He starts out seemingly like a total Cnut, then actually achieves something very satisfying.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 18:21, Reply)
Belongs on a double A side with this -
youtu.be/nr-SZXIVvuo
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 21:10, Reply)
And CNN couldn’t have presented it worse. Still gets a click though.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 19:41, Reply)
It looks like it's part of the energy dissipation.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 21:26, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 21:59, Reply)
m.youtube.com/watch?v=gmNmKS13kRI
Horrid music tho'
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 22:25, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 22:38, Reply)
More of my current-affairs-inspired word-wankery for those that can abide such linguistic onanism. Prize for the first correct solution drawn from the hat after 31 May.
Main link is to PDF.
Across Lite PUZ file here (but check the rubric on the PDF for additional info first): drive.google.com/file/d/1vJG14kFkmy0RLvsifq4a4QFgTHPbASyj/view?usp=drivesdk
Good luck.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 18:48, Reply)
What could possibly go wrong!??
Opt out now via the pdf (print, fill in and give to your doctors) or this link www.nhs.uk/your-nhs-data-matters/manage-your-choice/ (I don't think you can opt out children via this way)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 16:40, Reply)
"NHS Digital said names and addresses, written notes, images, letters, and documents would not be collected. Nor would coded data that is not needed due to its age and coded data that GPs are not permitted to share by law."
Sounds fairly standard for dealing with sensitive/confidential patient data, at least in my experience (pharmacy/clinical trials). Sure, there's always concern about data being hacked/compromised, but if it can't be used to identify an individual then what's the objection? Health professionals do take confidentiality very seriously.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 17:36, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 18:35, Reply)
Key point for me, though, is what data is collected in the first place. If (and I concede it's a big if) it's properly anonymised before the data is collected, I don't see the problem.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 18:49, Reply)
re: data anonymised - not really, since it really depends on what other databases exist now and in the future that could be used to cross reference the data. eg using the data from Tesco club card dataset(which has your name etc) with a machine Learning algorithm - I suspect the data would be able over a period time, able to identify a lot people. This will only get more detailed with time as more information eg facebook? your browsing habits which are also collected by ISPs and given to many many agencies etc.. etc...
and also allowing US multinational's to analysing the data to then start the bidding process for select GPs. has the UK government ruled NHS from the treaties with the US? no! what better way would there be for them to understand the UK healthcare market
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 19:44, Reply)
I like the idea of truly anonymous medical data being used constructively, but I have no faith in this or future governments to keep it anonymous, safe and secure.
Centralising government databases never ends well.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 19:52, Reply)
As soon as it is online it will be well worth selling to the US, then apologising afterwards and a public inquiry (after the election).
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 19:32, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 19:57, Reply)
They are unlikely to admit that is why they are refusing services, the same way it is difficult to prove discrimination at job interviews.
*although I have beaten the DWP at tribunal.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 21:42, Reply)
Isn't this data that Amazon and Google already had?
www.wired.co.uk/article/amazon-nhs-data-matt-hancock
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 19:57, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 21:25, Reply)
www.echo-news.co.uk/news/local_news/19284672.south-essex-gps-trial-scrap-prescriptions/
Fucking hilarious.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 0:07, Reply)
One of the reasons I am skeptical of conspiracies is that incompetence makes them unlikely to work.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 17:56, Reply)
Not sure he'd get much but it might be another source of revenue.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 9:05, Reply)
Nice Mariokart power-skid while it lasted though.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 14:44, Reply)
Because the physics look about as realistic as when I'm racing forklifts against my son in Lego Jurassic World.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 16:20, Reply)
There’s also this one with racing cardboard boxes - youtu.be/7SYSbvPbOyY
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 17:14, Reply)
and would like to add my own.
squeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaalllll!!!!!!!!! (with one extra exclamation mark)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 13:58, Reply)
Fake RatherGood.
Cyriak's worked with them, so there is a b3ta connection.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 14:43, Reply)
Q. How can we make this Sparks documentary even more awesome?
A. Get Edgar fucking Wright to direct it.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 18:25, Reply)
It's a sinkhole with attitude, and it's on a mission to go wherever the fuck it wants. Engineers, bollocks to your 5 story steel sheet pile driven barrier - piece of piss. Next THE HIGHWAY!!! There should be a live feed of this mischievous mucky anarchist.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 11:01, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 11:36, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 12:59, Reply)
Unless you have firmly established which criteria are being considered, it's impossible to agree on whether things are unique or not. Something that is unique under one set of criteria is not necessarily unique by a different set of criteria and vice versa.
Uniqueness is *not* a property of an object.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 16:16, Reply)
What an unexpected turn of events and in no way a vindictive pattern of behaviour since his evidence at leveson. Makes a change from them vilifying young girls for tweeting they're glad to be back at school, which is what really gets its readership off
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 10:08, Reply)
it's a sophomoric british breitbart, replete with references to the "chinese virus"
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 13:55, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 14:02, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 15:04, Reply)
do you really not think this new Partridge incarnation is utter shite compared to his 90s outings?
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 19:51, Reply)
I loathe it all. And him. And Courtney Love.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 22:44, Reply)
He’s done other good stuff. The Trip. Philomena. He’s flogging a dead horse here though.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 22:58, Reply)
but like other media that used to be centre right, it's followed its readership down a rabbithole of neo-trumpian orthodoxies at the expense of any gravitas it once possessed. The thunberg 'article' could have been an aggrieved tweet
As to the new partridge, I've not seen it, though if iannucci is still writing it's bound to have it's moments even if it suffers from over-familiarity
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 0:54, Reply)
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 1:16, Reply)
I googled "spectator thunberg" knowing I'd find predictable vitriol, but slightly taken aback by how juvenile and unnuanced the writing was.
"pigtailed Swedish school girl staged a hissy fit from the UN". "goblin of doom", "chinese virus" - all this in response to a tweet saying it was nice to be back at school.
There's nothing to learn here other than they hate thunberg and coogan, and it's not even particularly funny or well expressed. To me the parallels with trump are obvious, and it appeals to a similar kind of repressed and impotent bitterness that they act as ciphers for.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 3:46, Reply)
The article makes absolutely no mention of Coogan’s politics whatsoever, it’s a critique of the comic character Partridge’s declining comedy value, that is highly praised for it’s 90s period. And then you start dragging Greta into it. I understand you think The Spectator is evil. I get that. But all the article says is that Partridge isn’t as funny as he used to be and that’s a shame. You even admit you haven’t seen the show that this assertion is based on. Yet still you want to pick a fight about it, while at no point addressing the essential substance of the article. It’s just weird. I’m increasingly certain you’ve not even read the article. You just want a fight.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 12:13, Reply)
fine, spectator = evil, is that easier for you?
forget my observation with examples about how the spectator has been running attack pieces about coogan since leveson, with the obvious (or so I thought but I forget who I'm dealing with) inference that any spectator review of a coogan project will be through this editorial lens biased by its naked antipathy for him. how those same articles by the deputy editor writing an article that says no more that Coogan is a pillock are indicative of the downmarket intellectual malaise of a 200 year old publication, with the thunberg example sounding like it was written by some angry reddit troll than a professional writer. and with all this in mind, how it's no surprise that you're a fan willing to defend it. It used to be a mag for small c conservatives, city types, almost a tele weekend supplement with decent writers. Auden and kinglsy amis wouldn't touch it with a barge pole now, it's now squarely aimed at angry vauxhall driving middle england brexiters too stupidly pretentious to realise how far it's fallen. It's the burberry of the publishing world
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 14:39, Reply)
What do you think of the actual content of the article itself? Could you apply your devastating critical analysis to what was actually said in that specific article? Why do you insist instead on generalised criticism of the publication? I posted a link to an article. One article. I didn’t post a link to The Spectator’s subscription page. What do you think about the article you didn’t read about the show you didn’t watch?
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 15:13, Reply)
he managed to shitcan it without describing a single episode or plotline or gag from the new series. Perhaps he never watched the new series as well? so there's not much to critically analyse and it really wasn't worth linking to, so I thought instead I'd make a broader point about the rag itself
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 23:02, Reply)
Really quite odd since you haven’t even watched it, but bringing Greta into it was the zenith for me.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 23:33, Reply)
or Brett Hart's.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 14:40, Reply)
But this is such a perfect peel
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 1:05, Reply)
And wow...a whole channel dedicated to a single low bridge.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 9:54, Reply)
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 13:21, Reply)
It's a pity he didn't come to those conclusions before signing up.
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 21:57, Reply)
Might have upset the patriotic heroes in 'spoons tho'.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 16:57, Reply)
and I cannot agree. It would have been better if he had come to pacifism before joining the SAS and killing all those people, and sending all those children to be tortured, etc.
It would be better if our army had to conscript people rather than accept applicants who, assuming they understand what the job involves, have a desire to kill and maim strangers in exchange for money.
(, Sat 15 May 2021, 14:28, Reply)
vfpuk.org/articles/i-will-not-fight-for-queen-and-country/
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 14:47, Reply)

(, Thu 13 May 2021, 17:36, Reply)
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 21:52, Reply)
Have some Buckfunk 3000
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpuX_6Mb0QQ&list=PLVxlwX2yfkrJc8yOeHxfPho-LinW3Z-aM&index=1
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 22:36, Reply)
Could it be Skeletor?
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 20:25, Reply)
I didn't know that they were making a new series.
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 22:53, Reply)
But smaller than you might think.
If you enjoyed this video, check out Lawrence Krauss’s talk on the beginnings and ultimate fate of the Universe here.
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 16:13, Reply)
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 17:06, Reply)
Last I saw of him he was dressing as a hobo and doing lecture tours of countries where #MeToo isn't a thing.
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 19:10, Reply)
Seems pretty big to me.
The Algorithm (All glory to The Algorithm!) has been pushing this to me pretty hard, but I was sure I had watched a Kursgesagt video on the same topic about a year ago. Turns out that I had.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 9:52, Reply)
Tenacious D have been around for this long. Audio is a bit hissy.
edit-1997
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 11:56, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwshxagVS2w
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 12:32, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=934usAyueR8
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 12:48, Reply)
Jack Black’s mum. She makes almost all humans look like massive underachievers.
(, Fri 14 May 2021, 4:43, Reply)
but I think date rape isn't the same as real rape
(, Thu 13 May 2021, 7:36, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »


