b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 35844 (Older | Newer)

# downloadable MS SQL Server 2005 - Full for $69.95
God edit: HOORAY SOFTWARE
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:13, archived)
# emergency kitten
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:14, archived)
# \o/
I love this picture.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# you iz not kittin!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# Hahaha ACE
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# \o/ *joys*
Pics like this keep me alive.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:18, archived)
# I find fine single malts and smoking have much the same effect.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:20, archived)
# Yes, smoking/booze does help.
As do the pills.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:22, archived)
# :)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:37, archived)
#
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:14, archived)
# he's enjoying that
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# thought it was you.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# Yeah, well - you got me.
Edit: I think I may be mis-construing you - what do you mean by that?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:18, archived)
# volestrangler.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:28, archived)
# Now I really am confused.
Edit: Ah - you think that's me?

Sorry, bucko, null points, it's not.

Edit Edit: I do know who it is, though.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# that was the only other possiblity:
you'd have to know who it is if she/he is leeching your pics without you making a squeak.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# Quite so...
;-)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:53, archived)
#
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:17, archived)
# I love this!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:23, archived)
# ha!
I only just noticed that he is beatified
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:27, archived)
#
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# Dear Judith















(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# hahaha..arse!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:19, archived)
# pffft
good ol' Borb
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:22, archived)
# needs more shoes!


yays! I want some Hooray Software!!!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# MONTY PYTHON................(Spam)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# How is this account
not banned yet?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# How come you haven't ignored it yet?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:19, archived)
# <-> <->
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:23, archived)
# Yes, I think you're right ;)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:24, archived)
# WTFAYBOA?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# ey up thor
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:17, archived)
# hi ya
unemployment has allowed me to look at b3ta briefly while searching for a job.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:26, archived)
# Thanks Ms Perry
Can you please explain the legal issues surrounding the purchase and use of OEM software?

kthxbye
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:17, archived)
# fancy a fuck judy?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:17, archived)
# OK guys, who did it?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:18, archived)
# hehe
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:20, archived)
# Bloody hell, if you leave anything unattended for 5mins, they blow it up!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:34, archived)
# congratulations
You;ve just spammed a bunch of spam haters.

Your website is going to be:

1) Tested for hotlinks. If any found then the image is going to be changed to a Goatse
2) Added to a large number of blocked site lists
3) Mocked without any remorse

Well done you.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:19, archived)
#
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:20, archived)
#

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:24, archived)
# I haven't broke this out for a while
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# yes!!
:)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:48, archived)
# Poor Harry...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:01, archived)
# Gary Glitter is gay?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:03, archived)
# Is that Gary Glitter in the reflection?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:03, archived)
# yes....
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:05, archived)
# But he's legal now...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:04, archived)
# true
...damnit
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:05, archived)
# And male.
EDIT:

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:06, archived)
# hahaha
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:09, archived)
# Something wicked this way comes
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:05, archived)
# arf :)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:06, archived)
# HP Sauce?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:06, archived)
# Yeah!?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:54, archived)
# Hahaha
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:56, archived)
# this is true of all ginger cats
I found my keys - thanks to everyone who helped me look
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:59, archived)
# were they on top of the freezer?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:59, archived)
# no - but I did check
they were in the pocket of the jacket I wore when I last had them.

I just forgot I was wearing that particular jacket.

Stupid isn't it
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:02, archived)
# it's almost a daily occurrence for a simpleton like me.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# :D

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:01, archived)
# hahahaha bloody hahahahaha
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:27, archived)
# Ginger cats drink monkey beer
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# uh oh he's off on one
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:32, archived)
# .
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:45, archived)
# mmmmmmmmmmmm i want an msg burger.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:46, archived)
# i want a txt msg burger
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:00, archived)
# Lunch!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:46, archived)
# I am not responsible for what I do.
Therefore, if I get fat from eating lard, or cancer because I smoke, it is someone else's fault.

GM, however, needs to feck off. We don't have any say in the matter, and now it's in the cycle.

Twunts.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:46, archived)
# I'm confused, I don't know which bits are sarcasm.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# If you want to get it off the cycle
nick it's stablisers! A litre of the god awful coke actually costs a penny. THe mark up is criminal.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:51, archived)
# The ecosystem has far worse problems
Alien species, pollution. Most domestic breeds of plants and animals are the result of selective breeding (a form of GM) nowadays anyway.

Plus, given the increasing overpopulation of the planet, we're going to need GM crops just to avoid starving.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:52, archived)
# Oh I fully support the ideas for GM.
I don't support allowing it into the cycle untested, as they have done now.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:54, archived)
# Mutagenic virii, that's the way to go
FEV. Speed up evolution. Humans aren't going to evolve without it.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:57, archived)
# exactly
the reason people protested was because the government tried to sneak it past them, there wasn't a debate and the scientific evidence wasn't made public
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:59, archived)
# Yes but the effect of even tested GM produce is not fully know
In the 80's one such supplimet killed over 100 people and caused up to another 10,000 people to fall ill in the US.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:02, archived)
# which would support the idea of further testing, resolution and retesting
before release.

Not that we have a choice now.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:11, archived)
# There is a very good reason
the great unwashed are excluded from debates such as this.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# Well have a fucking bath!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:18, archived)
# what 'supplement' was that.
And how is a food supplement a GMO crop. The WHO only shows the passed GMO foods in use as having insect resistance and herbicide tolerance bred into them.
Canada and the US bred Virus resistance into Squashes as well.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:11, archived)
# *digs*
L-tryptophan
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:19, archived)
# That has absolutely no
relation to genetically modified crops.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:21, archived)
# Not according to Jeffrey M. Smith so seems to have quite a solid reputation.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:29, archived)
# well I'd suggest further reading
but your mind appears made up.
I'll just say this. Genetically engineered bacteria and genetically modified crops ( which we were discussing ) are not the same fields and have no relation to each other barring the vast umbrella of 'genetics'
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:31, archived)
# Maybe that was a bad example but you have to admit that there's more than one argument regard GM products.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:36, archived)
# All I can do is argue the facts as they are presented.
There may be debate to be had but the fact remains that most of the 'argument' against is based on myth and lies.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:39, archived)
# minimum of two clearly...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:41, archived)
# Are you seriously anti-GM?
God forbid we actually try and *feed* people, oh dear me, no.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:53, archived)
# Untested GM I think should be carefully tested before allowed into the cycle.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:54, archived)
# Yeah, I got that,
But why - pretty much all crops have been genetically modified anyhow, and have been for years.

It's the same argument as saying that since male pattern baldness is hereditary, so is a requirement to fight in the First World War, because that's what happened to my grandfather.

That *really* works.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:59, archived)
# Does anyone with half an education
think that corn, the foodstuff that started civilisation always looked like that?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:00, archived)
# I only had half an education.
The crap half.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:03, archived)
# how do you meant untested?
I'm sure someone, somewhere said " Yep, that's a huge tomato and it tastes fucking great".
If you mean unregulated then that's down to specific governments and where there is regulation ( such as most of the Western world ) there is extreme focus on consumer health and then environmental risks.

Besides, there is less of it 'in the cycle' than you might think with only 6 major GMO crops in worldwide mass use.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:59, archived)
# Tomatos with fish genes.
Etc.

Now they're out there - they've been grown in the open, and have already cross-pollinated with other, non-GM stuff.

Whether the original GM stuff was tested or not.

Wind doesn't really conform to regulations - Western or no.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:09, archived)
# Right.
Tomatos with fish genes.

Any evidence - at all - that there is anything actually wrong with that?
Granted, it's a bit weird, but what the fuck - so is fucking Quorn.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:12, archived)
# unfortunately, it's the converse that's the problem
Any evidence - at all - that there is anything nothing actually wrong with that?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# No. That simply doesn't work.
Merely because people are unsettled by the concept doesn't make it wrong.


(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:18, archived)
# that's not what i'm trying to say. From a scientific point of view
(ignoring the whale huggers views) there must be nothing wrong.

another way to put what I am trying to say is: everything must be right.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:34, archived)
# I'm not saying tomato with fish genes is wrong - I'm citing it as an example of GM, to illustrate the cross-pollination aspect.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# You should read less of the
anti GMO propaganda and more of the world health organisation literature before you use urban myth and half truths to prop up your argument.
The 'fish-gene' experiment was a bid to turn on cold resistance in tomato genes by copying the markers from Arctic fish. It never worked.
These antifreeze proteins are already present in the plants and are not taken from fish, they used the fish research to learn how to turn the genes on.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16, archived)
# I'm not saying tomato with fish genes is wrong - I'm citing it as an example of GM, to illustrate the cross-pollination aspect.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:22, archived)
# I'm saying it is wrong though
because you are using an example of a thing that did not quite happen in the manner that you report it to support an argument that is based solely on your opinion and resistance to progress.
"Tomatoes with anti-freeze proteins already present in the food being switched on after studying how the same proteins work in Arctic flounder" Does not really have the same shock effect does it?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:25, archived)
# OK - I'm sorry.
Here you go then: "Untested GM stuff shouldn't be allowed into the cycle."

Is that better?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:33, archived)
# It puts us back to the beginning
as I don't know what you mean by untested.
As I said, The world health organisation monitors this. The national authorities are required to carry out thorough risk assessments for human and environmental health risks so assuming that's what you mean then I agree with you but considering that's the way it is now I don't see what you are wanting to change.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:37, archived)
# GM food
is the best thing to happen to the world and it's lily-livered hippies that should hang their head in shame every time some child dies in a famine struck area because their constant, unfounded claims against modified foods are holding back progress.

Also MSG is the tastiest of all the food groups. I love it.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:53, archived)
# msg is lovely, however the thing that concerns me about GM
is that biological experiments/solutions, particularly where large populations, are concerned have gone a bit pear-shaped before.

I think continued development, and funding (which the aforementioned hippies are trying to prevent) is required.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:01, archived)
# But 'this happened in the past'
is no argument for anything.
I might argue that Hitler went a bit potty so I call for an open season shooting politicians. I'd probably get elected on that platform actually. Oh wait...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:04, archived)
# See also: the manifesto for UKIP
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:06, archived)
# 'this happened in the past' isn't a valid argument for stopping GM crops
it's an argument in support for more funding and research for it, that way, hopefully it won't be a disaster with inedible crops developing.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:08, archived)
# But there is already funding and research
and it continues. The EU and WHO have agreed on 18 GMO crops to date with 12 pending. As I said, 6 are in major use worldwide. These modifications are just for herbicide tolerance and insect/virus resistance.
What would you have people do? Throw more money at proven technology and talk about it or get on and feed the starving?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:19, archived)
# there's always going to be new research to be done.
If and when the research problem is solved then the products go into use, ie like the virus resistant crops.

There is no point not developing technology further if there is some advantage.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:25, archived)
# That's just how it works now
so you may sleep safe.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:33, archived)
# i know...remember my bais, I'll always want more research so people will pay me money.
It's just that the typical gm argument (particularly ones by political people) that i've seen goes down the lines of

"oh it's untestested, therefore bad and we must stop it immediately" vs. "People are starving, it must be accelerated and put in place as soon as possible"

And I don't want politicians cutting corners and research budgets.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:40, archived)
# I just don't understand the 'untested' bit
just because a word is bandied about does not make it fact.
There is international law on this. It differs slightly in some areas but EU law states that.

Article 4
Requirements
1. Food referred to in Article 3(1) must not:
(a) have adverse effects on human health, animal health or the
environment;
(b) mislead the consumer;
(c) differ from the food which it is intended to replace to such
an extent that its normal consumption would be nutritionally
disadvantageous for the consumer.
2. No person shall place on the market a GMO for food use
or food referred to in Article 3(1) unless it is covered by an
authorisation granted in accordance with this Section and the
relevant conditions of the authorisation are satisfied.
3. No GMO for food use or food referred to in Article 3(1)
shall be authorised unless the applicant for such authorisation
has adequately and sufficiently demonstrated that it satisfies the
requirements of paragraph 1 of this Article.


so I fail to see what the fuss is all about. People want it 'testing'. The law requires that it is 'tested' and the WHO passes it after the requirements are met ( and it does not pass a lot ) so it appears that people are arguing for a situation that already exists. Granted there will always be a group that oppose change for the sake of needing some cause to justify their petty existence but these can, and should, be mostly ignored.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:48, archived)
# The problem there is that people DO NOT ignore the (largely) unfounded opposition
and unfortunately the opposition are capable of making persuading arguments to people who cannot understand the facts for themselves, or for some reason, including laziness, refuse to find out the learned opinion on the matter. What's worse is, there is an awful lot of these thick/lazy people.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 14:05, archived)
# This is why I argue.
I have no wish to upset people or fall out with them I just have an innate need to challenge people when they use sweeping generalisation and misinformation to back up their claims. I just want to say "let's look at what you are saying and then let us look at what we actually know on the subject as opposed to what we would like to believe".
I think that's fair and I often enjoy the debate. It's a shame some people see it as some kind of attack when it never is.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 14:09, archived)
# i shall sleep safely now
for what it's worth i tend to agree with you.

my only concern with gm crops is the modified sterility of the seed, but i guess the guys have got to fund their research/holidays somehow
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:41, archived)
# haha
well cynicked that man ;)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:43, archived)
# well that's lunch sorted
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# Pfft!
nicely put, sir
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# seen it : D
: D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:48, archived)
# Double Whopper Cheese, no tomato
portion of onion rings, and a sprite, please.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:48, archived)
# Last night I had a 'bacon double cheeseburger pizza' from Asda.
It was very lovely.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:49, archived)
# *runs out the door to find the nearest Asda*
*Decides to go to Gourmet Burger Kitchen instead*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:51, archived)
# mmmm
we have a gourmet burger place here in Wells, but I have yet to sample its delights.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:53, archived)
# The garlic mayonnaise they do is the the feckin' business,,,,
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:55, archived)
# Well that's my plans for lunch today sorted.
I'll pre-book an appointment at the heart clinic for later this afternoon.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:56, archived)
# Why not combine the two?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:01, archived)
# oooh, yummie nurses!
*daydreams*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:29, archived)
# Oh noes
Protect me from the Genes, Aspartame and MSG...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:50, archived)
# Shocker
Consuming MSG makes you around 48% more likely to be overweight...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:53, archived)
# Well
No shit, it makes food more tasty making it far more likely you will eat more.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:54, archived)
# I've cooked with MSG
for about 20 years. Would not be without it in the kitchen.
The fact that I'm a fat cunt would probably be more likely a result of the 8 pints of beer a day I tend to consume ;).
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:55, archived)
# Aspartame has been widely used for 35 years
Where is the proof it causes problems
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:56, archived)
# It's lethal you idiot
I saw 20 people drop dead in Tesco yesterday after drinking sugar free cola!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:56, archived)
# That's nothing
I once ate GM soya and now I have a second arse!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:00, archived)
# They should have bought it before drinking it
Or at least know where the Tesco anti-shoplifting sniper nest is located.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:06, archived)
# I'm allergic to Aspartame...
But that's just a good excuse to drink full-fat soda, rather than the diet crap.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:00, archived)
# Don't forget the fluoride
I once found that there's fluoride in my toothpaste. I immediately set fire to my bathroom and ran around screaming "burn the witch"...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:59, archived)
# Nicely done.
But please don't throw your propaganda at me. Cheers.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:57, archived)
# wow
you managed to produce all this merchandise quick:
shop.cafepress.com/design/17761254
have a:
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:02, archived)
# Oh, good detective skills, sir
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:05, archived)
# think i saw it in a
stock photo library years ago now ;)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:07, archived)
# Also, I rather like your failcat
:)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:09, archived)
# Not this argument again...
It was determined that he is the artist. Has his own site full of stuff. He's now posting it here for our entertainment.
Ask Pasanonic.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:09, archived)
# For our intertainment?!:O
How dare he! We'll have none of this new fangled la di da entertainment round here!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:12, archived)
# he probably made it a while ago. It's not a repost, it's probably his own image.
what's wrong with that?

Do images have a used by date now?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:10, archived)
# Well he either made it
or has been posting someone else's work on a regular basis.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:10, archived)
# my apologies
to him IF he made it. it's a compliment to him that it's an image i remember from a few years ago ;)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:15, archived)
# yeah he made it, he's been through this before.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:20, archived)
# I had a Black Pudding burger
yesterday. You don't see that in Burger King.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:04, archived)
# I went to burgerking for the first time in 20 years about two weeks back
as I was starving, there was nothing in the house and it was the only place open. I played it safe and went for just a veggie burger and fries. I always eat healthily and I'm always very concious of where my food is sourced from.
As a result my body couldn't handle it. I puked the lot up within five minutes.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:14, archived)
# Well, in that case
avoid the one at Euston Station whatever you do.
Salmonella Central, that place.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:28, archived)
# There was vegetarian black pudding on the telly
yesterday. Now that's just plain wrong.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:38, archived)
# Oh god, not this rubbish again
In both senses
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:23, archived)
# HAHAHAHA. . . whicheverway it's looked at---it's BRILLIANT ART
*artlover*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:35, archived)
# Gadzooks!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:43, archived)
# I HATE it when that happens!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:43, archived)
# so do I
where am I?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:44, archived)
# You're here now, and that's what matters.
*unzips*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:45, archived)
# ahh, thankyou
this sleeping bag was causing some typing problems, I can tell you
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:46, archived)
# Pre-size Lee.
That's what I hate when it happens.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# You are in a darkened corridor
There are exits to the North and West, and a staircase leading up to the East.

There is a cloth bag on the floor.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:45, archived)
# USE BAG IMMORALLY
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# You put the bag over Anne Widdecombes head
and shag her senseless. Up the arse.

Now you feel dirty, don't you?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:48, archived)
# I'd only feel proper dirty if I hadn't used the bag.
REMOVE BAG FROM ANNE'S HEAD.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:49, archived)
# You catch crabs either way
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:17, archived)
# *picks up cloth bag*
*eats it*

*walks East*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:48, archived)
# I'd hate have seen the chicken! :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:44, archived)
# he looks shocked.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:48, archived)
# hehe

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:51, archived)
# Too soon?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:30, archived)
# HaHaHaHa
*Click*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:32, archived)
# OOOOOF!
Edit: he's a devil for doing that...

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:33, archived)
# Fantastic!!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:35, archived)
# so he has a history of this sort of thing?
he is pure liquid evil
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:35, archived)
# he's drawn to conflict, like a moth to the flame...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:37, archived)
# *ahem*
scale gone to pot?

or is he my brother?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:45, archived)
# this monkey's gone to heaven?
me no understandy...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# ?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:50, archived)
# To paraphrase various nameless citizens of Arulco,
"He is Satan. I risk my life saying this."
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:40, archived)
# Oh noes!

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:33, archived)
# Not at all! lol
Not at all! lol
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:33, archived)
# Over one hundred people have died
including small children pets, and making people orphans.

But this still gives me lolz!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:36, archived)
# small children pets?
are you confusing Australia with Austria?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:37, archived)
# Ha ha ha...
oh... too soon, man, too soon

or something. Have a click all the same :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:37, archived)
# I made a joke
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:41, archived)
# just a bit, and you probably mean melbourne in your sig
there's a few fires round here but pretty pissy all things considered.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:45, archived)
# cheers
they just said Australia on the news so it must be Sydney.
Marshmallows in Melbourne has a nice alliterative tone though.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:53, archived)
# 'Marshmallows in Melbourne' sounds like a disappointing sequel to 'Ice Cold in Alex'
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:55, archived)
# wheres the sauce pic of this henry chap?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:12, archived)
# Random composite
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:30, archived)
# Well I like it :)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:36, archived)
# Random, you say?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:40, archived)
# Yam it shop tiem?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:42, archived)
# It's always shop time on /board
Try posting without it.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:43, archived)
# You just did:P
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# Racist.
EDIT: Incidentally, did you see Louis Theroux about Racism? Intervewing the Brothers Of Islam, etc?

Man that was funny. They're convinced Shakespeare and Tom Jones are black hahahaha
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:48, archived)
# Hahaha
WHen was that on?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:52, archived)
#
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:44, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:17, archived)
# arf :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:18, archived)
# That's abominable!!
or even a 'bomb in a' snowman!!!!!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:20, archived)
# o_O
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:25, archived)
# A bomb in a ball
Snow man ball.

Snowballs.

Hmmm ...

*thinks*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:25, archived)
# Sodium pellets into a snowbank?
xkcd.com/521/

I'd like to see caesium or thermite on snow.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:33, archived)
# hehehehe
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:22, archived)
# Arf!
Who's going to clean up the slush afterwards? They never think of those they leave behind...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:24, archived)
# :D
damn those snow terrists!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:28, archived)
# ...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:52, archived)
# Classy, sir.
Very classy.

*clicks*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:54, archived)
#




what he said...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:54, archived)
# *fondles*
I've got something for you....
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:55, archived)
# *excites*
where?

Show me!!!


I'd forgotten about that what with having to *gasp* Public Transport this morning!!!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:58, archived)
# *shows*
Oh, you didn't mean that - sorry....
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:02, archived)
# aaaargh!
*turns and runs, straight into a table*


*knocks self out*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:03, archived)
# how tall are you
that you can knock yourself out running into a table?

also - after ningles - how are you all?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:12, archived)
# Freebs is exactly 2 feet eight inches tall.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:16, archived)
# is he blue?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:16, archived)
# No he is bright orange
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:17, archived)
# ah so he's an oompa loompa not a smurf.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:21, archived)
# ^ This is completely, utterly true*
*may not be true at all.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:26, archived)
# He appears to be still unconscious
so it might be true...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:34, archived)
# Fucked off
I've been in this job 5 years today, and I'm on my own as my colleague is off sick.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:20, archived)
# well if you're on your own, crack a tinnie, pop on a porno
and enjoy the day...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:21, archived)
# Morning Prof!
*chaste hugs*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:29, archived)
# ^
what she said
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:55, archived)
# Cheers JP!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:55, archived)
# Sexy
Where is it? I'm thinking Chicargah.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:56, archived)
# Peckham
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:57, archived)
# Oh of course
That scene from "The Taking Of Peckham 123"
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:57, archived)
# three blocks from here:
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:58, archived)
# I do love old photos
Especially when you have people in it looking on at this amazing new invention (usually seen in street scenes).
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:59, archived)
# "I say, it's one of those newfangled photomagraphical magic devices for portraiture!"
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:07, archived)
# perhaps if I show the young Lord my danger stick
he'll pay me in ale!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:14, archived)
# yes
Fabbo Mr. Fox-Talbert.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:40, archived)
# there's a lot of poo there
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:17, archived)
# It must be South London
which, as we all know, is poo.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:24, archived)
# Yays
Why do I feel so guilty loving the new ComparetheMarket.com adverts?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:56, archived)
# Because for the money,
the 3D is fucking top notch.

*along with the meerkat joke of course.*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:59, archived)
# You can't hate it.
How can you hate a meerkat?!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:00, archived)
# it'd be wrong not to
www.comparethemeerkat.com/home.html

also, very nicely indeed ninj
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:00, archived)
# that site is funny
kudos for them for setting it up
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:05, archived)
# Joyous!
...and any excuse...

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:00, archived)
# wonderful.
simply wonderful.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:02, archived)
# one of these days I'll get off my fat arse and give him a tie...

Edit



What do we think? With or without?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:04, archived)
# I'd say with.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:14, archived)
# Think I'm with you on that now that I see it.
It's a bit un-Henry, but then there's quite a glaring gap in the picture without it.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:15, archived)
#
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:15, archived)
# I KNEW he was evil
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:18, archived)
# Yeah, he needs a tie
and a cock
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:15, archived)
# Nah I don't do CDCs
/b3ta heretic
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:17, archived)
# INFIDEL!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:38, archived)
# Oh, with, definately
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:23, archived)
# Buses everywhere!!! Please stop
Seems the BBC can't put the Atheist bus down... maybe they can link to the generator so that the normal humans can have some fun like us b3tans.

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7875834.stm

I was half expecting someone to post a bus in this thread!!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:13, archived)
# they can all go to hell!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:17, archived)
# They should link to Hedgehog's "bus"...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:26, archived)
# topshop
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:17, archived)
[challenge entry] :(

Altered for all you blind old cunts.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:44, archived)
# That's nice
What is it?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:46, archived)
# I'm thinking it's a close-up of some boiled ham
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:47, archived)
# Then this should be FPed stat!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:48, archived)
# blurred
is what it is
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:47, archived)
# the final scene of The Snowman.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:48, archived)
# What?
Alid Jones using a carrot to anally stimulate himself?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:50, archived)
# "it's all gone wrong for me"
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:51, archived)
# Fargo?
ED: Ah, ninja jihad!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:48, archived)
# *squints*
Can't quite make that out....

*goes to find glasses*

Edit: Ahhhh - got it....

:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:49, archived)
# struggle in the way of God.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:50, archived)
# Yes indeed.
Do you regret having that barbeque, then?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:51, archived)
# hahaha
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:52, archived)
# what barbeque? I'm in New South
along way from the big barbeque :S
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:52, archived)
# -5 points
for not even trying to run with it.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:53, archived)
# hmmm, 135 people dead 700 homes destroyed due to some fuckwits lighting fires. not very funny at the moment.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:56, archived)
# almost as funny as 9/11
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:56, archived)
# i know I've laughed at jokes about it, but not at the time.
I should get of the moral high ground, before i get burnt off it...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:00, archived)
# I am in no way trivialising that.
You should know better than to even suggest it.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:59, archived)
# yeah sorry, it's a bit disturbing.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:01, archived)
# No need.
Apologies for any perceived insensitivity.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:03, archived)
# now kiss.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:06, archived)
# hahaha *puckers*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:09, archived)
# I thought you'd never ask...
*snogs*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:27, archived)
# Absolute Radio played "Beds are Burning" this morning by Midnight Oil
then seemed surprised by the number of texts they got saying that it was in poor taste...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:00, archived)
# whoooopsies.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:02, archived)
# hah
stupid djs
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:02, archived)
# Fucking hell!
That's awful!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:02, archived)
# tina arena's burn would have also been a little off.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:05, archived)
# *thinks*
Natalie Imbruglia's 'Beauty On The Fire'?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:25, archived)
# The Doors
Light My Fire
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:38, archived)
# ;-)
I was trying to maintain the Ozzie theme...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:50, archived)
# dear oh dear...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:04, archived)
# argh mine eyes. argh poor snowman
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:49, archived)
# Careful if you go sledging on that...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:49, archived)
# needs more barbed wire
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:51, archived)
#
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:55, archived)
# awful awful awful fucking awful film
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:56, archived)
# Yeah
but the first five minutes were ok
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:04, archived)
# you asked for it
don't shoot the "humourous" misinterpreter
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:04, archived)
[challenge entry] Here's my 'effort' for the compo

I'd like to thank Mr W. E. Coyote...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# errr
which compo?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:44, archived)
# The one with the stuff?
You know, about the thing?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:53, archived)
# you didn't read the rules
it needs more of, you know, things.
Especially next to the stuff with the things in it.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:55, archived)
# Hahaha
Surely they'd go through and the terrorist would get hit by a train?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:45, archived)
# :D


(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:53, archived)
# Quick one for Mr Scaramanga...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:36, archived)
# Arf!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:37, archived)
# also...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:42, archived)
# *gets involved*

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:42, archived)
# I hope you've got a license for that Bream Cake
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:48, archived)
# All bought and paid for, I'll have you know.
Purchased from the Ministry of Fishiness this very morning.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:50, archived)
# I rewatched that one recently.

Still really like the soundtrack
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:54, archived)
# *giggle*
Nice one Mr Gruntfuttock!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:37, archived)
# Marvilush!
*clicks*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:39, archived)
# *molests*
How are you, sir?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:39, archived)
# Great thankee!
You ok sir?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:42, archived)
# horrifically hung-over*
*might actually still be drunk, I'm that woozy.
Otherwise, good, ta!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# There's something a bit fishy about all this...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:39, archived)
# hahaha. That's brill
You don't want a broken one.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:40, archived)
# I sincerely believe that
Fish Engineering is the way forward.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:41, archived)
# Mmmm
fishy flange.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# You had to, didn't you?
*sections*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:44, archived)
# Yes
I had to.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:46, archived)
# *admonishes*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:48, archived)
# *runs round being a spitfire*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:49, archived)
# *watches in bemusement*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:52, archived)
# *flollops like a mattress*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:55, archived)
# Hahahaha!

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:41, archived)
# arf
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:41, archived)
# That's no ....
Oh, yes it is!

Woo!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# You've got to have a bream
♪ If you don't have a bream, how ya gonna have a bream come true? ♫
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# :)

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# Bish Bosh!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:25, archived)
# That's lovely!
:D

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:27, archived)
# Ha :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:28, archived)
# I could have him any day.
ANY DAY.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:29, archived)
# Pictures, or
it didn't happen.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:33, archived)
# Catfight!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:44, archived)
# Aaaaaarh!
LEAVE ME ALONE!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:30, archived)
# Haha
ace!

ning!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:32, archived)
# Ningles Barbie
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:33, archived)
# I've seen this here before
haven't I? ;)

edit: how rude; woo, and ning!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:33, archived)
# ^
years ago

also 'nings!!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:34, archived)
# Ning C!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:35, archived)
# that's a rather violent pussy.
*attempts to keep straight face*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:34, archived)
# Gibbon!

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:25, archived)
# How funky :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:25, archived)
# Ooo Ooo Ooo!
I wanted to say that :(
(If I was gibbon the chance)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:26, archived)
# Just went ahead and did it anyway.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:26, archived)
# Oh stop monkeying around!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:28, archived)
# You want ape-iece of me? Huh?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:30, archived)
# You aint got the balls man!
Everyone knows talk is chimp!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:34, archived)
# I'll run you over in my truck, man! Then tie ya to the gorill, as a cool ornament!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:41, archived)
# Hahaha Funkah
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:26, archived)
# A funky one at that!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:26, archived)
#
why are you walking like mini me pal?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:28, archived)
# The Gout!
Knee just before Christmas, then left foot, now right foot :( Downloaded Killzone2 demo? ;-)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:33, archived)
# hehehehe!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:27, archived)
# "I am, I am, I am, I am, I am,
I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, ..."

WHAT ARE YOU! I MUST KNOW!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:32, archived)
# haha
great work as ever
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:54, archived)
# Naughty Chef!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:19, archived)
# Ha ha ha!
Nicely :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:23, archived)
# Hahahahaharder!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:25, archived)
# Hehe
Smack that potty mouth!!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:27, archived)
# FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK!
FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK!

Heh! *click*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:28, archived)
# Hehehe
Only what he deserves
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:32, archived)
# Haha
Hugh has got a look of:

*sigh* "Once again I'm having to discipline Ramsey"
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:51, archived)
# I dropped him in your mailbox!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:01, archived)
# Hahaha *glees*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:02, archived)
# FUUCKKKK
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:11, archived)
# O_O
*whimper*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:15, archived)
# Sweet granny-murdering deities on a rope!
*fears*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:17, archived)
# Eeeek!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:26, archived)
# this makes me smile...
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:12, archived)
# me too...
:o)
oh but such cynicism!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:13, archived)
# Seems like you've cracked the code

*cleeck*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:14, archived)
# hahaha!
Ain't dat de troot!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:14, archived)
# This post has been approved by b3ta quality control.


(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:15, archived)
# pfft
but you forgot the jive-talking hyperactive character, surely? Usually voiced by Eddie Murphy
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:17, archived)
# ...
Always the best approach, I find.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:40, archived)
# spot on!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:31, archived)
# I love this
So true, so true
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:32, archived)
# sosososo true
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 18:24, archived)
# Winnar!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:04, archived)
# "Splinter: The early years"
Woo.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:08, archived)
# Martial arts woo :D
I watched Rumble in the Bronx the other night for the first time. It was hilariously bad :D

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:11, archived)
# LIES It's a work of art
DO I HAVE TO REMIND YOU THAT HE DID IT WITH A BROKEN LEG? DO I? DO I?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:33, archived)
# Sorry, I should have qualified my statement.
I absolutely love terrible films. And enjoyed RitB greatly :D The only thing that annoyed me was the dubbing :D

EDIT: Oh my! www.imdb.com/title/tt1155076/
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:35, archived)
# Best jackie chan film EVAR
The stunts, the hovercraft, the broken leg, the cheesy bad guys, the car arial arse whipping bit - its all classic cinema.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:33, archived)
# Better than Rush Hour?
I don't think so!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:36, archived)
# BANZAI!!!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:15, archived)
# Office animals are fun
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# SATAN'S VERY OWN COMPUTER PERIPHERAL!!!!
*BURNS*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:32, archived)
# Mighty mice are mighty
Right mouse buttons are for wimps.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:57, archived)
# Jean Michel Jar Jar
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:49, archived)
# GAAAAH! Kill it with hammers. Doubley
woo
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:50, archived)
# and sharpened spades!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:58, archived)
# lacist!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:59, archived)
# I knew someone would say that!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:09, archived)
# Then you were disappointed.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:12, archived)
# I didn't know they came from eggs...
Hallo Ninj!
How's you?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:58, archived)
# Hiya Moley!
Fine now sir and your fine self? I gave your pic a click down below :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:00, archived)
# How Wude!
hehe top notch.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:59, archived)
# NNOOOOoooooo

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:12, archived)
# Kill them.
Kill them all!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:17, archived)
# Jar Jar Gabor

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:32, archived)
# This is disturbing at the top
and arousing lower down.

I'm confused now.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:39, archived)
# Just the way I like it ;)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:43, archived)
# the new Number Two?
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 12:47, archived)
# Tea drinking sloth for mediocre
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:47, archived)
# Awwww!
Little SLoth is a cliche emo :D

Ningles all!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:47, archived)
# Well if sloths existed before emos
Wouldn't it be safe to say that emos are the cliché sloths?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:50, archived)
# no,because sloths always have a nice big happy smile
unlike the contrived emo straight-face
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:10, archived)
# Awww nice one

I think I like three-toed sloths best. Their faces are so friendly
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:53, archived)
# They really should be called
three huge fuckoff clawed sloths.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:55, archived)
# That's actually the scientific name for it
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:12, archived)
# Whatever the ones that they
have in the Clore enclosure at London Zoo are ace! They were fighting with each other last time I went to see Jahled :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:13, archived)
# Yay
I went to my local zoo yesterday. They have a section called The Night which they darken during zoo opening hours. You can walk freely between the sloths etc., but you have to be very quiet to see anything.
During the night, they light up the place to reverse the animal's daily cycle.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:16, archived)
# Oh wow!
That sounds woo! I am still trying to convince Jahled to let me go into the animal enclosures ;) I don't think he will....
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:24, archived)
# Triclawus biggus fuckum.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:20, archived)
# Arf!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:25, archived)
# It's probably 'Green tea'
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:55, archived)
# Slurpy slurpy sloth sloth
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:57, archived)
# Yeah I thought you were missing a sloth there.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:03, archived)
# Thats an ace mug!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:12, archived)
# Yeah thought I'd use an Emily The Strange mug.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:16, archived)
# Gibbon!

(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:32, archived)
# You know the rules, FWM. It's three pubes per bollock
;)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:33, archived)
# :D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:34, archived)
# CHEDGE
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:34, archived)
# Hooray!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:34, archived)
# :)
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:34, archived)
# I have just looked up "CHEDGE"
in your marvellous little dictionary. Nothing.

So what's it mean?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:40, archived)
# Hmmm
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:43, archived)
# Mmmm, flutey.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:46, archived)
# CHEDGE
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:59, archived)
# Yes.
CHEDGE.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:03, archived)
# is that like Chag?
Actually,
Chag is my own made-up word, meaning pant gravel- a blanket term for all detritus found in a gusset after a long day. including, but not limited to, bumchunks, winnet, poo stripes etc.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:07, archived)
# BUMWIPE
That's my word for what you should be using a little more of.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:09, archived)
# oh come on
are you honestly telling me that after a long hot day, perhaps walking the length of Oxford Street trying to find some matching bra and panties, your bum is still as pink and kissable as it was when you talced it after your morning bath?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:11, archived)
# Yes,
but then it's probably because the torrent of sweat off my back washes everything down through the legs of my boxers and into my socks.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:14, archived)
# ah I see
briefs=chag
boxers= shitty socks
I'm going to have to think of a new word
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:17, archived)
# Yay!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:41, archived)
# Awwwww
I want to kill it with sticks and single-band mobile radiation.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:44, archived)
# Oof! Want one!!
How ya doin' Moley, good weekend sir?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:45, archived)
# beautiful
in other news, did anyone catch the Daily Mail's story on the death threats made at Jonathan Ross?

And have you seen how that story doesn't exist now?
www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGIH_en-GBGB246GB246&q=Jonathan+ross+death+threat

The question is, did the Daily Mail realise it was probably one of their readers, or was the comments on the article just filled up with red faced, vitriolic conservatives shouting "good"?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:46, archived)
# Interesting.
Sickipedia got FP on the Star's site over the weekend.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:48, archived)
# Hahahaha Ross and Brand should have been fired.
If they'd done that to my grandad I would have messed them up good.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:54, archived)
# You could have just rain on them forever:P
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:58, archived)
# Hahahahahahaha
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:00, archived)
# What pissed me off about the whole thing is the way they played the daughter
as poor little innocent victim where in actualy fact she's a burlesque dancer.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:04, archived)
# All burlesque dancers are GUILTY!
They deserve no privacy because they wear MAKE-UP and CORSETS!

Is that what you meant?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:14, archived)
# Oh, the scandal!
Olivia, fetch the smelling-salts; grandmama has taken a turn.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:17, archived)
# obviously
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:31, archived)
# I don't see how that makes any difference.
She could be a hooker - doesn't make it acceptable for them to wind up her granddad about her sex life.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:15, archived)
# I didn't say it was.
I said the media was trying to enrage puritan Britons that this poor delicate blossom had be violated by a nafarious rogue. As if she swooned from her chair whilst doing her tatting when she head the news.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:34, archived)
# I think it's more the thinking that the making of nuicance 'phonecalls to 70yo grandfathers
By two men in their 30s and 40s - ie - fully grown adults - containing explicit references to said grandfather's granddaughter's sex life - is seen as pretty out of order.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:54, archived)
# also lesbian s&m porn 'actress'
film is crap btw
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:23, archived)
# aaaaaw
*glees*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:47, archived)
# "Yeah, but ... this one goes up to 11 ..."
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 9:49, archived)
# This...
is the good shit.

Woo and ning!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 9:50, archived)
# It's oregano.
I did a catering course. :P
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:10, archived)
# Clever boys...
*gets a kicking from chavs*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:29, archived)
# hahahaha, lunacy :D
'ningles ya all
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 9:51, archived)
# Good morning!
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:40, archived)
# Kensington High Street
I think.

Superb pic. Boom Boom.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 9:54, archived)
# Kensington Off Its Tits Street
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:11, archived)
# ^ this
with added yeahhhhhhhhhhh, man
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:13, archived)
# hehehe
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:06, archived)
# mate
may i commend you on your most splendid 'tache.
i'd only seen a side shot of it prior to today.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:11, archived)
# :D
thanks very much

i hope to be making a 'whispering grass' tribute video in the next couple of weeks
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:16, archived)
# lovely boy
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:18, archived)
# that is indeed a fine tache
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:31, archived)
# I invented a great new superhero in the shower today

I shall make a little comic with him in it forthwith
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:08, archived)
# nicely
fights the urge to do superduperdrug
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:08, archived)
# *does the yay'n'ningles*
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:13, archived)
# has anyone seen my keys?
I haven't seen them since Friday
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:18, archived)
# There Probably Is No Keys
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:20, archived)
# oh noes
my car will die
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:23, archived)
# Have you looked behind the sofa?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:27, archived)
# no
that would be silly
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:37, archived)
# They're next to or behind the radio
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:29, archived)
# hmmmm
no
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:38, archived)
# Did you eat them?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:34, archived)
# I have had an upset stomach
but I don't think that is why
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:38, archived)
# have you tried looking around the keyring?
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:34, archived)
# that is missing also
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:38, archived)
# they're usually in the pocket of the jeans you wore
or on top of the freezer. Look there first.
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:37, archived)
# tried the jeans
and the waterproofs I had over the top

I'll check the freezer
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:39, archived)
# They are
quite clearly where you left them last..
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:40, archived)
# actually
I think someone may have taken them as I think I left them outside my front door
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:41, archived)
# Hahahaha!
:D
(, Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:32, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds