![Challenge Entry: When the laws of physics pack up [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
Please try not to be unfluffy, its my first proper bit of shopping - everything else I have done involves shoving some text on an image, so this is new to me!

Click for Biggererificationness
source (if interested)
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:57,
archived)

Click for Biggererificationness
source (if interested)

I WOULD have stuck a helicopter and a bridge in there but i dont really know how to cut around stuff seamlessly like other people. I just use the wand and hope it works
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 14:07,
archived)

Edit: Yup - www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000AM6Q2/qid=1087563509/sr=1-6/ref=sr_1_11_6/202-5247941-3224620
I like them covers.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:54,
archived)
I like them covers.

edit: just did google search found fit lass and psp'd it all.
Good taste in girlies that Hed Kandi - Huzzah!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:57,
archived)
Good taste in girlies that Hed Kandi - Huzzah!

hurrah for an idea that doesn't relate to shroedinger!
Woo!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:57,
archived)
Woo!
![Challenge Entry: When the laws of physics pack up [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

really bad paintmash but never mind

quite insane though.
Edit: Oh it's been done by the way, sorry. But have a woo :)
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:51,
archived)
Edit: Oh it's been done by the way, sorry. But have a woo :)

I think you did. About 3 appeared at once. Look what happens when b3ta mess with the laws of physics!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:55,
archived)

50 years after he wrote "What is life".
It was published in 1994.
*I didn't actually write a book, I wrote a chapter, well not really a chapter, it was only a research paper. Actually I got my name on the research paper, cos I did something that obliged them to include my name somewhere, near the end.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:59,
archived)
It was published in 1994.
*I didn't actually write a book, I wrote a chapter, well not really a chapter, it was only a research paper. Actually I got my name on the research paper, cos I did something that obliged them to include my name somewhere, near the end.


...inspired by today's playlist on my tinpot local radio


Has anyone done this before? If they have, I hoped they put more time and effort into it than I did.
![Challenge Entry: When the laws of physics pack up [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

Number 2 in a possible series.
Previously

hahahahahahahahahahahaha
I laughed like a loon!
Woo/Yay/Houpla * infinity^2
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:50,
archived)
I laughed like a loon!
Woo/Yay/Houpla * infinity^2

drugs do work rp

rp 2408698
Not compo'ble as physics is realistic :-)
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:53,
archived)

rp 2408698
Not compo'ble as physics is realistic :-)

Tie fighters and moons, hey wait that....
maybe to much Star Wars
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:59,
archived)
maybe to much Star Wars

It always amused me when they drew Danger Mouse in the dark.... just the one eye!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:45,
archived)

sorry, I've no idea what you are talking about.....
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:44,
archived)

www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/en.asp?TopicID=722
for the first bit (SFW) - and a pearl, well, surely you know what a pearl looks like - sort of round, found in clams ;)
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:49,
archived)
for the first bit (SFW) - and a pearl, well, surely you know what a pearl looks like - sort of round, found in clams ;)

Why did I click that.
...I dare anyone to google search an image.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:53,
archived)
...I dare anyone to google search an image.

What really annoys me is that people stayed up until 2 in the morning, deliberately watched it and then saw fit to complain. I can just see the letters: 'Dear Ofcom, I was delighted when I finally saw something on TV that offended me...'
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:43,
archived)

saying something like 'some viewers may find the following scenes distressing' or summit like that.
Fucking cunts never mentioned severe disappointment at something that had more of a build up than the footie.
sorry Ma
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:49,
archived)
Fucking cunts never mentioned severe disappointment at something that had more of a build up than the footie.
sorry Ma

and Marco 'helium heels' hiding behind Emma 'I'm not fick' from Jason.
Watch Italy v Portugal if it happens. Same shit will happen there on the pitch.
Long haired oxygen thiefs
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:55,
archived)
Watch Italy v Portugal if it happens. Same shit will happen there on the pitch.
Long haired oxygen thiefs

nobbers ring the police to report the disturbance after watching it?
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:54,
archived)

Never has a url been more misleading.... I'm referring to the stunning bit.....
www.westlothiannews.co.uk/Articles/stunningmodels/stunningmodels.html
safe for work..
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:36,
archived)
www.westlothiannews.co.uk/Articles/stunningmodels/stunningmodels.html
safe for work..

looks like that one off the spice girls...
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:37,
archived)

Dear God. Spade in the face syndrome.
/gets slap from girlfriend.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:38,
archived)
/gets slap from girlfriend.

that what it was...thought she was doing her impression of a dogs arse.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:41,
archived)

Ah work in an all male environment reduces expectations
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:42,
archived)

A nice one with a dimple so she'll look like Kirk Douglas.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:46,
archived)

and incontinent?
wow - the youth of today, I'll never understand fashion!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:49,
archived)
wow - the youth of today, I'll never understand fashion!

(Honestly. The place is a growler-pit.)

My Girlfriend's from West Lotian (ish), so we'll have less of this sort of talk.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:46,
archived)

I should mention that I've been rejected by more W. Lothian females than I care to remember.
Also, if I were on a bin-rake at midnight in Larbert, I'd consider this one not half bad.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:54,
archived)
Also, if I were on a bin-rake at midnight in Larbert, I'd consider this one not half bad.

Falkirk Falkirk Falkirk,
although - having said that, I have some very pretty friends from Falkirk, so it's not completely true
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:40,
archived)
although - having said that, I have some very pretty friends from Falkirk, so it's not completely true

and yes he is... in a hairy kind of way.
Damn fine.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:43,
archived)
Damn fine.

I'LL FUCKING KILL YE....I'LL RIP YER HEID AFF!!!
/jason - big brother
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:46,
archived)
/jason - big brother

and the only thing anyone can find to do of an evening is drive around the one way system fast(ish)
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:47,
archived)

"dinnae' call us boy racers - we cruise!"
fannies..
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:57,
archived)
fannies..

"THE WHEEL, FUTURISTIC, MAGNIFIC !"
bitchpapa, May 2004
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:57,
archived)
bitchpapa, May 2004

But hes from Hamilton.....
Where im sitting right now... I'm frightend... :s
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:58,
archived)
Where im sitting right now... I'm frightend... :s

that they're not post-op transgender types.
they all look a bit too cock-in-a-frock to me.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:41,
archived)
they all look a bit too cock-in-a-frock to me.

and I must admit that it isn't blessed with good looking women.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:48,
archived)

always land on their physics
bread always lands buttered side down...
hence the invention of the first antigravity machine
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:43,
archived)
bread always lands buttered side down...
hence the invention of the first antigravity machine

(And pleasantly reminicent of The Hudsucker Proxy.)

the timing, as ever, is superb
big woo and yay to you sir!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:37,
archived)
big woo and yay to you sir!

Quel pisseur de cervaux!
Plus ca houpla, plus c'est la woo.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:43,
archived)
Plus ca houpla, plus c'est la woo.
![Challenge Entry: When the laws of physics pack up [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

pea roast for compo, cos physics can go wrong.
Pedant patrol: yes i know he's not a retard but work with me here.

work with you on branding him a retard - what's the pay like?
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:36,
archived)

David Beckham is thick, I am yet to find someone complaining that Steven Hawking is rubbish at football.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:37,
archived)

International standard.
eh...
Nope that still makes him rubish at footabll.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:42,
archived)
eh...
Nope that still makes him rubish at footabll.

about jumping moon-pigs?

oops, forgot to woo your newspapre headline!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:35,
archived)

oops, forgot to woo your newspapre headline!

That will be the headline the day Scotland win the World Cup!
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 15:43,
archived)

but can someone explain this whole Schrodiger's Cat thing to me?
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:35,
archived)

its just your basic wave particle duality stuff. Nothing to really write home about.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:36,
archived)

infact something different to wave-particle
duality; like, eg., entangled states.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:37,
archived)
duality; like, eg., entangled states.

he said that to observe something effects how that object behaves ...so by the act of observing that object it not longer does what you wanted to observe as its been effected by the observation..
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:37,
archived)

You have a cat in a box. Along with the cat there is a vial of poison, and a radioactive source. There is a certain probability that the radioactive source will emit a particle that shatters the vial, releasing the poison and killing the cat.
While the lid is on the box, you have no way of knowing if this has occured. Therefore the cat is in a state of "Quantum Flux" and is neither alive, nor dead, but some undetermined state.
When you open the box and determine wether the cat is alive it then "becomes" one or the other.
It's a demonstration of observer-specific reality in quantum physics.
Or something...
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:39,
archived)
While the lid is on the box, you have no way of knowing if this has occured. Therefore the cat is in a state of "Quantum Flux" and is neither alive, nor dead, but some undetermined state.
When you open the box and determine wether the cat is alive it then "becomes" one or the other.
It's a demonstration of observer-specific reality in quantum physics.
Or something...

Surely the cat is either alive or dead. Looking in the box only informs the viewer as to its state.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:41,
archived)

effect of the observation effects the outcome kinda thing.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:42,
archived)

that's not much good to the observer is it? Until you view it it could be a dancing monkey for all you know.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:43,
archived)

but the cat *is* either alive or dead.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:45,
archived)

Our scientific method is based on observation. How can you establish a fact if you can't back it up with experimental observation?
It's a philisophical issue, granted, but there you go.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:48,
archived)
It's a philisophical issue, granted, but there you go.

It cannot be in a 'state of flux', because cats don't do that.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:52,
archived)

Since the only time the cat can be in flux is when it is not being observed, it is impossible to say.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2004, 13:53,
archived)

ah yes, the demonstration of the absurdities of traditional logic as compared to quantum states where-in people feel compelled to supply seemingly obvious contradictions entirely based on alternative methods of measuring the results while the reality lay in the fact that the methods all constitute measurement of the concealed state..
excellent exercise in thinking "outside the box" and introduction into the realities of the breakdown between more a more newtonian view of physics and the reality of quantum mechanics. a quintessential zen approach to expansion of knowledge through unanswerable questions.
more or less, i have no idea what im talking about, but it sounds friggin great, eh?
( ,
Sun 20 Jun 2004, 11:37,
archived)
excellent exercise in thinking "outside the box" and introduction into the realities of the breakdown between more a more newtonian view of physics and the reality of quantum mechanics. a quintessential zen approach to expansion of knowledge through unanswerable questions.
more or less, i have no idea what im talking about, but it sounds friggin great, eh?

« Older messages | Newer messages »
