
oops, wrong film
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:59, Reply)

Is it a film or a series ? It looks a little low budget.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:49, Reply)

So hasn't got TV or film budget but still impressive production value wise for a web series. And of course has Machinima.com behind it, which are bigger than God at the moment in terms of YouTube channels.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:06, Reply)

I don't think posting such insightful battle tactics on youtube is a good idea, what is Al'Q sees it ?
Also, out on the 10th May ?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:35, Reply)

It reminds me that Enders Game is coming ... loved the series of books by Orson Scott Card ... hope the up coming movie does them justice.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:08, Reply)

Have they tried to remake "Starship Troopers", but even more shit?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:14, Reply)

Original Robocop is also a classic. I fear the R/Cop remake will be too sanitised.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 12:24, Reply)

has been confirmed to be 'softer'
:(
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 12:56, Reply)

Oh good god.
Never seen the sequels but I think there was a cartoon series.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:06, Reply)

geektyrant.com/news/2012/6/27/starship-troopers-reboot-will-be-less-violent-but-a-better-a.html
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:14, Reply)

Sod it, just thrown some money at amazon for a copy to read.
If classic sci-fi books about future space conflicts are your thing I recommend "The forever war"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forever_War
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:46, Reply)

So I'm now going to buy a copy.
If I don't like it I'll be holding *you* personally responsible.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 14:08, Reply)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsiuxim8vsM
( , Sat 14 Jul 2012, 3:40, Reply)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoEa7lApIKY
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:50, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:12, Reply)

The song really is annoying as it does stay stuck in your head. love the video too
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:24, Reply)

EDIT: you are right about that song, I'm just been scoffing some muesli and humming that tune....arrrggghh.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:28, Reply)

www.thefreelibrary.com/DRUGS+RAID+ON+BASIL+BRUSH+TV+COMPANY%3B+pounds+500,000+of+cocaine...-a094089900
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:55, Reply)

Songs with lovely harmonies are pretty much a tap-in for me. Saw the Beach Boys at Epsom Downs last year and it was the best night for that sort of thing.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:38, Reply)

He's a magic tramp with a swirly portal in his gut that sometimes kills people.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:15, Reply)

Not so keen on homoeroticism.
Like Glaswegian bunnies.
So.....8/10. Good work, Sirs.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 17:50, Reply)

the problem is probably inside you
( , Sat 14 Jul 2012, 14:35, Reply)

I come in at "average for Eritrea". Go me.
Also, feel free to make your own jokes about /talk, /QotW, or internet users in general.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:14, Reply)

Your numbers
Fat Index
20bmi
BMI is a measure of the body’s fat content based on a person’s height and weight National
Below average
You have less body fat than 92% of males aged 15-29 in your country Global
Below average
You have less body fat than 70% of males aged 15-29 in the world
Did you know?
If everyone in the world had the same body fat as you, it would remove 41,173,348 tonnes from the total weight of the world's population
You're most like someone from Bangladesh.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:20, Reply)

Fat Index
26bmi
BMI is a measure of the body’s fat content based on a person’s height and weight National
Below average
You have less body fat than 63% of males aged 30-44 in your country Global
Above average
You have more body fat than 70% of males aged 30-44 in the world
Did you know?
If everyone in the world had the same body fat as you, it would add 31,457,437 tonnes to the total weight of the world's population
And I still need to lose weight.
*assumes dramatic pose*
Curse you Diabetes!!!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:25, Reply)

AND I've got a full head of not-ginger hair too!
*jumps, clicks heels*
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:29, Reply)

Morning Tabs, saw this in the steam summer sale and thought of you.
store.steampowered.com/sub/15346/
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:31, Reply)

It will look great on his train-set in the loft.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:01, Reply)

I reckon I could still stand to lose a few kilos, though...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:31, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:35, Reply)

When he said that it's because of his denser bones. To which I cried 'bollocks', but sadly I was wrong- people of black african descent tend to have far more mineral-dense bones than caucasians. You live and learn.
tl;dr: When people say big boned, they may mean dense boned.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:50, Reply)

Doesn't it depend on diet? And does it make that much of a difference?
I'm open to the suggestion that there might be minor differences, but I'm sceptical of the idea that they're sufficient to outweigh the effects of environment and habit, and of the idea that it neatly follows ethnic lines (which is to say: even if there's an observable difference at the margins, it doesn't follow that there'll be one for any bog-standard individual). I'd like to hear more: do you have any references?
It could just be that he's not a very good swimmer.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:57, Reply)

I was also (sadly) away from access to the internet: there's been a huge number of studies on it...much to my chagrin. Just google "bone density race differences"
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:29, Reply)

All the same, the idea that it makes a difference to swimming ability for the bog-standard is one that intuitively seems debateable. It might make a difference at the elite level; but elite swimmers of any ethnicity are so abnormal that they're hardly a good guide. Human populations simply aren't that diverse.
But I shall read more...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:43, Reply)

I'm just amazed that there's a marked difference in mineral bone density dependant on ethnic heritage, to the extent that's it's caused academic debate.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:27, Reply)

For example, it might have to do with cultural norms that are more strongly associated with one ethnic group than another and make a difference to lifestyle. That way, it wouldn't be ethinicity per se that carries the load.
As I said, I shall read further. Google Scholar has its uses...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:33, Reply)

They managed to find her killers by tracing the minerals in her bones to a remote area in Africa. Mental.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:47, Reply)

But that has to do with diet: if you eat veg from one area, then elements from the local soil will find their way into your body. I've been wondering ever since that case whether that particular line of forensic investigation closes with increased urbanisation, since people's diets wouldn't be so localised.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 12:55, Reply)

Too busy fucking dead muslim kids?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:50, Reply)

as it keeps submitting things when I accidentally brush it whilst typing
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:35, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:37, Reply)

*hint*
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 12:02, Reply)

27 BMI
You have less body fat than 51% of males aged 30-44 in your country
This makes me think that we should reclassify what is normal to make people feel better.
I'm overweight. Not all bad though, I can aim for obese! Yay.
"If everyone in the world had the same body fat as you, it would add 45,439,259 tonnes to the total weight of the world's population"
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:35, Reply)

Does the total weight of everything on the planet basically remain constant?
If 45,439,259 tonnes were added to the total weight of the world's population, this would not in fact make the planet heavier, as resources are finite and the weight would be taken by the surrounding environment - ie, 45,439,259 tonnes of chips
Any science people available for comment?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:40, Reply)

Mass is not gained or lost, just dissipated. However, that does add to a lot of water and other minerals, compounded hugely when less appetite equals less demand for further resources.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:46, Reply)

Sending rockets into space diminishes the planet's mass slightly; meteors add to it. There's a list of things that might make a difference, but the list is small, and the difference is smaller.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:59, Reply)

trickle down to the earth as dust, and add about 25 tonnes each day.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 17:45, Reply)

You've earwormed me now, thanks; can I post this video for "Arming Eritrea" here and try to earworm you back?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkTvISL53HQ
It's SFW, unless you HATE OUR ROCK FREEDOMS.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:53, Reply)

I saw them play the Truck Festival number mumbleteen. They have that incredibly, frighteningly Prozac-like cheery thing going on that quite hard metal acts like Therapy? and Eiger have/had. Can definitely recommend.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:43, Reply)

FoTL are awesome. Ex-McLusky, search for 'Lightsabre Cocksucking Blues' on youtube and you'll find a good video involving punk kittens.
( , Sat 14 Jul 2012, 13:01, Reply)

Why is France so very low down the table of fat countries?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:55, Reply)

The only French people I know personally are all skinny as rakes and smoke like troopers
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:09, Reply)


This is what I smoked for about 20 years.
Used to love sharing them with silk cut smokers and watching them go pale.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:23, Reply)

Stomachs keep going on strike and throwing everything all over the carriageway.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:23, Reply)

by the industrial diet of heavily processed shit
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:41, Reply)

But it really is an eye-opening difference (complared to say ours & germany's).
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:19, Reply)

I've dropped nearly 3 stone in the last 6 months, and training for a half marathon, after not being able to walk up a flight of stairs without being absolutely paggered.
My BMI at the start of all this was 27.7 and my total Body Fat Mass around 28%.
I'm now 11 stone, and starting to get quite lean. I am building a lot of muscle as well. did the checks again, and i've gone to 18% Total Body Fat but BMI is still 27+
It's got to be nonsense, if such a big change in lifestyle, fitness, size etc... means nothing on the BMI scale. For the record i am 5'4" so 11 stone is still not quite there for my liking but damn close.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:53, Reply)

It is a rough-and-ready guide. If you have a BMI of 27, then that should just prompt another question: Why?
For some people, it'll be because they're fat. For others, it'll be because they're muscular. Further, simply stating BMI doesn't differentiate between visceral and subcutaneous fat, and that's an important distinction.
As a first step, assessing BMI isn't a bad measure - but it is only a first step.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:58, Reply)

Apparently many wrestlers are classed as morbidly obese because the scale doesn't account for this. Congratulations on the weight loss/training dude :o)
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:29, Reply)

I seem to be on the top of the world.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:02, Reply)

My uncle's a bodybuilder, he weighs 16 and a half stone at 5 foot 9 which makes him obese according to BMI. There's more fat on a chicken's lip.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 18:28, Reply)

From last year (Steve Jobs isn't dead yet) but Brooker in fine form.
GC says no.
NSFW for swears
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:11, Reply)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwrdDs0nmyg
great little clip from screenwipe on Nick Griffin
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:51, Reply)

who doesn't want to get kicked out of liberal club to do
I imagine someone was joking
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:17, Reply)

Not laughing, waiting for the video to finish.
*laughing a bit*
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:49, Reply)

but it could have condensed the funnier parts in to something a lot shorter.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 12:04, Reply)

Might be able to pick up a nice wardrobe full of dead mother's clothes here, I'd have thought.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:20, Reply)

Gold lame track suit FTW, noticed a "Jim fix it badge" commissioned for him for running London marathon.
Fuck me !!! that guy had the worst taste in everything !! ...... RIP Jimbo !
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:29, Reply)

Shame they don't give more details - I might ask them if they have them in my size.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:04, Reply)

www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/dreweatts/catalogue-id-2864602/lot-14800651
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:45, Reply)

a boy in my road claimed his dad had one and you pressed buttons and it gave money and cigars.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:31, Reply)

I love how shabby it looks. Not just the fraying around the edges. It must have been bloody uncomfortable, even at the time.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:17, Reply)

It's what the result would be if I decided one day, "Hey! I've got nothing to do this afternoon so I'm going to make myself a really snazzy velours club armchair with a built-in ashtray"
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:26, Reply)

uk.autoblog.com/2012/01/16/jimmy-savilles-range-rover-caravan-for-sale/
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:47, Reply)

www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/dreweatts/catalogue-id-2864602/lot-14800613
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:40, Reply)

I can't stop saying it. I'm starting to scare the missus.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:09, Reply)

www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/dreweatts/catalogue-id-2864602/lot-14800157
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:15, Reply)

www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/dreweatts/catalogue-id-2864602/lot-14800448
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:12, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:16, Reply)

Always bugs me that the only time we get to see the Alien full length is when a stocky muscular stunt man is wearing a cruder mock up of the costume after it gets blasted out of Ripleys airlock, he looks nothing like the one we've been seeing all thru the movie at all, spoils it a bit.
I wonder how much the above dude got paid and whether he gets royalties, considering he wasn't actually an actor.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:26, Reply)

...you get the suspense throughout, then at the end my reaction is always "but it's just a man in a suit!"
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:42, Reply)

They'd have been better off using a mannequin for the initial ejection followed by a cut to the original Nigerian feller in his hero costume as it clings back onto the ship.
But what's done is done...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:46, Reply)

See the scene when they're waking up and getting dressed and when Riply's getting into the space suit.
Lovely shots of Sigourney in her underwear.
However.....she's not changed her knickers in all that time.
Every tried to open up a toasted cheese sandwich?*
*©Tab Hunter
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:52, Reply)

Haven't you seen anything by George Lucas lately?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:52, Reply)

Just for the 'Ash is a goddamn robot' scenes as they are fucking poor by modern standards!
In one scene with it sat on the black dude you can not only see it doesn't have legs but all the cabling they're using to operate it.
Yeh there's a few scenes it wouldn't hurt to do a Lucas on, so long as it doesn't involve comedy Jawas and appalling key frame animation, anyway, as they're the main reason I find it hard to enjoy the first film now, lovely as it is, they keep bringing me out of the story.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:01, Reply)

You end up forgetting what you are watching and just wait for the jarring moment.
-Suspension of suspension of disbelief.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:07, Reply)

You have to use your imagination more basically, but it is a struggle sometimes.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:20, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:29, Reply)

Would be Them, the one with the giant ants, and that's mainly because of the sounds, but the scene when they find the little girl gets me every time!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:37, Reply)

I recently watched a few Star Trek TOS episodes where some pillock had inserted a load of CGI into it. Cunts.
For me it creates the same problem you are hoping it avoids. It breaks my willing suspension of disbelief to see some sparkly CGI stuff in the middle of the 60s stuff.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:15, Reply)

There doesn't seem to be any kind of limit being imposed on the amount of design put into the CGI upgrades. I'm sure TOS could benefit from some subtle CGI (backgrounds, clearing up matte lines, stopping models from zipping about the place) but instead we get "Look what *I* can do!".
See recent redesign of ED209 for the new Robocop remake. The original was a beautiful combination of corporate design and function. The redesign is an exercise in "CGI Robot you say?? LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS OF POLYGONS AND POINTY BITS THAT MAKE NO SENSE!!!"
ED-209
TRANSFORMERSRGO-209
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:36, Reply)

Looks well out of place.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 12:12, Reply)

Though I DO think it's terrible what westerners force scammers to do in front of the camera.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:22, Reply)

Shitty little country with fuck all infrastructure plus really hot & humid.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:28, Reply)

www.floellabenjamin.com/www.floellabenjamin.com/Welcome.html
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:08, Reply)

I never knew. Great website. She seems so unaffected. Talking about staying at the Carlton Hotel (in Cannes for the premiere of Black Joy), like your gran would.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:30, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:00, Reply)

I'm so fucking up for this.
The early reviews are incredible.
And Urban doesn't takes his mask off. At all. Looks like they've nailed the character.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:34, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:46, Reply)

It's a deliberate character piece full of eye candy, which isn't a bad way for a hopeful series of films to start.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:50, Reply)

I hope Karl Urban doesn't do much Stallone-eques gurning through out. He looks a little gurnie in this clip.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:54, Reply)

the cartoon jaw is the one thing Stallone had right
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:57, Reply)

like Heath Ledger redefined The Joker in The Dark Knight.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:01, Reply)

granted that particular version hadn't been on the big screen before
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:08, Reply)

If you read killing joke & Arkham asylum for some classic joker.
The "goofy" Nicholson joker just looks hollow.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:24, Reply)

he was well chuffed.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:29, Reply)

Story of Batman when he's old and retired.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:35, Reply)

I had to ask about Batman comic when I was looking for his present and was introduced to a complete Batman Geek who was blinding me with his knowledge and he could see my eyes glazing over. So this helps a lot thanks.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:40, Reply)

Killing Joke
Arkham Asylum
Dark Knight Returns
are the best I've read
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:45, Reply)

Chris Nolan says it's the book he returned to the most often when making his trilogy.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:12, Reply)

It's an Elseworlds Batman set in the 30's and is fucking excellent.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:03, Reply)

but the Heath Ledger one... how or why exactly was he the joker? no backstory in the movie, no reason for him to look like he did, or be called the Joker. He was a great villian, but didn't need the make-up or the name
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:30, Reply)

he was called The Joker because of the The Joker Playing Card he left as his calling card. Some people didn't get the idea that he changed his story about how he got his facial scars and thought it was a continuity error, but instead it illustrated that The Joker didn't want people to know his back-story and he makes it up as and when it suits him.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:38, Reply)

but why would it need to actually show it? films don't have to take you by the hand through everything do they? I liked the ambiguity.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:38, Reply)

but there was the Scarecrow, he made sense, he scared you, and with that burlap sack looked like a scarecrow, fine. Harvey Dent made sense, the whole half face thing, Bane has that mask which pumps him full of anaesthetic and whatnot, it all makes sense. But with the Joker, there was just no reason, he didn't tell jokes, the playing card thing isn't explained, or the make-up. He was just a (very good) generic psychopath. It just feels like a big plot hole.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:01, Reply)

It's all theatrics, he's anarchistic there is no reason other than because he is.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:06, Reply)

I like the fact that we don't know who he is, his backstory, or why he wears makeup like a clown it adds to the mystery.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:43, Reply)

Superheroes get their own movies, supervillians should too!
The whole 'air of mystery' thing seems tacked on after the fact, to explain away a hole. It could still have been done in a few minutes in the movie with a 'what do we know about him?' scene, with a few rumours etc. throwing some possibilities up. It didn't need to be definitive. The only reason that they could get away with this is because everyone is as familiar with the Joker as they are Batman.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:12, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:07, Reply)

Definitely not intended for the younger audience then I take it?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:04, Reply)

Tho not sure which side they'll be rooting for considering it's essentially a movie about Da Feds.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:28, Reply)

Every other frame would show some sort of lovely ultra violence.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:37, Reply)

I was there from the start as a kid in the '70s, literally from prog one onwards before it was even called 2000ad, I had the free flying thingy n metallic sparkly stickers they gave away on the first few releases n everything.
Then in some sort of classic enactment of every story ever that starts with the above, my Mum decided to throw them all out one time when I wasn't about to object.
She did the same with my Star Wars figures, my original Alien figure with snapping jaw action, and all my original ZX81 games, all at different times. I was afraid to leave the house after a while!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:56, Reply)

I can't think of a time when he wasn't shooting holes in people
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:00, Reply)

But they didn't smear the screen with blood and have giblets flying thru the air, the point of reading it wasn't for the gore wank and macho chest thumping, it was for the story, cool shit and pleasing boy hood morals, the good guy always won and all that.
This looks like its going to be half the story and twice the gore, nice and easy money off the 300 style crowd, I wonder if they'll throw in some confusingly homo erotic chest out male bonding scenes too, they all seem to have them?
'I feel the need, the need for speed!' ;)
Ah fuckit I'll most likely still watch it, might still enoy it, beyond all the 3D slo mo testosterone flying about there might still be some humour and depth to it...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:19, Reply)

the star is the universe, not the characters. Dredd is not interesting in himself, but we got to see glimpses of the Mega-City and snippets of its history etc. That was the real hook I think.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:28, Reply)

Seeing it that way explains why it must be fucking hard to bring it to the big screen as in the orginal strip he really isn't the main focus of most of the stories, all the robots, flying cars, belly wheels, Boing and block wars were.
He was almost a robot.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:35, Reply)

stupid voice, stupid gurn and the ultra-explicit gore is not in the spirit.
JD was black humour almost totally lacking in gore, people fell down, that was it.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:33, Reply)

This means you're not a real man, like me, not like all the other really hard guys who read comics, play video games and own a Bat'Leth! ;)
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:09, Reply)

I remember getting in vividly.
Don't when it wasn't violent.
He had a gun and shot bad guys with comical "budda budda" effects :)
[edit]
Here's Dredd in his Daily Star days.
www.forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/images/Dredd-secur-o-pod-heist.jpg
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:04, Reply)

Stop saying I'm saying it wasn't violent.
It was cowboys and indians/spaghetti western style the bad guy gets his dues type violent, bang bang you're dead the good guy always wins, not Braindead look at the giblets and prove you're a real man and not puke fuck the story type violent, THAT'S what I'm saying.
This isn't.
*Or at least from that clip don't look it anyways.
*mind you since when can you judge a film from what they cut into the trailer to get bums on seats?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:27, Reply)

I know I could google but anyone remember? Something very clunky and futuristicy is all I can recall, something like Star Lords Zoom! Or something, LOL!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:52, Reply)

as there wasn't a precursor to 2000AD, it just came out as a brand new comic when I was about 11 or 12 - fuck me I'm old :(
If I remember correctly Dan Dare was in it from the beginning and he was resurrected from The Eagle.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:00, Reply)

I may be remembering it wrong, it was a damn long time ago now, mind you, it wouldn't be the first time I've seen 'facts' about stuff I grew up with seem entirely wrong to me, and I'm never sure if I'm remembering it wrong, or its another case of a modern 'truth' about the past being slightly twisted by time and Chinese Whispers before anyone wrote it down on the Internet, I've seen a few before, mainly chronology issues or Roddenberry style fan ret con being accepted as fact now.
Meh, doesn't really matter I guess.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:13, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Dredd#Publication_history
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:21, Reply)

Confirms Dredd first appeared in issue 2 and that Starlord was merged into 2000AD a year after 2000AD was first published.
Thank you :)
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:48, Reply)

May explain my confusion?
*mayhaps even! Thank you auto correct! :s
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:11, Reply)

I bet they had the same problem with the bike as they had in the last movie. Good for straight lines.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:02, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:04, Reply)

Then CGI in the silly big fat unsteerable ones from the strip. Even in 3D that should work ok.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:17, Reply)

the CGI was spot on if not a tad implausible.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:29, Reply)

Don't try and tell me 'Batman Begins' was good, because it was no better than the others.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:44, Reply)

although my dog ate my Blu Ray disc of it yesterday so now I have to buy another!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:14, Reply)

Replacing the dog just cos it ate your Blu-ray disc. :-)
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:45, Reply)

Just hope it's not all style and no substance and endless Zack Synder style slow mo shots ...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:55, Reply)

Guess that's an 18 for sure, excellent stuff. They should have made this the trailer instead of that duffer they rolled out last month. Thanks Toats!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 13:01, Reply)

Just the way I like my Dredd.
LAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 14:02, Reply)

just drive it out of the store.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 5:15, Reply)

Stupid people thats an untapped market...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 4:02, Reply)

( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:48, Reply)

Pppffttt!!
At first it looked like a human squirrel experiment, then it turned into 'X-Factor.......on the Road!'
We need more of these machines in towns [and hospitals].
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:04, Reply)

An impressive feat of cognitive dissonance.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:07, Reply)

Jethro Tull- 1978 in Madison Square Garden
A whimsy of a song
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 2:14, Reply)

He's stood on one leg playing A FUCKING FLUTE
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 3:31, Reply)

This proved perfect.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 0:27, Reply)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lTVohhONFg
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 1:09, Reply)

I've become a bit of a fan of the Big Bang Theory lately. It appeals to my nerdlike nature.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 2:30, Reply)

been watching Galecki/Gilbert/Metcalf since Roseanne, and Mayim Bialik's role has hugely expanded in the current season
(I could never stomach Blossom though)
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 3:48, Reply)

Before I knew it I was drawn in, too many familiarities not to really, and the cast is very strong and the writing very sharp at times, very character driven, and unlike many American comedies it doesn't get too dumb or mawkish on you.
I wouldn't say it was unmissable but there's been some stand out episodes that I could watch again n again, such as the time Sheldon gets a robot avatar, the constant smug gurning of the man kills me everytime, and that for me is a good sign that they're getting something right!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:17, Reply)

I just don't get why actual nerdy people would be into it. I mean they say "youtube" and "blog" a lot and sheldon does a great aspie impersonation but saying it's a nerdy show is like saying some guy making cheese on toast is a cooking show.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 8:56, Reply)

...then recently, I decided to start from the pilot and give a three episode chance to grip me. I'm now half way through series three.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:04, Reply)

Oooh, like a little flower!
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:21, Reply)

For no real reason. Just haven't heard it in ages.
Go Terry.
( , Thu 12 Jul 2012, 23:46, Reply)

edit- also, Terry Hall's head looks like a mushroom
( , Thu 12 Jul 2012, 23:57, Reply)

And yes, really saying something made the blonde guy look like a retard.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 0:46, Reply)

Too much too young
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 0:55, Reply)

You're meant to be cleverrerer than me
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 3:36, Reply)

But yes, it's gorgeous and it's one of my favourite ever songs. I've listened to it about 15 times just tonight!
edit- also, Terry Hall has a mushroom-head
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 3:51, Reply)

My first Conservapedia post. Also worth looking up their entry for "Bigotry".
( , Thu 12 Jul 2012, 23:14, Reply)

..that Britain is 'increasingly atheistic' though - think the number of 'atheist' people is roughly the same as it always was, they're just making more fuss about it lately.
Also one must consider immigration - something like a net increase of 200,000 per year isn't it? Most of those are from Eastern Europe and the Asian subcontinent - thus not really shy about the old God-bothering. I'd be very surprised if there are 200,000 per year previously devout people suddenly knocking their lifelong beliefs on the head.
So net I'd say we're actually increasingly religious - or rather increasingly a population of People of Faith, just not in the familiar Anglican way we all knew and loved.
None of which bothers me, for the record. Just saying.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 0:21, Reply)

Church attendance rates are certainly falling, which is probably also a cultural thing, but you would think that believers would still go.
I guess it is easier to be openly atheist nowadays, whereas in the past you would probably be forced to attend church and keep quiet regardless.
Also, regarding immigration, that must mean that kids get exposed to a wider variety of religious practises, so it must be harder to indoctrinate them into a single one as I'm sure any child can easily see that they can't all be right.
That said, having a vague belief in "spirituality" is probably the fastest growing 'religion' in this country. People can be religious without organised religion.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 0:43, Reply)

Ask them nicely what that means and listen to the confusion :))
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 1:24, Reply)

but it does have a few genuine meanings and definitions, and not everyone who uses the word can be unaware of them.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 1:34, Reply)

and the number is falling.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 7:55, Reply)

If they didn't keep fucking editing it. More cuts in that than some cunt's vlog on youtube.
( , Thu 12 Jul 2012, 23:14, Reply)

but the Spanish over dub got on my tits, its a BBC clip too!!
( , Thu 12 Jul 2012, 23:14, Reply)

..and I thought it was polski or some such *meh*
( , Thu 12 Jul 2012, 23:17, Reply)

That's why I started watching, anyway
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 0:15, Reply)

yay. to me it seemed as if a kitten was to be put in a blender :(
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 20:30, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »