b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 37412 (Older | Newer)

# Can we Flex it?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:25, archived)
# I do not get body building at all.
Sure - get in shape. But that sort of stuff? Don't get it.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:28, archived)
# It's all about willy touching
Do you know him?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:29, archived)
# Agreed
But that Wendy loves it
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:32, archived)
# that's a bit good
nice one Q
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:30, archived)
# Morn' Bilbo
and thanks. One of my boys loves Bob and Postman Pat.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:33, archived)
# My Boy is into Thomas
and weirdly - Barney - he loves that annoyinh purple Dinosaur
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:38, archived)
# Jesus!!
I refuse to expose my kids to that evil purple bastard.
I expected more from you Bilbo ;)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:42, archived)
# First *Click* o' the week!
Brilliant sir! :)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:31, archived)
# Ta ninj
I found an old dancin ninja gif at the weekend, I'll have to dig it up for ya.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:37, archived)
# nice one squire
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:32, archived)
# Haha
thank you good fellow!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:38, archived)
# *Clicks
He's compensating for having a small tool
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:34, archived)
# No wanking spanners needed
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:43, archived)
# He's been pumpin' plastic
:D
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:48, archived)
# Hehe
:)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:04, archived)
# hahahahahaha!
Ace!

(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:49, archived)
# Hahaha
The first pic's a great comparison to Winstone in the film
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:56, archived)
# All my Woo pics ever, Sorry I don't have more!!! click click click!





(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:28, archived)
# Apologies if it's the Shirliest of all the Binduns.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:25, archived)
# :) - poor little arms? how do they crack one off?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:30, archived)
# trying to make a fat elvis

but it comes out like bernard manning.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:53, archived)
# Braw!
Is it made of fat?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:55, archived)
# sculpted from pure lard
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:59, archived)
# Smashing!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:04, archived)
# Pumpkins
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:06, archived)
# Homer Simpson smiling politely.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:11, archived)
# Haha, great episode
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:12, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:14, archived)
# That's cool.
Is he to go in one of your UFO things?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:56, archived)
# aye
its gonna be a bit flashy, in an elvisy sort of way
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:03, archived)
# Ace! Rhinestones in spaaaaaaace...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:09, archived)
# Elvis has left the Galaxy
:D
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:10, archived)
# Is it a gaint flying toilet?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:10, archived)
# i dont want to upset the evis fans too much
just a little bit
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:24, archived)
# nice attention to detail
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:59, archived)
# Superb - you are the model master :D
I'm hoping that thing in his right hand will be a cheese burger?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:08, archived)
# it will be eventually
just ran out of stuff to sculpt with
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:22, archived)
# Amazing!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:26, archived)
# or a fat Yngwie Malmsteen
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:32, archived)
# :D...\0/ ...:D
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:59, archived)
# Scaryduck's newspaper anger blog's proper good.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:47, archived)
# i actually starred in an angry photo a few months back
in fact i organised it
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:00, archived)
# What was the focus of your rage?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:09, archived)
# plans to build a chippy outside my front door

although the main campaign was to stop the local brewery converting part of a public assembly hall into said chippy, the hall is shared with the pub
www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=21897504390

that's not the official press pic, which had more angry folk in it, the link is dead. the pic is the MD of mc mullens shopped onto col saunders

and we won for the second time.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:15, archived)
# Hello Ainz, what's doing with yer?

Really? Well that's not so good then. If I was you I'd get someone in to look at it.

Na, no more than fifty quid. It just needs a new bit of piping and a couple of
washers then scoosh a bit of Jeyes through it. Try this lot, here's their number.

No bother, pal. See yer about.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:43, archived)
# YOUR COUS COUS IS FUCKING SHIT!
Hello dears.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:47, archived)
# bloody hell
long time no see

that's scary!

what's for lunch?

(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:49, archived)
# Aye.
I think I might have a Morrisonses cheese and roastbeef sandwich, Irn Bru, some beef Hula Hoops folowed by a nap down by the sea. Yerself?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:52, archived)
# that sounds Braw
I have nothing

I may nip to the Onestop for a pastie
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:31, archived)
# O_O
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:51, archived)
# I don't think he wants to fix it
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:54, archived)
# He is a tri-faced-god-of-partyfood
And Heston is just mental...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:57, archived)
# hahaha! splendid
good to see you sir
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:59, archived)
# slow board!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:43, archived)
# Oh God!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:45, archived)
# oh Zod!
lol threadrush
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:48, archived)
# You wait and you wait and then three come at once...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:49, archived)
# much like a bukakke video
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:53, archived)
# Sadly the headlines never live up to reality :(
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:41, archived)
# sadly not
nice monster meatball
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:43, archived)
# heh heh......thought it was world's largest turd forra minute
:)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:43, archived)
# nah
that's about 10 minutes away yet.

*shifts seating position*
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:47, archived)
# no scat outside the gay shift
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:48, archived)
# WELL WHY NOT GODDAMMIT!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:54, archived)
# clock is ticking
pics or.......:)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:52, archived)
# haha
I have to shuffle my way there yet.

I sprained my ankle quite badly last night.
/3 hours in A&E blog
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:53, archived)
# donated to the homeless
because no other fucker would dare to eat it.

'ning
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:50, archived)
# insta-heart attack
ning Thor
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:51, archived)
# and all in the name of CHARITY!........boy ,they sure know how to claim double whammy's
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:55, archived)
# Arrrrghhhhh! The food that bites back!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:47, archived)
# sounds like my chilli
oof
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:54, archived)
# ah, for food that bites back: Tuna + mayonnaise+a lot of habanero sauce (or rather the hottest sauce you can find) all in a sandwich....
mmmmmmmmmmm......
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:03, archived)
# or how about a live catfish sandwich!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:15, archived)
# the bread tends to get a bit soggy underwater.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:18, archived)
# hehe
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:48, archived)
# Is the comedy not working out for Omid Djalili
he has resorted to meatball making?

Monster! Monster!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:19, archived)
# ning peeps
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:12, archived)
# That's no moon
oh wait...yes, yes it is
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:17, archived)
# I find this an invaluable aid to celestial objects...


'Ning.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:25, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:37, archived)
# that's no spacestation.... It's a moon!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:45, archived)
# "A Nun of that order couldn't get this deep into the internet on her own...."
"She must have gotten lost, been part of a convent, or something."
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:28, archived)
# Stop this immediately
I have no spanging irons
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:36, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:26, archived)
# Took me a minute...
... and then there was an audible "Oh, for fuck's sake..."

NINGS!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:56, archived)
# ha ha
very good
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:17, archived)
# Silly Mr Johnson
.
You should have chilled and had a spliff instead mate
.

.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:10, archived)
# This story is great.
"Scientist - what do you think?"

"I think this."

"WRONG! You're fired."

It's great - a career politician decides that they themself know more about a scientific issue than a formally trained, experienced scientist, who's been specifically employed to study it, does.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:16, archived)
# The world is flat
no really the world IS flat..
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:21, archived)
# Sadly
This is entirely normal.

Politicians soon become so satisfied with their own adequacy that they believe themselves to be more authoritative than those experts that are employed to advise them, in matters scientific, defense, security and legal.

Silly politician, you are not an expert, you are not even qualified to have a proper job!
 
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:25, archived)
# "silly"?.........I think your a wee bit too kind there
get stuck in:D
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:28, archived)
# this
it's the only outlet politicians have for I-think-my-own-thoughts - normally they just get told what to think by mandarins
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:28, archived)
# i don't think the Chinese have that much influence in our politics do they?
lacist lols
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:39, archived)
# I don't think it's that at all
I think it's down to the government not wanting to take on unpopular scientific opinion.

At the end of the day, most the beer-guzzling, fag-smoking masses believe drugs are bad and wrong.
If the governemnt makes proposals based on scientific evidence to the contrary, the public will desert them.

And I fear in this instance, a lot of the public feel that Dr Nutt doesn't know what he's talking about. Science or no science.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:33, archived)
# I'm not going to have an opinion on it until I find out what the Daily Mail thinks
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:34, archived)
# They think "New labour Fucks Up Again"
while keeping very schtum about they think about Dr Nutt's findings, which they probably disagree with, but they won't say that
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:39, archived)
# Whats got me
is the fact all the attention seems to be on his findings about cannabis, and very little on the 'dangerousness' of alcohol, and lack of regarding tabacco
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:26, archived)
# that's one arrogant cunt right there
one of many
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:22, archived)
# Loliticians...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:28, archived)
# HAHAHAHAHAHA.......full-on lols .......love these kind


(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:33, archived)
# that
is pure win right there!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 23:36, archived)
# Trouble is he's not presenting
a scientific opinion. Saying that smoking a spliff is
less dangerous than getting sclerosis through 20 years of binge
drinking may be true but the examples are non-comparable.
Also making something legal because something "more dangerous"
is already legal makes no sense and is not the business of scientists anyway.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:53, archived)
# GIVE US THE DRUGS MAN
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:02, archived)
# Spot on!
You've just summed up Nutt's political
and financial interests in one sentence.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:05, archived)
# \o/
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:06, archived)
# So, let's keep the drugs business in the hands of criminal gangs
prosecute people who have a drugs problem and sit and hope it will go away..
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:12, archived)
# You said that, not me.
Criticising a suggested policy doesn't
mean I'm advocating the status quo.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:19, archived)
# Is your opinion something like this?
Science can tell us the probabilities of things
Risk-taking is a personal choice
Banning the personal use of things for being dangerous is immoral
Besides, many human risks are unassessable because of humans not being automatons
Science therefore has no bearing on banning drugs etc.

...if so I like it.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:56, archived)
# Of course it could be more like this:
Some risks are more insiduous than others
Comparing overt risks with hidden risks is invalid
People tend to overlook these risks due to being dimwitted
It is the duty of government to protect us from these risks, like a stern but kindly father
It's not the business of scientists to forcibly deny us things we like and treat us like retards.

In which case that would suck.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:04, archived)
# Or maybe even
it's that every subsequent government will have to obey the advisory council on the misuse of drugs to the letter, after this incident, and Nutt wants to make it completely independent of government, which means that it would tell us exactly what to do and we couldn't get rid of it by voting.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:14, archived)
# I would have liked to be first to reply to you but you beat me to it. ;>)
Well it's good to see a request for clarification of my opinion. It beats telling me what I think every time. I agree with all of your above post except for the last line. I think science should have a bearing on drug legislation as I believe laws should not be made against damaging oneself but should be made against damaging others.
There is evidence that much violent crime, including murder, is carried out under the influence of drugs including cannabis. This also applies to alcohol. Maybe a long jail sentence, if we had any places left, would be a deterrent but banning or legalising drugs taking misses the point. It's the associated crimes that need to be addressed and from which we need protection. Killing yourself by "ignorance" when there is so much information available should be your own risk.
Even Dr Nutt says of his children, "I've always told them about the dangers of drugs."
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:26, archived)
# Not sure what laws (or repeals) that stance leads to.
More laws against doing things, like driving, while drunk or stoned?

I think I'm generally against punishing people for things they appear to risk doing, but reading* "Moral Luck" by Thomas Nagel recently has confused me somewhat. If you can be clearly shown to have increased your likelihood of committing manslaughter to 0.4%, it's hard to say why you shouldn't be punished for having committed 0.4% of a manslaughter. I think the point is probably that you can't ever be clearly shown to have done that, and such statistical assessments overlook individual differences, and the whole centrally managed system is anti-rational (preventing people from being independent agents in creating ideas); but then that could be said about all laws. Heh.

*Reading half of. Must find out how it ends at some point, might make me less confused.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:48, archived)
# It's a quagmire of a subject, I know
and I wouldn't pretend to know even half of the answers.
Statistics I agree, should be brought into context. I don't believe that likelihood percentages should be taken into account if say, a person prone to bouts of anger knowingly takes a substance that reduces his inhibitions then commits a violent crime. Similarly if a driver drinks knowing his faculties will be impaired he is deliberately increasing the odds of harming others.
In general terms I believe our laws, enforced by the police, the judiciary and the prison system should protect us from anyone who would deliberately harm us. Unfortunately this ethic seems to have partially collapsed and we are far more likely to be jailed for trying to preserve our legal rights by protecting ourselves. Or maybe for accidentally harming, such as a doctor who makes a mistake.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:12, archived)
# Umm...
If cannabis was made legal, all the gangs currently making money from it would not simply go and get a job at B&Q instead. They would use thier smuggling, storage and distribution network for harder drugs instead and move the problem up a scale, surely?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:34, archived)
# I don't think that would create more use of harder drugs. Unless perhaps we tax the soft ones so much they go up in price.
It's true that those people with a primary motivation of being nasty, who are interested in selling drugs as an illicit way to make money (rather than out of a wholesome interest in drugs, like cheesemongers have an interest in cheese), would still find ways to be nasty and make money illicitly - quite likely less useful ways - and it wouldn't make any difference to that. (Those with a primary motivation of selling drugs for its own sake would find themselves becoming respectable tradesmen.)
Pot smokers would be less likely to meet any bad guys, which is nice, but that's about as far as the argument goes.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:08, archived)
# So in your view
the chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs is unqualified to offer opinions on the misuse of drugs, and downgrading cannabis to class C is the same thing as making it legal.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:17, archived)
# Opinions on the misuse of drugs yes.
Downgrading is an alteration to law and doesn't
fall within his remit.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:22, archived)
# You've misunderstood
.
Nutt didn't call for the legalisation of anything.

He wasn't presenting his opinion but an evidence based analysis of different drugs.

If anything the figures indicate that alcohol should be made illegal. (oh and I think you mean cirrhosis not 'sclerosis')
.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:24, archived)
# Alcohol, and horseriding. That's the logic of making dangerous things illegal.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:34, archived)
# Downgrading to class C in practice means
people generally won't be prosecuted. To me that is an
underhand way of legalising it. Yes I did mean cirrhosis.
I also meant sclerosis, it's the same thing.
/medical expert blog.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:29, archived)
# Gooooooood Mooooooorrrrrning!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:26, archived)
# morning, morning fish
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:26, archived)
# hahahah! Puckerfish.....
good nings to you all on this bright, but brisk, Monday morning!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:40, archived)
# Morning, The Board!
Who's doing Movember? I have trimmed my goatee and am now sporting a rather fine David Niven.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:47, archived)
# GIVE ME MONEY
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:52, archived)
# it had better be a damn good moustache; I expect a full curled and waxed villain moustashe for having to brave paypal's login system!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:07, archived)
# I've had to change my style already
my plan to incoroprate it into my sideburns is against the rules apparently.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:14, archived)
# can't you just shave a gap where your sideys meet your hair?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:29, archived)
# Like a redneck with sideburns....
I'll have to consult the T&Cs

*consults*

That seems fine
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:34, archived)
# sounds like a splendid plan
i shall be growing my own, we need a team b3ta

Edit, we now have team b3ta.com
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:16, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:14, archived)
# He was one suave motherfucker
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:19, archived)
# I don't think "motherfucker" is an appropriate term to describe David Niven.
I prefer "splendid chap"
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:25, archived)
# although if anyone could make fucking mothers classy
it was him
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:30, archived)
# he fucked my mum, and yours
in fact he did so much fucking in the 50s and 60s he changed the whole bloodline forever.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:40, archived)
# hello fishy
:)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 9:24, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:44, archived)
#
paintbynumbersofthebeast2
Paint by Numbers of the Beast: Possibly the cleverest thing I ever came up with.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:06, archived)
# #666 : Blood Red
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:08, archived)
# fuck me, that's good
:D
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:10, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 7:56, archived)
#
Hah! very nice indeed!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:34, archived)
# 616
shirley?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:51, archived)
# 668 Neighbour of the Beast
but yes I think yours is correct they revised it apparently
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:11, archived)
# Eff that noise.
666 will always be the number.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 11:05, archived)
# 616
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 10:07, archived)
# GOOD MORNING!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:04, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:06, archived)
# YOU'RE IN THE ARMY NOW
 

 
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:12, archived)
# Oh yeah, I made this album cover, I forgot.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:54, archived)
# Oooh liking this
Are Symposium making a comeback?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:07, archived)
# That's the title, not the band name.
Don't know if there are any conventions to indicate which is which on an album cover. Having looked up Symposium, they sound like a better band.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:12, archived)
# If there is a convention then neither of us have heard of it
Top work. I hope they're paying you handsomely.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:22, archived)
# I got a hundred quid loan to help pay my rent
and some left over cake, various free drinks, and other stuff. Maybe that was all unconnected to the album cover actually. Seems fair, anyway.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:27, archived)
# Nice!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:27, archived)
# It's all carefully researched and based on original sources from around the start of the 5th century BC
For instance the piece of folded cloth is based on the one in this piece of explicitly pornographic pottery.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:31, archived)
# THIS.. IS.. BUMSEX!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:34, archived)
# I don't know why he's fellating that strap-on exactly.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:35, archived)
# preparation is the key
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:45, archived)
# I mean that picture is just full of information
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:55, archived)
# i know, i've seen countless videos of ladies doing that
it always confuses me.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 8:55, archived)
# Hahaha!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:36, archived)
# TOAP
shit

coke float then bed
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:01, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:06, archived)
# ahhhhhh
sorry mate :(
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:08, archived)
# [/;-D
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:09, archived)
# next time
gadget......next time
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:11, archived)
# great stuff
 
which reminds me, I should rip my copy of Talking With the Taxman About Poetry
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:35, archived)
# mmmm
BNP?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:05, archived)
# Can anybody else see a BNP message in this picture?
If I've accidentally made a BNP advert instead of a scene from an ancient greek drinking party then that's seriously careless of me.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:22, archived)
# your use of contrast and perspective has a subliminal connection to the Banco Nacional de Panamá
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:28, archived)
# Dammit I may have to start over, I'm not sure my clients want to be associated with those people.
I mean what do they stand for? "Facilitamos las transacciones internacionales de nuestros clientes a través de una amplia red de bancos corresponsales". That could mean anything.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:40, archived)
# pet it
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:01, archived)
# lovely twinkling eyes


the bush babies are not what they seem
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:05, archived)
# Fuck no...it turns into a bat!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:06, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:18, archived)
# Hey Rocky, watch me pull a human out of my neck!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:58, archived)
# woop, wrong hat
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:10, archived)
# haha
i already know what this person looks like, based on his neck hair alone.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:13, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:26, archived)
# : )
 
took a while to find the bugger
www.ecal.ch/images_photographie.php?id=92&lang=en
wasn't he in the newsletter at some point?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:46, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:54, archived)
# DON'T LET'S START
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:00, archived)
# YIFF YIFF GRRRRRRRRR MEOW!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:05, archived)
# WAKE UP, SMELL THE CATFOOD
IN YOUR BANK ACCOUNT
 
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:35, archived)
# / I'M A SMOOTH OPERATOR/ I'M A MOOD ELEVATOR/
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 4:39, archived)
#
 

 
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:15, archived)
# Ahahahaha!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 5:28, archived)
#
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:29, archived)
# #Pointless information ticker#
I am currently on the frontpage of halflife2.net/
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:09, archived)
# nice hat
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:12, archived)
# Smack it!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:12, archived)
# ahahaahahaha
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:35, archived)
# awwwwww
 
it knows things
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:18, archived)
# also: HOLY FUCKING CRAP
Benicio del Toro in Wolfman remake for 2010
www.imdb.com/title/tt0780653/

unfortunately it's directed by the guy who brought you the Rocketeer and Jumanji, but OH, BENICIO
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:19, archived)
# if I didn't already want to be a wrwofl this would definitely change my mind
 
ARRROOOOOOOAOOOAOOAOOAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:47, archived)
# I kinda lost my way with this one,
didn't really know where it was going in the first place.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:51, archived)
# *fears*
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:01, archived)
# I'm not sure which aspect of this picture frightens me the most
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:05, archived)
# For me it's the brown.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:11, archived)
# Were you flicking through the Z section of the Necronomicon again?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:19, archived)
# Necktie?
Nickel?
 
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:59, archived)
# (shit. wrong way round AGAIN!!)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:04, archived)
# it was definitely an N word.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:18, archived)
# ...just toys...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:51, archived)
# IT LIVES
and that's all there is to it.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:57, archived)
# A rare shot of a Gronk in the wild...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:28, archived)
# WTF?!?!?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:29, archived)
# A GRONK!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:32, archived)
# I like the cut of his jib!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:33, archived)
# GRONK
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:42, archived)
# (((((gronk))))
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:06, archived)
# *peers*
hmm... ah, there it is!

...does it hover?

(in other news, i think i just found my favorite tv tropes artical:
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ptitleijqobqvle9an?from=Main.BRIANBLESSED )
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:31, archived)
# Hahaha, I love tvtropes.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:33, archived)
# i can't but hate it
...i should have been in bed an hour ago
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:35, archived)
# goddamn if I look at that site much more I will lose half the afternoon easy
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:46, archived)
# I know, it's got the same level of linking to other or related articles as wikipedia.
But the difference is the stuff is actually fucking interesting to read.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:53, archived)
# ahhhahhhahh
some of those wimps find the Dresden Dolls "creepy"
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/NightmareFuel/MusicVideos

AND YES, THERE GOES MY FUCKING AFTERNOON
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:43, archived)
# DIIIIIIIIIVE!!!!!!!


ditto
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:46, archived)
# well it's not just that site
I started on these before lunch

www.nichtlustig.de/toondb/090928.html
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:58, archived)
# my german's not really up to that ...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:05, archived)
# yeah I had to run some of the punchlines through a translator, where the joke wasn't obvious..
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:20, archived)
# incidentally the one I linked there is "Rabbit again, already?"
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:21, archived)
# a "haha" is due then
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:44, archived)
# LAL
(Lacht Aus Laut)

or to be precise, LOL (Lautes Online Lachen)
very specific, these Germans
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:51, archived)
# the strip is simply called "Not Funny"
so you can see the appeal..
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 3:52, archived)
# Lots of people say it has that effect
which is surprising for a kind of single-subject-area encyclopedia. I guess it must be an Important Site.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:54, archived)
# I like this one too
everything2.com/

it has taken me to some surprising places, most of which I've since forgot
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:13, archived)
# GRONK!
*throws safari-ball*
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:32, archived)
# throw 2!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:39, archived)
# Five!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:53, archived)
# YEEEHAAWWWWW!!!...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:58, archived)
# GLEE
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:59, archived)
# awwwwwwwwwwwwww!
 
that looks like it could probably flip over and run on its ears and tail
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:34, archived)
# nope...4 legs at the center of gravity.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:44, archived)
# It doesn't look too happy at having its picture taken.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:35, archived)
# He believes cameras steal your soul.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:45, archived)
# I WANT ONE
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:38, archived)
# Try to catch him...go on...
...what are you afraid of?...
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:46, archived)
# That is gronk-tastic :D
Little guy's probably more scared of us than we are of him.
And vice versa.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:41, archived)
# He likes legs the best...
...long chewy bones.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:47, archived)
# GRONK
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:46, archived)
# *grunts*... :)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:48, archived)
# FUUUCK!!! GRONKPAN
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:47, archived)
# Gronkpan's Posse!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:49, archived)
# this is real puma
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:00, archived)
# *(sig overload)*
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:39, archived)
# Put a gronk on it!
Woo!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:37, archived)
# :D :D :D
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:38, archived)
# Did you say

C R O N K ?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 2:31, archived)
# Oh. Naughty demon.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:27, archived)
# o8oo-pissflaps?
0_0
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:28, archived)
# Hello you.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:30, archived)
# Yo Anna
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 1:05, archived)
# HA!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:29, archived)
# And hello to you, sir! (:
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:30, archived)
# Hey Bob Todd!
I see you have a blog....
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:31, archived)
# Which I don't update all that often because Wordpress is a shit and refuses to believe my photos have uploaded.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:33, archived)
# Bah,
you need a new blog.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:36, archived)
# It's not really meant to be a blog blog;
just somewhere I could show people my photos to whom I might not want to show my deviantart gallery (i.e. potential employers, workmates)
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:38, archived)
# Have you got
that A4 sized?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:33, archived)
# Yes.
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:33, archived)
# Is that
all 'ship shape and Bristol fashion?'
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:38, archived)
# WTFAYBOA?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:40, archived)
# Pffft!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:33, archived)
# Have you ever met a 'nice' demon?
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:34, archived)
# *something about Nice, France*
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA! Oh mercy!
(, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 0:35, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds