"New York, I love you, but.."
video of all the characters who hang out at union square, nyc.
and here is a website dedicated to these people.
www.normalbobsmith.com/amazingstrangers/map.html
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:43, Share, Reply)
video of all the characters who hang out at union square, nyc.
and here is a website dedicated to these people.
www.normalbobsmith.com/amazingstrangers/map.html
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:43, Share, Reply)
I am particularly fond of the character "Paki Peeper"
www.normalbobsmith.com/amazingstrangers/matchgame/matchgamecloseup2013.jpg
#27
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:47, Share, Reply)
www.normalbobsmith.com/amazingstrangers/matchgame/matchgamecloseup2013.jpg
#27
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:47, Share, Reply)
That first guy on the railings is Christian Bale after about a year of Meth.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:50, Share, Reply)
this guy hasn't spent days/weeks/months even
edit:hasn't has
taking videos of people trying to get a glimpse of girls knickers
www.normalbobsmith.com/amazingstrangers/peepers/
too much time on your hands much?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 19:34, Share, Reply)
edit:
taking videos of people trying to get a glimpse of girls knickers
www.normalbobsmith.com/amazingstrangers/peepers/
too much time on your hands much?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 19:34, Share, Reply)
This chap also killed his own car
He's the same airhead who put litres and litres of diesel into his engine oil, isn't he?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mt0_-vK8bjA
(Worth watching in the background for the layers of fail. And smoke.)
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 11:33, Share, Reply)
He's the same airhead who put litres and litres of diesel into his engine oil, isn't he?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mt0_-vK8bjA
(Worth watching in the background for the layers of fail. And smoke.)
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 11:33, Share, Reply)
Feel Inside and Stuff Like That With Kids - Flight of The Conchords
New FOTC song with sale profits going to 'Cure Kids'.
Lyrical help from the kids themselves. Brilliant.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:53, Share, Reply)
New FOTC song with sale profits going to 'Cure Kids'.
Lyrical help from the kids themselves. Brilliant.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:53, Share, Reply)
The first 5 minutes or so of that were absolutely adorable :D
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:01, Share, Reply)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:01, Share, Reply)
^This
But I'm pretty sure The Muppets was not resolved with the selling of oil, gold and crystals...
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:40, Share, Reply)
But I'm pretty sure The Muppets was not resolved with the selling of oil, gold and crystals...
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:40, Share, Reply)
CANNNNNNNNNNDDLLLLLLLLEEEESSSSSSSSSS!!!!!
HAPPY CANDLE THING!
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
HAPPY CANDLE THING!
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
David Foster Wallace : This Is Water.
NSFW
I posted the transcript of this a while back, i didn't know there was a recording of it though, Part 2 isn't hard to find.
Such a great loss that he left us.
Here's the transcript if you don't want to listen:
moreintelligentlife.com/story/david-foster-wallace-in-his-own-words
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:27, Share, Reply)
I posted the transcript of this a while back, i didn't know there was a recording of it though, Part 2 isn't hard to find.
Such a great loss that he left us.
Here's the transcript if you don't want to listen:
moreintelligentlife.com/story/david-foster-wallace-in-his-own-words
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:27, Share, Reply)
Maybe read rather than listen mate, you'll take more of it in then i think.
I never knew there was a recording of this though, not the greatest post really.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:32, Share, Reply)
I never knew there was a recording of this though, not the greatest post really.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:32, Share, Reply)
A real loss losing him, that little speech sums him up so well though, sums people up so well too, glad you liked it.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 18:20, Share, Reply)
spooky air raid siren in Teesside
NSFW
I made this!
Possibly not that interesting but thought I'd share anyway. I've been hearing this in Teesside ever since I was knee-high to a Verne Troyer and finally caught it on video.
It was actually quite terrifying during the eighties, especially when you'd just been watching Threads or When The Wind Blows. I remember it going off on the way back from school one time and it was particularly loud, and it caused a bit of a panic with some Mums running home with their kids.
To this day I have no idea where the sound comes from, probably an old factory or something. But yeah, surely one of the most haunting, chilling noises known to mankind. Brrrr.
Maybe NSFW due to me saying a mild swearage.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:01, Share, Reply)
Possibly not that interesting but thought I'd share anyway. I've been hearing this in Teesside ever since I was knee-high to a Verne Troyer and finally caught it on video.
It was actually quite terrifying during the eighties, especially when you'd just been watching Threads or When The Wind Blows. I remember it going off on the way back from school one time and it was particularly loud, and it caused a bit of a panic with some Mums running home with their kids.
To this day I have no idea where the sound comes from, probably an old factory or something. But yeah, surely one of the most haunting, chilling noises known to mankind. Brrrr.
Maybe NSFW due to me saying a mild swearage.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:01, Share, Reply)
I live in Greenwich
And if you leave the windows open then on the first Monday of every month at 7am you can hear an air raid siren. Clearly its being tested, but no-one seems to know where it is and what it means.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:07, Share, Reply)
And if you leave the windows open then on the first Monday of every month at 7am you can hear an air raid siren. Clearly its being tested, but no-one seems to know where it is and what it means.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:07, Share, Reply)
I remember being scared of nuclear attack in the '80s
and thinking of Russians as "the baddies". Or Germans, depending on the mood.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:12, Share, Reply)
and thinking of Russians as "the baddies". Or Germans, depending on the mood.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:12, Share, Reply)
'I lived through that in the 80's'
would be nice if you'd just watched the cosy Nuclear War series 'Threads' :(
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:14, Share, Reply)
would be nice if you'd just watched the cosy Nuclear War series 'Threads' :(
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:14, Share, Reply)
Wow!
Do I get a special B3TA award? A commemorative magenta penis perhaps?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 20:31, Share, Reply)
Do I get a special B3TA award? A commemorative magenta penis perhaps?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 20:31, Share, Reply)
I was about 9 or 10
In the late 70's and was spending a week with my older brother and his wife just outside Bracknell. These were the days were you were allowed to leave a kid on his own in the summer holidays, so they were both out to work.
Terrified the life out of me, thought that this was it for the end of the world. Turns out they tested it every other Monday. It was the siren to warn everyone of escaped patients from Broadmoor.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:44, Share, Reply)
In the late 70's and was spending a week with my older brother and his wife just outside Bracknell. These were the days were you were allowed to leave a kid on his own in the summer holidays, so they were both out to work.
Terrified the life out of me, thought that this was it for the end of the world. Turns out they tested it every other Monday. It was the siren to warn everyone of escaped patients from Broadmoor.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:44, Share, Reply)
We've got a siren in my bit of Bristol
it's tested once a month (3pm on the first Thursday of the month I think)
I don't know about your siren, but ours is to warn of a fire/explosion at one of the chemical plants or fuel depots in Avonmouth. Pretty much "if it goes off and you're not expecting it, go inside and shut the windows, summat nasty is coming towards you on the wind"
Every couple of years they send out a leaflet with a map in it showing all the risk sites with fallout zones drawn round them showing you how at risk of death you are.
Thankfully, while I'm in earshot of the siren I'm not in any of the danger zones.
I know where one of the siren towers is, and for years I've been meaning to go and hang around at the base of it during a test to see how loud it is :)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:05, Share, Reply)
it's tested once a month (3pm on the first Thursday of the month I think)
I don't know about your siren, but ours is to warn of a fire/explosion at one of the chemical plants or fuel depots in Avonmouth. Pretty much "if it goes off and you're not expecting it, go inside and shut the windows, summat nasty is coming towards you on the wind"
Every couple of years they send out a leaflet with a map in it showing all the risk sites with fallout zones drawn round them showing you how at risk of death you are.
Thankfully, while I'm in earshot of the siren I'm not in any of the danger zones.
I know where one of the siren towers is, and for years I've been meaning to go and hang around at the base of it during a test to see how loud it is :)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:05, Share, Reply)
We can hear the same sirens
There are several of them, for different factories in Avonmouth. I've got that leaflet hiding on a shelf somewhere and it tells you the days and times for each different siren. Problem is that there is one on Monday at 10am, one on Wednesday at 11am, one on Thursday at 2pm, one on Sunday at 10am, one on the third Wednesday of the month at 3pm, one on the 2nd Tuesday of the month at midday, one on the third Wednesday after Ascension Sunday at 10am, except in leap years when it's at 11am, one on the 4th Tuesday in February on years where there is a 3 in it and so on. So no-one actually knows when the tests are running and just ignores them all anyway.
And yeah, they all sound like air-raid sirens.
In the mid-80s, when I was a teenager, the air-raid siren in my part of Bath went off at about 2am one night. Scared the crap out of me! A couple of local old boys had heart attacks and died and everyone was talking about it at school the next day. You could hear it on the other side of the city, my house was 100 yards from the siren itself. The official excuse from the council, (or police, or whoever was responsible for it) was that they tested the air raid sirens regularly but with the loop to the sirens themselves switched off so they didn't actually go off. The test that night had been a normal test but they had forgotten to switch the siren loop off so it actually went off, for which they were sorry. Which completely failed to explain why they were testing air raid sirens at 2am and how they expected to actually test them without making a sound! They have since been removed.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 15:59, Share, Reply)
There are several of them, for different factories in Avonmouth. I've got that leaflet hiding on a shelf somewhere and it tells you the days and times for each different siren. Problem is that there is one on Monday at 10am, one on Wednesday at 11am, one on Thursday at 2pm, one on Sunday at 10am, one on the third Wednesday of the month at 3pm, one on the 2nd Tuesday of the month at midday, one on the third Wednesday after Ascension Sunday at 10am, except in leap years when it's at 11am, one on the 4th Tuesday in February on years where there is a 3 in it and so on. So no-one actually knows when the tests are running and just ignores them all anyway.
And yeah, they all sound like air-raid sirens.
In the mid-80s, when I was a teenager, the air-raid siren in my part of Bath went off at about 2am one night. Scared the crap out of me! A couple of local old boys had heart attacks and died and everyone was talking about it at school the next day. You could hear it on the other side of the city, my house was 100 yards from the siren itself. The official excuse from the council, (or police, or whoever was responsible for it) was that they tested the air raid sirens regularly but with the loop to the sirens themselves switched off so they didn't actually go off. The test that night had been a normal test but they had forgotten to switch the siren loop off so it actually went off, for which they were sorry. Which completely failed to explain why they were testing air raid sirens at 2am and how they expected to actually test them without making a sound! They have since been removed.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 15:59, Share, Reply)
used to here the one in
north finchely every week during the 80's, the plymouth one is still tested every few weeks, dont think most people know what it is, due to the fact the ferry makes a lot of noise
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:31, Share, Reply)
north finchely every week during the 80's, the plymouth one is still tested every few weeks, dont think most people know what it is, due to the fact the ferry makes a lot of noise
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:31, Share, Reply)
They test the sirens of Broadmoor
Once a week at a set time, Monday at 10? If the sirens go off they have a network of people who phone/text each other.
The way it works is that say 10 people are given the responsibility to contact say 5 other people if the siren goes off. Those people each have 5 people to contact and they in turn... you get the picture.
The idea is that the whole of Berkshire will know within a few minutes of any escape. Serious business.
Edit: oops, saw someone else posted this... soz
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:24, Share, Reply)
Once a week at a set time, Monday at 10? If the sirens go off they have a network of people who phone/text each other.
The way it works is that say 10 people are given the responsibility to contact say 5 other people if the siren goes off. Those people each have 5 people to contact and they in turn... you get the picture.
The idea is that the whole of Berkshire will know within a few minutes of any escape. Serious business.
Edit: oops, saw someone else posted this... soz
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:24, Share, Reply)
In France
they test their civil defence sirens at noon on the first Wednesday of every month in major cities. I was unaware of this until suddenly a load of deafening air raid sirens started going off all over the place. Spent about a minute considering where to shelter then thought 'nah, I'll just film it for posterity'.
In the event of a surprise nuclear strike, smartphone users will be wiped out.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
they test their civil defence sirens at noon on the first Wednesday of every month in major cities. I was unaware of this until suddenly a load of deafening air raid sirens started going off all over the place. Spent about a minute considering where to shelter then thought 'nah, I'll just film it for posterity'.
In the event of a surprise nuclear strike, smartphone users will be wiped out.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
I was in the Slavonia region of Croatia in 2000 when their air raid sirens went off
Began wondering whether the Serbians were kicking off again when someone pointed out that they now used the sirens to get their part-time fire brigade in for an emergency.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 16:01, Share, Reply)
Began wondering whether the Serbians were kicking off again when someone pointed out that they now used the sirens to get their part-time fire brigade in for an emergency.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 16:01, Share, Reply)
They sound familiar
I work at Seal Sands on Teeside,and every Wednesday the majority of chemical sites including the one i work at,test their site alarms
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:42, Share, Reply)
I work at Seal Sands on Teeside,and every Wednesday the majority of chemical sites including the one i work at,test their site alarms
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:42, Share, Reply)
I know this!
Every Tuesday at 10:00 hours - its the siren test for the chemical plants (possibly what used to ICI). Like you say its been going on for years and if I'm in the garden or have the windows open I can hear quite clearly.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 18:00, Share, Reply)
Every Tuesday at 10:00 hours - its the siren test for the chemical plants (possibly what used to ICI). Like you say its been going on for years and if I'm in the garden or have the windows open I can hear quite clearly.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 18:00, Share, Reply)
Spoiled for choice.
I think it's over in the old ICI plant site near Billingham / Haverton Hill where they still produce chemicals, or maybe the steel plant in Redcar, or maybe the Tioxide plant in Hartlepool. Either way we're spoiled for choice for potential chemical related disasters here.
EDIT: Ooops it helps if i read all the responses first *re-lurks*
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 20:29, Share, Reply)
I think it's over in the old ICI plant site near Billingham / Haverton Hill where they still produce chemicals, or maybe the steel plant in Redcar, or maybe the Tioxide plant in Hartlepool. Either way we're spoiled for choice for potential chemical related disasters here.
EDIT: Ooops it helps if i read all the responses first *re-lurks*
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 20:29, Share, Reply)
im at ConocoPhilips
sounds like ours,but then again it sounds like many other area plants
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 20:35, Share, Reply)
sounds like ours,but then again it sounds like many other area plants
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 20:35, Share, Reply)
it's the nonce alarm
there's an emitter in your head that goes off every time you think about little boys
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 20:24, Share, Reply)
there's an emitter in your head that goes off every time you think about little boys
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 20:24, Share, Reply)
Air Raid siren
Ever Monday morning at 10am you hear the Broadmoor escape warning siren go off in Bracknell to test that. Imagine how shit steering it is when it goes off at any other time (like it did last month... false alarm apparently... cheers for making the local populous lock themselves indoors wondering which of Britain's raving loony, rapist, serial killing bastards you'd let out...)
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 23:24, Share, Reply)
Ever Monday morning at 10am you hear the Broadmoor escape warning siren go off in Bracknell to test that. Imagine how shit steering it is when it goes off at any other time (like it did last month... false alarm apparently... cheers for making the local populous lock themselves indoors wondering which of Britain's raving loony, rapist, serial killing bastards you'd let out...)
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 23:24, Share, Reply)
Its the toxic gas emergency siren from ICI Wilton (don't know what its called now). They used to test it weekly when I worked there in 1996. Dupont used to use it weekly as they accidentally released nasty looking gas into the atmosphere. It was followed by a very posh man announcing "This is a toxic gas emergency close all doors and windows" in the Wilton Research centre. I hated Middlesbrough the whole place just stinks of chemicals on a warm day.
( , Tue 28 Aug 2012, 6:40, Share, Reply)
Some of them are great, some just make me glad i'm not a pikey.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:03, Share, Reply)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:03, Share, Reply)
Indeed, the joy of the internet.
I can tarmac a drive with my eyes closed, i normally throw in a burning mattress for free.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:48, Share, Reply)
I can tarmac a drive with my eyes closed, i normally throw in a burning mattress for free.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:48, Share, Reply)
God I hate the way people use the word "hack" instead of "tip" or "trick"
HACK YOUR BRAIN BY GOING TO BED EARLY
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 3:48, Share, Reply)
HACK YOUR BRAIN BY GOING TO BED EARLY
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 3:48, Share, Reply)
Massive cock of glass
NSFW
Pretty much nails most of the accents.
Number 24 in my opinion is the best of the lot.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:53, Share, Reply)
Pretty much nails most of the accents.
Number 24 in my opinion is the best of the lot.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:53, Share, Reply)
Someone appears to have cloned patchy eyebrows all over his face
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:03, Share, Reply)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:03, Share, Reply)
Generally good...
...he Scouse and N Irish ones were quite odd.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:23, Share, Reply)
...he Scouse and N Irish ones were quite odd.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:23, Share, Reply)
If you watch the second video
he appears to have become some kind of magical carny fellow, and has saved up enough to buy a razor, shave off those face eyebrows.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:54, Share, Reply)
he appears to have become some kind of magical carny fellow, and has saved up enough to buy a razor, shave off those face eyebrows.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:54, Share, Reply)
6hrs of Silverstone
In case you've got nothing planned this afternoon, here's a live feed of the 6hrs of Silverstone - the same teams as race at Le Mans. There's just over five hours remaining.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:53, Share, Reply)
In case you've got nothing planned this afternoon, here's a live feed of the 6hrs of Silverstone - the same teams as race at Le Mans. There's just over five hours remaining.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:53, Share, Reply)
The Bible and Homosexuality
Matthew Vines picks apart every Biblical argument against homosexuality, placing them in historical context and examining them sensitively and intelligently to see how anti-gay they actually are.
Yes, this is an hour long, but it's really really excellently researched and presented. Definitely worth sitting down and watching.
If you can't watch the video, here's the transcript: www.matthewvines.com/transcript
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:37, Share, Reply)
Matthew Vines picks apart every Biblical argument against homosexuality, placing them in historical context and examining them sensitively and intelligently to see how anti-gay they actually are.
Yes, this is an hour long, but it's really really excellently researched and presented. Definitely worth sitting down and watching.
If you can't watch the video, here's the transcript: www.matthewvines.com/transcript
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:37, Share, Reply)
I got 10 minutes in before getting a bit bored, is there an abridged version?
I appreciate he's done his research and is passionate about it, but I've not got the time and he needs to cut to the chase a bit more.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:20, Share, Reply)
I appreciate he's done his research and is passionate about it, but I've not got the time and he needs to cut to the chase a bit more.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:20, Share, Reply)
summary so far
(will edit as it goes on)
1. Sodom & Gomorrah nothing to do with it
2. supersessionism
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:14, Share, Reply)
(will edit as it goes on)
1. Sodom & Gomorrah nothing to do with it
2. supersessionism
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:14, Share, Reply)
Perhaps a bit too abridged
I was more after, is he just justifying his choice of religion with his sexuality, and if so, does he and why?
I just can't get my head around people wanting to be a part of a religion that is so full of people telling them they are wrong.
It's like Stockholm Syndrome or something
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:17, Share, Reply)
I was more after, is he just justifying his choice of religion with his sexuality, and if so, does he and why?
I just can't get my head around people wanting to be a part of a religion that is so full of people telling them they are wrong.
It's like Stockholm Syndrome or something
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:17, Share, Reply)
Well because they believe in the message of Jesus I guess,
and love God as the creator of the Universe.
There are congregations that are not homophobic, it's ignorant individual Christians that are the problem, not Christianity itself.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:22, Share, Reply)
and love God as the creator of the Universe.
There are congregations that are not homophobic, it's ignorant individual Christians that are the problem, not Christianity itself.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:22, Share, Reply)
I can honestly say, I've never met a Christian that wasn't homophobic
they've always just said it's wrong, it's what they've been taught and believe.
But I won't judge them all on these cases.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:25, Share, Reply)
they've always just said it's wrong, it's what they've been taught and believe.
But I won't judge them all on these cases.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:25, Share, Reply)
We need people to tell them that their beliefs are based on dodgy biblical interpretation,
bad scholarship, and ideas that are a lot more modern and a lot less traditional than they realise.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:28, Share, Reply)
bad scholarship, and ideas that are a lot more modern and a lot less traditional than they realise.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:28, Share, Reply)
Yes, and there's nothing devoutly religious people are better known for
than listening to people tell them what they believe is wrong and taking what they say on board.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:33, Share, Reply)
than listening to people tell them what they believe is wrong and taking what they say on board.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:33, Share, Reply)
You have to start at the fringes and work your way inwards.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:35, Share, Reply)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:35, Share, Reply)
yeah it's difficult,
they typically accuse me of talking a load of bollocks and quoting ridiculous facts.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:04, Share, Reply)
they typically accuse me of talking a load of bollocks and quoting ridiculous facts.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:04, Share, Reply)
Actually I don't have any religious friends who aren't already tolerant,
except the Jehovah's Witnesses that come round, if they count, and I can scarcely make a dent on them.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:14, Share, Reply)
except the Jehovah's Witnesses that come round, if they count, and I can scarcely make a dent on them.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:14, Share, Reply)
you can't have met very many then
Just off the top of my head I can count over 20 christians I know personally (either through work, hobbies or family connections) who are absolutely fine with it - and one who isn't
4 of those have invited myself and my boyfriend to their weddings and we had a *fabulous* time chatting to the grandparents!
I know 4 openly gay christians, one of whom trained as a priest. None of those have a problem with their church (so I guess you can add at least 3 congregations to the numbers)
I'm not a christian (I tend to describe myself as ignostic) but I really don't get this whole "OMG! The church is so evil and homophobic" because it just doesn't match up with my experiences.
Sure some churches are twats, but an awful lot of them aren't.
Edit: Anecdote not data, your mileage may vary etc etc etc
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:18, Share, Reply)
Just off the top of my head I can count over 20 christians I know personally (either through work, hobbies or family connections) who are absolutely fine with it - and one who isn't
4 of those have invited myself and my boyfriend to their weddings and we had a *fabulous* time chatting to the grandparents!
I know 4 openly gay christians, one of whom trained as a priest. None of those have a problem with their church (so I guess you can add at least 3 congregations to the numbers)
I'm not a christian (I tend to describe myself as ignostic) but I really don't get this whole "OMG! The church is so evil and homophobic" because it just doesn't match up with my experiences.
Sure some churches are twats, but an awful lot of them aren't.
Edit: Anecdote not data, your mileage may vary etc etc etc
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:18, Share, Reply)
Much like my arguments to friends from church that make generalisations about groups they see as "anti-Christian"
(I'm so glad to see your comment, because b3ta can get me down sometimes with the hate that some people post)
I'm sure there is a huge silent majority of atheists and agnostics who feel as deeply embarrassed to be categorised with twat-atheists as I am to be categorised with twat-christians (my beloved brothers and sisters, but boy do they vex me sorely sometimes). Just as there are likely muslims who get frustrated that the outsiders' perception of them as a group is so coloured by the actions of the jihadists. I couldn't say authoritatively on this though: I've not met many muslims as I live in a very anglo-saxon part of the UK.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 10:04, Share, Reply)
(I'm so glad to see your comment, because b3ta can get me down sometimes with the hate that some people post)
I'm sure there is a huge silent majority of atheists and agnostics who feel as deeply embarrassed to be categorised with twat-atheists as I am to be categorised with twat-christians (my beloved brothers and sisters, but boy do they vex me sorely sometimes). Just as there are likely muslims who get frustrated that the outsiders' perception of them as a group is so coloured by the actions of the jihadists. I couldn't say authoritatively on this though: I've not met many muslims as I live in a very anglo-saxon part of the UK.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 10:04, Share, Reply)
Agree entirely
A church full of decent people will treat people decently. A church full of ignorant people will treat people ignorantly.
And as you know, I'm in the 19/20.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 17:16, Share, Reply)
A church full of decent people will treat people decently. A church full of ignorant people will treat people ignorantly.
And as you know, I'm in the 19/20.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 17:16, Share, Reply)
3. verse in Romans 1 is about an excess of lust not the type of lust
4. dodgy translation from the Greek
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:37, Share, Reply)
Attempt at shortening it a bit
There are 6 passages in the bible which are usually used as anti-gay arguments: (Genesis 19, Leviticus 18, Leviticus 20, Romans 1, 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy)
Aditionally, often people argue that God's natural design' is man and woman, using the creation of Adam and Eve as evidence.
If this interpretation is correct, then any gay person who wishes to be a good Christian must always reject love. Not just sex, but romantic love, family, having a spouse, children etc. They must live a life of loneliness.
Going back to Genesis, God made the heavens and earth, plants, animals, man and everything else. All of these he said were 'good' or 'very good'. The FIRST thing ever said to be not good in the Bible is "for man to be alone" (Gen 2:18), thus God made Eve as a companion for him. What we get from this is that all men need a companion. The fact that Adam's comanion was Eve doesn't necessarily translate that ALL men need a woman as a companion. The only thing the Bible says is that a companion is needed.
Genesis 19: Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Two angels in the form of men seek hospitality in Sodom with Lot and his family. Men of Sodom gather outside Lot's house and demand he hands over the men so they can have sex with them. Instead, he hands over his virgin daughters. God destroys Sodom with fire and brimstone.
Set in historical context, gang rape of men by men was used by societies of this place and era as a tool of agression and humiliation in warfare. Every other mention of Sodom in the Bible refers only to the arrogance and selfishness of its people, not homosexulaity. The story is illustrating that Sodom is violently agressive to strangers, and that this act is against God's wishes. The male/male rape is used to show this, but this isn't what God was angry about, it was the xenophobia.
Leviticus: this is a huge book of Laws for Jews; 613 of them in total. Leviticus 18:22 says "you shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination" and Leviticus 20:13 says that the penalty for this is death.
The thing is, none of these rules apply to Christians. Sure, some of the more common-sense ones are still followed, but Christians happily eat pork and shellfish, wear mixed-fibre clothing and cut their hair. So Leviticus 18:22 is no more relevent.
Also, the term 'abomination', put in correct cultural context, simply means "not Jewish". it doesn't make it a sin, it's just not the Jewish way. In addition, while the death penalty may make it seem that this is a particularly strong rule, loads of rules in Leviticus have astonishingly harsh punishments, simply being put to death is actually not as bad as many of them. So we need pay no attention to Leviticus.
Romans 1:26-27: This speaks of God's rejection of people who turned away from Him and abandoned their 'nature' for 'unnratural relations'. However, if the verses are placed in context it is shown that God rejects these people because they CHANGE their nature. They used to be heterosexual, and they hav decided to be homosexual. They have turned away from how they naturally feel. This is bad, God rejects them. The correct ting to do is to follow your nature, stay true to it, and God will support you.
In addition, the word 'natural' in this passage is used elsewhere but translated as meaning a cultural norm. So Romans 1:26/27 is not saying that homosexuality is 'unnatural', only that it is not the cultural norm.
Consider too, that in this place and era, sexuality didn't exist as a the concept we see it today. Instead, men were expected to take an 'active' sexual role, and women the 'passive' role. This was the cultural norm, so an active female or a passive male would be culturally 'unnatural'. This has been translated by later scribes as 'shameful', but this weight to the word is not there in the original text.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:28, Share, Reply)
There are 6 passages in the bible which are usually used as anti-gay arguments: (Genesis 19, Leviticus 18, Leviticus 20, Romans 1, 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy)
Aditionally, often people argue that God's natural design' is man and woman, using the creation of Adam and Eve as evidence.
If this interpretation is correct, then any gay person who wishes to be a good Christian must always reject love. Not just sex, but romantic love, family, having a spouse, children etc. They must live a life of loneliness.
Going back to Genesis, God made the heavens and earth, plants, animals, man and everything else. All of these he said were 'good' or 'very good'. The FIRST thing ever said to be not good in the Bible is "for man to be alone" (Gen 2:18), thus God made Eve as a companion for him. What we get from this is that all men need a companion. The fact that Adam's comanion was Eve doesn't necessarily translate that ALL men need a woman as a companion. The only thing the Bible says is that a companion is needed.
Genesis 19: Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Two angels in the form of men seek hospitality in Sodom with Lot and his family. Men of Sodom gather outside Lot's house and demand he hands over the men so they can have sex with them. Instead, he hands over his virgin daughters. God destroys Sodom with fire and brimstone.
Set in historical context, gang rape of men by men was used by societies of this place and era as a tool of agression and humiliation in warfare. Every other mention of Sodom in the Bible refers only to the arrogance and selfishness of its people, not homosexulaity. The story is illustrating that Sodom is violently agressive to strangers, and that this act is against God's wishes. The male/male rape is used to show this, but this isn't what God was angry about, it was the xenophobia.
Leviticus: this is a huge book of Laws for Jews; 613 of them in total. Leviticus 18:22 says "you shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination" and Leviticus 20:13 says that the penalty for this is death.
The thing is, none of these rules apply to Christians. Sure, some of the more common-sense ones are still followed, but Christians happily eat pork and shellfish, wear mixed-fibre clothing and cut their hair. So Leviticus 18:22 is no more relevent.
Also, the term 'abomination', put in correct cultural context, simply means "not Jewish". it doesn't make it a sin, it's just not the Jewish way. In addition, while the death penalty may make it seem that this is a particularly strong rule, loads of rules in Leviticus have astonishingly harsh punishments, simply being put to death is actually not as bad as many of them. So we need pay no attention to Leviticus.
Romans 1:26-27: This speaks of God's rejection of people who turned away from Him and abandoned their 'nature' for 'unnratural relations'. However, if the verses are placed in context it is shown that God rejects these people because they CHANGE their nature. They used to be heterosexual, and they hav decided to be homosexual. They have turned away from how they naturally feel. This is bad, God rejects them. The correct ting to do is to follow your nature, stay true to it, and God will support you.
In addition, the word 'natural' in this passage is used elsewhere but translated as meaning a cultural norm. So Romans 1:26/27 is not saying that homosexuality is 'unnatural', only that it is not the cultural norm.
Consider too, that in this place and era, sexuality didn't exist as a the concept we see it today. Instead, men were expected to take an 'active' sexual role, and women the 'passive' role. This was the cultural norm, so an active female or a passive male would be culturally 'unnatural'. This has been translated by later scribes as 'shameful', but this weight to the word is not there in the original text.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:28, Share, Reply)
cheers for the abridged version
but why does he want to be defined as a Christian/follower of the bible?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:19, Share, Reply)
but why does he want to be defined as a Christian/follower of the bible?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:19, Share, Reply)
He can read the Bible for himself, I guess,
and he seems to have done his research.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:11, Share, Reply)
and he seems to have done his research.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:11, Share, Reply)
I'd much prefer to watch homosexuals re-enact famous bible sermons.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:37, Share, Reply)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:37, Share, Reply)
This needed doing.
Homophobia is largely the creation of 19th century psychologists.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:46, Share, Reply)
Homophobia is largely the creation of 19th century psychologists.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:46, Share, Reply)
*stares blankly*
*goes out into the sunshine for the rest of the day*
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:51, Share, Reply)
*goes out into the sunshine for the rest of the day*
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:51, Share, Reply)
Can you please comment on something that won't lead to you talking a load of bollocks and quoting ridiculous statistics?
Please, honestly.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:56, Share, Reply)
Please, honestly.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:56, Share, Reply)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buggery_Act_1533
“Forasmuch as there is not yet sufficient and condign punishment appointed and limited by the due course of the Laws of this Realm for the detestable and abominable Vice of Buggery committed with mankind of beast: It may therefore please the King’s Highness with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and the Commons of this present parliament assembled, that it may be enacted by the authority of the same, that the same offence be from henceforth ajudged Felony and that such an order and form of process therein to be used against the offenders as in cases of felony at the Common law. And that the offenders being herof convict by verdict confession or outlawry shall suffer such pains of death and losses and penalties of their good chattels debts lands tenements and hereditaments as felons do according to the Common Laws of this Realme. And that no person offending in any such offence shall be admitted to his Clergy, And that Justices of the Peace shall have power and authority within the limits of their commissions and Jurisdictions to hear and determine the said offence, as they do in the cases of other felonies. This Act to endure till the last day. of the next Parliament.”
Thomas Cromwell, House of Commons
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:10, Share, Reply)
“Forasmuch as there is not yet sufficient and condign punishment appointed and limited by the due course of the Laws of this Realm for the detestable and abominable Vice of Buggery committed with mankind of beast: It may therefore please the King’s Highness with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and the Commons of this present parliament assembled, that it may be enacted by the authority of the same, that the same offence be from henceforth ajudged Felony and that such an order and form of process therein to be used against the offenders as in cases of felony at the Common law. And that the offenders being herof convict by verdict confession or outlawry shall suffer such pains of death and losses and penalties of their good chattels debts lands tenements and hereditaments as felons do according to the Common Laws of this Realme. And that no person offending in any such offence shall be admitted to his Clergy, And that Justices of the Peace shall have power and authority within the limits of their commissions and Jurisdictions to hear and determine the said offence, as they do in the cases of other felonies. This Act to endure till the last day. of the next Parliament.”
Thomas Cromwell, House of Commons
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:10, Share, Reply)
Good work.
Although I did say "largely" not "completely".
The origin of the word "buggery" is very interesting, too. You should look that up.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:20, Share, Reply)
Although I did say "largely" not "completely".
The origin of the word "buggery" is very interesting, too. You should look that up.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:20, Share, Reply)
Yeah, before those pesky 19thC Psychologists came along homosexuals
were welcome everywhere and were never targets of hate, violence or other forms of discrimination or prejudice.
Seriously though, whilst the inclusion of paraphilias in the DSM has many things to answer for the creation of homophobia was not one.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:25, Share, Reply)
were welcome everywhere and were never targets of hate, violence or other forms of discrimination or prejudice.
Seriously though, whilst the inclusion of paraphilias in the DSM has many things to answer for the creation of homophobia was not one.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:25, Share, Reply)
There wasn't any concept of "homosexuals" as such before then.
There were laws and social taboos against various sexual acts which I won't defend, but it's largely (and I emphasise largely) dodgy Victorian science that shaped the development of homophobia in its modern form.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:33, Share, Reply)
There were laws and social taboos against various sexual acts which I won't defend, but it's largely (and I emphasise largely) dodgy Victorian science that shaped the development of homophobia in its modern form.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:33, Share, Reply)
I'm not sure (and I don't want to put words in your mouth) but are you trying to suggest that because the term homosexuality had yet to be coined and officially defined that there could not be any homophobia?
I might be getting the wrong end of the stick, if so I apologies. But hate for those of differing sexual preference and practise can exist independant of a term and definition for that preference.
What the 19th C Psychologists were complicit in was the formalising of a term for diagnostic purposes, which in turn was an extention of the social norms, conventions and controls already in place. And these controls were used in a manner (intentional or not) that was harmful. They didn't create homosexuality or homophobia though.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:42, Share, Reply)
I might be getting the wrong end of the stick, if so I apologies. But hate for those of differing sexual preference and practise can exist independant of a term and definition for that preference.
What the 19th C Psychologists were complicit in was the formalising of a term for diagnostic purposes, which in turn was an extention of the social norms, conventions and controls already in place. And these controls were used in a manner (intentional or not) that was harmful. They didn't create homosexuality or homophobia though.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:42, Share, Reply)
People weren't aware of such a thing as "sexual preference" as an intrinsic feature of a person,
there was no concept of "sexuality" as we now understand it. There were just things like anal sex that no-one should do. In fact the wording of the law reflects this, if you take the Buggery Act for instance, "abominable Vice of Buggery committed with mankind or beast". What is denigrated are the acts themselves*, not same-sex attraction or inclination as such (or even romance; on this line an interesting thing to look up is Adelphopoiesis). The buggery act was repealed by the Offences against the Person Act 1828 only for the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 which "Extended buggery laws to include any kind of sexual activity between males."
* anal sex with anyone, including men with women.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:52, Share, Reply)
there was no concept of "sexuality" as we now understand it. There were just things like anal sex that no-one should do. In fact the wording of the law reflects this, if you take the Buggery Act for instance, "abominable Vice of Buggery committed with mankind or beast". What is denigrated are the acts themselves*, not same-sex attraction or inclination as such (or even romance; on this line an interesting thing to look up is Adelphopoiesis). The buggery act was repealed by the Offences against the Person Act 1828 only for the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 which "Extended buggery laws to include any kind of sexual activity between males."
* anal sex with anyone, including men with women.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:52, Share, Reply)
Please, guide us, Oh Holy One.
I can see where Pissy was coming from with his religious replies to your posts now.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:58, Share, Reply)
I can see where Pissy was coming from with his religious replies to your posts now.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:58, Share, Reply)
I don't know where this comes from,
I'm only trying to point out that the usual "the Church is homophobic, the Church has always been homophobic" line is a massive over-simplification to say the least.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:03, Share, Reply)
I'm only trying to point out that the usual "the Church is homophobic, the Church has always been homophobic" line is a massive over-simplification to say the least.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:03, Share, Reply)
I don't have anything against you, you just seem to instigate 'conversations' for no other reason than to prove to yourself you are right.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:07, Share, Reply)
You sometimes prove you are wrong?
I don't know why i'm not surprised to hear this.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:29, Share, Reply)
I don't know why i'm not surprised to hear this.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:29, Share, Reply)
Part of the reason I have these arguments is to find that out.
You can often get better counter-arguments from other people than you can by solitary research, especially since you can't help but be guided by confirmation bias to a certain extent.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:34, Share, Reply)
You can often get better counter-arguments from other people than you can by solitary research, especially since you can't help but be guided by confirmation bias to a certain extent.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:34, Share, Reply)
It is, and one you'd probably argue lacks accuracy. Likewise stating 19th C Psychologists were largely responsible for homophobia is a gross and inaccurate over simplication.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:08, Share, Reply)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:08, Share, Reply)
It's not that inaccurate,
19th century science has had far more influence on modern culture than you might think, it's because of 19th century "nutritionist" Dr Kellogg gave us eating cereal for breakfast for instance. It's also when circumcision became popularised in the US.
They categorised homosexuality as such (as opposed to sexual excesses and lust) as a mental disorder, in a way that society and the Church previously never did, and we're still dealing with the repercussions of that. It's even an argument that conservatives drag up - "science classed it as a disorder," they go on, "and it was reclassified because of political lobbying". What is touted as "science" can have an enormous impact.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:24, Share, Reply)
19th century science has had far more influence on modern culture than you might think, it's because of 19th century "nutritionist" Dr Kellogg gave us eating cereal for breakfast for instance. It's also when circumcision became popularised in the US.
They categorised homosexuality as such (as opposed to sexual excesses and lust) as a mental disorder, in a way that society and the Church previously never did, and we're still dealing with the repercussions of that. It's even an argument that conservatives drag up - "science classed it as a disorder," they go on, "and it was reclassified because of political lobbying". What is touted as "science" can have an enormous impact.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:24, Share, Reply)
I do think modern science has had a huge impact. I'm not going to deny that.
And that classification was horrible*.
But that classification didn't create homophobia, nor would I argue did it contribute greatly to homophobia. That homophobia was already present and enshrined within society.
That's why I would argue it is an inaccurate and sweeping statement**
When we're taking about reprecussions (and I guess blame) it might be better to consider why such homophobia was already present.
*The next DSM is also going to have a horrible change in the classication of paraphilia's.
**Especially when you take into account, and this is my pet peeve, that the area of Psychology that deals with supposed abnormality, clinical cases and atypical behaviour is actually only a small fraction of the discipline.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:49, Share, Reply)
And that classification was horrible*.
But that classification didn't create homophobia, nor would I argue did it contribute greatly to homophobia. That homophobia was already present and enshrined within society.
That's why I would argue it is an inaccurate and sweeping statement**
When we're taking about reprecussions (and I guess blame) it might be better to consider why such homophobia was already present.
*The next DSM is also going to have a horrible change in the classication of paraphilia's.
**Especially when you take into account, and this is my pet peeve, that the area of Psychology that deals with supposed abnormality, clinical cases and atypical behaviour is actually only a small fraction of the discipline.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:49, Share, Reply)
I don't think it "created" it,
so much as steered it in the direction it took. I suppose I should have said "modern homophobia".
So what's up with the new DSM? :(
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:08, Share, Reply)
so much as steered it in the direction it took. I suppose I should have said "modern homophobia".
So what's up with the new DSM? :(
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:08, Share, Reply)
Yeah with the creation I was refering to your original statement which I think we'd sort of moved on from anyway!
In the current and soon to be old verison of the DSM things like fetishes were classified and diagnosed as a paraphilia if they caused discomfort and/or dysfunction. Usually to a fairly high level.
In the new verison simply having the urge could lead to the diagnosis of a paraphilia. So the simple urge or fantasy about a body part or object could under the proposed criteria changes lead to diagnosis of what is essentially considered a mental disorder. Bad times.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:27, Share, Reply)
In the current and soon to be old verison of the DSM things like fetishes were classified and diagnosed as a paraphilia if they caused discomfort and/or dysfunction. Usually to a fairly high level.
In the new verison simply having the urge could lead to the diagnosis of a paraphilia. So the simple urge or fantasy about a body part or object could under the proposed criteria changes lead to diagnosis of what is essentially considered a mental disorder. Bad times.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:27, Share, Reply)
Apparently not evidence.
There's a raft of papers and critiques out there slating the changes and the editors involved. Some of the data they seems to be working from for the changes is questionable.
There seems, in my view anyway, to be a general call for the removal of paraphilia's from the DSM. I had a fantastic article on it, I think it's at work and behind a paywall so it's not much use, but if I can find it I'll stick a link up. The authors make a much better case than I do, Clinical Psychology isn't my bag.
EDIT: Might be Wakefield (2011) for the current changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-V and Moser & Klienplatz (2005) for the changes to the DSM-IV-TR.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:45, Share, Reply)
There's a raft of papers and critiques out there slating the changes and the editors involved. Some of the data they seems to be working from for the changes is questionable.
There seems, in my view anyway, to be a general call for the removal of paraphilia's from the DSM. I had a fantastic article on it, I think it's at work and behind a paywall so it's not much use, but if I can find it I'll stick a link up. The authors make a much better case than I do, Clinical Psychology isn't my bag.
EDIT: Might be Wakefield (2011) for the current changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-V and Moser & Klienplatz (2005) for the changes to the DSM-IV-TR.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:45, Share, Reply)
Existence in law and existence in society are potentially two different things.
Sexuality or preference doesn’t have to be legislated against for it to suddenly exist. Extending the argument to the ridiculous conclusion how do you even get the ball rolling on legislating against a concept that supposedly is yet to exist? For such laws to be passed there has to be the motivation for them to be created, which requires an understanding a priori.
That’s kind of moot anyway. First of all as you’ve said those laws don’t specific homosexuality of sexual preference until the 19th C. But just because they are not mentioned doesn’t mean that no concept or understanding existed separate to the laws. As I said law and society are potentially different, but usually interacting, entities.
To stress again as I’m waffling, just because those laws do not indicate intrinsic sexual preference doesn’t mean that there was a lack of recognition in society as a whole for such preferences, or a lack of homophobia.
Also, we’re being terribly ethnocentric here. Homosexuality and sexual preference is fairly clearly recognised in many cultures, B.C and A.D.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:06, Share, Reply)
Sexuality or preference doesn’t have to be legislated against for it to suddenly exist. Extending the argument to the ridiculous conclusion how do you even get the ball rolling on legislating against a concept that supposedly is yet to exist? For such laws to be passed there has to be the motivation for them to be created, which requires an understanding a priori.
That’s kind of moot anyway. First of all as you’ve said those laws don’t specific homosexuality of sexual preference until the 19th C. But just because they are not mentioned doesn’t mean that no concept or understanding existed separate to the laws. As I said law and society are potentially different, but usually interacting, entities.
To stress again as I’m waffling, just because those laws do not indicate intrinsic sexual preference doesn’t mean that there was a lack of recognition in society as a whole for such preferences, or a lack of homophobia.
Also, we’re being terribly ethnocentric here. Homosexuality and sexual preference is fairly clearly recognised in many cultures, B.C and A.D.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:06, Share, Reply)
Good point but I think the new scientific treatment made it more concrete,
the taboo against anal sex as far as I can tell goes back to two cultural sources, on the one hand the pre-Christian pagan, Nordic culture and the Hebraic culture imported by Christianity. On the Nordic side look up "Ragr", to violate someone else was seen as a supremely manly thing to do but to be violated the ultimate shame. Christianity kind of turned the tables and made the aggressor into the villain.
Indian culture is the most interesting on this matter.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:18, Share, Reply)
the taboo against anal sex as far as I can tell goes back to two cultural sources, on the one hand the pre-Christian pagan, Nordic culture and the Hebraic culture imported by Christianity. On the Nordic side look up "Ragr", to violate someone else was seen as a supremely manly thing to do but to be violated the ultimate shame. Christianity kind of turned the tables and made the aggressor into the villain.
Indian culture is the most interesting on this matter.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:18, Share, Reply)
The diagnostic criteria and treatment was arguably very harmful, that's true. But I don't think it was a direct legitimisation of homophobia...
It was used more in the either/or sense. Someone caught in a compromising position could be threatened with the law, but then they could also be offered the 'but if you get treatment instead...' option. Prison or treatment option. And option really isn't the right word. Especially when the treatment was aversion therapy and/or chemical castration.
In other words the homophobia already existed, was usually part of the social norms and was again usually enacted in law in some format. The homophobia was there but the diagnosis and treatment simply, and shamefully, added another string to a homophobic society's bow. I don't think that constitutes the creation of homophobia, or the legitimising it. It was already there and just inflitrated another area. The shame for Psychology comes from not standing up to it as a discipline.
Don't get me wrong, Psychology has made some massive mistakes and I say that as a Psychologist, but it is very hard to find an instance where it is something that has developed from the discipline or the people within it. Usually it was a result of the more malleable elements and members mirroring the society they were within. And that to a large extent was and is inevitable. As much as I hate the term 'Social Sciences' Psychology does sit within it, which means it examines, studies, tests and hypothesises about human behaviour and social constructs in one way or another.
TL;DR - Not our fault Guv'.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
It was used more in the either/or sense. Someone caught in a compromising position could be threatened with the law, but then they could also be offered the 'but if you get treatment instead...' option. Prison or treatment option. And option really isn't the right word. Especially when the treatment was aversion therapy and/or chemical castration.
In other words the homophobia already existed, was usually part of the social norms and was again usually enacted in law in some format. The homophobia was there but the diagnosis and treatment simply, and shamefully, added another string to a homophobic society's bow. I don't think that constitutes the creation of homophobia, or the legitimising it. It was already there and just inflitrated another area. The shame for Psychology comes from not standing up to it as a discipline.
Don't get me wrong, Psychology has made some massive mistakes and I say that as a Psychologist, but it is very hard to find an instance where it is something that has developed from the discipline or the people within it. Usually it was a result of the more malleable elements and members mirroring the society they were within. And that to a large extent was and is inevitable. As much as I hate the term 'Social Sciences' Psychology does sit within it, which means it examines, studies, tests and hypothesises about human behaviour and social constructs in one way or another.
TL;DR - Not our fault Guv'.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
Every science made some big mistakes in the 19th century, if it's any consolation.
Victorian society was on the whole very prudish, but surely psychology had a hand in the development of the idea of homosexuality as "a thing that some people are" rather than as a hedonistic excess that some people get up to. And as I write this it occurs to me that they were right about that at least; but psychology at the time was also, as a branch of medicine, concerned with making people "normal" and society wasn't ready to accept the normality of men being sexually attracted to other men, until Kinsey et al.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:51, Share, Reply)
Victorian society was on the whole very prudish, but surely psychology had a hand in the development of the idea of homosexuality as "a thing that some people are" rather than as a hedonistic excess that some people get up to. And as I write this it occurs to me that they were right about that at least; but psychology at the time was also, as a branch of medicine, concerned with making people "normal" and society wasn't ready to accept the normality of men being sexually attracted to other men, until Kinsey et al.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:51, Share, Reply)
It might be a case of arguing for a distinction between prudish and suppressed.
With suppressed indicating it was present. Definitately some Victorian jazz mag equivalents with decidedly homosexual content. So present within a subculture and suppressed in the mainstream.
I think you can make the case for Psychology developing the concept of homosexuality but I think that development was limited in comparison with what already existed. Might be one of those agree to disagree areas. Though obviously I strenuously disagree with the original statement re: homophobia ;)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:24, Share, Reply)
With suppressed indicating it was present. Definitately some Victorian jazz mag equivalents with decidedly homosexual content. So present within a subculture and suppressed in the mainstream.
I think you can make the case for Psychology developing the concept of homosexuality but I think that development was limited in comparison with what already existed. Might be one of those agree to disagree areas. Though obviously I strenuously disagree with the original statement re: homophobia ;)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:24, Share, Reply)
Homophobia?
Really?
Is that a typo for homosexuality? If that is what you mean, then you seem simply to be parrotting Foucault's claim about homosexuality's having been invented in 1870. Homophobia didn't enter the language until the mid-to-late 20th century, though - which sits oddly with your claim if it's not a typo (and I'm more inclined to trust the SOED than you, to be perfectly honest).
But even if you did have Foucault's claim in mind, and even if we understand it as he meant it to be understood - that is, that homosexuality became a subject of study of a particular sort, rather than just another sub-species of sexual transgression - it's not really clear why it's relevant here...
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:00, Share, Reply)
Really?
Is that a typo for homosexuality? If that is what you mean, then you seem simply to be parrotting Foucault's claim about homosexuality's having been invented in 1870. Homophobia didn't enter the language until the mid-to-late 20th century, though - which sits oddly with your claim if it's not a typo (and I'm more inclined to trust the SOED than you, to be perfectly honest).
But even if you did have Foucault's claim in mind, and even if we understand it as he meant it to be understood - that is, that homosexuality became a subject of study of a particular sort, rather than just another sub-species of sexual transgression - it's not really clear why it's relevant here...
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:00, Share, Reply)
it's not a typo,
see the debate above. My point isn't about inventing the term "homophobia" but rather laying much of the groundwork for the modern social phenomena now called such.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:06, Share, Reply)
see the debate above. My point isn't about inventing the term "homophobia" but rather laying much of the groundwork for the modern social phenomena now called such.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 17:06, Share, Reply)
thank you for posting that,
well worth the watch of the whole thing. He presents his case flawlessly.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:49, Share, Reply)
well worth the watch of the whole thing. He presents his case flawlessly.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:49, Share, Reply)
This made me weep at several points
I am a Christian and I've been speaking out against homophobia to members of my church for some time, I've had a good look at the Bible myself on this issue as well as read/watched/listened to several well put together presentations of these issues. This is the best I've ever seen, with many points that I'd not come across before that were exceptionally strongly argued. Especially so as it was argued from the Christian standpoint. I will be doing my best to make sure that this is seen by as many Christians as possible.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 10:14, Share, Reply)
I am a Christian and I've been speaking out against homophobia to members of my church for some time, I've had a good look at the Bible myself on this issue as well as read/watched/listened to several well put together presentations of these issues. This is the best I've ever seen, with many points that I'd not come across before that were exceptionally strongly argued. Especially so as it was argued from the Christian standpoint. I will be doing my best to make sure that this is seen by as many Christians as possible.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 10:14, Share, Reply)
That was an incredibly emotional
Well researched and well presented talk.
It's a shame that his critical thinking has been applied within the teachings of Christianityand not to the belief in God itself.
Although if he wants to be a Christian then that's up to him, I do hope.he manages to change some.minds.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 15:05, Share, Reply)
Well researched and well presented talk.
It's a shame that his critical thinking has been applied within the teachings of Christianityand not to the belief in God itself.
Although if he wants to be a Christian then that's up to him, I do hope.he manages to change some.minds.
( , Mon 27 Aug 2012, 15:05, Share, Reply)
Although I did have another thought
That he does seem to be condemning Gay Jews to a life of loneliness and self hatred.
( , Tue 28 Aug 2012, 8:13, Share, Reply)
That he does seem to be condemning Gay Jews to a life of loneliness and self hatred.
( , Tue 28 Aug 2012, 8:13, Share, Reply)
Somehow maybe I missed this show.
Seems like it would have been prime material for the Python folks. Originally aired in 1964.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 5:43, Share, Reply)
Seems like it would have been prime material for the Python folks. Originally aired in 1964.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 5:43, Share, Reply)
Pls Dont Go into pewdies channel if your just gonna say something good i know Novas pretty good in happywheels BUT DONT GO IN PEWDIES CHANNEL TELLING HIM THAT HE SHOULD FUCKING QUIT IN HAPPY WHEELS well you just messed with the bro army And if you cant handle the bro army then Go Suck Novas Dick and shut up -_- PS. FUCK YOU!!
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:18, Share, Reply)
Just stumbled across it on youtube, made me laugh.
Of no relevance whatsoever, kind of like most of pissy's posts.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:49, Share, Reply)
Of no relevance whatsoever, kind of like most of pissy's posts.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 13:49, Share, Reply)
More chill out for your Sunday
I made this!
Another full album what I made
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:44, Share, Reply)
Another full album what I made
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:44, Share, Reply)
I know I'm picking apart a word that's not in the dictionary
but I think you mean tunage?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:23, Share, Reply)
but I think you mean tunage?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:23, Share, Reply)
wow! cheers.
You are certainly prolific.
Edit: Nice chilled stuff, I like it.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:45, Share, Reply)
You are certainly prolific.
Edit: Nice chilled stuff, I like it.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:45, Share, Reply)
ha! thanks :) it's all from my back catalogue of the last seven years, I'll run out eventually!
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:57, Share, Reply)
Where are you on the American Political scale?
Im Moderate Liberal.
Happy with that.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:44, Share, Reply)
Im Moderate Liberal.
Happy with that.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:44, Share, Reply)
interesting!
social: very liberal
economic: moderate republican
overall: moderate democrat.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:57, Share, Reply)
social: very liberal
economic: moderate republican
overall: moderate democrat.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:57, Share, Reply)
That's what I got
Apparently socially I'm way out there on the left, which makes me a bit concerned how right-wing the US may be as a whole.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:09, Share, Reply)
Apparently socially I'm way out there on the left, which makes me a bit concerned how right-wing the US may be as a whole.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:09, Share, Reply)
I'm a liberal democrat
I don't know if I feel good about that, as I don't really understand American politics *meh*
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:08, Share, Reply)
I don't know if I feel good about that, as I don't really understand American politics *meh*
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:08, Share, Reply)
Liberal Democrat
Nearly off the scale for leftyness, happy with that :)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:16, Share, Reply)
Nearly off the scale for leftyness, happy with that :)
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:16, Share, Reply)
Liberal democrat too
Maybe the answers of any sane non-American come out as Liberal Democrat?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:57, Share, Reply)
Maybe the answers of any sane non-American come out as Liberal Democrat?
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 0:57, Share, Reply)
I'm to the left of the liberal democrat in all areas
*proud hippy*
:D
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 1:17, Share, Reply)
*proud hippy*
:D
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 1:17, Share, Reply)
Political quizzes serve only to polarise opinion and generate clicks
Completely agree[X] Mostly agree [ ] Mostly Disagree [ ] Completely Disagree [ ]
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 3:51, Share, Reply)
Completely agree[X] Mostly agree [ ] Mostly Disagree [ ] Completely Disagree [ ]
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 3:51, Share, Reply)
The average breakdowns are interesting
Hardly any movement between the demographic groups.
18-29 and 65+ are both clustered around the middle for example.
I'm guess the numbers of participants are huge, but feels a little like those kids are jaded.
Far left on all three counts here.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 8:56, Share, Reply)
Hardly any movement between the demographic groups.
18-29 and 65+ are both clustered around the middle for example.
I'm guess the numbers of participants are huge, but feels a little like those kids are jaded.
Far left on all three counts here.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 8:56, Share, Reply)
I nearly fell of the end of the
very conservative end, you bloody hippies!
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 9:31, Share, Reply)
very conservative end, you bloody hippies!
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 9:31, Share, Reply)
I'm having some difficulty answering these
as I know fuck all about the state of things in the US.
'There needs to be stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment.'
Well, it sounds all very nice and good to say 'AGREE!', but if I recall correctly the US has thousands of square miles of protected nature reserve and the fallout from things such as that gulf of mexico oil spill is usually pretty big (even if not actually outlined in law).
But isn't more regulation always good? Well, not if you want to make a bonfire for your barbecue, or not have wolves eating all your sheep.
It seems that people's perceptions of their own political leanings affect the quiz rather than the quiz affecting their perception, especially when the people taking the quiz come from another country and are merely giving general answers (e.g. 'environment good!')
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:20, Share, Reply)
as I know fuck all about the state of things in the US.
'There needs to be stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment.'
Well, it sounds all very nice and good to say 'AGREE!', but if I recall correctly the US has thousands of square miles of protected nature reserve and the fallout from things such as that gulf of mexico oil spill is usually pretty big (even if not actually outlined in law).
But isn't more regulation always good? Well, not if you want to make a bonfire for your barbecue, or not have wolves eating all your sheep.
It seems that people's perceptions of their own political leanings affect the quiz rather than the quiz affecting their perception, especially when the people taking the quiz come from another country and are merely giving general answers (e.g. 'environment good!')
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:20, Share, Reply)
yup
you'd need to be an expert in US policy to make an informed decision on some of those questions
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:37, Share, Reply)
you'd need to be an expert in US policy to make an informed decision on some of those questions
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:37, Share, Reply)
• The growing number of newcomers from other countries threaten traditional American customs and values
Of course I completely agree with the question but I also consider newcomers to America as generally a hard working people who set up businesses and help the economy as they have done in the past.
Of course American customs might be compromised with a influx of people from other customs but do I support this? Yes I do but the question indicated I don't if I answer with completely agree.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:36, Share, Reply)
Of course I completely agree with the question but I also consider newcomers to America as generally a hard working people who set up businesses and help the economy as they have done in the past.
Of course American customs might be compromised with a influx of people from other customs but do I support this? Yes I do but the question indicated I don't if I answer with completely agree.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:36, Share, Reply)
I suppose the key there is in the word threaten.
It's usually pejorative, they seem to be assuming that people will see it negatively.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:49, Share, Reply)
It's usually pejorative, they seem to be assuming that people will see it negatively.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 11:49, Share, Reply)
Crikey. I answered a few questions that I thought were a bit to the right
yet I came out as left of Liberal Democrat.
I suppose it depends on your perspective. I've always thought that what the UK considers centrist, the USA considers raving leftist.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:22, Share, Reply)
yet I came out as left of Liberal Democrat.
I suppose it depends on your perspective. I've always thought that what the UK considers centrist, the USA considers raving leftist.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 14:22, Share, Reply)
^This^
Note that, thanks to their endorsement of things like the NHS, the Tories are (at least publicly) to the left of the Dems.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:15, Share, Reply)
Note that, thanks to their endorsement of things like the NHS, the Tories are (at least publicly) to the left of the Dems.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:15, Share, Reply)
that depends
on whether you are going by what they say before an election, or by what they do after it.
looking at you Health and Social Care Act.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:25, Share, Reply)
on whether you are going by what they say before an election, or by what they do after it.
looking at you Health and Social Care Act.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:25, Share, Reply)
This^
Answering as honestly as I could, and I don't always tow a traditional liberal line, and was churned out here
I guess my stance on same sex marriage, healthcare, the environment, immigration not effecting American identity, God, and abortion, make me a raving liberal in North American eyes; which is tiresome that some of those things are deemed such major issues in life.
I even thought I might be pushing it to the right, by completely disagreeing with The government should help more needy people even if it means going deeper in debt question, which is one issue where I probably fall straight into the fold of libertarianism. Live within your means, I mean defence spending is mental
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
Answering as honestly as I could, and I don't always tow a traditional liberal line, and was churned out here
I guess my stance on same sex marriage, healthcare, the environment, immigration not effecting American identity, God, and abortion, make me a raving liberal in North American eyes; which is tiresome that some of those things are deemed such major issues in life.
I even thought I might be pushing it to the right, by completely disagreeing with The government should help more needy people even if it means going deeper in debt question, which is one issue where I probably fall straight into the fold of libertarianism. Live within your means, I mean defence spending is mental
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 16:39, Share, Reply)
A 50 second musical ditty
I made this!
inspired by all the fuss about Prince Harry's bottom being displayed in a newspaper.
It's not big, it's not clever, and it's not quite in tune.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:28, Share, Reply)
inspired by all the fuss about Prince Harry's bottom being displayed in a newspaper.
It's not big, it's not clever, and it's not quite in tune.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:28, Share, Reply)
getting in the mood for next week ends belgium grand prix from spa
clip from 1985 on the bbc so may not play in your area
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:34, Share, Reply)
clip from 1985 on the bbc so may not play in your area
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:34, Share, Reply)
Have you seen what Crazy Dave's been up to?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6j19v2fSg
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:37, Share, Reply)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6j19v2fSg
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:37, Share, Reply)
Muslims destroy shrines in Libya, leave saucy minarets intact.
PHOOOOAAAARRRR!!!!! Eh, lads?
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:34, Share, Reply)
PHOOOOAAAARRRR!!!!! Eh, lads?
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:34, Share, Reply)
Religious extremists behaving like intolerant fascists
Nothing new there then
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:18, Share, Reply)
Nothing new there then
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:18, Share, Reply)
HA HA HA HA!
Brilliant, fingers crossed it results in all those stupid cunts killing each other.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:28, Share, Reply)
Brilliant, fingers crossed it results in all those stupid cunts killing each other.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:28, Share, Reply)
this is why I don't buy the whole "Islamic outrage" whenever a Koran is destroyed
Anyone who isn't Muslim trashes (accidentally or not) a copy of the Koran and there are days of protests, effergies burnt, people killed. Islamic militants destroy shrines, churches and temples of other branches of Islam where hundreds of Korans must have been kept, nobody bats an eyelid.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:34, Share, Reply)
Anyone who isn't Muslim trashes (accidentally or not) a copy of the Koran and there are days of protests, effergies burnt, people killed. Islamic militants destroy shrines, churches and temples of other branches of Islam where hundreds of Korans must have been kept, nobody bats an eyelid.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 12:34, Share, Reply)
Woman puts her kung fu training to use against a man
pretty impressive stuff
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:29, Share, Reply)
pretty impressive stuff
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:29, Share, Reply)
Neil Armstrong has died.
Here's an interview from 1970. God bless him and his massive (metaphorical) balls.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:24, Share, Reply)
Here's an interview from 1970. God bless him and his massive (metaphorical) balls.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:24, Share, Reply)
Realy? shit that was bad news :{
he was in hospital only a couple of weeks ago having a quadruple bypass i think it was.
this man is an icon of american spirit and adventure, although the preview pic makes him look like patrick moore.
*feels sad*
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:28, Share, Reply)
he was in hospital only a couple of weeks ago having a quadruple bypass i think it was.
this man is an icon of american spirit and adventure, although the preview pic makes him look like patrick moore.
*feels sad*
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:28, Share, Reply)
scary uncanny if you ask me
maybe it was a conspiracy ?
*dons tinfoil scrotum guard and hat *
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:42, Share, Reply)
maybe it was a conspiracy ?
*dons tinfoil scrotum guard and hat *
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:42, Share, Reply)
if he is not real . then some one should
tell he doesnt exist .
i would like to see prof brian cox explain to patrick that he isnt real and only exists in his own imagination
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:14, Share, Reply)
tell he doesnt exist .
i would like to see prof brian cox explain to patrick that he isnt real and only exists in his own imagination
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:14, Share, Reply)
It's true, he doesn't exist.
He was all filmed in an aircraft hanger in Nevada.
You can tell because his shadow goes the wrong way.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 22:13, Share, Reply)
He was all filmed in an aircraft hanger in Nevada.
You can tell because his shadow goes the wrong way.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 22:13, Share, Reply)
True
Patrick Moore is an alias, his real name is Games Master !
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:27, Share, Reply)
Patrick Moore is an alias, his real name is Games Master !
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:27, Share, Reply)
*Sads*
43 years, and all we have left are 8 men who have stood on the moon.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:53, Share, Reply)
43 years, and all we have left are 8 men who have stood on the moon.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:53, Share, Reply)
makes me think
how recent all this going to space malarkey really is. We're as far from the moon landings today as they were in 1969 from the General Strike, the League of Nations abolishing slavery, the birth of Kenneth Williams and the death of Houdini and the age of airships.
*lights pipe and settles down to reminisce*
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:22, Share, Reply)
how recent all this going to space malarkey really is. We're as far from the moon landings today as they were in 1969 from the General Strike, the League of Nations abolishing slavery, the birth of Kenneth Williams and the death of Houdini and the age of airships.
*lights pipe and settles down to reminisce*
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:22, Share, Reply)
A good place to post this
www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-11.html
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:52, Share, Reply)
www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-11.html
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 21:52, Share, Reply)
Reg prescot the dangerous diy chracter created by/for kenny everett compilation is 28 mins long
kenny everett as reg prescott the DIY handyman .a collection of nine sketches , featuring reg & the pirhanas,the guillotine,in the kitchen,in the garden and more. from the kenny everett television show
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:21, Share, Reply)
kenny everett as reg prescott the DIY handyman .a collection of nine sketches , featuring reg & the pirhanas,the guillotine,in the kitchen,in the garden and more. from the kenny everett television show
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:21, Share, Reply)
crap out time on the linkydinky
just click the watch on youpube bit
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:31, Share, Reply)
just click the watch on youpube bit
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:31, Share, Reply)
Similar to the ACS Law situation in the UK recently (a company acting on behalf of the studios scan P2P network for IP's).
It sucks and they should put an end to this practice. This chap didn't help himself though with the way he handled it (dubious legal advice seems to have played a part too). He was originally fined 3 grand. beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/sony_tenenbaum_091207DecisionSumJudg.pdf
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:31, Share, Reply)
It sucks and they should put an end to this practice. This chap didn't help himself though with the way he handled it (dubious legal advice seems to have played a part too). He was originally fined 3 grand. beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/sony_tenenbaum_091207DecisionSumJudg.pdf
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:31, Share, Reply)
I hate to say it, but I think the entertainment industry is starting to win the war on pirates.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 23:31, Share, Reply)
I haven't paid for anything in over 10 years
mind you, I am a career criminal...
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 7:30, Share, Reply)
mind you, I am a career criminal...
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 7:30, Share, Reply)
The Tiny Tim link below reminded me of this animation
By the Layzell brothers, for Adam Buxton/BUG. Great stuff.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:04, Share, Reply)
By the Layzell brothers, for Adam Buxton/BUG. Great stuff.
( , Sat 25 Aug 2012, 20:04, Share, Reply)
bollocks bollocks bollocks
It's a different vid so it didn't come up as GC. Ah well. I'm a cockface.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:32, Share, Reply)
It's a different vid so it didn't come up as GC. Ah well. I'm a cockface.
( , Sun 26 Aug 2012, 15:32, Share, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »