
When the frog deflates do the blokes cheeks explode?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:18,
archived)

That's Dizzy fucking Gillespie!!
(small rant) ee, the youth of today, don't know they're born, I remember when all this were Gracie Fields
when I were a lad, we were poor but we were happy
bring back hanging, that's what I say, no proper education see,
they don't know 'owt nor nowt these days, kids don't (/small rant)
I feel better now, thanks. And woo! to the pic.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 20:25,
archived)
(small rant) ee, the youth of today, don't know they're born, I remember when all this were Gracie Fields
when I were a lad, we were poor but we were happy
bring back hanging, that's what I say, no proper education see,
they don't know 'owt nor nowt these days, kids don't (/small rant)
I feel better now, thanks. And woo! to the pic.

has anyone shopped tom wait's playing a swordfishtrombone yet ? if not i might have to do that later.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:13,
archived)

I might have to have a bit of a listen to that now.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:13,
archived)

Salmon ought to stop this before it begins again.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:11,
archived)


which made my foot swell up?
And my head fall off (not really).
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:23,
archived)
And my head fall off (not really).
![Challenge Entry: Animal Instruments [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
( , Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:04, archived)

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah !
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:06,
archived)

Tea for the Tillerman is pretty much the only good one.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:17,
archived)

I have purged my record collection of 'Mr' Stevens. Apart from 'campfire song', which wouldn't be a problem if I re-bought that album today.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:36,
archived)

and I'm very very picky about horror films.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:45,
archived)

which makes me feel paranoid and like i'm being the most annoying person ever
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:46,
archived)

how are ya darling ?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:47,
archived)

i need adventure and fun..but i'm broke and got noone to have fun with other than the cat..and it just sleeps all day.
did ya go fishing ?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:49,
archived)
did ya go fishing ?

no wonder you're still snotty, camping at this fucking time of year.
up to much this weekend ?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:53,
archived)
up to much this weekend ?

take em fishing !
edit: or the park or seaside or something more child friendly. :P
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:00,
archived)
edit: or the park or seaside or something more child friendly. :P

right who wants to lend me their children !?!?!
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:17,
archived)

I fed him today, he smiled, and then threw up on my face.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:25,
archived)

i love children far too much..specially other people's kids...cos i don't have to deal with them all the fucking time. it's great.
when i first met my friend little girl, poppy, a few years back, her mum told me after meeting me she asked her if i was a child or a grown up. :D
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:27,
archived)
when i first met my friend little girl, poppy, a few years back, her mum told me after meeting me she asked her if i was a child or a grown up. :D

I love kids too - my nephews and nieces are ace, and have the same sense of humour as me.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:48,
archived)

I am hoping that Charlie Brooker will one day turn in to Spider Jerusalem.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:59,
archived)
![Challenge Entry: Animal Instruments [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
Well, Ah woke up this mohnin'
With a hangover and a broken femur
An' dats why Ah'm jest sittin' here
A-pluckin' on my lemur
eveybody -
I Got Those...

"What you lookin' at"?

not a dig at you, Neffer - just the apparent restrictions of the given goods :/
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:26,
archived)

know what you mean. Thought that as I was pintling around trying to make it. "Never mind, Neffer, me old pineapple cheesecake", I said, "You'll have them all singing along and failing to notice either the saminess or the crapnitudinosity of this appalling creation thereby brightening the b3tans' lives considerably." Wrongly. :-)
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:32,
archived)

Also I have no problem with seaminess or crappiness, and have just voted for the seams challenge.
edit: oh, he said saminess. Sorry about the accidental insult there.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:38,
archived)
edit: oh, he said saminess. Sorry about the accidental insult there.

:)
I can already hear the gnashing of teeth from b3tans with talent over the prospect of a whole week of seamy postings...
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:45,
archived)
I can already hear the gnashing of teeth from b3tans with talent over the prospect of a whole week of seamy postings...

'show beta that you are actually quite fucking fantastic at using photoshop and don't use text or filters in your masterpiece'
For a change.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:17,
archived)
For a change.

Felix!I would love this challenge.
Being absolutely talentless I could let my imagination run riot and not have to rein it in as I don't have the 'shoppery skills to execute an idea.
I clicked. Hard.

( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:49,
archived)
Being absolutely talentless I could let my imagination run riot and not have to rein it in as I don't have the 'shoppery skills to execute an idea.
I clicked. Hard.


For maximum seams Ms Paint is the only way to go.
Plus use a clonky mouse with the hand you don't usually use to write. Or if you are ambidextrous a foot.
4. Profit

( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:55,
archived)
Plus use a clonky mouse with the hand you don't usually use to write. Or if you are ambidextrous a foot.
4. Profit


turn off anti-aliasing, and maybe re-save it a couple of times for extra JPEG artifacts.
(Re-sizing inbetween helps for this. And remember, always scale up, never down.)
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:56,
archived)
(Re-sizing inbetween helps for this. And remember, always scale up, never down.)

though I manage quite well on the seam front without too much effort at all. Not meaning to sound too smug about it.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:01,
archived)

but the seamhorse is a special phenomenon.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:54,
archived)

and arf again! One day I am going to look at a tutorial or something. Promise. :-D
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:41,
archived)



home tutor you in the basics of photoshopping. Just keep me sober or my hands would wander.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:20,
archived)

www.b3ta.com/board/8037131
/just whoring really...
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:43,
archived)
/just whoring really...

That's who he reminds me of.,.,
Quick TC story; I worked with a bloke who was a very, very junior assistant on TC's autopsy. He had kept a lock of hair as a 'memento'. To say he was a bit weird would be the understatement of the century.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55,
archived)
Quick TC story; I worked with a bloke who was a very, very junior assistant on TC's autopsy. He had kept a lock of hair as a 'memento'. To say he was a bit weird would be the understatement of the century.

Put your name on it, quick. It will probably all over the internets and emails tomorrow.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58,
archived)

tag it, this will be in Nuts tomorrow
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03,
archived)

Having to log back onto the machine with p'shop...
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:05,
archived)

So that when the fuckers say they don't know who made it, you can show them the digital watermark.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:15,
archived)

With scary corporate copyright notice in the Digimark, too.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:27,
archived)

Tommy's on stage doing some magic. He produces a stick of rock and informs the audience "I will now turn this stick of rock into some furniture". He then snaps the stick of rock twice, and announces...
"Three piece sweet"...
Ayethanyou.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 20:01,
archived)
"Three piece sweet"...
Ayethanyou.

until my moron neighbour feeds it. Then it eats, shits and starts to whine again.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:52,
archived)

for the hide . . . in the jingle jangle . . . I'll come following . . .
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:01,
archived)

(and forgot to plug the lap top in)
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:54,
archived)

as I started again. I felt a shower of croissant crumbs across my keyboard - the fucker was laughing at me. So I blew him up. Again and again and again.
Now who's smug? :D
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57,
archived)
Now who's smug? :D


I'm far too smug for any old wine glass.
How's the CV coming on?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:06,
archived)
How's the CV coming on?

i'm crap at thing like that, can never sell myself...so mine always look boring and drab.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:11,
archived)

I was taught to pretend I was writing about somebody else so that I wouldn't feel so self-conscious.
You can use my CV if you'd like :)
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:16,
archived)
You can use my CV if you'd like :)

and all that.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:18,
archived)

The smuggest bastardest CV the world has ever seen!
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:40,
archived)

is so they can give you a tidly portion instead of a decent amount of juice.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:38,
archived)


He was working in some shop, and he was completely oblivious to his B3ta fame.
Probably true today.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:16,
archived)
Probably true today.


intense fashion . . . your ideas are well done !
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55,
archived)

The virtuoso pianist who is about 15 years old?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:33,
archived)

Only she wasn't quite so.... slim
or attractive
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:23,
archived)
or attractive

altho there not too much difference really.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:28,
archived)

It's the front two legs that do it.
I used some generic google "sexy legs" and Halo 3's Scarab :)
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57,
archived)
I used some generic google "sexy legs" and Halo 3's Scarab :)

Press 'I like this'. Press it hard...

Scary.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14,
archived)

( , Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:09, archived)

They're already training up next years crop.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:10,
archived)

The ones I looked at all appeared to have beri beri & rickets
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14,
archived)

Besides, the bird could just fly a bit higher, it's obviously teasing him.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:19,
archived)

That most mainstream of all silliness.
Just wave your hand over some tap water whilst praising Gaia and you'll get the same effect.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:10,
archived)
Just wave your hand over some tap water whilst praising Gaia and you'll get the same effect.

THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:13,
archived)

So true. There's probably more Hitler in that homeopathic crap than the "active ingredient".
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:16,
archived)

Down with sugar pills as medicine! Go back to the 18th century you scientifically illiterate, logic impaired idiots! :)
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:21,
archived)

Just because some people don't seem to trust medical advice unless it's at least a few hundred years old
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:24,
archived)

Obviously as a Scientist it's an insult, and to make it worse they're wasting money they could spend on increasing my salary.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:27,
archived)

but if you happen to be one of the hundreds of thousands of people who feel they've been helped by Homeopathy, don't you think it's kind of insulting to say, you're all fucking idiots who are imagining it?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:44,
archived)

But not because homeopathy has any effect.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:45,
archived)

the scientifically uncomfortable fact is; Homeopathy actually works for some people. There have been scores of rigorous scientific studies, many of them undertaken by major pharmaceutical companies, which have proven that fact beyond doubt.
The really troublesome thing for conventional medical theory and practice is that there is no observable mechanism by which Homeopathy works. All logic says it shouldn't work, and yet it demonstrable does in some cases.
Exactly the same is true of placebos. Again, the uncomfortable, scientifically proven fact, is that some people are cured of medically diagnosed ailments when taking sugar pills. Science sees no clear physical, chemical mechanism for this effect which can be isolated, therefore it regards it as useless. Clearly though, in both the case of the placebo and in the case of Homeopathy, something is happening which can cure or alleviate sometimes serious medical ailments.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:40,
archived)
The really troublesome thing for conventional medical theory and practice is that there is no observable mechanism by which Homeopathy works. All logic says it shouldn't work, and yet it demonstrable does in some cases.
Exactly the same is true of placebos. Again, the uncomfortable, scientifically proven fact, is that some people are cured of medically diagnosed ailments when taking sugar pills. Science sees no clear physical, chemical mechanism for this effect which can be isolated, therefore it regards it as useless. Clearly though, in both the case of the placebo and in the case of Homeopathy, something is happening which can cure or alleviate sometimes serious medical ailments.

It seems that patients are cured faster if they think someone is taking an interest in them.
Homeopathic doctors spend much longer with their patients than normal doctors, so the patients feel better and heal faster.
Psychology has a big effect on how fast you'll heal.
In my opinion, the money would be better spent on allowing normal doctors to spend more time with all their patients.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:43,
archived)
Homeopathic doctors spend much longer with their patients than normal doctors, so the patients feel better and heal faster.
Psychology has a big effect on how fast you'll heal.
In my opinion, the money would be better spent on allowing normal doctors to spend more time with all their patients.

Sugar pills work, therefore there is clearly some other effective mechanism at work, other than purely chemical mechanisms.
Far from eliciting ridicule, this should be a field of urgent investigation.
There's no patent in it though, is there... therefore no possibility of hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:46,
archived)
Far from eliciting ridicule, this should be a field of urgent investigation.
There's no patent in it though, is there... therefore no possibility of hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.

That doesn't excuse spending millions on pounds on homeopathy.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:50,
archived)

there is no need to go down the route of homeopathy.
An interesting study would be to replace the prescriptions of a homeopathic department with pure water for a while,
and see if this has any effect on the patients.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:56,
archived)
An interesting study would be to replace the prescriptions of a homeopathic department with pure water for a while,
and see if this has any effect on the patients.

... but this probably isn't the right forum...
/hummus/
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:54,
archived)
/hummus/

there's nothing wrong with this discussion. It's good-natured and it's among people who often post images on this forum.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58,
archived)

The problem I have with this area is the quackery. I worked with a woman who had severe medical & mental problems who was fleeced thousands by 'alternative' practitioners. Every week she would tell us the latest theory of her illness and how her 'doctor' was treating her.
It was madness and expensive madness at that.
No denying the placebo/psy effects. Just not keen on the snake-oil sellers.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:20,
archived)
It was madness and expensive madness at that.
No denying the placebo/psy effects. Just not keen on the snake-oil sellers.

we wouldn't have to maintain this weird illusion that dilution and shaking a substance is the cause of the medicine's effect.
If placebos are so effective, just pretend sugar pills are strong drugs, and we don't need homeopathy.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:53,
archived)
If placebos are so effective, just pretend sugar pills are strong drugs, and we don't need homeopathy.

but the scientifically proven fact remains, sometimes Homeopathy works for some people, so why not use it.
I simply can't see a reason for not using something that works. Particularly since it's something which is incapable of inducing side-effects.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:56,
archived)
I simply can't see a reason for not using something that works. Particularly since it's something which is incapable of inducing side-effects.

a tiny dangerous impurity present in the water at the start of the dilution process would become stronger throughout the process.
One of my problems with homeopathy is they seem to think only the desired chemical's effect is amplified, not those of any impurities.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58,
archived)
One of my problems with homeopathy is they seem to think only the desired chemical's effect is amplified, not those of any impurities.

but only in terms of addressing the theory that Homeopathy itself puts forward. Personally though I see no reason to address, or engage with, that theory in a scientific way. My stance here is entirely empirical and practical, and can be summed up as:
Given that Homeopathic medicine demonstrably works for some people, why not use it?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:07,
archived)
Given that Homeopathic medicine demonstrably works for some people, why not use it?

and may divert money away from more effective treatments.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:09,
archived)

but the fact remains that sometimes Homeopathy works for people when other methods, placebo included, fail.
I don't have the figures, but I am willing to bet that the amount of money spent by the NHS on Homeopathy is tiny when compared to the amount of money spent on 'conventional' drugs and treatments.
Despite everything that's been said here, I still don't see a single reason to withhold a potentially helpful treatment from people, particularly one that's so clinically risk-free.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:24,
archived)
I don't have the figures, but I am willing to bet that the amount of money spent by the NHS on Homeopathy is tiny when compared to the amount of money spent on 'conventional' drugs and treatments.
Despite everything that's been said here, I still don't see a single reason to withhold a potentially helpful treatment from people, particularly one that's so clinically risk-free.

But there always has to be a cost-benefit assessment.
I'd be happy for there to be more research done into homeopathy and for it to be compared to other treatments, Science should work by looking at any possible explanation without prejudice.
Normally, treatments aren't offered to patients until this kind of assessment has been done, and it should be the same for homeopathy.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:29,
archived)
I'd be happy for there to be more research done into homeopathy and for it to be compared to other treatments, Science should work by looking at any possible explanation without prejudice.
Normally, treatments aren't offered to patients until this kind of assessment has been done, and it should be the same for homeopathy.

may well delay proper medical attention.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03,
archived)

Homeopathy is never used as a first recourse in the case of a serious illness, at least not by the NHS. There are plenty of reasons to question the use of Homeopathy, but with all due respect, this is not one of them.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:08,
archived)

I did not suggest that the NHS did. Patients consult homeopaths and may do so as a first resort. I am personally aware of people who have been given very hazardous advice by homeopathic practitioners that could have had serious consequences.
Do you honestly give any credence to the homeopathic concept of dilution leaving a memory of the treatment in the diluent?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:16,
archived)
Do you honestly give any credence to the homeopathic concept of dilution leaving a memory of the treatment in the diluent?

But it has relieved the pains of my best friend who suffers from arthritis, has acute danger of constant thombosis, and is in pain due to her immune system attacking itself.
So if it can do that for whatever reason it may be, homeopathy is good enough to stick around.
And no, it wasn't as a first resort. That avenue almost killed her (antibiotics).
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:21,
archived)
So if it can do that for whatever reason it may be, homeopathy is good enough to stick around.
And no, it wasn't as a first resort. That avenue almost killed her (antibiotics).

It's a reason to examine how and why she is being helped. It certainly is not through the "science" of homeopathy.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:30,
archived)

which characteristically has periods where it's very serious, followed by periods of apparent remission.
This makes it difficult sometimes to know whether the treatment has affected it, or if it's a natural cycle.
I'm not trying to insult her intelligence here, I'm just saying it's an another possibility.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:41,
archived)
This makes it difficult sometimes to know whether the treatment has affected it, or if it's a natural cycle.
I'm not trying to insult her intelligence here, I'm just saying it's an another possibility.

But the uncomfortable, unavoidable, clinically proven fact remains, Homeopathic remedies have been shown to cure or alleviate diagnosed medical conditions in some people.
My position is, don't get blind-sided by the dogma and dodgy theories and explanations. Sometimes Homeopathic remedies work. So why not use them?
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:28,
archived)
My position is, don't get blind-sided by the dogma and dodgy theories and explanations. Sometimes Homeopathic remedies work. So why not use them?

www.b3ta.com/board/8039312
aaaaand the circle is complete.
Hometime!
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:35,
archived)
aaaaand the circle is complete.
Hometime!

It's in fact immensely difficult to create a drug that works BETTER than the placebo effect.
But the placebo effect is useless for treating many illnesses.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:45,
archived)
But the placebo effect is useless for treating many illnesses.

Homeopathy does not work at all. The beneficial effect some people may experience after visiting a homeopath may be due to a number of things but not to the homeopathic nostrum they have been given. There is not one properly run double blinded, randomised controlled trial that shows any beneficial effect of homeopathic medicine.
Edit: Having read the stuff that's appeared while I was writing. The placebo effect is well known in mainstream medicine and is sometimes employed. There is a lot of interest in the field of psychoneuropharmacy which is fascinating and I'm not suggesting any of this is nonsense. Homeopathy is nonsense however and deserves to be mocked.
The entire "science" of homeopathy is quackary and nothing else. What is more it is potentially dangerous rubbish.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:56,
archived)
Edit: Having read the stuff that's appeared while I was writing. The placebo effect is well known in mainstream medicine and is sometimes employed. There is a lot of interest in the field of psychoneuropharmacy which is fascinating and I'm not suggesting any of this is nonsense. Homeopathy is nonsense however and deserves to be mocked.
The entire "science" of homeopathy is quackary and nothing else. What is more it is potentially dangerous rubbish.

I'm playing all the right notes.
Just not necessarily in the right order.
*apologises to estate of Eric Morecambe*
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:21,
archived)
Just not necessarily in the right order.
*apologises to estate of Eric Morecambe*

OK, you're going to have to drink your own urine. That should set everything to "tickety boo"
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:23,
archived)

how does this gayness fit in with evolution?
shirely they should be extinct
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:10,
archived)
shirely they should be extinct

whoa i just realised we're talking about homosexuality like it was a disease. that's not how i meant that to sound...
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14,
archived)

Only tendencies. And you could have a positive selection pressure for tendencies as they would come in handy for other reasons.
So, yes, there could be a range of gay alleles (not exactly genes) that are preserved in a population despite the obvious problem of passing on a tendency not to breed.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:28,
archived)
So, yes, there could be a range of gay alleles (not exactly genes) that are preserved in a population despite the obvious problem of passing on a tendency not to breed.

there aren't a huge number of kids with downs parents.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:01,
archived)

It's a genetic mutation, where the parents possibly normal genes aren't passed on properly.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03,
archived)

It just needs "activating" if you've got it.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14,
archived)

In a gender imbalanced tribe is good for the whole of the tribe. Less fighting over scarce wimmins, more focus on the tribe.
China, take heed.
Besides, even homosexuals can have children. Albeit not with their preferred partner.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:13,
archived)
China, take heed.
Besides, even homosexuals can have children. Albeit not with their preferred partner.

He was a bit strange.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17,
archived)

And so is my knob
Cos last night I raped you
But you're on the blob
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:11,
archived)
Cos last night I raped you
But you're on the blob

I went out with a girl who sent me "Rape me" by Nirvana once - like - as a special effort.
That freaked me out a little - especially considering I'd buried her under the patio only a few weeks before.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14,
archived)
That freaked me out a little - especially considering I'd buried her under the patio only a few weeks before.

i was very freaked out this morning due to a similar experience
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:38,
archived)

That's when us bitter husks of men really shine.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17,
archived)

Violets are blue
I'm not good at poetry
but i have a massive fucking cock
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17,
archived)
I'm not good at poetry
but i have a massive fucking cock

the eyes....
* Why do they make me laugh like a loon!
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:41,
archived)
* Why do they make me laugh like a loon!

state of preparedness to report it? As if it could happen in our vicinities at any given moment?
QUICK! Homophobia! To the Batcave!
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:58,
archived)
QUICK! Homophobia! To the Batcave!

*stabs the phobes with batknives*
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:59,
archived)

or not getting any.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:00,
archived)

If you're a homophobe, you're everything else that's bad as well.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:01,
archived)

edit: I'm going home, only the best ones of you are all gay, big big love n'night xx
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:06,
archived)

but you wouldn't want some poof to try and stuff one up your arse.
they do that, it said so in zoo.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:09,
archived)
they do that, it said so in zoo.


Bruce Wayne and his Ward have gone too far.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:59,
archived)

* PS. This is what you are looking for yourallgay.com/

is just advertising his packaging company
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:01,
archived)

edit: the poster I mean - not the homophobia. That I have plenty ta ;)
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:05,
archived)

"We're ready to report on our friends, family and neighbours" :D
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:05,
archived)

implies a fear of homosexuality. This is ridiculous as homosexuality is a genetic thing. There's nothing outwardly visible about homosexuality unless the homosexual in question chooses to behave like a mincing little girl, which has nothing to do with their sexual inclination. It's just a very very shallow badge worn by those who have nothing else about themselves, and choose to act like a complete knob to gain attention. These people are just plain annoying to some in the same way that overt machismo is plain annoying to others. It should be 'minceraphobia' if anything, but that still doesn't mean people who are bored with it are afraid in any way. Just....bored!
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 21:13,
archived)

Fantastic!
Though my pedant sense is crying out for a comma in the puffer fish's dialogue.
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:55,
archived)
Though my pedant sense is crying out for a comma in the puffer fish's dialogue.

I found those images whilst trying to think up an instrument including puffer fish..
I gave up ;-) ...
( ,
Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:59,
archived)
I gave up ;-) ...
« Older messages | Newer messages »
