not much changes as you grow up ey?
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:23, Reply)

just last week i had a cry about glitter and glue.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:33, Reply)

have this amazing picture of a man-eating shark: tinyurl.com/7ljdr78
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 21:58, Reply)

it probably would not surprise you that i have seen every one of those.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 22:03, Reply)

are amazing at acting! Oh what am I talking about, ALL of those sharks deserve an Oscar!
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 22:13, Reply)

weknowmemes.com/2012/08/shark-week-drinking-game/
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:48, Reply)

some class movie shockers there - was that shartopus in there?
still, goes to show that Jaws was the only *decent* shark film ever made
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:31, Reply)

Titan gives the silly twat a slap for his trouble. Seriously though, what a complete cocktrumpet. (skip forward to about a minute)
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 21:26, Reply)

A proper robot would have crushed his head with his iron fist or pull him in half, wimp.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 21:39, Reply)

they were doing it for the guy's safety. They knew the robot couldn't control his head squisher much longer, and nobody wanted to clean up the gorey mess afterward.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 22:01, Reply)

standard uniform of larger-fuelled thuggery.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:27, Reply)

Go to the youtube. See the title...
BUTLINS BOGNOR 2010
That sums it up..
Also, fucking hell, Titan the robot has hit on hard times.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 23:58, Reply)

If/when have kids I'd never take them to a holiday park - they seem to attract more than their fair share of swaggering cunts like him.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 0:24, Reply)

You build a fantastic looking, wearable robot suit with a built-in sound system and what do you do with it? Walk it around like a fucking street clown playing radio clips and fart noises?!
RIP UP SOME CARS AND DEAFEN PEOPLE, YOU CUNT!
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 0:26, Reply)

seems a bit of a harsh way to get to the bottom but it was quick and effective.
evo was totaly furnuckered by the looks of it.
not sure what condition the driver/codriver is/was/will be in, but there bank balance will take a hammering trying buff this one out.
also i found it very hard to wank too, does mean i am a lesbian or maybe even a conservative?
please advise
yours, confused of colchester
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 21:25, Reply)

Eeesh! my spine hurt watching that.
glad to hear they made it out of that alive.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 21:36, Reply)

definitely saved their lives.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 21:41, Reply)

Which means people going off will be going faster when they do it, which is not helpful with a steep drop off like that. Though that corner might always have been tarmac I suppose.
Try 0.25 of this to see how roll cages save you......just, the cage is punched down and in front of co-driver Phil Mills face on the 3rd bounce. He was OK.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-_PyovawYQ&feature=related
Yikes
[edit] Dave?
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 22:02, Reply)

but i find it amazing how much force the roll cage can take.
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 22:10, Reply)

great job getting that thing fitted correctly and saving there lives
( , Wed 15 Aug 2012, 22:17, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »