![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Can you remember a time without smartphones, mp3 players or desktop computers?
The Buxton Collection celebrates 35 years of gadgets that inspired modern day tech. Curated by Bill Buxton (Principal Researcher for Microsoft), his collection contains numerous input and interactive devices and helps span the history of pen computing, pointing devices and touch technologies.
From the early mouse, to the first smart phone, kooky keyboards, right-up to the tablet computers of today - Buxton's collection is a fascinating treasure trove of gadgets from the golden era.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:42, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Have a vague recollection that IBM Warwick used to hold a similar collection but just of their own devices. The special keyboard they developed to input (shot by shot) important matches at Wimbledon was quite nicely done, if I remember rightly.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:05, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I thought he might have had an Atari joystick though.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:12, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Or one of the Saitek Cyborgs.
Or a Microsoft Sidewinder force-feedback.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:19, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Looking at the image for the 3M ergonomic mouse
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:47, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It's still good, mind.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:17, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If they could do this from a plane i'd be even more impressed, but it's still pretty damn good.
GC says no, but it's probably lying
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:40, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
That's pretty awesome. I want a go, even though I'm sure I'd spang my head on the sides a lot.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:52, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Been there a couple of times. Be warned that all you'll be doing for the first few times will be floating about 6 feet from the ground (If you're lucky/a natural) for a few minutes at most. It's expensive for what you get but still worth it and a great introduction to skydiving/aerodynamics/resistance. The tiniest adjustment to your shape affects your position/direction/height massively. The guys you see here have spent (I'm guessing) hundreds of hours in that tunnel mastering that routine. They also turn the fan down for beginners so you can't go that high or as fast. Don't want to put anyone off but it's not as easy as it looks!
Right, I'll fuck off back in my hole now.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:19, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
cheaper than I thought it'd be!
my finger is poised over the book now button!
:)
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:22, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...I resent the fact I wasn't informed about this beforehand.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:02, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'm sure you weren't bored.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:09, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...had a great time. This would have been the icing on the beer and goulash soaked cake though.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:15, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But imagine the size of the table you'd need to balance that on it.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:38, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
of a story on the Today programme in about November 2005 about one of these things being used to teach an injured bird of prey to hover.
I thought that was pretty awesome.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:41, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
My go! My go! I dibs next go! Me, me, me, me, me!!!
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:54, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Anyone else going to say "fake"? Not the airfix thing, but the actual stunts...? Find it a little unbelievable somehow. Still enjoyable though.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:00, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Impressed!
( , Sat 11 Jun 2011, 1:24, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
So with Le Mans coming up this weekend it seems a bit odd to be looking forward to the next one already, but if this thing turns up I might have to go and see it for myself.
What do you think? Is it as revolutionary as Colin Chapman asking "Why don't we put the engine in the boot?" or a technological dead-end?
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:26, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but will also be pleasantly surprised if it succeeds.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:38, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I was a bit upset by the whole US-F1 saga. Peter Windsor's a really nice bloke :(
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:31, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...it will be a demon in a straight line (even if it does seem a little underpowered). Can't see how it will generate much downforce though, so corners may be a bit of an issue. But it is De La Sarthe. So probably not.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:58, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is the lower drag and weight (they're talking about half the drag and weight of a normal LMP car) means they can get away with lower power. Most of the downforce comes from the venturi tunnels at the back, where the weight is.
I'm a bit puzzled about how it'll perform in corners, but I can only assume they've done their sums and it all stacks up. After all, to get to the stage where they're entering it into a race they're bound to have done the relevant simulations to prove it actually works.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:08, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Because I don't see it personally.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:12, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and the bloody great big jet engine?
Ok...
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 17:02, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
first was 'its an F1 with narrow wheels at the front.'
If it does go into full production, straight line will be spectacular but, as noted by others, I fail to see it being any good in a hairpin bend.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:02, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
watching an outdated B-rated TV star recycle old memes on top of events that, frankly, aren't half as funny as the shit you get on QOTW.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:33, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It's a shame BBC 3 didn't exist when Alan Partridge was trying to pitch his new programme ideas.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:33, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But only if Will mellor presented it
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:35, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
There are literally thousands of clips identical to, as good as or better than every one they show. And Mr.T? What were you thinking?
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:07, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQlCaroTcIw
You really have to ask yourself why?
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:08, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
that has a TV showing Fashion TV as a urinal...
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:15, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but pissing on the worlds most shallow and vacuous people doesn't worry me much. Fashion TV has men and women on it, so you can get lucky and piss on some asymmetrical haired twat in lederhosen.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:24, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is that you like pissing on men in lederhosen.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:27, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Rather an unfair generalisation don't you think? I can think of a lot worse.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:32, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
really???
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:34, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But I can think of a few folks working in the music industry for a start. Plus someone had to design the clothes you're wearing.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 19:14, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Although they use John Madden alot, which is ok :)
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:29, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
They'll just love swimming about in your bowels!
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:10, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The thing is, they might all meet up in your tummy and form a new ball and then live there forever... perhaps only coming out at night.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:56, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I assure you its not...
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:58, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Funniest quote: The judge said he was considering ordering treatment, adding: “If I send him to prison for a short time he’ll be out in a flash.”
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:55, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
for an advert!?
It was quite amusing up til then
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:54, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
That insane flyby that was posted earlier in the week isn't fake according to gizmondo, who've got hold of a cockpit cam view of the stunt. Pilot clearly has a deathwish (for his crewmates).
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:05, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It's still impressive flying.
The Argentinians were always good at low level flying - they did it during the Falklands War. The problem with it was that they were dropping the bombs so low, they didn't have chance to arm before hitting the ship they were targeting, resulting in some of them being disarmed. Obviously, that wasn't the case for all of them, though.
Apparently, they even flew between masts on some of the Navy ships.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:30, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Got a 'maybe' from the linkchecker.
/hangs head
BombayMick: that's crazy - were they flying low to avoid radar or fire? Or were they just being crazy showoffs?
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:35, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
They were flying that low for a mix of all 3.
What really scuppered them was the overall tactics they employed - attack the ships, not the planes. It gave the Harriers free-reign to take them down - we would have probably lost otherwise.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:37, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
They demonstrated a fearsome anti-shipping capability but deployed it against the wrong ships. If they'd concentrated on the aircraft carriers it would have been pretty much game over.
The air combat stats on the other hand were pretty decisively in favour of the Harrier.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:02, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is that they were going for the carriers, but ship recognition at 50ft and over 1,000 mph while being shot at is a tricky business. The Sea Harriers did very well though considering how slow they are.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:26, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
on a touchscreen phone from a toilet stall but here goes:
The Argentine Air Force never got close enough to the Carrier fleet to bomb them, using Beyond Visual Range Exocet missiles which, while deadly enough, could be spoofed, and which were targetted via radar. A Carrier looks like any other large vessel on a radar screen, meaning the pilots have to make an educated guess based upon the ships position within the fleet. Any competent Admiral will know this and shuffle accordingly.
Those ships that were bombed were either acting as screen ships and therefore distant from the fleet (HMS Coventry) or were supporting the land invasion in and around San Carlos (HMS Ardent). While difficult to identify from low-level they're only ever going to be Frigates, Destroyers or Amphibious Assault vessels.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:00, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I use iGoogle as a home page so that's probably buggering it up.
/edit, and it's about half way down the page as well ;)
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:18, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...but I sure as hell can't identify it.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:10, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
excellent deduction. Iron Man. Respect to anyone who can work out Stair way.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:19, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
[Repeat]
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:55, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...is the intro from Redemption song
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:26, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Loads of vids, real freaking skillz here.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:30, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I highly recommend the tomorrows world series from the 60's and 70's. There are also a few brilliant old Panorama episodes as well as an interesting documentary about the choice of weapons for James Bond following an exchange with a fan which ultimately led to the creation of the character Q.
James bond link for those who can't find it: www.bbc.co.uk/archive/james_bond/12603.shtml
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:12, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
cheers!
*edit* and in ref to the above www.bbc.co.uk/archive/james_bond/12607.shtml love how it starts
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:21, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Although for some reason the first thing I was drawn towards was this: www.bbc.co.uk/archive/broom_cupboard/12320.shtml
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:30, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
www.bbc.co.uk/archive/great_egg_race/
WARNING: Lots of brown
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:36, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Top kids TV show, that.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:46, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 21:20, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Especially like the Tomorrows World - Moog Synth where it's the size of a house!!
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:42, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:05, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
just because I moved down here to bring the convicts some culture, the bloody BBC won't let me watch the programmes my license fee paid for!
/flounce
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:15, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
*watches out for drop bears*
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:47, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
As a bit of a gun nut i enjoyed that james bond one, now onto this www.bbc.co.uk/archive/bankholidays/7119.shtml
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:23, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
lovely stuff.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 20:27, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
www.bbc.co.uk/archive/programme/index.shtml
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 22:09, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'll just pop this here before I head of to the dentist for some root canal work :0(
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:04, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Cheers :0) got to love 8bitpeoples. Loads of good music, most of which is free to download.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:35, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It looks like like you've moved from Scratch to Itch. ....how are you finding it?
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:13, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I have mate but only whilst im getting to try out the DDJ-S1. Itch is great, really easy to use. Given the choice I'd rather turntables and Scratch than Itch and a controller though
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:32, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i have it but my 8bit people folder is way too big to find it
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:30, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I've put the track list in the description on the You Tube page, hopefully that'll help you track it down :0)
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:41, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
'It's All Quiet Now'
A Swedish short about a teenage boy, a teenage girl, and their thoughts. NSFW as has some swears and stuff.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:58, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
And I'm sure nobody here would have discovered it without my posting it up here...
But Google's got quite a funky little Les Paul thing going on today.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:23, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
A very clever site allowing you to see and compare the average Rotten Tomatoes review score of actors and directors over the last 25 years. Some bounce around all over the place, others fade, some recover. See M Night Shamalamadingdong's performance crash! Laugh at Jennifer Love Hewitt's terrible reviews! Wonder what happened to Julie Walters in the '90s!
Edit - scroll to the bottom of the page to get past the copy and get to the career-o-matic
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 8:24, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Can't believe Romeo is Bleeding got shite reviews and shows as a blip on Gary Oldman's career.
I love that film.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 8:54, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:36, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Yeah, i really like this. I'm equally stunned that Face/Off got a 93% rating on Nicolas Cage's graph (which I specifically looked at to scoff at his guttering career).
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:59, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Not one of those self righteous head-cam heroes, this one is quite funny.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 7:42, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
so I clicked.
*removes cycleclips from journey into work*
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:21, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
yeah when im driving occasionally there will be objects in my path....
nope not going to start the bike debate again :)
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:51, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is that you won't get fined for going around them. he got a ticket for riding on the road instead of the bike lane, which is perfectly legal anyway. afaik
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:55, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
if they ride on the pavement they deserve a massive slap. see also running red lights etc.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:44, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
With the 0.1% usually including the person making that assumption.
Discuss.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:10, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
These arguments are low down in my priority, so I have the right to go away.
Or something.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:06, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Also illegal
"Highway code rule 64
You MUST NOT cycle on a pavement.
[Laws HA 1835 sect 72 & R(S)A 1984, sect 129]"
I know this because i'm learning to drive. I had to learn this fact as a driver.
This includes just popping onto the pavement to get past a red light.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:28, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
if there's no one else using the pavement why not ride on it out of the way of traffic? If the pavement's clear I'll happily ride on it, but if there's someone else using it I'll get off or slow down if it's wide enough.
It's just about common sense and courtesy, two things most people unfortunately lack...
( , Sat 11 Jun 2011, 19:28, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...in whatever jurisdiction's laws you just cited. But not illegal everywhere. It's perfectly legal where I live.
( , Sun 12 Jun 2011, 2:59, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
cycle lanes actually go onto the pavement to allow a cyclist to pass red lights on the pavement then drop back onto the road further on, which to most drivers is not known and they assume they cyclist has merely mounted the pavement to skip the light.
As a driver/motorcyclist it riles me watching it happen as I also assume they're just doing it to skip lights, but as a cyclist it's very useful to not have to stop or get close to queues of cars who normally won't give you enough room. Cyclists who just skip red lights blatantly should be ran over from cars coming the other way, as karma. Or something.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2011, 12:50, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Nowt wrong with that is there?
Cycling on the pavement is a cuntish thing to do though, I agree, especially when there are clearly marked cycle lanes.
Shame the cycle lanes and advance stopping zones keep getting clogged up with twunts in four wheels.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:54, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You guys are WORSE THAN HITLER STOMPING BABIES &c. &c.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:55, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I walk, ride a bicycle, drive a car and ride a motorbike. So I will just watch, if it's all the same to you guys.
And Bieber lookalikes.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:32, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
This doesn't warrant it's own post so I'll stick it here if that's all right - www.core77.com/blog/social_design/bikes_cars_and_pedestrians_at_28th_park_ave_a_never-ending_cycle_of_near_misses_19541.asp#more
[VIDEO]
3 way Intersection in New York which has had its many near misses tracked on satellite.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:25, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But yeah, interesting what people are like.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:39, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
me and the missus was crossing the road when a around the corner came a guy on a racer going full pelt just missing us.
As he past us he shouted in a rather self righteous tone "CYCLIST!"
I replied likewise shouting "TOSSER!". Apologies to people who live near me for waking them up at 6:30...
I am normally a mild mannered guy but i've been hit by someone on a bike and it bloody hurts.
Still got nothing against cyclists in general and good vid.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 9:56, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
that man is a tool. cyclists have no more or less right to be on the road than cars.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:44, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
the last time you got hit by a cyclist, was it because you then too couldnt be arsed to look both ways before crossing the road?
but yeah... erm bloody cyclists... lycra is gay lol... and uhm... road tax! yeah. road tax...
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 10:52, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Walking out from a foot path into another one where a building obscured the view to the right.
It was a narrow footpath not a cycle path and there's a bollard at the start of it to discourage cyclists.
Ended up covered in cuts and bruises. So no it wasn't because I couldn't be arsed.
Still it was probably my fault for not shouting out "PEDESTRIAN!" before exiting.
Seeing as you raised it, why shouldn't cyclists pay a reduced road tax? Ok they may not damage the roads like cars but you still use road signs and traffic lights.... oh wait.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:05, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If a pedestrian has already started crossing, the vehicle/cycle should give way. He's clearly a twat.
This argument is more a sign of human condition than anything else. People are just arrogant behind the wheel/in the saddle, and generally only view things from their own perspective.
I should probably load this statement with various disclaimers, as someone's bound to be upset by what I've said ("I'm not arrogant, blah blah, rant rant", etc).
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:08, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'm going to start up a big flouncy campaign to raise awareness.
We, can have stickers and shirts with funny but yet thoughtful slogans.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:54, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
of strict liability hows this:
lorrys strictly liable for accidents with cars.
cars strictly liable for accidents with bikes.
bikes stricytly liable for pedestrians...
that way we are all looking out for each other?
and no one gets a free card to cause accidents.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:36, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but don't fancy the idea of being run over because i'm wearing it.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:21, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
My taxes also pay for Dialysis machines. I want my fucking dialysis machine whenever I feel like it.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:25, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
So unless you have made clear eye contact with a pedestrian you are about to pass, slow the fuck down.
I speak as a cyclist who has almost hit plonkers walking all over the place, not looking where they are going.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:49, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
you woke up your neighbours at 6.30 am calling yourself a tosser?
good work loony!
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:08, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and people don't seem to realise that a bike in a lot of places goes just as fast as a car. Every other day someone steps off the pavement in front of me and it pisses me off.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 12:47, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
A car driver would be expected to slow down in that situation.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 13:14, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
despite the fact that it was the middle of the road length with maximum viability to each way.
Even though I didn't mention where in the road we were crossing you just had to assume the cyclist was innocent.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:31, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You'd followed the green cross code, of course, yet a vehicle which rarely goes faster than 20mph managed to reach you - and have to dodge because there wasn't time to brake and stop - before you'd got half way across the road?
( , Thu 20 Oct 2011, 22:52, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
do you treat children and the blind as cunts if they cause you to slow down by stepping into the road?
Car drivers are expected to look at what type of person is on the pavement and if they are able to see / comprehend you are coming and if not you get prepared to stop.
It is for that reason electric cars are having to be fitted with some kind of sound system to alert those that cant see you coming.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:38, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and you're right, it does bloody hurt.
I've also been hit by a car, and I can categorically tell you it hurts a whole bloody lot more.
(Both times I was walking on the pavement and was hit from behind)
( , Sat 11 Jun 2011, 13:17, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Doing the world a favour would be getting his balls crushed in a horrific accident thereby stopping another smug gene from being passed on.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 11:06, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I ride a bike, drive a car and ride a motorcycle and walk my kid to school every day too.
And the main point I would like to raise is this:
Your all gay.
Thanks.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 14:10, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but the lack of capitalization ruined it for me.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 20:08, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
These guys did loads of great stuff
neistatbrothers.com/neistat-movies
( , Fri 10 Jun 2011, 18:53, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Ronseal parody. *Off to work, have a good day board.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 6:03, Reply)
![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
When the man test-driving your new Jag slips on his racing gloves, know that he means business...
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 4:46, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
At about 40 seconds in you can clearly see a race-track crash barrier go by - so I'm sure the passenger knew what was going to happen.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 15:51, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
for having his "super-prepared" face on @ 0:35 then.
( , Thu 9 Jun 2011, 19:55, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »