DISSOLVING INTO DIARRHEASorry, my screen isn't showing the true colors, the fire looks brown here :^P
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:42,
archived)
haha-what a title......"The adventures of........."
Elvis impersonator,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:34,
archived)
Cheesy gay porno seriesfrom Japan
(
FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector.,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 17:00,
archived)
haha-i recognise that vanhermanized again!!!!!!!!!:)
( Elvis impersonator,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:36,
archived)
That hippeagle looks pretty raw.you could use some savlon on that.
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:35,
archived)
would have been a good "sausages" compo entry:-)
( The Twisted Omentum vidi vici veni,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:48,
archived)
Oooh yeah . . . wing it !
Valin I changed glasses while I wasn't looking,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:49,
archived)
It's a . . . great northern quilted ! Valin I changed glasses while I wasn't looking,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 17:01,
archived)
woohoo....sky's the limitand it's erm....hangon............THATAWAY!!!!:D
( Elvis impersonator,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:58,
archived)
his eyes are fixed..........he hovers.............he waits...:)
( Elvis impersonator,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:05,
archived)
I like watching the bitching. FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector.,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:22,
archived)
you forgot about the evil lasers!
tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:26,
archived)
Those aren't evil lasers, they are LASERS OF CHANGE!
discomeats This canoe,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:51,
archived)
![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Steampunk"){kind=small}
more?
(
Dr Scunner She’s a he, technically, but she’s scalding hot,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:08,
archived)
It seems that 2 Unlimited lied to us all
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:11,
archived)
hahaha :Dnicely done that one.
( ms morbo lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:39,
archived)
TREASON!(Looks more like Philip's body)
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:26,
archived)
"Why don't you - stay for the Knighthood..." The Twisted Omentum vidi vici veni,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:31,
archived)
thats f-ing brilliantso good i can't bring myself to swear properly, cunts.
(
KittyVomit more super than a can of Tennants,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:02,
archived)
WowsersGreat image.
(
TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:26,
archived)
Why thank you! :)Just playing about with Eye Candy Snapart
I may have to read the manual..
(I may have to read the manual..
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:28,
archived)
That's you, isn't it?;)
(
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:29,
archived)
There is a Canon Press announcement in Stockholm on TuesdayIf they don't announce anything about the 1Ds MKIV, I'm going to grab a 1Ds 3 next Saturday, being an impetuous and impatient person :)
( Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:34,
archived)
Compo it!It is a dig at blair right?
( epiphany coming live from sweden,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:31,
archived)
NahI just figured something needed an update
( Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:36,
archived)
AhYes, I can see it now
THE VILE FIEND!
(THE VILE FIEND!
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:42,
archived)
I love playing around with Guttenberg images
keo COCKS COCKS COCKS,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:12,
archived)
Pay them no mind. Well done!The idiom is hardly my exclusive domain.
It's a great source pic, I have had it in my
to-use folder for a while. But didn't do
anything with it yet. Do more, it's fun!
(It's a great source pic, I have had it in my
to-use folder for a while. But didn't do
anything with it yet. Do more, it's fun!
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Mon 31 Aug 2009, 0:42,
archived)
Soft Cheese Surprise
Serves 3
You will need:
* 10ml orange juice
* 3 oysters
* 110g soft cheese
* 150g mince
* 50g lard
Instructions:
1. whisk the mince
2. toast the lard
3. heat the mince in the saucepan
4. sauté the orange juice
5. throw the lard away
6. put the orange juice in the fridge to set
7. fry the oysters until browned
8. whisk the mince
9. slice the soft cheese
10. put everything in the blender
(Serves 3
You will need:
* 10ml orange juice
* 3 oysters
* 110g soft cheese
* 150g mince
* 50g lard
Instructions:
1. whisk the mince
2. toast the lard
3. heat the mince in the saucepan
4. sauté the orange juice
5. throw the lard away
6. put the orange juice in the fridge to set
7. fry the oysters until browned
8. whisk the mince
9. slice the soft cheese
10. put everything in the blender
epiphany coming live from sweden,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:18,
archived)
Even betterCheese And Cheese Pudding
Serves 1
You will need:
* 110g cheese
* 1 carrots
* 5 lamb chops
Instructions:
1. grill the carrots
2. put the lamb chops in the saucepan
3. sift the cheese
4. go down the pub
(Serves 1
You will need:
* 110g cheese
* 1 carrots
* 5 lamb chops
Instructions:
1. grill the carrots
2. put the lamb chops in the saucepan
3. sift the cheese
4. go down the pub
epiphany coming live from sweden,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:19,
archived)
I always pull a Raptor impression to impress the ladiesIt has never failed*
*It possibly has
(*It possibly has
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:23,
archived)
Screw the planet, I want one of these!
Optimising blurred it to hell, but you get the idea.
TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:08,
archived)
OopsI accidentally clicked Use as Desktop picture
It's so large it looks like it's about to crash through my monitor!
(It's so large it looks like it's about to crash through my monitor!
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:16,
archived)
It cornerslike it is on rails*
*possibly a lie.
(*possibly a lie.
TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:17,
archived)
eeek!At that size it probably shows up my poor 'shoppery even worse. Get rid of it man!
( TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:22,
archived)
Worry not!All is fluffy and back to Red Pandas
( Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:24,
archived)
That grille part looks like a building mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:16,
archived)
YIKES!I bet it does look like the sun when coming towards you at night
(
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:03,
archived)
SadlyI think if you use High Beam, the engines* stall.
*I like to think there are two V8s in there. A W8, if you will.
(*I like to think there are two V8s in there. A W8, if you will.
TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:24,
archived)
I imagine that it runs on photon powered photons ! Valin I changed glasses while I wasn't looking,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 17:13,
archived)
He has faith.He truly and absolutely believes in a set of unprovable principles and theories to the extent that he will not entertain any other possibilities and openly berates anyone who does not conform to his beliefs.
I can follow that for as far as his theories are testable, beyond that he is just a lunatic who has chosen which theories he likes and stuck to them, like the worst religious fundamentalist.
(I can follow that for as far as his theories are testable, beyond that he is just a lunatic who has chosen which theories he likes and stuck to them, like the worst religious fundamentalist.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:34,
archived)
All about the dark side.Yes he's dogmatic about the force...hang on..
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:37,
archived)
You don't need faith to believe in empiricism, that's the pointI define "faith" as "believing in something impossible for which there is no proof" and then I further define it as "insanity". Dawkins is no lunatic, though I will concede he's pretty fundamental. But then I'm pretty hardline myself.
(
emvee cruor deo cruoris,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:45,
archived)
You see, where you are going wrong is that you do not know what faith is."believing in something impossible for which there is no proof" is stupidity.
"believing in something for which there is no proof" is faith.
The conclusion that our worldview does not need transempirical support does not hold water once one begins questioning beyond our current ability to test. Asking questions which are beyond our present abilities is not madness, it is theorising and yes, science needs empiricism, but speculation is not at fault.
Dawkins does not adhere to radical empircalism, but allows for speculation, but he has decided, for whatever reason, to highlight any philosophical or scientific postulation which includes a deity as automatically wrong. What he does by this is declare any non deity based idea as correct and he does it in a manner which is fundamentalist.
As long as there are questions which there are not evidence for the answers to it will be a matter of faith to subscribe to any of those answers.
("believing in something for which there is no proof" is faith.
The conclusion that our worldview does not need transempirical support does not hold water once one begins questioning beyond our current ability to test. Asking questions which are beyond our present abilities is not madness, it is theorising and yes, science needs empiricism, but speculation is not at fault.
Dawkins does not adhere to radical empircalism, but allows for speculation, but he has decided, for whatever reason, to highlight any philosophical or scientific postulation which includes a deity as automatically wrong. What he does by this is declare any non deity based idea as correct and he does it in a manner which is fundamentalist.
As long as there are questions which there are not evidence for the answers to it will be a matter of faith to subscribe to any of those answers.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:25,
archived)
*touches with a 20 foot pole*please explain WHICH "set of unprovable principles".
( but the hedgehog can never be buggered at all foreskin of the apocalypse,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:50,
archived)
Pffffft!You can't expect anyone how calls Dawkins a fundamentalist to actually explain why!
(For the record I think Dawkins is a smug antagonistic tosser, but he isn't as bad as the extremists no matter how much they want him to be).
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:08,
archived)
(For the record I think Dawkins is a smug antagonistic tosser, but he isn't as bad as the extremists no matter how much they want him to be).
He is an extremist.He holds a belief and condemns those who hold any other belief. He is an extremist.
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:30,
archived)
Well, Big Bang theory for one.I mean, I subscribe to it, but I am aware that I could be proven wrong and, whilst I believe in it, it is not any more valid than an early creation.
Short Earth creationists can be shown to be wrong to an extent which is acceptable, hell, evolution is demonstrable, but theories as to soul, initial creation, fate and so on are all just that, theories.
I don't think I was sneezed out of the nose of a big green cat, but until I see some evidence to the contrary I will hold back from condemning those who might.
(Short Earth creationists can be shown to be wrong to an extent which is acceptable, hell, evolution is demonstrable, but theories as to soul, initial creation, fate and so on are all just that, theories.
I don't think I was sneezed out of the nose of a big green cat, but until I see some evidence to the contrary I will hold back from condemning those who might.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:29,
archived)
Actually, a better example might be this:He absolutely believes, despite no evidence to back this up, that there is no deity.
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:41,
archived)
You've got the burden of proof the wrong way 'round again.there is no evidence FOR god, therefore it's completely reasonable to hold the position it doesn't exist. God is about as probable as santa: there is a theoretical possibility it exists, but in all likelyhood it doesn't and anyone claiming otherwise had better provide some good evidence.
( but the hedgehog can never be buggered at all foreskin of the apocalypse,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:56,
archived)
You can just as much disprove creationism as you can disprove the statement 'Jesus was gay'.You can never wholly disprove something, but that's irrelevent, that is not how burden of proof is.
As it stands there is evidence besides theory for the Big Bang (the residual energy), there is none for creation theories besides writing (most of which is actually copied from early Persian beliefs).
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:42,
archived)
As it stands there is evidence besides theory for the Big Bang (the residual energy), there is none for creation theories besides writing (most of which is actually copied from early Persian beliefs).
The burden of proof rests entirely on the delivery.If I want you to believe that Jesus was gay then I need to provide evidence.
If you want me to believe that he is straight then you need to provide me with evidence.
To be fair, I see no evidence against initial creationism.
(If you want me to believe that he is straight then you need to provide me with evidence.
To be fair, I see no evidence against initial creationism.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:46,
archived)
You don't need evidence against creationism.Otherwise I could spread libelous bollocks about anything or anyone and order them to give me concrete proof to the otherwise, but that is not how burden of proof works. You have to have evidence for your claims, other people don't have to provide evidence to contridict your baseless assertions.
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:04,
archived)
Are you saying Science should sue Religion for defamation? my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:06,
archived)
sounds reasonable to methe royal society vs the church of england, at the old bailey. tickets only £400 a place. it'd be a killer.
(
boris the spider,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:08,
archived)
I think women should sue religion for demation of character!And maybe the Fruit Marketing Board.
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:09,
archived)
You are wrong.How burden of proof works is something you should research.
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 18:59,
archived)
given the bits in johnabout the "most beloved disciple" (implied to be john) lying on jesus' bare breast, there's actually some evidence for the "jesus was gay" argument.
except... oh, that damned catholic church, replacing the name "mary magdelene" with "john". i knew they were up to something!
(except... oh, that damned catholic church, replacing the name "mary magdelene" with "john". i knew they were up to something!
boris the spider,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:46,
archived)
a slight refinement"it is not any more valid than an early creation that can also produce the cosmic microwave background, the observed anisotropies on the cosmic microwave background and the length-scale of the baryon acoustic oscillations in the large-scale structure of galaxies, ideally without waving a hand and saying 'God did it that way'."
Is the "big bang" correct? Of course it's not. It relies on the universe being homogeneous and isotropic and the very fact we're here disproves that. Is it a predictive model that has passed every test so far? Well, no, but it's passed far more than any other cosmology ever has. Where it breaks down is on small scales around galaxies (it generally predicts cuspy dark matter haloes and too many satellites compared to observations), which is no great shock since the model itself cannot and can never have been trusted on small scales.
This is what annoys me about this kind of argument -- we're comparing a model that produces quantitative numbers and testable predictions, with the half-assed rambling of lunatic Bronze-Age goatherders which will never produce numbers. That's all science is about, ultimately -- numbers and predictions. Got a model that predicts what's observed? Good, it's a valid model. Is it truth? Who cares? Leave that to the philosophers. Got a religion that doesn't predict any numbers? Good, it's a religion. But don't try and pretend that it's got a viable cosmology unless you can get numbers out of it.
Very irritating.
(Is the "big bang" correct? Of course it's not. It relies on the universe being homogeneous and isotropic and the very fact we're here disproves that. Is it a predictive model that has passed every test so far? Well, no, but it's passed far more than any other cosmology ever has. Where it breaks down is on small scales around galaxies (it generally predicts cuspy dark matter haloes and too many satellites compared to observations), which is no great shock since the model itself cannot and can never have been trusted on small scales.
This is what annoys me about this kind of argument -- we're comparing a model that produces quantitative numbers and testable predictions, with the half-assed rambling of lunatic Bronze-Age goatherders which will never produce numbers. That's all science is about, ultimately -- numbers and predictions. Got a model that predicts what's observed? Good, it's a valid model. Is it truth? Who cares? Leave that to the philosophers. Got a religion that doesn't predict any numbers? Good, it's a religion. But don't try and pretend that it's got a viable cosmology unless you can get numbers out of it.
Very irritating.
boris the spider,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:44,
archived)
You see, the problem is that you are saying 'Religion is not science, therefore it is wrong'.It is not wrong, it is just different.
Well, it might be wrong, but we do not know yet.
(Well, it might be wrong, but we do not know yet.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 18:58,
archived)
No no noI doubt you'll read this reply, alas, but overall I more or less agree with your position. It's true that I'm saying "Religion is not science", but I'm not then following it up with "therefore it is wrong". What I was trying to drive at is that drawing *scientific* conclusions out of religion is wrong -- unless it can produce testable numbers. Just the same as drawing religious conclusions out of science is straining what are, after all, sophisticated algorithms rather too far.
What science can tell is is how nature behaves. That doesn't mean that that's what nature *is*, just that that's how it behaves. Drawing conclusions beyond that is certainly a matter of faith.
Sorry for the antagonistic tone -- I study cosmology for a living, so I'm a bit more sensitive to claims that it's only as valid as a creationist theory than the usual nerd is.
(What science can tell is is how nature behaves. That doesn't mean that that's what nature *is*, just that that's how it behaves. Drawing conclusions beyond that is certainly a matter of faith.
Sorry for the antagonistic tone -- I study cosmology for a living, so I'm a bit more sensitive to claims that it's only as valid as a creationist theory than the usual nerd is.
boris the spider,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 21:49,
archived)
LOL!ok.
No mention of the supernatural in his ideas.
(No mention of the supernatural in his ideas.
op op op op op I stink therfore I spam,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:55,
archived)
Indeed not.But then, if a deity existed it would not be supernatural, would it? It would be natural.
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:26,
archived)
is this a face to faith meeting? The Twisted Omentum vidi vici veni,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:48,
archived)
christopher hitchins for the win
op op op op op I stink therfore I spam,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:53,
archived)
"too much tallent for a place like this" Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 17:40,
archived)
fuck off you cunt Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 17:41,
archived)
shut your cake you hipocrytytthis plaxce i bursting with tallent
( Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 17:43,
archived)
i was confused about which bread to use..have i missed something?
( op op op op op I stink therfore I spam,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:57,
archived)
Hahahha what?Defrost the cucumber
( epiphany coming live from sweden,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:17,
archived)
Some of those are really funnyVinegar A La Soy Sauce
Serves 1
You will need:
* 110ml mint sauce
* 20ml soy sauce
* 60ml vinegar
* 30ml essence of vanilla
* 30ml lemon juice
Instructions:
1. pre-heat the oven to 200 C
2. slice the lemon juice
3. stir-fry the soy sauce
4. rinse the vinegar
5. grill the essence of vanilla
6. sauté the mint sauce
7. bake for 70 minutes and serve hot
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:24,
archived)
Wah!
Just Juan Cornetto will take you to the lo-rider show n' flaunt ya on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 15:42,
archived)
Why am I looking at your dog? LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:26,
archived)
I'll see your Cyriakand raise you with a Willwillwritehiswillesque wall that I saw in Buenos Aires
( emvee cruor deo cruoris,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:49,
archived)
I KNEW IT!The bastard was working for the NWO after all!
Click for bigger (161 kb)
(
Click for bigger (161 kb)
tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:13,
archived)
The picture used on his wikipedia page pretty much sums him up.Self important megalomaniac cunt.
( Koba http://sexycooladventures.blogspot.com/,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:15,
archived)
ohso this is going to be one of those kind of days here
That's actually Bill Hicks with the megaphone. He never died.
www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=bill+hicks+is+alex+jones
(That's actually Bill Hicks with the megaphone. He never died.
www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=bill+hicks+is+alex+jones
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:17,
archived)
I heard that roumer, but after seeing Jones "do stand up" I thought NOPE! tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:36,
archived)
i just read the wording on the vanI like the idea of a mobile mobile! jesus i should work harder at these ideas
( tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:30,
archived)
Alex JonesGoogle him, you wont regret it! lol
( tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:33,
archived)
*googles**regrets*
Crystal Magnet Like a diamond geezer, but better,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:55,
archived)
he educates the masseshis lectures on building tin foil hats are highly entertaining
( tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:57,
archived)
That dog's got four eyes!How does it see?
Terribly
.. Hang on...
/cheers all :)
(Terribly
.. Hang on...
/cheers all :)
The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:06,
archived)
Happy candle! my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:10,
archived)
i thought i could smell burninghappy candles old chap
have this
www.televisiontunes.com/Dads_Army_-_Drum_And_Bass_Remix.html
p.s great theme tune site
(have this
www.televisiontunes.com/Dads_Army_-_Drum_And_Bass_Remix.html
p.s great theme tune site
god save the queen making another unremarkable comeback,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:22,
archived)
needs more all-seeing eye and pyramid PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:11,
archived)
topshop Dr Scunner She’s a he, technically, but she’s scalding hot,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:12,
archived)
pfft....nowhere near the same calibre..but then, that would be givin'it away:)
( Elvis impersonator,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:40,
archived)
:) i did i voted for BNP!(jokes)
( op op op op op I stink therfore I spam,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:14,
archived)
What is this I dont even.
(
Koba http://sexycooladventures.blogspot.com/,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 14:05,
archived)
i apolagise to you and your family op op op op op I stink therfore I spam,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:17,
archived)
i waited an hour for this
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:19,
archived)
haha!it was worth it! :D
( op op op op op I stink therfore I spam,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:20,
archived)
I am going to send a robot back from the futureyou will hear a knock on your door 20 minutes ago. answer the door.
( PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:24,
archived)
is this robot likely to become violent?i have to ask
( op op op op op I stink therfore I spam,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:28,
archived)
I do not think a murderous robot would bother knocking.
( PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:33,
archived)
hamster, actually.you'll be taken over by it's fluffiness, and forget that you had a file open in (what appears to be) MSPAINT.
( PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:44,
archived)
I just dont like the idea of the coal fired remote control!open the back... roll the coals around a little
( tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:15,
archived)
version 3.0 will use anthracitethat'll be better
( The Twisted Omentum vidi vici veni,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:16,
archived)
I looks like you're trying to knit a manualWould you like assistance with that?
( mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:45,
archived)
Lovely stuff! The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:00,
archived)
Congrats on not getting banned for five years!;)
( mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:04,
archived)
haha, cheers/there's still a few hours left
( The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:07,
archived)
cheers fella The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:07,
archived)
cheers squire The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:10,
archived)
hehehe :) The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:18,
archived)
happy candles
5 years - bet it only seems like 10
The Twisted Omentum vidi vici veni,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:13,
archived)
you don't even get 5 years for armed robbery these days The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:18,
archived)
crime just isn't worth it these day.. The Twisted Omentum vidi vici veni,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 13:02,
archived)
10,000 scargill points to that man
(
Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:33,
archived)
Surely with the Scargill referenceManic Miner would have been more appropriate :)
( Marty McFly can't grate cheese without getting angry,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:32,
archived)
Ah yesNaturally
( Marty McFly can't grate cheese without getting angry,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:38,
archived)
>Look at poster MrPineapple .co.uk - TSHIRTS FOR SALE. I GIVE YOU GOOD PRICE.,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:02,
archived)
Fool!> FUCK GANDALF
(
kingsuperspecial is in an audience, wanking furiously,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:23,
archived)
> Go North> Fuck Polar Bear
( mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:32,
archived)
I DON'T KNOW WHAT A 'POLAR' ISNOW WHAT?
( kingsuperspecial is in an audience, wanking furiously,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:34,
archived)
FUCK GANDALF!
( Dr Scunner She’s a he, technically, but she’s scalding hot,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:36,
archived)
great jobmicrowave
( Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:03,
archived)
Pull the switch!Adventures in county jail.
( Bob the mul Don't look at me that way,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:07,
archived)
I added myself as a friend and clicked thiswoo yay hoopla
so alone
(so alone
Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:39,
archived)
well i likeit too, and have clicked accordingly
(
thirsty a rare visitor these days,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:41,
archived)
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuckmorning peoples
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:58,
archived)
aaargghhkill it with a spanner!
and hello mediocre
(and hello mediocre
Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:03,
archived)
Hello sirIt's a bit quiet here, don't you think
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 11:07,
archived)
Great . . . but how does it _______________________ do ? Valin I changed glasses while I wasn't looking,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 16:58,
archived)
Is it me...Or is jordan turning into whats her face off Planet of the apes?
I'd still like her boobs tho.
(,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:13,
archived)
I'd still like her boobs tho.
she looks better like thatgawd she looks like dean gaffney
( Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:16,
archived)
I thaught that was helana bolom carteror someone.
also : phwoar
(also : phwoar
Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:31,
archived)
Michael Jackson has come back ot of hiding after faking his death for his latest surgery MrSanity has maybe kicked the WoW habit forever,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:46,
archived)
That's nice..* TEXT ON AN IMAGE
Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 8:53,
archived)
really
'ningles all (or one person. It's Sunday after all. Imaginary deity's day of hangovers.
riverghost servicing your mum since,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 9:26,
archived)
Wonderful!Edit:
And on that note I'm off to bed. But I'll give a
hearty Happy B3day to Archie' in case I'm
not around until after it passes before I go. Night all.
(And on that note I'm off to bed. But I'll give a
hearty Happy B3day to Archie' in case I'm
not around until after it passes before I go. Night all.
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 9:34,
archived)
cheers fella :) The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 12:36,
archived)
Why am I looking at a picture of...hang on a minuet, thats not your dog
( Jamnog Sardines in her eyebrows, lobsters up and down,
Sun 30 Aug 2009, 10:33,
archived)
« Older messages | Newer messages »
