
A friend's dad once stormed up to me and threatened to "punch your stupid face in" because I pointed a camera at him. I was 11. Have you ever done something innocent or made a harmless joke that ended in threats to your person? Tell us about it.
Thanks to Skullfunkerry for the suggestion
( , Thu 26 Sep 2013, 12:28)
« Go Back

So, I'm out in the car. My cousin, who was about 10 at the time, was sat in the passenger seat as I was "babysitting" (for want of a better expression) that day.
Needless to say, as 10-year-olds tend to to, she's egging me on to drive faster and faster. We got to about 140mph along a stretch of dual carriageway before I had to ease off as traffic was building up ahead. Anyway, with the speed down to about 80mph, the blue flashing lights appeared in my mirror and I get pulled over.
The usual script gets read out, about how "dangerous" it is etc etc... "and how would you feel if your daughter there got hurt?" (To be fair, she does look like she could be.)
Automatically I said "she's not my daughter". Before I could finish my sentence with "she's my cousin", this little twat of a copper said "oh right, your girlfriend, you look like a paedo to me".
Needless to say, this did not sit well with me, and the red mist descended. By the time his colleage had got out of the car and held me back, Plod was on the floor, me having repeatedly lamped him in the head. He had a black eye, a split lip and a bloody nose.
Backup arrived, and I retrieved my phone from my pocket, stopped it recording and played the recording back to the uniforms who had arrived. They let me go as soon as they heard it.
Needless to say, Plod whined to the CPS and I got a summons for a. speeding, and b. assaulting a police officer. It gets to court. The recording gets played - at which point the CPS withdraw their case.
I get awarded costs, the copper gets sacked.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 17:46, 446 replies)


( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 0:23, closed)

it would be a shame if the farsighted accuracy of colonel boris was to remain unacknowledged
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 13:47, closed)

Truly beautiful (apart from the subject matter).
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 0:12, closed)

I can't square the above pen pic with your bird images tbh :)
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 0:37, closed)

375 replies later - it must have been massive
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 21:00, closed)

'The nasty man was rude to me' is a totally justifiable defence.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 18:35, closed)

STOP RIGHT THERE!
THIS IS A COMMON MISUNDERSTANDING. THE PARTIAL DEFENCE OF PROVOCATION HAS BEEN REPLACED WITH ONE OF "LOSS OF CONTROL" BOTH OF WHICH APPLIED ONLY IN CASES OF HOMICIDE.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:06, closed)

b3ta.com/questions/guiltysecrets/post88784
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 18:06, closed)

a simpler time, when confessions of noncery could go unchallenged.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:11, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 18:27, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 18:34, closed)

1. She's my cousin, 2. she was 10 years old at the time. I know this is b3ta but that's still fucking wrong...
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:00, closed)

He totally challenged your manliness. I bet he's a nonce himself. Yeah, go on, fucking do him.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:05, closed)

He called you a nonce, go on, record it on your phone and go to town on the cunt! Fucking bastard deserves it!
Track him down and fucking give him what for!
Make it your life mission to avenge the honour of your fictitious cousin, find this piece of shit and make him pay for his nasty words. Ooh yeah, make that cunt wish he'd never been born. We'll all bear witness in court to the slander and provocation that justified violent retribution.
Go on you big puff, Hit Him!
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:51, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:07, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:40, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:53, closed)

Saw a new lass's fanny last night. Looked like a crap butcher throwing out giblets. Still..lovely small soft hands and no gag reflex.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:40, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:02, closed)

It's well lol and more often than not rofl.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 18:52, closed)

Tremendous fun. I too quite often bash policemen (and policewoman) for looking at me wrong, or spilling my pint.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:03, closed)

But you deserve top billing.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 18:55, closed)

Bit graceless of the plod to complain to the CPS, after you kindly permitted him to live. Some people...
EDIT: Don't let it get your goat, it's a satyr.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 19:16, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 14:19, closed)

Merely pointing out that it's just satire. Don't let that diminish your impotent internerd fury, though.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:08, closed)

The idea that you'd beat up a copper, and when the back-up arrives you whip out your evidence, and they say fair do's...and not take the phone off you, give you a kicking and charge you with everything from littering to arson in a royal dockyard is heart warming.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 19:55, closed)

so apologies if some of the details aren't 100%.
The point being, what that copper said was bang out of order, and plus I had a witness. She may have only been 10, she might not have understood what that bad word the copper used meant, but she remembered it.
Because when I got home the whole story got relayed to her parents in graphic detail... "Mummy, this bad policeman called RabidRodent a 'paedo' so he beat him up, what does that word mean?"
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:03, closed)

Fucking do one you lying cunt.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:12, closed)

but magistrates lap it up.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:14, closed)

Did you tell them you drove their daughter at 140mph?
Did they beat you up before or after you had a chance to tell them they looked like paedos?
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:38, closed)

and then done a wicked ollie and then flipped it sideways and roundhoused them with his 10 foot spoiler into the next fucking postcode area.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:15, closed)

that the OP actually does believe his own story.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:47, closed)

Ha ha.
You need something like this now and again though, makes a change from the fucking Marshmallow vs. Sickpuppet banter.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:54, closed)

Please, I'd love to read your 'local newspaper' account of the nonce-accusing copper, the fight and then his dismissal.
I really don't expect you to reply.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 22:24, closed)

Let me correct that:
"And then I woke up."
There. Much better.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:35, closed)

"Backup arrived"...for fuck's sake.
Walter Mitty goes berserk on nasty copper.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 20:37, closed)

So, you against a trained police officer equipped with CS, truncheon and other assorted goodies. Oh, and his mate as well. Who would ALSO be equipped with items of necessity to keep good law and order.
Lets say you DID get a punch in - it wouldn't be long before you would have been on the floor writhing and sobbing like a baby after being CS'd.
And also, lets say, you DID have a phone recording of him giving you some "verbal".
Erm, after a copper has repeatedly crunched your phone into millions of fragments on the floor in front of your face I would challenge any fucker to try and recover any files.
And lastly - copper making a smart arsed reply against GBH against an officer? YOU LOSE!
You score a "fuck off".
TL-DR ... I work alongside em, and your story is shit.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:06, closed)

Ok, that was the over-dramatised version. The non-dramatised version wouldn't have made good reading.
But yes, a copper pulled me for speeding (fair cop actually), then accused me of noncing up my then 10-year-old cousin. (Who's actually the closest thing I have to a daughter, and if anyone so much as thought about laying a finger on her I'd kill them with my bare hands.) And the copper found himself on the end of my pure fury.
Like I said, the events on which the dramatisation were based were fairly mundane. He was single-crewed. He ended up getting hit exactly once, square in the middle of the face. At which point I legged it back to the car and drove off.
At which point the awkward questions started coming from my cousin - "why did you hit that policeman?" and "what did he mean when he called you a peanut?"
See, nowhere near as exciting to read. But someone did put in an earlier post that they wanted to see the phrases "this did not sit well with me" and "the red mist descended". So there. *neeeerrr*
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:17, closed)

the roundhouse and karate kicks, the judo chops, etc etc... and how I single-handedly took out an entire riot van full of coppers?
And did I also mention that my 10-year-old cousin was actually Hit Girl?
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:22, closed)

while she was wearing that purple wig?
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:26, closed)

Yes, I can change letters to numbers to make it appear like I'm impersonating another user too. And then change my signature to match. Ho-hum...
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:41, closed)

often utilising an opponents momentum against them in order to perform throwing manoeuvres.
Unless "Judo" is the name of you pet lamb, pig or cow.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 0:01, closed)

But you DID say in your first post the colleague stepped in to stop you from carrying out any further physical assault.
Yet in the reply, you say that there wasn't a second person, ready to jump out of the car (if he or she wasn't already), and therefore not ready to spray you full on in the face with a happy spray of CS.
Being honest, with all this bullshit you are coming out with, my betting is that if you do / did have have a 10 yr old cousin, I bet she thinks you are a bit of a paedo cunt, and so wouldn't get into a car with you on her own, as do most of us on here so forth.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 3:31, closed)

So in addition to being Walter Mittissimmo III, Internet Hardman, you're also actually a paedo? I think AB needs to erect a separate wing of the Fail Archive just to cope with all this.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 22:18, closed)

Are these your Friday night dress up friends? Judging by the initials on the belt buckles, Mr BinDun and your cousin, Miss HairlessGash.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 21:58, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:47, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 19:11, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 21:07, closed)

I am going to undertake a full analysis of this, and I am going to conclude by showing that (if you don’t want to know the result, look away now) you are a paedo and a wanker.
Firstly let’s take it as accepted that this is a made up story, and therefore a product of your imagination. The elements that combine to create your narrative are of interest to our analysis here and the first element I would draw your attention to is the presence of your cousin. The detail of her age is important to you and is included immediately, as is your role as her carer.
The next important detail is the speeding; so immediately we are in a situation which implies recklessness, and risk-taking. You draw her into complicity with this through her encouragement of your behaviour; she is “egging you on.” There is a tinderbox of imaginative inappropriateness now just waiting for a spark.
At this point the police arrive. These are emblematic of your super-ego, and in typical super-ego style they seek frantically to control, suppress and dominate your raging, amoral id with their petty rules and taboos of shame. “and how would you feel if your daughter there got hurt?" asks your superego, foolishly attempting to bring your id to heel.
We are treated to a brief pause in the breakneck pace of the action-focused narrative at this point, the parentheses signalling a snag within this blossoming fantasy. Although you have already established your passenger’s familial relationship to you, your ‘policeman’ has introduced uncertainty of identity by pointing out that she could be mistaken for your daughter. Your ego steps in to mediate here and acknowledge the truth of the assertion; “to be fair, she does look like she could be...” I would suggest that even within your imaginative schema you are unable to truthfully approach the heart of the taboo you seek to break, and therefore allude to it obliquely.
At this point the narrative breaks down into the conflicting voices of your fragmented self; is she your cousin, daughter or girlfriend? The id steps in and provides the only answer it can give, sensual and unco-ordinated violence; the openly made suggestion that you are actually doing what you cannot even admit to yourself you are fantasising about, is too much to contain.
The aftermath I will not dwell on beyond pointing out that your imagined triumph and vindication signifies a fantasy of “getting away with” your transgression, as I feel the above provides sufficient proof of my first conclusion.
As to my second conclusion, on the basis that, as I have established above, all of these characters are creations of your imagination, and therefore the imagined intercourse is with a self-generated figure, you are in addition to being a paedo, also a wanker.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 22:18, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 23:09, closed)

there's nothing wrong with wanting to fuck 10 year olds, as long as it's confined to a fantasy like this one. It's only when you start planning to act out such sick paedo perversions that you should seek professional counseling
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 22:30, closed)

I wouldn't touch anyone under 20.
Back to normal service anyway...
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 22:35, closed)

www.b3ta.com/questions/darkness/post490062/
"I was at the time madly in love with this girl, I shall call her Heidi, for that was her name. She was 15."
www.b3ta.com/questions/wankbank/post1713528/
"And for the record: Shagging a 15 year old when you're 22 doesn't make you a nonce.Interfering with girls of primary school age (or younger) - now that makes you a nonce"
www.b3ta.com/questions/schooldays/post356522/
"I got kicked out of primary school...
...for fingering a girl behind the bike sheds."
www.b3ta.com/questions/gettingolder/post414580/
"I'm quite a bit older than gf. She's not young enough to be my daugher or anything but still more than a 10-year age gap"
www.b3ta.com/questions/cougars/post323857/
"Wait for 6 years...
and shag the daughter? "
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 22:40, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 23:05, closed)

From the first linked post, immediately before the quoted text:
"Right, I shall put the year at around 1992, so I'd have been about 14. And hormones were raging."
So, chasing after a 15-year-old when you're 14. Problem? Not likely.
Next, quoting two obviously facetious posts out of context? Spot on. We can all do that! Just like why you shouldn't shag a midget with learning difficulties - it's not big and it's not clever.
And taking a quite deep posting about a (now-ex) gf who was sexually abused as a kid, then pulling it out of context? Well sorry, but that's the lowest of the low.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 23:26, closed)

( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 23:30, closed)

...so when I was 22 I nailed some girl less than a week before her 16th birthday - and we were in France at the time, so completely legal (unless your name's Jeremy Forrest, which mine isn't). Remember boys & girls, AOC in France is 15.
Next question?
(Starting to remember why I stopped coming on here now... but as I've got more time on my hands these days I'll just keep feeding the trolls, it's entertaining.)
( , Mon 30 Sep 2013, 23:35, closed)

Actually under countries linked by the MLAT (or something like that); it is an offence to travel to another country and perform an action which would be an offence in your own country. It is designed, amongst other things, to stop massive paedos from being sex tourists.
I assume you will now list Far East Asian countries which aren't covered by MLAT seeing as you seem to be setting yourself up as paedo travel agent?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 0:20, closed)

There is, I believe, a provision in the Sexual Offences Act 2003 for this, however it's pretty much unenforceable throughout the EU due to a little thing called the Human Rights Act 1998, article 7, paragraph 1:
"No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed."
So, go to France with a group of friends, end up shagging one friend's younger sister a week before her 16th birthday - an act which is legal in the country you're in - and there's nothing anyone can do.
If you remember the Jeremy Forrest / Megan Stammers case, they could only issue a European Arrest Warrant for the offence of abduction (because that was still an offence under French law). They couldn't do anything about him shagging her, because it wasn't an offence under the French jurisdiction. Although I believe they got her to admit that he'd porked her whilst in the UK, hence the s.9 charge he got convicted of.
Translated from legalese to b3tan - get your fucking facts straight and do your research before posting bullshit, you faggot!
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 5:18, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 8:19, closed)

It's almost like you're protesting too much here.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 8:38, closed)

Perhaps that's because I'm employed within the legal system, dumbass?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:08, closed)

He'll smash you in and you'll alway lose, 'cos he always wins, yeah!
He's a cop-punching lawyer in the Fight For Right,
He's gonna start speeding so hold on tight!
He knows about the law and he'll kick your ass
And it was only his cousin so he gets a free pass!
He's a cop-punching lawyer, YEAH!
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:20, closed)

This is gonna be big!
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:45, closed)

however I am on a retainer for a law firm's IT service contract.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:20, closed)

Seriously, you should be very proud of the whole thread, but this comment is priceless.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:48, closed)

"I KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT I AM EMPLOYED WITHIN THE LEGAL SYSTEM as a tech support monkey."
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:20, closed)

That's a bit like saying that the guy who cleans the windows is the next Master of the Rolls.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:30, closed)

Well - I've certainly looked out of one, anyway.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:38, closed)

I thought it was your natural hair.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:40, closed)

Then yes, you definitely are.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 12:38, closed)

Nice work if you can get it.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:28, closed)

Inmates are not permitted Internet access in any way, shape or form, unless on day-release, and even then, only if not prohibited by their licence conditions.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:21, closed)

but that doesn't seem to stop prisons being awash with them
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:16, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:23, closed)

Apparently that's a 100% reliable way to have all accusations against you dropped.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:31, closed)

Sexual Offences Act 2003
You just have to understand a bit of Legalese.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 13:17, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 14:45, closed)

That the sexual offences act 2003 does state that "(a)a United Kingdom national does an act in a country outside the United Kingdom, and
(b)the act, if done in England and Wales, would constitute a sexual offence to which this section applies,the United Kingdom national is guilty in England and Wales] of that sexual offence.
A funny bunch the french (they harboured Polanski for a long while too) and they obviously don't see the inherent issues with a sexual predator grooming a child and coming to their country to avoid paying the appropriate price in their own country. I find it disturbing that you seem to think its big and clever to circumvent laws in the UK which are designed to protect children from being abused and cite a case involving a teacher and a pupil in your defense.
It wouldn't surprise me if you were in the legal trade....paedophiles always seem to get ridiculously lenient sentences so I imagine you're a judge.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 14:51, closed)

HOWEVER:
Human Rights Act 1998, article 7, paragraph 1:
"No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed."
Because the Human Rights Act was enacted in 1998, and the Sexual Offences Act in 2003, under the ultra vires principle the existing law takes precedent over the newer law, unless the older law is explicitly repealed. Which, of course, it wasn't.
My point about the Forrest case was that they could only extradite him for child abduction (which is an offence under French law), not underage sex, because she was 15 (which is legal in France), and they couldn't use the "position of responsibility" argument as he'd ceased to be in a position of responsibility the moment he walked out of his teaching job and ran away to France with someone half his age.
Of course, it later transpired that he'd "sexually touched" her whilst in the UK, and thus was also charged under SoA 2003 s.9(1).
I cited that case as it was an excellent example of how that provision of the SoA 2003 is incompatible with the HRA 1998.
(Forrest still got 5 1/2 years, if you remember? So he didn't exactly "get away with it".)
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:45, closed)

Wow.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:57, closed)

Installing and maintaining a server suite, network, a number of workstations, offsite backups etc etc.
It's funny just how much you learn about your client's field of expertise, which in this case happens to be law.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:21, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 20:19, closed)

I wouldn't share it around, but some of the things clients say... for your own amusement... ;-)
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 20:44, closed)

THESE ADMISIONS COULD AMOUNT TO REPREHENSIBLE BEHAVIOUR FOR THE PURPOSES OF A BAD CHARACTER APPLICATION DURING YOUR INTERNET TRIAL
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:59, closed)

I FEEL OBLIGED TO POINT OUT THAT THE AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY IN ENGLAND & WALES IS 10 YEARS OLD.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:58, closed)

My first comment was flippant, but after a quick click on your replies to QOTW reveals that 80% of your posts to previous questions relate in someway to sex with minors.
I find this rather disturbing, depite your attempts to trivialise it with humour. my fear is that level of obsession might indicate that despite your joking fascade, you may actually be a paedophile, whether latent or active, and a real danger of harming minors.
You seem incapable of understanding why the law would seek to protect 15 year old girls from people such as yourself.
Reading between the lines, and from your other QOTW answers, it seems that you had a disturbed childhood. Perhaps, now as an adult you prefer to regress to childhood in order to get a second chance at the happiness you never had, by seeking inappropriate relations with minors as an adult. This is very similar to Michael Jacksons tragic life. Your OP seems to tick many of these boxes.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:11, closed)

Try "creating an Internet persona that is allowed to break every social taboo, which in real life would probably get you lifed off".
Or, a comment which if made down the pub would get you glassed, on here results in a hilarious exchange of trolling posts. You get to play bait-a-troll. Hours of free entertainment.
To sum up my original post: "Light the blue touch paper and retire immediately to a safe distance."
And believe me, I'm laughing from that safe distance!
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:25, closed)

however, seeing as how you have now told several anecdotes over many months about sex with minors, not all of them as obviously inflamatory as this one, and filled with varying amounts of detail, I don't buy it.
It just sounds like a mix of fantasy and real-life from somebody who confuses the two and thinks a lot about sex with children. I fear the real truth may be even uglier than what you've revealed
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:53, closed)

I think what worries people is that either you are
1) A paedophile
or that you are going to such great lengths to portray yourself as a disgusting hateful person with absolutely no self control who preys on underage girls that you seem to be getting some sort of sexual thrill from the idea of being
2) A paedophile
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 19:03, closed)

I AM GRATEFUL TO YOU FOR YOUR KIND ASSISTANCE IN GATHERING THIS IMPORTANT INTERNET EVIDENCE
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:14, closed)

So I will be boring and point out that research indicates that engaging in sexual fantasy actually increases the likelihood of engaging in the activity at some point. That, coupled with the 'she was egging me on' defence used by paedos everywhere; is truly cause for concern.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 0:08, closed)

I'm looking after my cousin, who was 10 years old at the time. I get pulled for speeding. Copper accuses me of being a "nonce" cos the 10-year-old girl in the passenger seat isn't my daughter (despite being a blood relative). I take exception to this and smack the copper in the face.
So, where's the sexual fantasy come into it? Only some kind of nonce could read a sexual fantasy into that situation.
So, research clearly indicates that 1. you can't recognise a joke when you see one (see earlier link) and 2. you're a fucking nonce who got a boner when I mentioned my 10-year-old cousin. Who, btw, is now 18. And I'd still kill any fucker that even thought about laying a finger on her. That's if she didn't kick them square in the nads first of course.
Of course, as this thread has shown, the general standard of conversation on this board has gone down in the last few years, so I'll just stand here and shout "YOUR ALL GAY, LOL!" instead.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 5:10, closed)

Experience everything in life except incest and cannibalism.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:22, closed)

Does that include noncing?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:39, closed)

as long as your "victim" isn't related to you, as that would be incest.
And as long as you don't eat him/her for dinner afterwards.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:53, closed)

Are you saying paedophilia is a victimless crime?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 12:08, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 12:40, closed)

This is one creepy cock-end who is not doing himelf any favours
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 10:43, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 14:05, closed)

The sexual fantasy comment comes from Cumquats comment...which i replied to.
P.S. One could read quite a lot of fantasy into your original post but much has already been made of that and I don't need to contribute.
P.P.S Someone who is egged on to drive at 10,000 times the speed of light by a 10 year old girl; is probably not best placed to criticise the standard of anything.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:01, closed)

Normally I would expect INTERNETLAWYERMAN,QC to make an appearance but I don't think it would add anything.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:55, closed)

I was in my BMW M3 CSL. You know, the one where you lie awake at night planning your gearshift aggression strategy for the drive to work in the morning.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 19:54, closed)

Can't say I've ever felt the need to think overtly my gear shifting strategy unless that's a euphemism for George Michael-esque drivewanklols.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 12:24, closed)

It's all ok for rory and AB to talk about you guys having a party at my house where my primary-school aged daughter gets 'handed around' with much "haw-hawing and he-heing" from the peanut gallery.
But this guy gives his cousin a bit of a rush (albeit lacking responsibility) and defends her honour and to a person pretty much you lot go all mumsnet.
Yes BD - I've made it all about me!
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 7:43, closed)

A clear case of double-standards? A post that, whilst based on an incident that actually occurred, was clearly dramatised (and crafted to use the two phrases specifically requested in an earlier posting), and, well, you see the result.
Thanks for the support anyway. ;-)
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 9:06, closed)

I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE CROWN WITHDREW THE CHARGE OF SPEEDING, SINCE IT OFCCURED PRIOR TO YOUR ASSAULT PC.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:04, closed)

I, for one, am glad that INTERNETLAWYERMAN is here, as he lends this thread some much needed gravitas.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:12, closed)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND WORDS.
I COULD UNDERSTAND A CPS DECISION TO DROP THE ASSAULT PC CHARGE AS THE OFFICER'S CONDUCT FELL WELL BELOW THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE PACE CODES, HOWEVER, THE EVIDENCE IN RELATION TO THE SPEED AT WHICH THE INTERNET DEFENDANT WOULD HAVE REMAINED VITALLY IMPORTANT...
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:17, closed)

...the traffic cop's word was worthless, given that he'd verbally abused me (and had been recorded doing so).
Also, CPS equation. Speeding == fine. Assault police == up to 6 months (serve 3).
They withdrew both when the recording of the verbal abuse was played back.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:18, closed)

The conduct or otherwise of the officer concerned has no bearing on the speeding charge, that being unequivocal, what with the car having recording gear.
*because, apart from anything else, the fucker would charge me for typing this
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:22, closed)

THIS IS ANOTHER COMMON MISCONCEPTION.
YOU MAY WELL BE ENTITLED TO FREE INTERNET LEGAL ADVICE IN CASES WHERE YOU FACE A CRIMINAL ALLEGATION.MEANS TESTING IS IN PLACE IN RELATION TO MAGISTRATES' COURT MATTERS AND YOU MAY HAVE TO PAY A CONTRIBUTION TO LEGAL AID
YOU MAY WELL BE ENTITLED TO HAVE YOUR CASE RUN ON A NO WIN NO INTERNET FEE BASIS IN RELATION TO CLAIMS FOR PERSONAL INJURY.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:25, closed)

We should drop this, now, before he flicks his pony tail and destroys us all with his Aikido moves.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 10:28, closed)

What a load of pish! hahahaha
You ARE a paedo, ya clownshoe*
*Is this being recorded?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:11, closed)

Come on, people, we can do this.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:45, closed)

But I agree with you - this MUST be done.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:49, closed)

Also, if someone could do a massive grab of the OP and all the comments, in case it magically vanishes, that'd be splendid. I'm assuming that there's some way to do that.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:53, closed)

I was waiting for the tagline that this post (and thread) needed, and with 'nonce-punch' I think we have it!
Now it is the stuff of legend.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 13:25, closed)

Who can summon the Badger from its lair?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 13:30, closed)

It deserves to be pride of place on top of the archive with the hyperlink in gold font.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 13:33, closed)

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuu?
I can't remember a fail of this gargantuan shit-munching magnitude since the original Honda Accord post, yet you seem determined to top it off with your replies (and from the looks of it, past posts)
I recommend you seriously consider electric shock therapy, chemical castration, and putting a little timer next to your PC that means that you have to think really hard for 60 seconds before posting anything again.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:39, closed)

Apart from that I'd never buy a Jap car...
Well well, this has been entertaining. Still, I suppose when you do the kind of boring job that I do, you need some entertainment.
Oh well, back to trying to run the country I guess.
Take care, DC xx
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:57, closed)

I think even with the most hardcore bondage bestiality rape porn I could lay my hands on, it would take me a bit longer than 60 seconds. 2 minutes maybe.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 11:59, closed)


( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 12:16, closed)

That was well lol.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 12:23, closed)

First you posted a story seemingly because you thought it made you sound hard, then when people pointed out that it seemed a little unlikely you claimed that you had exaggerated some of the details for entertainment value, then when people made reference to previous stories you have posted about sex with underage girls you attempted to legitimise this with arguments about relative ages and the French legal system, and then you completely wig out and claim that you've intentionally made everything up to upset everyone and start posting maddy pictures.
U OK hun?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 19:20, closed)

I'm laughing my fucking head off at the shitstorm this has caused. It's hilarious.
And the "smug bastard / Maddie" pic was just the icing on the cake.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 19:56, closed)

You're currently rocking back and forth in front of your computer, laughing hysterically and typing about how great everything is going with your left hand whilst your right hand alternates between wiping the tears away and frantically tugging at your semi-erect penis.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 20:52, closed)

havent been on in months, and im greeted to this clusterfuck
i need to log in more often
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 13:44, closed)

Every time I re-read this shit, I see something a bit more sinister.
There are so many revealing themes contained within the whole story; self delusion, absence of shame, absurd sense of righteousness, impressing kids with childlike emotional control, and no notion of personal responsibility.
It's the fantasy of an immature mind, with a large dash of Aspergers.
And the self justification while quoting inane laws to distance oneself from acts of grooming, yet boasting about the deed (no doubt whilst sniffing one's fingers) smacks of a clever pervert with a calculating mind.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 13:52, closed)

To post this pile of dillusional, creepy wank the guy's obviously as thick as a concrete milkshake
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 14:03, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:16, closed)

in an attempt to draw the attention back onto himself.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:26, closed)

"I'm the person your mother warned you about, Cousin."?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:34, closed)

There's a load of trolls from Pommie Land (and elsewhere)
who clearly sit there at their computers constantly thinking about me, commenting about me here (and on other boards no less) and posting almost continuously about - me.
When I'm not here.
I'd love to say this was flattering. But this is b3ta.
Take a moment to ponder. Over the last 12-18 hrs (let alone the last week) do all the posters that hate and revile me so much and constantly post about it, imagine that prior to writing this post I've given any of you so much as a moment's thought?
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Thu 3 Oct 2013, 7:28, Ignore, 13 replies, latest was 5 minutes ago, I like this!)
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 9:54, closed)

I'm sure he has a graph plotted in his kitchen.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:37, closed)

mostly to himself to clarify his position and bring out the 'titanic gambit' of putting his women and children first as part of any defence mechanism
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:47, closed)

They really are just a little bit obsessed with me aren't they?
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 12:52, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:23, closed)

...is almost orgasmic.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:30, closed)

is that her tiny hands make your cock look massive.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 21:45, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 23:39, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:56, closed)

You should picture me as AWESOMEB0T, the ultimate artificially intelligent forum banter-bot.
I scored 73% in my Turing test.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 23:27, closed)

Eat at Shenanigans, RABIDRODENT WORKS HERE
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:05, closed)

I half suspect that he'll defend the OP in a weird sort of stand against the trolls, doubling as a weak attempt at finding an ally. The OP will then tell him to kill himself.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 22:52, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 22:53, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 23:18, closed)

especially the 22 year old fucking a 15 year old bit: b3ta.com/questions/cougars/post319848
Coincinonce?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 23:26, closed)

Still it warms my cockles that you're thinking about me.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 23:57, closed)

you cant even put the effort into a shitty strikethru joke.
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 12:50, closed)

In fact, it's not even on his profile now at all :(
I wonder if the vote will be rigged this week so that this doesn't win?
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 8:33, closed)

It's about time somebody stood up to the bullies in blue.
When will they leave ordinary people alone to get on with their mostly legal activities?
I haven't read the rest of this thread, but I imagine it is full of similar congratulations from my fellow posters.
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 10:14, closed)

is that not one of the usual contrarian whingers has made a stand and defended the OP against the mean /talk trolls (not yet, anyway)
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 21:18, closed)

( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 11:33, closed)

This is internet gold.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 12:15, closed)

Steve McDonald, Mrs Doyle, & Dickie Davies to make it perfect
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 11:52, closed)

i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/03/04/article-1159089-03BDAE0B000005DC-398_468x330.jpg

( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 12:01, closed)

The genius required to make the pictures into a relevant story is quite staggering.
Sir, I salute you.
*applauds*
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 11:31, closed)

Did you take her on holiday to France?
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 13:25, closed)

The magical 'nonce-friendly' pixies from Honda Accord la-la-land pressed it for him.
HTH
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 13:30, closed)

as wanking material for later. Obviously
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 13:39, closed)

was his way of explaining why she was screaming 'Faster, faster, faster!' earlier on in the recording?
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 13:49, closed)

The workings of a particularly devious nonce.
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 14:33, closed)

( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 8:59, closed)

I intended to consolidate the twin aims of this thread (to reach 500 replies and to top the Fail Archive) in one snappy phrase i.e. FA 500.
I failed, but at least this pointless reply furthers the former aim.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 11:44, closed)

( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 8:59, closed)

S0ckpuppet has posted and it looks as if everyone has rounded on him (again), which I for one think is a shame for this wonderful thread :(
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 10:56, closed)

a real shame
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 11:02, closed)

Oh, I see...you have some dignity.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 11:08, closed)

Got nothin', really.
Just doing my bit to at least reach 400.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 10:55, closed)

I would now like to cite several legal precedents (all of them baseless bullshit) to conclusively prove beyond doubt that it's perfectly fine to send a picture of kids to a peado
Or I could just admit to being a twat and apologise.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 12:05, closed)

But perhaps he's been arrested? We can but hope.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 11:38, closed)

Cousin, 140mph, coppers, paedo, punch
see how easy it is
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 11:47, closed)

Needs more "and that was his first mistake".
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 12:19, closed)

Only I'd quite like to be here for posterity.
So here I am.
x
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 12:37, closed)

Another subliminal message within the story...the copper was a "little twat".
A "little twat" that needed to be dominated.
( , Thu 3 Oct 2013, 13:39, closed)
« Go Back