
to get into SCOTLAND
it gets going after the 5 min mark as they pretend they're at border control
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:40, Reply)

you should perhaps put an NSFW for swearies?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:49, Reply)


Not seen it up here before, and it made me do a little wee of mirth.
It actually has the name and number on the original pic - I am trying so hard not to ring it.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:39, Reply)

EDIT humm... www.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&source=imghp&q=found+cat&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=g2&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:54, Reply)

Just the sign of course, not this particular photo of it
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 14:30, Reply)

My guess is that it's been adapted
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:53, Reply)

They may make someone smile. Thats important.
Plus it makes me chuckle.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 16:19, Reply)

And I like it. That's one cute looking kitty too. I hope his owner phones up and collects him.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 23:34, Reply)

similar, also funny is this video with the answering machine messages:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXfCmrDULDc
( , Thu 22 Jul 2010, 7:46, Reply)

It's a shipwreck, for both humans and dog alike. Probably sloths, too. And maybe pandas. Further research needed.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:26, Reply)

( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:11, Reply)

A little headwound is on the way then? A Concussion maybe?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:28, Reply)

Military action in Iraq = increase in home terrorism threat
Military action in Afghanistan = essential for our home security.
And the difference is...?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 14:47, Reply)

they're completely different countries that are hundreds and hundreds of miles apart, that are culturally completely different from one another and basically have nothing to do with each other in any way, shape or form. Aside from that they're exactly the same.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 8:49, Reply)

finally someone with the balls to tell it like it is
"She also said she believed intelligence on Iraq's threat was not "substantial enough" to justify the war."
she sticks it to blair/campbel./madelson/brown and their cronys
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 15:12, Reply)

doesn't mean there weren't good reasons. Saddam Hussein being a vile murderer who massacred thousands will do for starters.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 8:50, Reply)

Out of all the vile murderers who have massacred thousands, why start with Saddam Hussein in particular?
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 10:03, Reply)

eating lots and lots of shitty food and doing no exercise contributes to making people fat.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 8:48, Reply)

want to own Lockes wheelchair? Or Hurleys shirt / fishing net. Well, here is your chance.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:46, Reply)

but you can buy a large, aged and distressed leather collar, intended for a polar bear.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:50, Reply)

i have all my hours I havent watched one epsiode of lost or 24 etc
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:20, Reply)

not sure if it makes up for it or not.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 15:18, Reply)

that's a man?
Seriously, if true this is fucking awful
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:41, Reply)

can be useful at time but at others a bunch of wanking monkeys (i occasionally browse the boards)
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:42, Reply)

seeing as though they took the piss out of the girls you dun goofed video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiVK3eWZfn0&feature=player_embedded
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:47, Reply)

is this real news or just a made up 4chan story?
I saw something about a girl crying on a webcam and a dad shouting, but didn't follow what the heck it was about, was her crying because she'd been raped and now its a Youtube hit? :|
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:48, Reply)

She posted an earlier vid where she was telling people she would 'stick a Glock in thier mouths and make a brain squishy', and that people were only being nasty to her because she was perfect and had 3 boyfriends. She also invited people to 'suck her non-existant penis'. I'm not saying she deserved the backlash, but it was pretty daft.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:08, Reply)

Whatever next?
Though quite why an 11-year-old had any need of a YouTube account, and why anyone watched it, are questions that baffle me entirely. However did we manage in the dark days of the 1980s?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:14, Reply)

Although her language and attitude were really a bit much for that age. It is easy to blame the parents, so I'm going to.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:21, Reply)

I remember feeling so brave when I used the words "damn" and "bloody" in front of my parents for the first time. I was about 11 then.
I still try not to say "fuck" around them too much...
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:24, Reply)

swear once, and he only heard me a few times, all of which i lived to regret!
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:30, Reply)

I had to say "bimp".
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 15:47, Reply)

this other bloke seems to be just a target cos he wears make up and is gothy, 4chan /b/ are showing their power by smushing the two together and hoping nobody asks too many questions.
Seems to be working!
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:27, Reply)

i thought the raping and dating claims were already all made up by 4chan?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:49, Reply)

Or a rumor which accidentally turned out to be true.
Either way, his previous conviction won't help him.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:59, Reply)

that said all this was rumor by 4chan
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:52, Reply)

perfectdot.info/the-art-of-trolling-inside-a-4chan-smear-campaign-gawker-blog.htm
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:53, Reply)

nor are alot of the previous allergations of him beign a dirty perv.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:05, Reply)

I don't think that means 4chan /b/ should own me tho...
*edit* statutory rape means there's a story they had a relationship, as she is underage that is technically rape in the eyes of the law, no actual rape has occurred.
as far as I can tell anyhoo
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:23, Reply)

Making false allegations about someone is going to make it far more hard to prove any potential real claims.
Equally, the details of the previous charge (was he even found guilty?) are never stated or indeed linked to from any reputable news source, hence 4chan have just blurred any truth. A stupid thing to do with serious allegations.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:28, Reply)

and their involvement please show YOUR power by doing so before both these poor souls are utterly destroyed...
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:32, Reply)

my security didn't like something on that page. Some htm file it downloaded apparently is a bit dodgy.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:13, Reply)

The source code just looks like a bog standard Wordpress blog.
I can't see anything dodgy in it.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:31, Reply)

( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:59, Reply)

www.news.com.au/technology/jessi-slaughter-and-the-4chan-trolls-the-case-for-censoring-the-internet/story-e6frfro0-1225894369199
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:16, Reply)

So I wouldn't put it past them.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:38, Reply)

"Parents should take responsibilty of/for their offspring."
I think a wide variety of society's problems would be resolved if people thought about the consequences of having children/took responsibility if they did.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 14:20, Reply)

we may be about to see the case for internet control and censorship take a BIG leap to reality.
Remember to tell all your kids how 4chan /b/ caused the demise of internet freedom...
knowyourmeme.com/memes/jessi-slaughter-you-dun-goofd-the-consquences-will-never-be-the-same
gawker.com/5589721/the-art-of-trolling-inside-a-4chan-smear-campaign?skyline=true&s=i
Too far guys, WAY too far...
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:22, Reply)

how do they get stuff like addresses and phone numbers?
these people are picking on an 11 yr old girl? way to go, hard men.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 15:28, Reply)

or 123people.com? It's a piece of piss, anyone can do it.
Just most of us don't do shit like this with it...
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 16:49, Reply)

One of the features of the XVIII International Aids Conference currently going on in Vienna is launch of this simple declaration, to which you can give your support.
The criminalisation of illicit drug users is fuelling the HIV epidemic and has resulted in overwhelmingly negative health and social consequences. A full policy reorientation is needed.
It ought to be a no-brainer. Go. Do it.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:35, Reply)

if I were doing something recreationally that became illegal, I'd stop doing it, and wouldn't use it's criminalisation as an excuse for the ill-consequences that my doing it caused.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:41, Reply)

I'm sure a lot of people would give up if it was as easy as you suggest.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:44, Reply)

... seems psychologically implausible.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:58, Reply)

how about just not starting? It's not rocket science.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 8:51, Reply)

Am I right?
Noone is denying that there are undesirable consequences of much (most?) drug use. But treating it as a problem for the criminal law, rather than as a social and public health problem, is utterly counterproductive.
The only people who benefit from illegality are the traffickers. For everyone else, it's a disaster.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:48, Reply)

( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:38, Reply)

But if it's decriminalised everywhere, there'd be no room in the market for traffickers to operate - or, at least, they'd be reduced to the status of dodgy cigarette dealers. But why buy from an unlicenced dealer when you can get stuff from an approved pharmacy that's guaranteed for quality?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:40, Reply)

either way, the CIA gets the money...
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 15:35, Reply)

From the site: The Vienna Declaration is a statement seeking to improve community health and safety by calling for the incorporation of scientific evidence into illicit drug policies.
If it was down to me, I'd decriminalise everything, and treat all drug use from nicotine to heroin and back to alcohol as a public health issue.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:50, Reply)

but nicotine is legal and there are still hundreds of thousands of addicts - despite the money that is spent on anti-smoking campaigns etc.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:25, Reply)

The kind of stuff which could be monitored (may be entirely wrong, still reading it through).
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:27, Reply)

The health problems of smoking are much easier to counter if it's legal.
But the argument here isn't just about health. It's wider. Decriminalised drugs would be cheaper for the user, which'd reduce the wider crime rate. It'd also be easier to get treatment to come off them, and treatment for related health problems.
It'd also mean that growers could take control of their crops by going legit, and charge a higher price (since they wouldn't be under the monopsonistic control of their local cartel). That'd massively improve welfare in places like Afghanistan and Colombia, and improve security as well, since the Taleban and cartels would be deprived of a major source of income and protection money.
The general consensus among medics is that addiction is an illness - partly physiological, partly psychological, but an illness all the same. It's an illness that, left untreated, is socially and politically devastating. And it's an illness that the current state of the law does nothing to help.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:46, Reply)

If drugs are elgalised then the government will save alot of moeny by not trying to shut them down and make lods more thanks to taxes.
But then the number of drug dealers bribing their way up the private investor (lobbiests and donators) food chain will diminish.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:08, Reply)

it would be easy fuel to whip up a moral panic amongst the socially conservative - and we've got a government that responds to such stuff - they asked Facebook to remove the Moaty RIP stuff etc.
So I don't see it happening anytime soon either.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:15, Reply)

Though the precedent set by Portugal is a good one, so might be taken seriously within the EU.
The big prohibitionist is the US, though - but even there, I can see a time when the crisis in northern Mexico will lead the Mexican government to act, and that could well force the US' hand. And maybe that'll happen before there're too many more deaths in Juarez.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:23, Reply)

I was stunned to hear that Portugal have managed it successfully.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:21, Reply)

This is either tremendously lazy, or total genius.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:21, Reply)

That's fantastic!
It could only be improved by the use of a picture of a kitten and the caption "Flying ants are just like this, apart from the vast differences."
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:31, Reply)

thing that happens every year at about this time of year happens
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:36, Reply)

Though the comment about Empire of the Ants is complete fail.
It's a great film
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:40, Reply)

www.metro.co.uk/weird/835471-world-snail-racing-championship-ends-in-triumph-for-least-slow-snail
This one is good too
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:10, Reply)

*This* is Metro captioning at its finest.
www.metro.co.uk/weird/81848-driver-blames-crash-on-pterodactyl
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 9:28, Reply)

And I thought it was just for keeping the rain off your head.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 13:01, Reply)

The picture was of two clothed people on a bed, embracing each other, with the caption "What sex may look like"
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 18:07, Reply)

I know when I downloaded Blender3D I wasn't quite expecting such a steep learning curve and my searches for a step-by-step guide of the basics left me scratching my head and fearing I'd never understand this program. But this Blender tutorial series is the first that actually makes sense and he does it with the mind on using your models in AfterEffects.
So if you want to download Blender (it's totally free and as good as the commercial 3D apps) but worry that you'll not understand it then follow this series.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:04, Reply)

I think I got as far as making a square. Or something, I gave up when I couldn't find any good tutorials.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:07, Reply)

it will make sense.
There are several Blender tutorial sites like www.blenderguru.com/ the problem is he assumes you can keep up with him and he doesn't explain what shortcut keys he's using so presumes a good knowledge of the Blender interface which is always a problem.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:18, Reply)

and promptly went "uh?" at the inteface and never used it again.
Thanks for this, I shall be rendering bouncing balls by the weekend
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:19, Reply)

www.vimeo.com/channels/blender3d
en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Category:Blender_3D:_Noob_to_Pro
I've tried blender but unfortunately I haven't the patience for 3d modelling
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:28, Reply)

but I'm too lazy to follow written tutorials (ironic as my own website contains my own written tutorials) but not seen the vimeo one - thanks for the links.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 13:47, Reply)

My pun generating system needs some jump leads me thinks.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:05, Reply)

(which I can't believe is still on TV)
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:05, Reply)

1 - 2pm weekdays would do, I'm not greedy.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:13, Reply)

Little donkey, little donkey in the dusky sky
Got to keep on floating onwards though you're very high
Been a long time, little donkey, through scary height
Dont give up now, little donkey,
the landing zone's in sight
Little donkey, little donkey, wows the Ruski crowd
Little donkey, carry on past that cloud
Little donkey, little donkey, journey's end is near
There are journalists waiting for a sign to bring them here
Do not falter little donkey, there's a star in reach
It will guide you, little donkey, crashing to the beach
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:07, Reply)

utterly jaw dropping. the squarepusher bit at the start is impressive enough, but once the aphex song kicks in at about 1:00, it's just incredible. and then it ramps up a notch again... I want to be able to do this.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:50, Reply)

...but only if you're a woman according to the first paragraph.
Daily Fail obviously
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:43, Reply)

by phrasing the headline as a question they try to absolve themselves of any responsibility.
"COULD THE MAIL GIVE YOU TEH BAD AIDS???!!??"
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:52, Reply)

...I'm told new material is coming soon. What a horrific thought...
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:38, Reply)

to cure all fertility problems by examining what you are wanking over, and suggesting healthy alternatives such as this.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:58, Reply)

...Anne Robinson. That'd n'doubt make me push an arc of glistening spluff all over my own groin.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:08, Reply)

In an illustrated format. Im glad mine is deemed very trustworthy!
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:01, Reply)

my chops m ake me borderline "Neutral"/"Questionable"
What a nonsense.
James Bond never trusted men with beards.
If it's good enough for the worlds greatest spy, it's good enough for me
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:27, Reply)

I think this sums it up nicely.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:37, Reply)

Although I have ventured into "unsavoury" at times
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:40, Reply)

now I have proof.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:17, Reply)

Apparently not, according to JP Morgan.
JP Morgan has raised serious concerns about its commitment to its new £1.5bn European headquarters at Canary Wharf because of anger within the bank at the lack of support for the financial sector in the UK.
Will somebody please exterminate these fucking parasites?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 10:49, Reply)

So why should be it taxed for the failures of other institutions?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 10:58, Reply)

and "thinking about things before jumping to conclusions"
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:01, Reply)

JP Morgan isn't a UK bank, but it did of course benefit from the US bailout.
The UK pumped half a trillion pounds into the financial sector. And JP Morgan are saying that isn't enough.
I think it's about time we stood up to these parasites instead of taking it up the pooper.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:17, Reply)

Well you're on the internet, and therefore you're a cancer-causing paedophile.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:33, Reply)

Or are you just swinging your handbag?
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:42, Reply)

they need all the support we can offer.
Or perhaps you have some socialist ideal of tough men working down't'pit.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:43, Reply)

that people have got the impression that the government have just given away taxpayers' money, when in fact what they have done is to buy huge chunks of the banks, which in the long run (when all this unpleasantness is behind us) will generate a profit for all of us.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:40, Reply)

Sorry, but people are happy enough to borrow money for their houses and their cars and their widescreen tv's because "it's their right" to have these things when they can't afford them. God forbid they should have to live within their means. This "everything is black and white Daily Fail scape-goating" is rather tedious.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:13, Reply)

What was the American bank who got fined last week for telling its clients to invest heavily one way, knowing it was a shit move, then betting the other way and making a huge profit?
For years I've said banking is just the respectable side of gambling.
I don't think it's even respectable anymore
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:29, Reply)

... I'm amazed by the number of people who seem not to have realised that the primary function of a bank is exactly the same as the primary function of any other business - to make a profit.
This genuinely seems to have come as a revelation to many.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:31, Reply)

The majority of people see banks as a business, so get pissed off when they see tax payers money used to help them out.
It would take weeks to explain to these people WHY we gave them the money
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:45, Reply)

...which made a profit aren't necessarily the problem in this case. The ones that failed, received huge public cash bailouts, then continued in exactly the same failing business practices as before? They're a problem.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:49, Reply)

If you're accepting of a broadly liberal, broadly capitalist model of political economy, you're going to have to bite the bullet every now and again.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:04, Reply)

and your house was worth 50 billion-squillion poundrals.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:18, Reply)

and they are well known for being utter utter cunts. first time they've been caught with their hand in the till and everyone else in the city was ecstatic about it.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:52, Reply)

but there are a lot of activities in the wider financial sector which serve no purpose other than to make money for very rich men. So yeah, I'd agree with the term parasites.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:36, Reply)

Christ: I can't believe that an unrepentant Marxist like me is offering defences like this.
But then again, possibly I can. Marxism isn't a moral theory; it's a historical and economic set of theories. There's no morality in it. So... yeah. Ummmmm... Crisis of capitalism, anyone?
That's what Marx got wrong: he thought that crises were fatal, when clearly they aren't.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:49, Reply)

( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 12:03, Reply)

bust loop.
JMP sink a lot of money into moving their HQ to London, realise they're going to get shafted if they do, think about moving elsewhere. for many many other reasons they're utter cuntnuggets, but i think this is fairly justified.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 11:56, Reply)

American politilols with sinister dummies.
Ronseal beyond that.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 10:23, Reply)

That was rather odd :)
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 10:38, Reply)

I'd only need to show Mr. Bats the preview frame and he'd turn into a gibbering scaredy-cat.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 10:41, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »