But if your local network is filtering out a website you want to visit, then this might make it accessible. It works by converting URLs into raw IP addresses (e.g., www.friv.com/ >>> 77.92.85.19/)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:29, Reply)
cant wait to try that out at school
i'll message you if it works tommorrow
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:34, Reply)
it's your own time you're wasting!
/teacher rant blog
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:47, Reply)
Actually I miss my college days, even if I chose the wrong subjects....
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:53, Reply)
The buggers here have the IP blocked and all...
Fiddle sticks.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:56, Reply)
So I probably won't be able to visit that url
D:
Looks very good all the same, and should work a charm.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 17:34, Reply)
I can't thank you enough!! This will make surfing a lot less stressful!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 18:03, Reply)
They all sound so bloody calm, even when they guy says "radar contact lost", he must've been shitting himself
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:28, Reply)
But I want these guys on MY side.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:55, Reply)
"OUR SHITTING PLANE IS GOING DOWN! OOHHHH....CHRIIIIIIST!"
"This is air traffic control...GOD HELP YOU!!! OHHHH JESUS! LAND IT IN THE WATER, BRIAN! IN THE FUCKING WATER!"
"I'LL HAVE A GO! OOOOHHHH....GOOOOOD....THIS IS BLOODY AAAAAWFUL!"
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 17:02, Reply)
" just doing the job we were trained to do"
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 17:55, Reply)
It was unnerving to hear the 2 pilots so calm when they knew they were going to die. It went something like:
"We're going down"
"I know it"
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 18:55, Reply)
Actual screencaps of subtitles on some foreign LOTRD dvd. I almost died laughing.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:26, Reply)
Anyway, this is another classic:
winterson.com/2009/01/episode-iii-backstroke-of-west-redux.html
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:50, Reply)
LolChristopher Lee!
www.winterson.com.nyud.net/pics2/botw19.jpg
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 17:00, Reply)
I gave up watching the film and concentrated on the engrish subtitles, they were better than the film and made no sense whatsoever!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:51, Reply)
it makes no sense, unless its for deaf jappers who read english.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 17:35, Reply)
So it was a translation of a translation
Vader's "Nooooooooooooooo" became "DO NOT WANT"
:D
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 19:00, Reply)
Is it wrong that I'm even more horrified by the comic sans than by the unicorns?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:53, Reply)
I love unicorns.....sorry.
We girls get different factory brain settings
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:00, Reply)
And you're using your Dad's computer, while he's still at work, aren't you? ;-)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:08, Reply)
so is My Little Pony Cos-play
pics.livejournal.com/ofthelily/gallery/00021yy9
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:17, Reply)
can't be real Shirley? still pretty cool mind you
GC sagt nein
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:48, Reply)
that would be rather cute and no mistake :-)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:59, Reply)
It's like saying "Jump!" to a stone...
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:08, Reply)
I was bored today, so i did a little bit of juggling and set it to creepy clown music.
Fun!!!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:44, Reply)
had a couple of auditions for jobs now, made some good contacts.
Got an audition tomorrow to be in an acrobatics team on a cruise ship travelling round the bahamas :-D
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:49, Reply)
as someone with the worst hand/eye co-ordination in the world, I salute you
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:51, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsVIOp4wz88
juggling off the floor
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:55, Reply)
Called Ed Cox, he's revolutionised the clowncore industry.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:37, Reply)
I searched back to mid Jan, and didn't find this.
Mike Nelson (of MST3K) is eating nothing but bacon in February
I wouldn't like to be sitting next to this man come mid Feb.
And I don't expect him to be alive by the end.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:16, Reply)
She turns up at a label's reception and lets rip.
And delivers a quite woo live performance.
Also, she's a sometime calaborator of Grey Bloke, and so an honourary b3tan, by virtue of that :)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:12, Reply)
In my experience, those little stunts just piss everyone off in the office.
I expect that CD she left them at the end, became a novelty little frisbee for the rest of the day...
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:19, Reply)
but I quite liked it. She's not bad. (Singer that is. I think the socks are not very nice)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:41, Reply)
It cuts off mid-sentence at the end but I'm sure he's saying, "What a fine young boy."
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:57, Reply)
I'm hanging. We made a party bucket last night and got pretty reckless. I fell into a cupboard :D
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:04, Reply)
including but not limited to, cider, vodka, rum, beer, absynthe, whiskey, red wine, white wine, coke and ribena.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:09, Reply)
We had to keep whisking it to stop it separating.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:18, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkEAS_eySw4
0:56 onwards...
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:09, Reply)
Mr Rogers is a national icon in the USA. It's not HE who is creepy it is the times we live in that make it impossible for an adult to converse with a child without suspicion.
Taking the pish out of him is like Yanks deriding Tony Hart or Oliver Postgate.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:23, Reply)
Really, Mr Rogers' Neighbourhood was, with Sesame Street, the best kid's programme on TV when I was growing up (I spent part of my childhood in the states before moving back to the UK at 8). He was a lovely man, genuinely dedicated to education, who started every programme by reassuring the watching children that everyone is an equally special, important individual. He also believed that the scripts on kid's shows should be as well-written as those for grown-up programmes, and that just because children were young, they shouldn't be fobbed off with second-rate entertainment.
Edit: yes, what he^ said. Nearest US equivalent of Hart/Posgate
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:34, Reply)
In the 70s I was naught but a twinkle in my father's underpants.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:38, Reply)
"The chairman of the subcommittee, John O. Pastore, was not previously familiar with Rogers' work, and was sometimes described as gruff and impatient. However, he reported that the testimony had given him goosebumps, and declared, "Looks like you just earned the $20 million." The subsequent congressional appropriation, for 1971, increased PBS funding from $9 million to $22 million.[13]
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 17:24, Reply)
Was impressive to hear what a nice human being he was- and a shame he seems creepy today- but from the sounds of things he was a really really nice guy
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 18:13, Reply)
It sounded very Santana like but not sure.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 19:25, Reply)
"One night in the zoo there's dreadful weather, and a T-Rex chews through his leather tether" is my favourite line...ever!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:07, Reply)
so play some Flash games and enjoy your afternoon
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:19, Reply)
"Your organization's Internet use policy restricts access to this web page at this time. Reason: The Websense category "Games" is filtered."
I need a new job.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:28, Reply)
I really am losing the will to live :(
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:35, Reply)
anon.me
www.hidemyass.com/
www.cantbustme.com/
www.proxymafia.net/
www.browse.ms/
www.proxypimp.com/
www.texasproxy.com/
www.proxrio.com/
www.250.eu/
www.kroxy.net/
www.unblock.biz/
www.proxystart.com/
www.armyproxy.com/
www.anonr.com/
www.webproxy.pro/
www.invisiblesurfing.com/
www.surfaz.com/
www.url.sc/
www.ourproxy.com/
www.nuip.net/
www.unblocked.org/
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:38, Reply)
they all say "The Websense category "Proxy Avoidance" is filtered."
and I'm now probably going to get the sack for trying them! Oh well.
EDIT: Well they first 5 did- I think i'd better stop trying!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:42, Reply)
at my school kent county council filter the internets meaning only the most obscure strange proxies work
as i said filterfreedom.info was the only proxy to wrok last time i checked
www.arcade.freakz.ro is an excellent games site still unblocked
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:06, Reply)
I am an ICT Technician at a school, part of my job to to update the web filter and add sites to block.
I promise to do my very best to keep these sites off that list :)
Nice one.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:43, Reply)
The tutor was politely puzzled when she saw it..
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:46, Reply)
I'm not ignoring him as in IGNORING him, I'm just not speaking to him as he's been mean to me ;)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:59, Reply)
which I can't see in there - maybe someone will know it.
You have 5 or 6 items with which to build a tower in a certain order, get it right and all sorts of wonderful things happen. Get it wrong and a few wonderful things happen but differently.
There was a similar on based on an island.
Help me please!!!
In the mean time I will amuse myself with this collection of treats :D
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:28, Reply)
Tower one is here: www.eyezmaze.com/eyezblog_en/blog/2009/01/grow_tower.html
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:36, Reply)
i've been playing here for a few days, and there are a few games i quite like.
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 3:54, Reply)
I can't help but think the newsletter is responsible for this.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:18, Reply)
It's like a mix between that rubarb cartoon with the dog and some anime I havent seen. enjoy.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:17, Reply)
*clicks* - that is how Pokemon should be :)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:21, Reply)

(Image may have nothing to do with the article)
*edit. lots of debate on this. I have my own views that I'm not goign to force on anyone. (if you really want to know more check my profile)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:31, Reply)
Given that the atheist ads were required to put the word 'probably' in to avoid problems with the ASA, how come the godbotherers get to say 'definitely' on theirs?
*Edited* - I just submitted a complaint. Anyone want to join me? www.asa.org.uk/asa/how_to_complain/complaints_form/
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:42, Reply)
was proposed by a group who claimed scientific basis, therefore it was false advertising?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:44, Reply)
So perhaps they're claiming it's a quoted opinion, and not fact?
Unsure, but it's all quite amusing. Perhaps the atheits and god bothers could have it out in a giant snowball fight
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:48, Reply)
because they believe in stoning, and would just wrap snow round rocks :D
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:49, Reply)
that the word probably was just put in to please the ASA?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:11, Reply)
on a secular public! As far as I am concerned, the atheist bus campaign served as little purpose as a christian campaign would.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:43, Reply)
This.
I think that anyone is allowed to follow whatever belief system they want as long as it doesn't interfere with anyone else's rights. (or is Scientology, sorry but there is an exception to every rule)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:49, Reply)
I myself am a catholic, but I would never try and force my beliefs on other people. If they asked me about it, I would be happy to talk to them about what I believe in and why. The problem is with these atheists, is that they don't seem to realise that they are as fundamental about their beliefs, as certain religious people are, thus contradicting their whole point.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:50, Reply)
I don't have the answers, and neither does anyone else, because it is impossible to know.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:55, Reply)
and I think it's a bit lame. Do you believe there is a god or don't you? Obviously we can't prove there isn't (cf Russell's teapot), although God could really save us all a lot of bother by manifesting in Trafalgar square and clearing the whole thing up. But do you really not have an opinion one way or the other?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:58, Reply)
he is nothing at all like the "God" that all the religions describe.
When good things happen, people thank God - he made it right. When things go badly, God is either ignored or it's "all part of his plan". I like what David Attenborough said about the worm whose sole purpose is to burrow through eyeballs.
I think it's very obvious that most religions arise from the fact that our ancestors couldn't comprehend a lot of what happened, so they filled in the gaps with God.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:09, Reply)
i mean i dont seriously believe in santa claus or faries but that alone doesn't mean they can't exist.
Suspending Judgement is the only way to go when this are not knowable and since philosophy teaches us that Knowledge can never be achieved we have to at suspend judgement on everything...at least a little
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:16, Reply)
But I'm open to many ideas that are beyond our comprehension. Perhaps the universe is just an eternal and cyclical system with no plan? Perhaps it had a begining and will have an end? Perhaps god is chaos? Perhaps the universe is ordered into an intelligence of its own? Perhaps our universe is simply a computer simulation by some consciousness beyond our abilities to percieve?
I don't believe in God or Allah or Jehova, as these are just humanised labels that have been given to things we can't possibly hope to understand. BUT, unlike many of my atheist friends, I am willing to live with cognitive dissonance over this- pretending that you can know 'the truth' is arrogant. It's possible to reject human-based religious traditions without rejecting spirituality. It's also possible to reject the ego-centric/human-centric view of 'God' without claiming that nothing exists beyond our own comprehension (an equally ego/human-centric position).
So I suppose my thoughts about 'god' are confused by the labelling- god is the only word we have for what is beyond our understanding. The core of my belief is that the human mind is a wonderful, but ultimately limited and flawed instrument for attempting to understand the universe. Thus, pretending to know any absolutes is ridiculous.
Having said that, we must learn to explore the nature of the universe within the constraints of our minds. I believe science is the best tool we (currently) have for this, and so I lean much more towards the conventional 'scientific' understanding than I do to a religious one.
So: I suppose I reject the conventional idea of God, but am unwilling to reject the possibility of something beyond ourselves (or 'god'!).
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:17, Reply)
even every Christian has a different idea of what God is
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:24, Reply)
Sorry, I know we've had this discussion before, but still, I can't let that pass. How is 'There is probably no god, so stop worrying and enjoy your life' even comparable to the statements of fundamentalist religious nutters? When did Richard Dawkins advocate killing people who disagreed with him or blasphemed against the sacred word of Darwin? Get some perspective.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:55, Reply)
I am not saying that it does, however, I have never read a religious text that does sanction or advocate murder. That is down to the interpretation of certain people for their own ends. The point I was trying to make was that a fundamental discounting of anyones beliefs, either way, serves no purpose.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:01, Reply)
then how can the word be relied upon?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:20, Reply)
But that is the nature of humanity, no matter who put it here....
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:36, Reply)
clearly the bible has too many metaphors and hyperbole than any factual story
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:46, Reply)
Atheists generally believe there is no god because there is no evidence to suggest that there is one. It's easy to suggest examples of hypothetical evidence which, should it appear, would change their mind (cf my post above, but also Haldane's 'Fossil rabbits in the Precambrian').
Religious people believe despite the lack of evidence, and there is no evidence that you can suggest that would make them change their view (indeed, the whole 'virtue' of faith is that it is maintained despite the lack of evidence)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:37, Reply)
and sparked off a massive public debate. Seems like a good thing in my view. I thought it was fascinating that such a mild-mannered thing could spark so much outrage.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:51, Reply)
involved in the debate was made any more aware by the campaign, it simply forced people into it more which I don't believe is necessary.
And on the mild-mannered thing, I don't see how anyone could expect a public advertisement that states everything that you believe in is bollocks can really be claimed as mild mannered, no matter the naivety of the intention.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:55, Reply)
not at believers. Obviously that's a bit disingenuous, but still, it's incredibly mild compared to the Christian ads you see all over the place, which claim that everything *I* believe in is bollocks. In fact, doesn't *every* ad claim that one way or another?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:01, Reply)
I personally think that anything that claims truth not based on proven evidence shouldn't be allowed.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:03, Reply)
Me, I'm a agnostic, no religion gives me any answers, but I really hope that humanity is not the highest level of conscious in the universe.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:11, Reply)
I have faith, but I don't necessarily believe in Jesus Christ being the son of God, and I don't necessarily believe in a God who controls all that happens on earth and in the universe. However, I do consider myself a Catholic.
Religion, as with any tool, is only as helpful or as dangerous as the person who is using it. A hammer in a builders hands helps make a house, but in a Yorkshiremans hands it becomed a murder weapon ;)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:17, Reply)
But yay! for mannered dabate :)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:42, Reply)
is to use it for bad?
then its you who is wrong, not the fundamentalists
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:53, Reply)
Do you not have faith in yourself?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:21, Reply)
That's what kicked off the "Atheist Bus" campaign.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:09, Reply)
I don't get your point. I didn't see those adverts, but as far as I am concerned, people will not suddenly not believe in God or Jesus Christ as the Messiah purely as a result of an advert. And I also believe the opposite is true.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:15, Reply)
It doesn't take into account the dialogue that has begun about advertising religion, which was possibly the point in the first place. I don't want any view pressed upon me, thank you very much.
I love the etiquette the ASA had to use in order to inoffensively point out that *both* sides don't have any imperical proof of their opinions, hence rendering both arguements useless.
Bu tthe person up there making the 'lion on the loose' analogy has it precisely right - if ou can't prove it either way, stop advertising opinion as fact altogether.
That is all.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:23, Reply)
If you read through my first comment, I stated that I don't agree with Christian advertising either, and I am a Christian.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:29, Reply)
...and this whole Atheist campaign is nothing but a reactionary stunt.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:27, Reply)
Well I don't believe that to be the case. As I stated, I don't believe in Christian advertising either. However, what this has done is not bring to the fore the opinion that christians, muslims, jews, whoever can't advertise, it has just made the carte blanche a lot bigger by setting such a public precedent.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:31, Reply)
1. if God is willing but unable to prevent evil, he is not omnipotent
2. if God is able but not willing to prevent evil, he is not good
3. if God is willing and able to prevent evil, then why is there evil?
And if he is unwilling and unable to prevent evil, why call him God?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 19:18, Reply)
Imagine downhill mountain biking crazyness. Then imagine that, but with 4 wheels instead of 2.
Its hilarious.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:29, Reply)
I would well do crazy shit like that! At least there is no more chance of you making your legs work any less....
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 15:11, Reply)
Gillian McKeith has been telling oor First Minister, Alex Salmond to lose weight: story
See the results for yersel'
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:20, Reply)
I fuckin hate that woman with a passion - she should be force-fed Lorne sausage until she bursts.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:18, Reply)
That awful woman is a quack, charlatan. snake oil seller and frankly spouts utter utter shit.
Kill it with hammers!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 16:57, Reply)
"There probably wasn't a goal. So stop whining and get on with your life"
(Although seriously: it was one goal, once. Some of us don't get to see any of our chosen sport on British TV.)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:13, Reply)
doesn't have the black and white "advertising imminent" bar in the top right corner.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:54, Reply)
Following on from excellent Algorhythm March posted yesterday, here's some Heath Robinson, or Rube Goldberg (to our American cousins) machines. As a fun game, see how many booze related items are used...
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 12:54, Reply)
Was totally, TOTALLY obsessed with them about a year ago. Got to the point where I could sing in Japanese and everything.
Woo!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:49, Reply)
the full set of these (which aren't actually the opening titles) on a DVD box set from Japan.
I could share them if
a) there's interest
b) someone could suggest a place to upload them without getting sued.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:15, Reply)
And yes please!!! Can we have the bit where the two penguin puppets have continental drift explained to them by Televis-jon. :)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:23, Reply)
It won't let me change the actual title (avec les cocking spelling mistake and all). I don't think I can live with the shame. Balls!
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:29, Reply)
the "rube goldberg" bits, not the whole show.
But there are millions of 'em.
Edit: ...and I still need a place to upload them. I put them on YouTube before and they deleted them, which I thought was particularly mean as the above video is still there.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:33, Reply)
My mate Matt introduced them to me a few years back over a bottle of crackin' red wine and a fatty-boom-batty, or two. A simply delightful show.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:42, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »


