b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 33109 (Older | Newer)

[challenge entry] parp


Click for bigger (128KB)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:11, archived)
# I don't get it.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:15, archived)
# That is tip top!
When the frog deflates do the blokes cheeks explode?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:18, archived)
# Or vice versa
depending on the song.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:19, archived)
# 'the bloke'? THE BLOKE!!??
That's Dizzy fucking Gillespie!!
(small rant) ee, the youth of today, don't know they're born, I remember when all this were Gracie Fields
when I were a lad, we were poor but we were happy
bring back hanging, that's what I say, no proper education see,
they don't know 'owt nor nowt these days, kids don't
(/small rant)


I feel better now, thanks. And woo! to the pic.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 20:25, archived)
# This carp looked at me earlier. He was a scary fucker.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:09, archived)
# you're carping on a bit now...
sorry...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:10, archived)
# That was a sole destroying pun.
;)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:11, archived)
# haha..i'm a bad bad person.
has anyone shopped tom wait's playing a swordfishtrombone yet ? if not i might have to do that later.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:13, archived)
# Oh yes you must.
I might have to have a bit of a listen to that now.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:13, archived)
# must have been done..as it is pretty obvious.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:15, archived)
# Mebbe, but not seen it.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:20, archived)
# Oh god, we had hundreds of fish puns just the other day.
Salmon ought to stop this before it begins again.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:11, archived)
# Yes we should. Fish.


damn...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:12, archived)
# Cod almighty.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:13, archived)
# it's making a clown(fish) out of the forum, all these puns.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:14, archived)
# I'm just churning them out Parrot fishion.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:15, archived)
# R-eel-ly good.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:16, archived)
# well there blenny of other things we could be making up puns about
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:18, archived)
# That's not even a real fish.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:19, archived)
# it is
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:20, archived)
# You obviously just created that wikipedia article yourself.
:)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:22, archived)
# pssh. admit defeat !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:23, archived)
# I know what Gaelic for 'viviparious blenny' is
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:27, archived)
# You're just talking pollocks.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:34, archived)
# Is that the bastard I trod on in Wales
which made my foot swell up?

And my head fall off (not really).
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:23, archived)
# that was Shakin' Stevens
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:28, archived)
# I think yo could be right there.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:41, archived)
# I hope you ate him before he could complete his death star.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:10, archived)
# He had his mate with him
so I didn't dare.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:12, archived)
# You maniac, you'll surely destroy us all
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:14, archived)
# A Dark Lord of the Fish?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:11, archived)
[challenge entry] "I prefer catsup to ketchup, and Yussuf Islam will always be known as..."
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:04, archived)
# I agree.
He is Cat Stevens.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:05, archived)
# oh god..i now have "the first cut i the deepest " stuck in my head..sung by him.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:06, archived)
# I have Tea for the Tillerman
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:12, archived)
# i luckily don't own a single album by him.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:16, archived)
# I have a few.
Tea for the Tillerman is pretty much the only good one.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:17, archived)
# I'm with 10,000 maniacs.
I have purged my record collection of 'Mr' Stevens. Apart from 'campfire song', which wouldn't be a problem if I re-bought that album today.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:36, archived)
[challenge entry] ARCTIC MONKEYS, GEDDIT?!?!
(, Sun 10 Feb 2008, 21:27, archived)
# I made you all a silly :)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:40, archived)
# curry night?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:41, archived)
# Hahaha!
It's not a personal experience :)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:42, archived)
# Is this a scene from Cloverfield 2?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:42, archived)
# From what I've heard, it'd make the film far better.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:42, archived)
# I loved the first one,
and I'm very very picky about horror films.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:45, archived)
# Saw the film last night
Entertaining, at least...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:48, archived)
# crap
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:42, archived)
# *kick*
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:44, archived)
# what was that for
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:45, archived)
# you never reply to gaz's
which makes me feel paranoid and like i'm being the most annoying person ever
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:46, archived)
# i never notice them
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:47, archived)
# aww. well thats alright then. as long as it's not just me being a pain in the arse.
how are ya darling ?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:47, archived)
# still really snotty
how are you
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:48, archived)
# bored shitless.
i need adventure and fun..but i'm broke and got noone to have fun with other than the cat..and it just sleeps all day.

did ya go fishing ?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:49, archived)
# yeah, caught fuck all
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:50, archived)
# aww. still at least you went.
did you camp ?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:51, archived)
# yep, with my little kettle
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:51, archived)
# awww. no tv ?
no wonder you're still snotty, camping at this fucking time of year.

up to much this weekend ?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:53, archived)
# i might go on a trip with the kids somewhere
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:59, archived)
# awww. i want a small child damn it !
take em fishing !
edit: or the park or seaside or something more child friendly. :P
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:00, archived)
#
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:16, archived)
# hahaha. what a good idea !
right who wants to lend me their children !?!?!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:17, archived)
# You can have my six month old nephew if you want.
I fed him today, he smiled, and then threw up on my face.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:25, archived)
# awwww.
i love children far too much..specially other people's kids...cos i don't have to deal with them all the fucking time. it's great.

when i first met my friend little girl, poppy, a few years back, her mum told me after meeting me she asked her if i was a child or a grown up. :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:27, archived)
# Hehehe
I love kids too - my nephews and nieces are ace, and have the same sense of humour as me.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:48, archived)
# IT BURNS!
that is indeed silly
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:43, archived)
# Fatal Intestinal Maelstrom!
/Transmetropolitan bowel disrupter
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:44, archived)
# Yay!
I am hoping that Charlie Brooker will one day turn in to Spider Jerusalem.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:59, archived)
# ooo that could be fun
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:03, archived)
# Winner The Poo !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:52, archived)
# Hahaha!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:56, archived)
# That would make one helluva
CLEVELAND STEAMER!!!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:01, archived)
# The brow reminded me of a Mr Pineapple;
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:03, archived)
# Haha!!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:05, archived)
# Top sillyness.
It's inspired me too...

Watch this space.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:06, archived)
# :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:06, archived)
# This is great, and brings up repressed memories.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:07, archived)
# Haha sorry!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:13, archived)
# Fantastic! :D
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 9:39, archived)
[challenge entry] Ooh la la

Not an animal, but it is a French git.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:26, archived)
# his cock is a weird colour

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:31, archived)
# It has been in one of those vacuum things.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:31, archived)
# You mean a Dyson?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:32, archived)
# I mean Outer Space.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:37, archived)
[challenge entry] Ok then :)

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:03, archived)
# Hahaha!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:15, archived)
# Holy deity of choice!
It's giving me the fear.....
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 8:49, archived)
[challenge entry] I Got Those Ring-Tailed Lemur Blues


Well, Ah woke up this mohnin'
With a hangover and a broken femur
An' dats why Ah'm jest sittin' here
A-pluckin' on my lemur

eveybody -

I Got Those...



"What you lookin' at"?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:24, archived)
# The entries in this challenge all seem very samey
not a dig at you, Neffer - just the apparent restrictions of the given goods :/
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:26, archived)
# ^this
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:32, archived)
# yea
know what you mean. Thought that as I was pintling around trying to make it. "Never mind, Neffer, me old pineapple cheesecake", I said, "You'll have them all singing along and failing to notice either the saminess or the crapnitudinosity of this appalling creation thereby brightening the b3tans' lives considerably." Wrongly. :-)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:32, archived)
# :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:36, archived)
# mmmm. pineapple cheesecake sounds good.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:36, archived)
# Yes, yes it does.
Also I have no problem with seaminess or crappiness, and have just voted for the seams challenge.
edit: oh, he said saminess. Sorry about the accidental insult there.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:38, archived)
# There's a seams challenge?!
Where do I sign up?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:40, archived)
# *saves you three mouseclicks*
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:41, archived)
# My RSI physio thanks you
:)

I can already hear the gnashing of teeth from b3tans with talent over the prospect of a whole week of seamy postings...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:45, archived)
# *votes*
I want something with some legs in it.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:49, archived)
# There is always a gnashing of teeth no matter what
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:50, archived)
# I want a challenge that says
'show beta that you are actually quite fucking fantastic at using photoshop and don't use text or filters in your masterpiece'
For a change.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:17, archived)
# Bless you, Felix!
Felix!I would love this challenge.
Being absolutely talentless I could let my imagination run riot and not have to rein it in as I don't have the 'shoppery skills to execute an idea.
I clicked. Hard.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:49, archived)
# Lasso select
cut
paste
job done. Can't wait :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:52, archived)
# You must be joking
For maximum seams Ms Paint is the only way to go.
Plus use a clonky mouse with the hand you don't usually use to write. Or if you are ambidextrous a foot.
4. Profit
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:55, archived)
# You'll put some effort into the seams though I hope
turn off anti-aliasing, and maybe re-save it a couple of times for extra JPEG artifacts.
(Re-sizing inbetween helps for this. And remember, always scale up, never down.)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:56, archived)
# ^most interesting
though I manage quite well on the seam front without too much effort at all. Not meaning to sound too smug about it.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:01, archived)
# Skillful photoshopping leaves me cold
but the seamhorse is a special phenomenon.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:54, archived)
# arf arf!
and arf again! One day I am going to look at a tutorial or something. Promise. :-D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:41, archived)
# I've yet to find a tutorial that applies to my lack of experience or needs
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:00, archived)
# I would happily
home tutor you in the basics of photoshopping. Just keep me sober or my hands would wander.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:20, archived)
# o hai familiar guitar player
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:27, archived)
# It's gotta nice ring to it !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:29, archived)
# Needs more bass...
Mind if this guy jams?

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:33, archived)
# Compo that bass MF'r !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:41, archived)
# Did so earlier - with added goatse hands.
www.b3ta.com/board/8037131

/just whoring really...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:43, archived)
# Right . . . jolly good too !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:55, archived)
# Jam session! Huzzah!
Pity about sad lack of seams though
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:13, archived)
# A history of b3ta.com : The Mona B3ta
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:21, archived)
# Bindun
but still would.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:22, archived)
# Hahahaha!
U FILTRD!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:23, archived)
# yes!
is this going to be a series


make it a series
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:25, archived)
# You do . . . Mona right !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:27, archived)
# haha! :)

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:29, archived)
# YOU WIN 387 INTERNET.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:30, archived)
# heyyyyy Mona.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:38, archived)
# that is brill
hahahahahaha have all the woo's today
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 20:03, archived)
# "You dirty thief! I'll have your hand for that!"
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:14, archived)
# There's no getting away . . .
with it !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:25, archived)
# Yay
for tickling
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:35, archived)
# Glass bottle - bottle glass - World Cup!
Fabio Cooper

Jus' like that!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:54, archived)
# Yes!
That's who he reminds me of.,.,

Quick TC story; I worked with a bloke who was a very, very junior assistant on TC's autopsy. He had kept a lock of hair as a 'memento'. To say he was a bit weird would be the understatement of the century.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55, archived)
# And the even shoddier first draft...
"Nothing up the sleeves"

Tommy Capello
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55, archived)
# hahaha bloody 'ell that's freaky :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)
# hahaha!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)
# Soup herb!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)
# Fantastic!
Put your name on it, quick. It will probably all over the internets and emails tomorrow.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58, archived)
# ^this^
quick before NUTS/ZOO see it
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03, archived)
# Hahaha!
Yes!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:00, archived)
# Haha :D
"Just like that!"
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:02, archived)
# fan
tastic
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03, archived)
# thats it! thats who it reminds me off
tag it, this will be in Nuts tomorrow
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03, archived)
# Workin' on it now
Having to log back onto the machine with p'shop...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:05, archived)
# And Digimarc it too.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:07, archived)
# what is digimarking?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:10, archived)
# Digital (and invisible) watermark
So that when the fuckers say they don't know who made it, you can show them the digital watermark.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:15, archived)
# It's OK. I done if for you.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:26, archived)
# Pffft
Perfect!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:28, archived)
# smart!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:27, archived)
# It is DONE
With scary corporate copyright notice in the Digimark, too.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:27, archived)
# pffff
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03, archived)
# Haha!
'shopped pics only, please.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:08, archived)
# My favourite of the day..
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:23, archived)
# Great stuff :)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:27, archived)
# Favourite ever Tommy Cooper joke
Tommy's on stage doing some magic. He produces a stick of rock and informs the audience "I will now turn this stick of rock into some furniture". He then snaps the stick of rock twice, and announces...


"Three piece sweet"...

Ayethanyou.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 20:01, archived)
[challenge entry] ...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:50, archived)
# Beat it. Beat it til it bleeds!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:51, archived)
# This is inspired by the stray cat that whines outside my window every night
until my moron neighbour feeds it. Then it eats, shits and starts to whine again.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:52, archived)
# Can it be milked?
You could save a few bob.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58, archived)
# it has worms,
she tells me...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:06, archived)
# Free spaghetti!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:30, archived)
# Good use
for the hide . . . in the jingle jangle . . . I'll come following . . .
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:01, archived)
# In the event of a nuclear war, aim for the smug bastard.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:50, archived)
# hahahahah. yay,
thats brilliant.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:51, archived)
# Guess who forgot to save as he went along?
(and forgot to plug the lap top in)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:54, archived)
# smug bastard !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55, archived)
# His smug piggy eyes burned into me
as I started again. I felt a shower of croissant crumbs across my keyboard - the fucker was laughing at me. So I blew him up. Again and again and again.

Now who's smug? :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)
# yoooou are !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58, archived)
# Oh yes. Yes indeed.
I am just warming up the croissants.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:59, archived)
# haha.
and don't forget..orange juice in a wine glass.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:00, archived)
# Fuck yes.
Freshly pressed, with bits in.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:01, archived)
# hahaha..has to be a wine glass just to add to the posh/smugness of it all.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:02, archived)
# Crystal, obviously.
I'm far too smug for any old wine glass.

How's the CV coming on?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:06, archived)
# not started it yet.
i'm crap at thing like that, can never sell myself...so mine always look boring and drab.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:11, archived)
# I'm the same.
I was taught to pretend I was writing about somebody else so that I wouldn't feel so self-conscious.

You can use my CV if you'd like :)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:16, archived)
# hahaha...i dunno if people would beleive i'm male and trained to a be a surgeon
and all that.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:18, archived)
# They don't believe it for me either.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:27, archived)
# aww. still probably more chance than me.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:28, archived)
# I shall shop you a CV.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:31, archived)
# hahaha
a smug bastard one !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:32, archived)
# Oh yes indeed.
The smuggest bastardest CV the world has ever seen!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:40, archived)
# The wineglass
is so they can give you a tidly portion instead of a decent amount of juice.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:38, archived)
# Hahahaha!
Yes!!!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:51, archived)
# I like the way the vectors spatter
Woo Yay!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:52, archived)
# Around 250 layers in the full animation = a fucker to remember what goes where...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55, archived)
# Bombastic !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)
# great work! woo!

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:08, archived)
# I had a dream about Smug Bastard last night
He was working in some shop, and he was completely oblivious to his B3ta fame.

Probably true today.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:16, archived)
# hahaha!
he even has a smug skelton face!!
top marks!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 19:16, archived)
[challenge entry] ...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:42, archived)
# i'm tempted to point out you are spamming the fuck out of the board
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:46, archived)
# not until
his third post he's not
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:48, archived)
# Sorry
Though no-one else is currently posting anything.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:49, archived)
# It's not your fault we're all too lazy to make stuff
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:52, archived)
# Harsh.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:50, archived)
# She blows that in such an
intense fashion . . . your ideas are well done !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55, archived)
# Ta!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:01, archived)
[challenge entry] Have a zebriano
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:26, archived)
# EBOOOOOOONY AND IVOOOOOOOOOOORY
*clicks*
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:27, archived)
# is that a boy named Alex?
The virtuoso pianist who is about 15 years old?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:33, archived)
# Looks like Tony Blair actually.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:44, archived)
# Zeeberace . . .
breakout the candelabra !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:40, archived)
# hahaha ! and the glitter !
and the furs...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:41, archived)
[challenge entry] Amy Swinehouse...Our fave crackwhore porcine songstress...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:16, archived)
# That's no seam!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17, archived)
# WHAT IS A FLORN?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:23, archived)
# They try to make me go to rehab, and I said SEAM, SEAM, SEAM
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17, archived)
# Pffft...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:18, archived)
# So why dont you come on over Seamerly
berdum tsch
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:21, archived)
# hahaha

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:23, archived)
# SEAMONSTER!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:18, archived)
# Head cheese . . .
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:19, archived)
# reminds me of my ex
Only she wasn't quite so.... slim
or attractive
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:23, archived)
# I really should learn photoshop
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:25, archived)
# Amy Pisshouse?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:25, archived)
# Hahahaha
Excellent!

She's related to Shane McGollum you know!

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:26, archived)
# haha, he looks like mark e. smith there.
altho there not too much difference really.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:28, archived)
# Yes!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:29, archived)
# 'SHOPPED IMAGES ONLY PLEASE
ect ect ect...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:35, archived)
# I think you made a bit of a pig's ear of that!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:32, archived)
# It's no silk purse !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:41, archived)
# I hope she sorts herself out so she can do the next bond theme


(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:44, archived)
# I made you a seamhorse
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:50, archived)
# The Fear,
Very, very fucking similar.

Could be The Fear's mum?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:55, archived)
# Haha!
It's the front two legs that do it.
I used some generic google "sexy legs" and Halo 3's Scarab :)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)
# Seam challenge . . .
Good idea !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58, archived)
# Hahaha! Yes!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:00, archived)
# clicks 'suggest a challenge' button.

Press 'I like this'. Press it hard...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:07, archived)
# You've gone and done it . . . hayayah !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:58, archived)
[challenge entry] That's right

It's a dachs-ophone
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:12, archived)
# Looks like the dog and the saxophone went through Jeff Goldblums Fly teleporter together.
Scary.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14, archived)
# Raising the question
What does the other one look like?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:16, archived)
# Just checked
It looks like jeff goldblum
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:18, archived)
# Like a meat flute.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:19, archived)
# Whoof . . .
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:18, archived)
# *dachspangs
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:19, archived)
# How do you think they make your Christmas tree so big and strong?

(click for bigger)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:09, archived)
# pfft
topical
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:09, archived)
# Hey, Christmas tree farming is a year long business.
They're already training up next years crop.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:10, archived)
# Hopefully they're better than last year's batch
The ones I looked at all appeared to have beri beri & rickets
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14, archived)
# hmm
That humming bird will have to stop some time.

*watches*
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:11, archived)
# I think the tree will get tired first.
Besides, the bird could just fly a bit higher, it's obviously teasing him.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:19, archived)
# they're much bigger than you think


also, nicely.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:12, archived)
# Steroids.
And humming birds... of course.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:12, archived)
# Flying high now . . .
Yo !
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:15, archived)
# Prepared to report...

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:07, archived)
# Ah good old homeopathy...
That most mainstream of all silliness.

Just wave your hand over some tap water whilst praising Gaia and you'll get the same effect.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:10, archived)
# I'm Cured!!!
THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:13, archived)
#

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14, archived)
# Gah
So true. There's probably more Hitler in that homeopathic crap than the "active ingredient".
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:16, archived)
# Hurrah for the truth!
Down with sugar pills as medicine! Go back to the 18th century you scientifically illiterate, logic impaired idiots! :)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:21, archived)
# The best bit is, the NHS is actually spending money on this rubbish.
Just because some people don't seem to trust medical advice unless it's at least a few hundred years old
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:24, archived)
# This makes me furious.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:26, archived)
# I'm a Scientist working in the NHS.
Obviously as a Scientist it's an insult, and to make it worse they're wasting money they could spend on increasing my salary.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:27, archived)
# Maybe the lack of a clear clinical mechanism is an insult to a scientist
but if you happen to be one of the hundreds of thousands of people who feel they've been helped by Homeopathy, don't you think it's kind of insulting to say, you're all fucking idiots who are imagining it?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:44, archived)
# As I've said down there, I think the treatment has helped them.
But not because homeopathy has any effect.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:45, archived)
# Hmmmm
the scientifically uncomfortable fact is; Homeopathy actually works for some people. There have been scores of rigorous scientific studies, many of them undertaken by major pharmaceutical companies, which have proven that fact beyond doubt.
The really troublesome thing for conventional medical theory and practice is that there is no observable mechanism by which Homeopathy works. All logic says it shouldn't work, and yet it demonstrable does in some cases.
Exactly the same is true of placebos. Again, the uncomfortable, scientifically proven fact, is that some people are cured of medically diagnosed ailments when taking sugar pills. Science sees no clear physical, chemical mechanism for this effect which can be isolated, therefore it regards it as useless. Clearly though, in both the case of the placebo and in the case of Homeopathy, something is happening which can cure or alleviate sometimes serious medical ailments.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:40, archived)
# This is a case of 'mind over matter' in some way.
It seems that patients are cured faster if they think someone is taking an interest in them.
Homeopathic doctors spend much longer with their patients than normal doctors, so the patients feel better and heal faster.
Psychology has a big effect on how fast you'll heal.
In my opinion, the money would be better spent on allowing normal doctors to spend more time with all their patients.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:43, archived)
# placebos also work.
Not proof that sugar is medicine though.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:43, archived)
# But that's entirely my point.
Sugar pills work, therefore there is clearly some other effective mechanism at work, other than purely chemical mechanisms.
Far from eliciting ridicule, this should be a field of urgent investigation.
There's no patent in it though, is there... therefore no possibility of hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:46, archived)
# Yes, I think it's accepted that psychology has an effect on heal rate.
That doesn't excuse spending millions on pounds on homeopathy.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:50, archived)
# On that point, we differ.
I think it does excuse it.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:53, archived)
# As far as I can see, if the same effect is created by cheaply and easily produced things like sugar pills,
there is no need to go down the route of homeopathy.
An interesting study would be to replace the prescriptions of a homeopathic department with pure water for a while,
and see if this has any effect on the patients.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:56, archived)
#
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)
# I could be wrong...
... but this probably isn't the right forum...

/hummus/
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:54, archived)
# Nah
there's nothing wrong with this discussion. It's good-natured and it's among people who often post images on this forum.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58, archived)
# Gullible
The problem I have with this area is the quackery. I worked with a woman who had severe medical & mental problems who was fleeced thousands by 'alternative' practitioners. Every week she would tell us the latest theory of her illness and how her 'doctor' was treating her.

It was madness and expensive madness at that.

No denying the placebo/psy effects. Just not keen on the snake-oil sellers.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:20, archived)
# True, but
we wouldn't have to maintain this weird illusion that dilution and shaking a substance is the cause of the medicine's effect.

If placebos are so effective, just pretend sugar pills are strong drugs, and we don't need homeopathy.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:53, archived)
# I hear you
but the scientifically proven fact remains, sometimes Homeopathy works for some people, so why not use it.
I simply can't see a reason for not using something that works. Particularly since it's something which is incapable of inducing side-effects.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:56, archived)
# But if homeopathy were true,
a tiny dangerous impurity present in the water at the start of the dilution process would become stronger throughout the process.
One of my problems with homeopathy is they seem to think only the desired chemical's effect is amplified, not those of any impurities.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:58, archived)
# That's a good point
but only in terms of addressing the theory that Homeopathy itself puts forward. Personally though I see no reason to address, or engage with, that theory in a scientific way. My stance here is entirely empirical and practical, and can be summed up as:
Given that Homeopathic medicine demonstrably works for some people, why not use it?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:07, archived)
# Because it's more expensive than treating people with sugar pills or some other placebo,
and may divert money away from more effective treatments.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:09, archived)
# Again, I hear you
but the fact remains that sometimes Homeopathy works for people when other methods, placebo included, fail.
I don't have the figures, but I am willing to bet that the amount of money spent by the NHS on Homeopathy is tiny when compared to the amount of money spent on 'conventional' drugs and treatments.
Despite everything that's been said here, I still don't see a single reason to withhold a potentially helpful treatment from people, particularly one that's so clinically risk-free.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:24, archived)
# In a perfect world, the NHS would offer every potentially beneficial drug available.
But there always has to be a cost-benefit assessment.
I'd be happy for there to be more research done into homeopathy and for it to be compared to other treatments, Science should work by looking at any possible explanation without prejudice.
Normally, treatments aren't offered to patients until this kind of assessment has been done, and it should be the same for homeopathy.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:29, archived)
# Because treating a potentially fatal illness with a nonsense potion
may well delay proper medical attention.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03, archived)
# Come on now.
Homeopathy is never used as a first recourse in the case of a serious illness, at least not by the NHS. There are plenty of reasons to question the use of Homeopathy, but with all due respect, this is not one of them.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:08, archived)
# No, you "come on"
I did not suggest that the NHS did. Patients consult homeopaths and may do so as a first resort. I am personally aware of people who have been given very hazardous advice by homeopathic practitioners that could have had serious consequences.

Do you honestly give any credence to the homeopathic concept of dilution leaving a memory of the treatment in the diluent?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:16, archived)
# Well, I don't - I think it IS quackery.
But it has relieved the pains of my best friend who suffers from arthritis, has acute danger of constant thombosis, and is in pain due to her immune system attacking itself.

So if it can do that for whatever reason it may be, homeopathy is good enough to stick around.

And no, it wasn't as a first resort. That avenue almost killed her (antibiotics).
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:21, archived)
# No. It's not a reason to stick with homeopathy.
It's a reason to examine how and why she is being helped. It certainly is not through the "science" of homeopathy.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:30, archived)
# I'm presuming it's rheumatoid arthritis,
which characteristically has periods where it's very serious, followed by periods of apparent remission.
This makes it difficult sometimes to know whether the treatment has affected it, or if it's a natural cycle.
I'm not trying to insult her intelligence here, I'm just saying it's an another possibility.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:41, archived)
# No, I give no credence to it whatever.
But the uncomfortable, unavoidable, clinically proven fact remains, Homeopathic remedies have been shown to cure or alleviate diagnosed medical conditions in some people.
My position is, don't get blind-sided by the dogma and dodgy theories and explanations. Sometimes Homeopathic remedies work. So why not use them?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:28, archived)
# No, Don't give credence to nonsense.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:33, archived)
#
www.b3ta.com/board/8039312

aaaaand the circle is complete.

Hometime!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:35, archived)
# Ha, ha
Fun though!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:56, archived)
# Oh we're not denying the placebo effect
It's in fact immensely difficult to create a drug that works BETTER than the placebo effect.

But the placebo effect is useless for treating many illnesses.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:45, archived)
# No you are wrong
Homeopathy does not work at all. The beneficial effect some people may experience after visiting a homeopath may be due to a number of things but not to the homeopathic nostrum they have been given. There is not one properly run double blinded, randomised controlled trial that shows any beneficial effect of homeopathic medicine.

Edit: Having read the stuff that's appeared while I was writing. The placebo effect is well known in mainstream medicine and is sometimes employed. There is a lot of interest in the field of psychoneuropharmacy which is fascinating and I'm not suggesting any of this is nonsense. Homeopathy is nonsense however and deserves to be mocked.

The entire "science" of homeopathy is quackary and nothing else. What is more it is potentially dangerous rubbish.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:56, archived)
# You missed out "..."
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:25, archived)
# I think
I just threw up a little in my mouth.

Well done.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:27, archived)
# *tries it*
I can walk! And see!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14, archived)
# But can you play the piano?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:19, archived)
# *tries*
I'm playing all the right notes.

Just not necessarily in the right order.

*apologises to estate of Eric Morecambe*
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:21, archived)
# Hmm, partial cure
OK, you're going to have to drink your own urine. That should set everything to "tickety boo"
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:23, archived)
# always wondered
how does this gayness fit in with evolution?
shirely they should be extinct
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:10, archived)
# Only if gayness was a genetic trait.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:12, archived)
# so its life choice then
ok
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:13, archived)
# i thought it was genetic
whoa i just realised we're talking about homosexuality like it was a disease. that's not how i meant that to sound...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14, archived)
# mmm me too
but then there is the gene skip theory thang
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:15, archived)
# I have absolutely no idea
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:15, archived)
# I've never believed that behaviours could be attributed to genes.
Only tendencies. And you could have a positive selection pressure for tendencies as they would come in handy for other reasons.

So, yes, there could be a range of gay alleles (not exactly genes) that are preserved in a population despite the obvious problem of passing on a tendency not to breed.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:28, archived)
# Is downs syndrome a life choice?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:38, archived)
# eh?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:41, archived)
# Surely they should be extinct if it isn't
there aren't a huge number of kids with downs parents.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:01, archived)
# Down's syndrome isn't passed on genetically, as far as I understand.
It's a genetic mutation, where the parents possibly normal genes aren't passed on properly.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 18:03, archived)
# They reckon it is.
It just needs "activating" if you've got it.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14, archived)
# rectally activating it?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:15, archived)
# I shouldn't have laughed at that.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17, archived)
# I don't understand your logic
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:13, archived)
# Apparently having some non-heterosexual males
In a gender imbalanced tribe is good for the whole of the tribe. Less fighting over scarce wimmins, more focus on the tribe.

China, take heed.

Besides, even homosexuals can have children. Albeit not with their preferred partner.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:13, archived)
# My Geography teacher always used to thank homosexuals for helping to keep the world's population down.
He was a bit strange.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17, archived)
# SEXY focus :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17, archived)
# In your profile photo you look like Robson Green
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:20, archived)
# is that good or bad?
Or neutral?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:28, archived)
# Well depends who you ask
It's very good in my humble opinion
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:30, archived)
# Am it anti-Valentine's Day ples?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:07, archived)
# you're a week early
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:08, archived)
# Needs more anthrax
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:08, archived)
# Roses are red
And so is my knob
Cos last night I raped you
But you're on the blob
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:11, archived)
# Awww...
I went out with a girl who sent me "Rape me" by Nirvana once - like - as a special effort.

That freaked me out a little - especially considering I'd buried her under the patio only a few weeks before.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:14, archived)
# whilst this is funny
i was very freaked out this morning due to a similar experience
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:38, archived)
# Hallmark
Are losing their monopoly of the market
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:11, archived)
# nice
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:13, archived)
# I'm waiting for St. Skeletor's Day
That's when us bitter husks of men really shine.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17, archived)
# Roses are red
Violets are blue
I'm not good at poetry
but i have a massive fucking cock
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:17, archived)
# Roses are red
Give us a blowy.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:19, archived)
# aah
so you're my valentine from last year
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:42, archived)
#
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:24, archived)
#
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:25, archived)
# The eyes....
the eyes....

* Why do they make me laugh like a loon!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:41, archived)
# Well, that is out of my head...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:56, archived)
# Do we have to be in a constant
state of preparedness to report it? As if it could happen in our vicinities at any given moment?

QUICK! Homophobia! To the Batcave!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:58, archived)
# Homophobia is most usually the sign of being a cunt.
*stabs the phobes with batknives*
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:59, archived)
# and being insecure about your own views and ideas
or not getting any.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:00, archived)
# All bad things.
If you're a homophobe, you're everything else that's bad as well.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:01, archived)
# like Hitler and spiky firepits
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:03, archived)
# and parsnips
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:04, archived)
# noooooooooo
-10
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:04, archived)
# Parsnips are lovely if done right.
edit: I'm going home, only the best ones of you are all gay, big big love n'night xx
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:06, archived)
# true
but you wouldn't want some poof to try and stuff one up your arse.

they do that, it said so in zoo.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:09, archived)
# Parsnips are like carrots gone wrong. Just eat carrots, you fools!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:08, archived)
# Tom O'Bedlam's present to homophobes/racists/fundies/4chan
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:09, archived)
# It's too late for homophobia to do anything in the Batcave
Bruce Wayne and his Ward have gone too far.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:59, archived)
# Hmm.
There's a 'sliding down his pole' gag there somewhere.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:01, archived)
# ...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:03, archived)
# Ha ha.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:07, archived)
# Your all gay.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:59, archived)
# No,
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:01, archived)
# No.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:03, archived)
# 404 lol
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:05, archived)
# Try this
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:05, archived)
# No way...

* PS. This is what you are looking for yourallgay.com/
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:08, archived)
# Wadayamean 404?
*slow ninjas*
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:12, archived)
# is that little fucking kev?
with his day-saver?
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:04, archived)
# Devvo.
Ya fuckin' scrat end.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:05, archived)
# Devvo innit
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:06, archived)
# that guy on the right
is just advertising his packaging company

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:01, archived)
# I don't geddit
edit: the poster I mean - not the homophobia. That I have plenty ta ;)
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:05, archived)
# Those posters are wierd..
"We're ready to report on our friends, family and neighbours" :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:05, archived)
# "homophobia"
implies a fear of homosexuality. This is ridiculous as homosexuality is a genetic thing. There's nothing outwardly visible about homosexuality unless the homosexual in question chooses to behave like a mincing little girl, which has nothing to do with their sexual inclination. It's just a very very shallow badge worn by those who have nothing else about themselves, and choose to act like a complete knob to gain attention. These people are just plain annoying to some in the same way that overt machismo is plain annoying to others. It should be 'minceraphobia' if anything, but that still doesn't mean people who are bored with it are afraid in any way. Just....bored!

(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 21:13, archived)
# angry fish
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:53, archived)
# Arf! :D
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:55, archived)
# hahahahahaha
Fantastic!

Though my pedant sense is crying out for a comma in the puffer fish's dialogue.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:55, archived)
# All of the above.
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:55, archived)
# That's a LOT of the above
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:00, archived)
# ^this
^that
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:02, archived)
# heheheheh!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:56, archived)
# hahahaha!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:57, archived)
# hehe
I found those images whilst trying to think up an instrument including puffer fish..

I gave up ;-) ...
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 16:59, archived)
# Yay!
(, Thu 7 Feb 2008, 17:31, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds