

TOADM
i'm bored someone post something thats not the daily mail :(
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:07,
archived)
i'm bored someone post something thats not the daily mail :(

b3ta.com/board/~r.11188108 cool :D
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:09,
archived)

I'm out on Wednesday afternoons, so am never around.
www.b3ta.com/questions/imagechallenge/post290653
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:10,
archived)
www.b3ta.com/questions/imagechallenge/post290653

You fail with your own challenge :(
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:15,
archived)

The opening paragraph of the article fits in with the n00b theme so well! :P
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:02,
archived)

but it seemed to fit the overall theme quite well...
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:04,
archived)



top notch *click*
look you are overspending my clickage allowance stop being so good!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:59,
archived)
look you are overspending my clickage allowance stop being so good!


Click for galaxy size! (525k)
Lots of filters used I admit, but I'm happy with how it turned out.
*relurks*

The only thing I can think of at the moment is Bob, and that's not really a respectable name for a planet, he'd probably get picked on by those mean gas giants or something...
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:58,
archived)

...although the name does make me think of small feet shaped inhabitants.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:11,
archived)

Hmm. No, that appears to be a L'Oreal product. How odd.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:55,
archived)


Would have been bloody difficult to do without them as well
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:54,
archived)

Also, first google image result for spaceman scares me...
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:08,
archived)

I was begining to question my sanity
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:09,
archived)

a barber shop at the top of my road does "traditional close shaves" using a cut throat, i wanna try one, but im scared to, in case he sneezes
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:38,
archived)

ive never seen the film
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:40,
archived)

smother you with ketchup
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:41,
archived)

THE ONE STAYING PUT IN HIS PROPER PLACE AND THE ONE WITH HIS FOOT IN THE OTHER ONE'S FACE
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:42,
archived)

AND PUTTING "OUR FOOT IN THE OTHER ONES FACE"
...and with that i have to go host a jam night...cya folks
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:44,
archived)
...and with that i have to go host a jam night...cya folks

GREAT JOB CHOPCHOPCHOPCHOP
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:37,
archived)

he does stuff in flash occasionally though.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:38,
archived)

Jerkface
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:41,
archived)

If I didn't like your pictures I wouldn't bother making them hump each other.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:42,
archived)

True story.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:09,
archived)

Lots of large .gifs do it.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:18,
archived)


don't bring those good looks round here
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:45,
archived)

playing "toss" the coconut?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:21,
archived)

or are you just trying to mess my head up?
Woo picture mind!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:34,
archived)
Woo picture mind!

We can always rely on toats to bring sanity back to teh board.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:18,
archived)

a lovely little dolly to break up ones lunch time
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:25,
archived)

but maybe in another format
But I'm not around much here at lunchtimes
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:27,
archived)
But I'm not around much here at lunchtimes

as i dont have an office jobby, ill probably sleep through it :P
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:28,
archived)

looks like your compasses went a bit wobbly on this one.
I'm just jealous :(
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:38,
archived)
I'm just jealous :(


Baby P - Petit Pois, geddit? (French for Baby Peas)
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:21,
archived)

But I still stand by my first statement. It clearly isn't a joke. Jokes are funny....
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:15,
archived)

Bunch of hypocrites at times....
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:16,
archived)

knob
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:18,
archived)

you twat...
...by way of justice, it is easier to distance yourself from a "building", then it is a helpless child being beaten to death.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:23,
archived)
...by way of justice, it is easier to distance yourself from a "building", then it is a helpless child being beaten to death.

hypocritical cunt
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:25,
archived)

that I think there is a huge difference between the WTC attacks and a defenseless child who had so many things happen to him I can not even bring myself to list them, and wouldn't make anyone else read them either!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:27,
archived)

What makes a subject here tabboo? Like I mentioned, Holly and Jessica, and Madeleine were fair game for a long while.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:30,
archived)

To be honest with you, I don't know. There was a post by someone a few months back about one of the kids who was stabbed and killed in London. I personally wasn't keen on it at all, mainly because I knew the boys family. But also, because it was in no way a clever or humorous take on it.
Also, I think the facts over a story affect peoples reaction. Maddy, as far as we know for definite, is simply missing.
Holly and Jessica, we simply know of them being murdered.
Baby P, we know a hell of a lot more details of that, thus, in my opinion, it is a lot harder to distance oneself from it.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:36,
archived)
Also, I think the facts over a story affect peoples reaction. Maddy, as far as we know for definite, is simply missing.
Holly and Jessica, we simply know of them being murdered.
Baby P, we know a hell of a lot more details of that, thus, in my opinion, it is a lot harder to distance oneself from it.

I guess you're right. Although we knew a fair amount about Holly and Jessica after they were found and there were still alot of pictures and even now we get the odd sutcliffe/suffcliffe/whatever references.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:58,
archived)

one click and it makes all your posts vanish...
EDIT: - aaaaaahhhhhh MUCH better :-)
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:28,
archived)
EDIT: - aaaaaahhhhhh MUCH better :-)

just shows you are hypocritical and also spineless.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:29,
archived)

Surely?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:17,
archived)

and innocent office workers?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:19,
archived)

And Madeleine Mccann?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:22,
archived)

If one person gets it, its a job well done, now where is Monty?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:24,
archived)

you can have censorship or not when it comes to a matter of taste on b3ta.
It has been chosen 'not' so you really can't complain about any image here that is safe for work.
I find this in extremely poor taste ( the original image ) and can't understand what kind of feeble mind can see any humour in it either, but that being said what can I do? It's b3ta and by all means call them a cunt for making something bad but don't suggest they can't post it unless you want to wear the hypocrisy hat.
You have the hide and ignore features plus the use of adblock if you choose FF.
( not aimed at you, just my opinion of the "what should and should not be posted" debate)
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:29,
archived)
It has been chosen 'not' so you really can't complain about any image here that is safe for work.
I find this in extremely poor taste ( the original image ) and can't understand what kind of feeble mind can see any humour in it either, but that being said what can I do? It's b3ta and by all means call them a cunt for making something bad but don't suggest they can't post it unless you want to wear the hypocrisy hat.
You have the hide and ignore features plus the use of adblock if you choose FF.
( not aimed at you, just my opinion of the "what should and should not be posted" debate)


But there is no taboo on b3ta. You can even post porn, you just have to consider the users and link it.
I dislike a huge amount of childish and distasteful stuff on here but I have no right to say it can't be posted.
( and before anyone gets at me I complain about threadwaste rather than tell people not to post shit ).
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:40,
archived)
I dislike a huge amount of childish and distasteful stuff on here but I have no right to say it can't be posted.
( and before anyone gets at me I complain about threadwaste rather than tell people not to post shit ).

I just expressed my opinion that it wasn't funny and in my opinion was rather distasteful.
But as I say, in my opinion.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:44,
archived)
But as I say, in my opinion.

I agree its bad taste, but so are hundreds of images on here every day, whether it be about Maddie, Simon Weston, Diana's crash etc. Anything is fair game, just ignore it if you dont want to see it
Its actually a clever play on words, just happens to be a poor and unfortunate subject
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:33,
archived)
Its actually a clever play on words, just happens to be a poor and unfortunate subject

I just think that this is the kind of story that should make anyone sick.
I have posted above my reasons for why that may be the case.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:39,
archived)
I have posted above my reasons for why that may be the case.
![Challenge Entry: The Daily Mail [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
Edit:- VERY NSFW. (Apols to all & thanks to Sir T. Skellington)
s297.photobucket.com/albums/mm209/Esox-Lucius2000/?action=view¤t=Dispenser.jpg
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:10,
archived)
s297.photobucket.com/albums/mm209/Esox-Lucius2000/?action=view¤t=Dispenser.jpg

infact, just fuck off
:-)

But you really shouldn't repost in new threads.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:14,
archived)

Wha... OH DEAR GOD MY WATCH IS MELTING! IT BURNS! IT BURNS! COME BACK DAILY MAIL! ALL IS FORGIVEN!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:10,
archived)

Wha... OH DEAR GOD MY WATCH IS MELTING! IT BURNS! IT BURNS! COME BACK DAILY MAIL! ALL IS FORGIVEN!
Nice picture! Woo!

disagreement with the comparison between small minded bigotry represented by the Daily Mail and a clever, articulate man who's most famous speech has sadly created an image that most people have.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:59,
archived)

after all Powell was the one who opened the very floodgates of immigration he predicted would be the end of our society.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:00,
archived)

although I accept that at times it must be remembered that it came from an old man, who used some old fashined words and styles. The general message and some of the specifics were not only correct, it turned out, but remain so.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:04,
archived)

he started the immigration programme and then he predicts it will flood our society - so yeah it's ok to have foreigners in the country as long as they know their place and only do the jobs none of us British Folk want to do and of course they don't start inviting their families over here and having lots of kids demanding rights and well "There goes the neighbourhood!"
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:08,
archived)

if by starting the immigration program, you mean getting British subjects from overseas who were already resident in this country better jobs than otherwise would have been available, then yes, he did that, as health minister. In the NHS.
I quote from wikipedia:
"Later, he oversaw the employment of a large number of Commonwealth immigrants by the understaffed National Health Service.[39] Prior to this, many non-white immigrants who held full rights of citizenship in Britain were obliged to take the jobs that no one else wanted (e.g. street cleaning, night-shift assembly production lines), often paid considerably less than their white counterparts."
He never said anything about inviting families or knowing their place or anything that could be so construed.
You're simply re-enforcing my comment above about an image that people have.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:16,
archived)
I quote from wikipedia:
"Later, he oversaw the employment of a large number of Commonwealth immigrants by the understaffed National Health Service.[39] Prior to this, many non-white immigrants who held full rights of citizenship in Britain were obliged to take the jobs that no one else wanted (e.g. street cleaning, night-shift assembly production lines), often paid considerably less than their white counterparts."
He never said anything about inviting families or knowing their place or anything that could be so construed.
You're simply re-enforcing my comment above about an image that people have.

but none the less no matter how you put your edge to his views - he was a right wing twunt who did nothing to help cultural intergration. Many immigrants were used as nothing more than cheap labour well after Enoch Powell's time and from the very foundations of the Rivers of Blood speech the likes of the National Front and the British Movement sprang up - so don't try to persuade me he was a jolly good ol' chap who was misunderstood!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:24,
archived)

and don't get me started about the BNP and the NF, I am fully aware of the evils that they do. Once again, reading what they want to from that speech.
I don't like Enoch Powell especially, I just don't see him as being in any way comparable with the scaremongering of the Daily Mail, or indeed in any way related to the extreme right movement of today or the past.
Which was my only comment in this thread to start with.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:28,
archived)
I don't like Enoch Powell especially, I just don't see him as being in any way comparable with the scaremongering of the Daily Mail, or indeed in any way related to the extreme right movement of today or the past.
Which was my only comment in this thread to start with.

upon wikipedia for fuelling your internet debates.
Especially not when you want to discuss Enoch Powell who regardless of your image of him and even regardless of his one famous speech, was an extreme far right racist. And I mean racist in the dictionary term and not in the manner that is is bandied about today by people more ignorant that you could make them believe.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:38,
archived)
Especially not when you want to discuss Enoch Powell who regardless of your image of him and even regardless of his one famous speech, was an extreme far right racist. And I mean racist in the dictionary term and not in the manner that is is bandied about today by people more ignorant that you could make them believe.

I'm currently able to afford.
Well said, sir.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 21:08,
archived)
Well said, sir.

it doesn't bear comparison to The Daily Mail's simplistic demagogy purely to sell their papers based upon people's fears. And yes the Right Wing Extremeist did take the Powel speech out of context. But Enoch Powell did himself no favours by throwing a bone to those dogs - speaking of Rivers of Blood and Floods of Immigrants is always going to be used by the demagogues!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:38,
archived)

Powell defended his speech on 4 May through an interview for the Birmingham Post: "What I would take 'racialist' to mean is a person who believes in the inherent inferiority of one race of mankind to another, and who acts and speaks in that belief. So the answer to the question of whether I am a racialist is 'no'—unless, perhaps, it is to be a racialist in reverse. I regard many of the peoples in India as being superior in many respects—intellectually, for example, and in other respects—to Europeans. Perhaps that is over-correcting."
The attraction of wankers such as the National Front to his speech was unfortunate, but ultimately highlights Mr horrible's original statement above about filth like the Daily Mail
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:35,
archived)
The attraction of wankers such as the National Front to his speech was unfortunate, but ultimately highlights Mr horrible's original statement above about filth like the Daily Mail

is not meant as a blanket term for those who feel superior to everyone not of their race.
A racist can quite easily choose to be selective in his choice of which man is less worthy.
Powell was very clearly intolerant of West Indians or ( wide-grinning piccaninnies as he is on record as calling them, something he attempted to sue newspapers over but later dropped because he had not a shred of evidence for his feeble excuse of "quoting a constituent")
Like many of the right of his day. They were happy that the 'Windrush' folk saved Britain from economic meltdown after the war but come the late 60's when it was all fixed again they found it distasteful to have 'these people' having the same right to the same benefits as 'us people'.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 20:10,
archived)
A racist can quite easily choose to be selective in his choice of which man is less worthy.
Powell was very clearly intolerant of West Indians or ( wide-grinning piccaninnies as he is on record as calling them, something he attempted to sue newspapers over but later dropped because he had not a shred of evidence for his feeble excuse of "quoting a constituent")
Like many of the right of his day. They were happy that the 'Windrush' folk saved Britain from economic meltdown after the war but come the late 60's when it was all fixed again they found it distasteful to have 'these people' having the same right to the same benefits as 'us people'.

( , Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:03, archived)

its amazing how opinions differ on such subjects though is it not?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:17,
archived)

or the poor documentary "rivers of blood" from Martin O' Neill which has done a lot to confuse and cloud the truth about Powell.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:57,
archived)

which coupled with their Right-Wing views have made then vulnerable to lampoon.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:57,
archived)

Blackletter ... too beautiful to be associated with Nazis, sorry.
( ,
Sun 16 Nov 2008, 15:18,
archived)

it would be really easy to hang jews from the protruding serifs
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:55,
archived)

just create a path along any line and have the text align to the path. Neat trick and easy enough.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:55,
archived)

I'd like to though. How do I do that thing you said?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:59,
archived)

make sure it's set for paths and not shapes in the toolbar then click click along your line. This is automatically the 'work path' which is replaced by the next path you create so going into the paths layers and renaming the path to something else will make it permanent in the document. You can then do what you like with the path after that.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:15,
archived)

and I haven't nicked it. Perhaps it just looks like it should have been done.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:00,
archived)

Just waiting for the day they're allowed to round up asylum seekers and paedophiles.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:01,
archived)

you would have got a click from me on the strength of your sig alone
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2008, 0:52,
archived)
![Challenge Entry: The Daily Mail [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
Since this took so fucking long, and will no doubt be buried with the rest.

( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:45,
archived)



it was lovely, then the cunts stopped making it
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:31,
archived)

I haven't had any since I was in New York :(
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:37,
archived)

It had the logo in both english AND arabic. Was quite nice.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:43,
archived)

the issue is over I've gone back to my badger icon - it's not a male badger although I wish Pecker would make me a girl badger perhaps with a bow in her hair so that it doesn't confuse your gender preconceptions. OK?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:31,
archived)

It was only a suggestion. I have nothing against badgers.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:44,
archived)

it was just that you harped on about it so much I thought you really did have issues.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:49,
archived)

things to people that you'd not say to their face in their local pub.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:44,
archived)

to someone in the pub. Well, as long as they actually had a badger.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:46,
archived)

and I'm not having a go at you. It was just me responding to a comment I hate "it's only the internet" often seems to give people the impression that that can, from the anonymous safety of their bedroom, be abusive and threatening as if internet words are not the same as real-life words.
I'm an old fashioned, old fella who thinks that it's just courtesy to only call someone a cunt if you think you can get away with it to their face in their pub.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:50,
archived)
I'm an old fashioned, old fella who thinks that it's just courtesy to only call someone a cunt if you think you can get away with it to their face in their pub.

although Jeremy is a rather over-opinionated twunt and his views about speed limits don't hold water 70mph is a reasonable enough speed you can really do some road-kill at much lesser speeds ;)
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:26,
archived)

but you are mad. There is no such thing as being over opinionated. Just teats that are uncomfortable with having others brave enough to speak out.
Also There should be no national speed limits set. There should just be reasonable limits set for roads determined by the circumstances.
120mph on the M1 at 3am in the morning should be no bother to anyone.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:33,
archived)
Also There should be no national speed limits set. There should just be reasonable limits set for roads determined by the circumstances.
120mph on the M1 at 3am in the morning should be no bother to anyone.

I'm a busdriver for a living and the majority of near-misses involving motorists cutting up the bus I'm driving is down to idiots who think they can drive at high speeds and obviously can't. 120mph on a motorway is dangerous at anytime of the day - are you absolutely sure that your tyre isn't going to explode, perhaps after hitting a stone or piece of junk you find of all roads? It's really not necessary if you want to speed go to a circuit.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:37,
archived)

but speed on the motorway for me has nothing to do with thrills, certainly not at my age. I just hate travelling and the sooner I can get anywhere the better.
I've driven the Nürburgring a few times and was a grass track racer in my youth and now have my advanced license.
I'm not advocating idiocy, just that I think speed restrictions should be road specific for the circumstances on that road rather than just being blanket national restrictions.
Just my opinion of course.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:42,
archived)
I've driven the Nürburgring a few times and was a grass track racer in my youth and now have my advanced license.
I'm not advocating idiocy, just that I think speed restrictions should be road specific for the circumstances on that road rather than just being blanket national restrictions.
Just my opinion of course.

if you can prove you can handle driving at speed and are fully aware of the hazards of speeding then perhaps you should have a higher National Speed limit for those drivers - however what I have learnt is that "Monkey See, Monkey Do" and Top Gear does a lot of Monkeying about.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:48,
archived)

and then ignore everyone who tells you you're full of shit?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:48,
archived)

in zero visibility
:)
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:57,
archived)
:)

I have always wondered if there was something to that
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:49,
archived)

which is why I like Top Gear and it does push the boundries of comedy/info entertainment whatever you classify Top Gear as. But it's not really the Clarkson's of the world we need to fear but the wannabe Clarkson's who are on our roads everyday in every city.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:54,
archived)

Why don't they sell Nice and Spicy Nik Naks in Big Bags?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:19,
archived)

a huge bag like the sensations would be the tits
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:22,
archived)

or even just a BIg Bag like the walkers standard would be a start!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:23,
archived)

Do they? Sign me up for the Nice 'n' Spicy ones when they arrive though - yum!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:23,
archived)

I fear the excessive saltness and flavour combination would be too strong and uncontrollable in a big bag
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:24,
archived)

but the Nice and Spicy ones are the only real flavour. If they have no Nice and Spicy ones, I shoot them in the head and take the Rib N Saucy!
NEVER SCAMPI THOUGH!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:24,
archived)
NEVER SCAMPI THOUGH!

rib N Saucy just doesn't do it, man
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:27,
archived)

there has been a bag of scampi nik naks in my cupboard for about 6 months they give me the fear
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:33,
archived)


:)
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:31,
archived)

i screamed as i got it!
I spang you about the face and genitles for this one!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 19:00,
archived)
I spang you about the face and genitles for this one!

I applaud your effort.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:21,
archived)

...for having more betterage and talentness! Damn you, I say!!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:27,
archived)
![Challenge Entry: The Daily Mail [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
P.S. please excuse the shitty haircut continuity

( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 17:58,
archived)


And I can count all the way up to five!
One, two, six, twelve, four... um... help?
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:07,
archived)
One, two, six, twelve, four... um... help?

one, two CHAINSAW!!
yay!
oh hang on
*runs out into the street with chainsaw screaming*
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:14,
archived)
yay!
oh hang on
*runs out into the street with chainsaw screaming*

I hope I never meet you in real life as there is no way one human could really be as awesome as you :D
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:15,
archived)

I collect stamps
into huge piles
then I burn them
haha, stamps
SHIT, ME STAMPS ARE BURNT!
:'(
:D
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:20,
archived)
into huge piles
then I burn them
haha, stamps
SHIT, ME STAMPS ARE BURNT!
:'(
:D

I got all the classy stores in my locale, innit
tho waitrose left
hah!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:24,
archived)
tho waitrose left
hah!

imagine you're doing a countdown to blasting Liam into space on a space shuttle* with a leak in the boosters - then reverse the process and do it over and over again. You soon learn to count.
Ten... Nine... Eight... Seven... Six... Five... Four... Three... Two... One... Blast off you twunt hehe look at him explode *reverses*
*ninja'd - but not well enough apparently
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:12,
archived)
Ten... Nine... Eight... Seven... Six... Five... Four... Three... Two... One... Blast off you twunt hehe look at him explode *reverses*
*ninja'd - but not well enough apparently

Thank you for bringing your name back, as I was getting confused again!
BUT BRING BACK THE BADGER! I don't care if people say they are masculine ;)
EDIT: Damn you you ninja :D
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:13,
archived)
BUT BRING BACK THE BADGER! I don't care if people say they are masculine ;)
EDIT: Damn you you ninja :D

there'd be no boy badgers
folk can't mess with science like that
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:14,
archived)
folk can't mess with science like that

Science, although inherently evil, is actually a good thing!
*dies paradoxically*
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:17,
archived)
*dies paradoxically*

only science has the answer
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:20,
archived)

I ONLY SAID THE ICON LOOKS LIKE A BOY ONE!
*sits in a corner and cries*
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:17,
archived)
*sits in a corner and cries*

they have bad press, they also have rabies, TB but mostly bad press...
Ok you have twisted my arm.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:14,
archived)
Ok you have twisted my arm.

I am starting to feel I am the only one who cares about the rules on icons staying the same ;)
Next up, BilboBarneyBobs!
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:16,
archived)
Next up, BilboBarneyBobs!

my main problem with Bilbo is that he has the same icon as Barbarossa and their names look like each other at a quick glance.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:23,
archived)



Having said that though, Noel once admitted in an interview that Liam is a better singer than himself. I say he was being a bit rough on himself 'cos he voiced the lyrics of their 2nd best selling hit.."Don't Look Back In Anger"
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:19,
archived)

that doesn't mean much that Noel is the brains ;)
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:39,
archived)

Sadly, it was hidden away at various points throughout 8 albums.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:06,
archived)

^ This.
I don't want to hate them universally because there is a great deal ofBeatles talent there. But they must be the laziest musicians ever. Well, apart from Britney Spears.
( ,
Thu 13 Nov 2008, 18:24,
archived)
I don't want to hate them universally because there is a great deal of
« Older messages | Newer messages »
