b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 29156 (Older | Newer)

# no reason
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:47, archived)
# HAAAAAAAAAAAAROLD!
that made me laugh! woo!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:48, archived)
# you
dirty old man
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:50, archived)
# I really should do something with these two
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:01, archived)
# wow
they're rather woo indeed!!

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:16, archived)
# :D
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:22, archived)
# They remind me of the
fucked up comic strip that ocaasionally appeared in the Grauniad. I can't remember what it was called.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:23, archived)
# Hahahahaha
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:21, archived)
# The perfect gift this Christmas.....
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:36, archived)
# say it with bongo mags and videos
more like
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:37, archived)
# Say it with Um-bongo?
.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:38, archived)
# nah
that's only on birthday parties; tis not a Christmas drink :D
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:40, archived)
# it is in the congo
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:25, archived)
[challenge entry] Meh
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# Can you make the top bit bigger
and the bottom bit smaller?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
#
This is to stop people having sex, not to be wank fodder.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:31, archived)
# Don't be silly, this is the Internet!
;)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
# And as everyone knows,
the internet is for porn!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:42, archived)
# yay
:D
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:13, archived)
# Surely
they'd both look the same then?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:31, archived)
# that's exactly what she said
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:31, archived)
# Cripes!
..
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
# that's disgusting
pregnancy is scary
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
# Im amazed
at how this is under 50k
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:31, archived)
# Mmmmmm,
jpg artifact goodness.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:31, archived)
# Have sex and return to the right aspect ratio!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:32, archived)
# What, you think children are meant to be that small?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:33, archived)
# wank pudding

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:32, archived)
# you stretched the top one too much
so other than the hair, there is really no difference

*whistles*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:32, archived)
# anybody who makes jokes about shagging fat birds has never done it!
great fun!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:33, archived)
# hahaha
slap the fat and ride the waves
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:34, archived)
# hahaha ^this
I bet the bottom one is a much better shag :)

Though I wouldn't like to find out the hard way
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:34, archived)
# why does everyone think that?
just cause ugly girls are ugly doesn't mean they're better in bed.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
# humour the poor ugly girls

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:36, archived)
#
I mean I guess it's nice that ugly girls can get laid, but the assumption that they're better in bed is silly.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:38, archived)
# well said
tell you who IS good in bed: posh girls
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:40, archived)
# amputees
AMAZING!!!!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:41, archived)
# but wouldn't chav girls be dirtier?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:43, archived)
# Well they're more scummy that's for sure
I wouldn't have thought they possess the imagination to be particularly fun in bed though.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:29, archived)
# Very true
*cough* *blush*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:01, archived)
# Never even mentioned the word "ugly"
Who's to say she's ugly, Who's to say you're ugly? Who's to say I'm ugly?

Ugly is such an ugly word :)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:41, archived)
# lol
minging!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:15, archived)
# it's because they are more greatful
for getting some, and will have more pent up sexual frustration to expend on you, so tend to be fucking wild compared to ms. IcanGetItAnyTime who will, lets face it, be as loose as a bucket of water.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:26, archived)
# Does one
bounce?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
# as Zappa used to say
the bigger the cusion
the better the pushin'
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:37, archived)
# This blinds me
Starts off so well too....
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:37, archived)
# PS
Found bottom one here:

www.pornotube.com/media.php?m=23891
NSFW, obviously
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:37, archived)
# Beastiality Bob's Tip Of THe Day:
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:25, archived)
# pfff
thats horrible!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:26, archived)
# no, I am
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# that's true
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# no, you are!
.... oh... hang on!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# this is why duck tape is so called
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# eh?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# hahaha
sick human!

:D
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:14, archived)
[challenge entry] guys, don't get your willies eaten up by monsters!




(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:23, archived)
# hehehe - I know a Shandy
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# class!
*makes note!*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
# because they though it was OK !
I thought something looked wrong...
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:34, archived)
# meh
I should fix it. Or make the frames go faster.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:14, archived)
# GAH!
Kill it!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:49, archived)
[challenge entry] ugh
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:20, archived)
# I'm off for a wank.
Cheerio B3ta.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:21, archived)
# enjoy!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# It's a wank,
what's not to enjoy?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# the feeling of lonelyness and slight akward guilt afterwards when you realise you been using a makeshif masturbatory aid
made from an empty bottle, a rubber glove and some hand cream.

then realising you left it ont he floor in your room and your mum was doing a speing clean today.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# people should schedule their masturbation better
speings should be kept clean on a regular basis, it's only propper
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:21, archived)
# burns
?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# This^
And tigerbalm as a lubricant
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:38, archived)
# shit optical illusions - part eleven

"Do you see two children or a vase?"

the other ten are in the profile
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:18, archived)
# hahahahah
one of the 10 best so far
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:18, archived)
# praise indeed!
secretly wonders which one you think is the worst one then?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# can you see a duck or a rabbit
as it made me want to stab something.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:27, archived)
# I see two easy lays
and a place to leave the condom
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:18, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:20, archived)
# there's only one vase

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:20, archived)
# to hide a johnny in
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# meh
\vase-o-phile blog
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:24, archived)
# This is fucking sick.
You NEVER, and I do fucking mean NEVER, use a condom twice.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:25, archived)
# ahhh
a wee bit of blob roulette never hurt anyone
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:27, archived)
# its an old woman! No its a young woman!
A MEXICAN RIDING A BIKE!


actually - the illusion here is whether the vase is in front of the children or behind them
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:18, archived)
# tandem!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:20, archived)
# hahaha
love all of them!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:21, archived)
# Arf!!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:23, archived)
# I see sexy results
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# I see a priest
behind that communion cup
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:44, archived)
# they're great
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:05, archived)
# thank you!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:07, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:12, archived)
# Evening
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:13, archived)
# Hahahahahahahaha!
It's funny because it's name sounds like a bodily function!

Nice drawing though, I like the strip.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:15, archived)
# they should have called it the Nintendo Felch!
!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:26, archived)
# or Nintendo Spaz
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
# Pfft!
This is brilliant.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:16, archived)
# The 12 Days of Christmas
At our school, each class has done a picture for 1 of these days of the song. I got 10 Lords A-Leaping and this is what we did.
The photos are of me. I hope you like it!

Please don't do anything to this picture and sorry it's 95k.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:10, archived)
# I don't remember the song specifying gaylords.
;)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:11, archived)
# whatever
.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:14, archived)
# you forgot
to notice the smiley.

:)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# You forgot not to be homophobic.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:20, archived)
# Me?
How so?

Gays can be peers of the realm just as easily.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:21, archived)
# Fucks up hereditary titles somewhat though,
eh?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:23, archived)
# pass it on to your adopted gaylord son
surely?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:25, archived)
# It's all life peers now though
innit? (all new ones that is)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:26, archived)
# See?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:27, archived)
# FUCK THE FUCKING GAYS IN THEIR FUCKING ARSES!
THE BIG PUFFS!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
# I feel magentaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in the air....
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:11, archived)
# who's the face
?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:11, archived)
# Reminds me of Maddox..
I was wanking till i realised it wasnt.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# "Please don't do anything to this picture and sorry it's 95k."
Worst line of text on B3ta ever.

Also, Where am I in there?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:12, archived)
# That does sound like a challenge
doesn't it?

But it's hometime and I don't have photoshop here.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:13, archived)
# To be fair though,
Jeremy Beadle, front bottom centre, in the Stan from South Park hat, has already got CDCs for legs.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:14, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:26, archived)
# Hmmm
I was polite for a reason
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
# Are you the only pupil with a beard
or are you a teacher?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:14, archived)
# good question
maybe you'll never know
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:15, archived)
# Although there is a picture of you in your profile.
I rather like the display though.

/Making displays for primary school art classes blog.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# thanks
:)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:38, archived)
# I need to know
as I might send a child to that school ;-)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:18, archived)
# You are Dave Grohl
AICMFP
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:15, archived)
# hehe
I've never heard that one.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# I like to think
that Dave Grohl would know how to optimise
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# oh he would
and he'd do it to a kick ass drum solo
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:18, archived)
# that's just how PSP7 does it
I don't know what else to do to optimise it.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# To opimise in PSP 7 simply do.....
This......
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Then this....
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

You are now free from persecution and hatred. :D

[/'This machine kills fascists'] blog.



(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 20:00, archived)
# Crossed with Tom Green
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:18, archived)
# Middle one - BEADLE HAND!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:19, archived)
# you have a keen Beadle-eye
very handy
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# I do like it
I do
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:31, archived)
# dank je wel
:)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:36, archived)
# graag gedaan
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:57, archived)
# your post says
"please don't do anything to the picture"

I'll respect this wish, I will however do disgusting acts with a copy of this picture :D
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 18:32, archived)
# "Deus ex machina" #6
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:58, archived)
# I want to hump you in the anus
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:59, archived)
# I want to watch!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:00, archived)
# you would.
Edit: I am here humping a big f*cking RIS to your stapler meningities story... please explain.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:01, archived)
# I followed it, and thought it very wise.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:08, archived)
# Ok then riddle me this..
What is the part with the glass all about?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:09, archived)
# If you have a rash from meningitis, and you roll over it with a glass
it wont go white and disappear, whereas most other rashes will
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:10, archived)
# Richard Dawkins IS the supreme being
that is all

ps woo!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:59, archived)
# Eh?
Richard Dawkins is a prick, I think you'll find.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:00, archived)
# I answered a question he couldn't answer
about 12 years ago. Problem is I've forgotten what it was. Something to do with memes.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:01, archived)
# Was it something like...
"Why are you so angry about something you don't think exists or is it that really you're a bit afraid that God does exist and you're going to hell for being a twat?"

I'm all for people having their own beliefs but it annoys me when someone pretends to be a scientist or insists that science can do things which it can't.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:05, archived)
# I can see why he gets frustrated
The questions being asked him by American students the other day were frightening.
And the thing about their University museum having a 3000 year old dinosaur bone is disturbing.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:07, archived)
# Hahahaha!
The ID brigade annoy me too. They're just feeble. They just happen to contain enough waffly bullshit to convince people who know no science.

But the people who think that science proves that God does not exist are just as stupid.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:09, archived)
# I didn't think that was the point/issue
I thought it was to teach kids the science that we know first, and then let them decide if they want to be religious when their brains are capable of understanding what it means - generally just avoiding the brainwashing.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:12, archived)
# Nope.
Intelligent Design is about teaching kids God made everything, using bad science.

If what I've read about God is correct, he'd probably use good science.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:14, archived)
# sorry, I misread what you said
I thought you were saying that Dawkins was proving God doesn't exist.
He just isn't accepting that he does either until science proves it.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# It's abductive reasoning
not deductive. Evolution explains the facts without invoking the supernatural, it's the most likely theory. Deducing is not possible and will never be, unless time travel is invented or God appears.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:19, archived)
# Unfortunately
Evolution explains the facts by invoking other things we have no real evidence for. The fossil record is amazingly scarce (and saying that the conditions required to fossilise and the massive time scales make finding fossils difficult, is not an argument in favour) and doesn't really show what we'd expect it to.

Which could point to either evolution being rubbish or something a lot different to what we currently imagine it to be. Either way, there's not much evidence for it as it stands.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:27, archived)
# this is true
and so we have a plausible idea of what might have happened with some scant artefacts and a bit of reasoning, or a somewhat less plausible idea based on a collection of old writings.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
# Yep.
Exactly the same thing.

Both require an act of faith to say that you know what is right and others are wrong.

As for the plausibility - how can you say one is more plausible than the other? You can say that one makes more sense to you than the other, doesn't make it more likely.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:32, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:33, archived)
# Pffft!
Hardly surprising on a technology based search.

I bet you'd get a different result if you checked the Bible.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
# I don't think that science proves that there is no God
I think that science shows that stuff could have happened quite well without the existence of a deity.

No point complicating things unnecessarily.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:12, archived)
# I don't think it is ever possible to prove the existence of anything
that is by its own definition outside of the bounds of rationality.

For example they've been trying for years to tell me that my friend Bobo doesn't exist, but I know he does, don't you Bobo?

What's that Bobo? No surely not, THEY DON'T DESERVE IT BOBO - NONE OF THEM HAVE EVER DESERVED IT! I CAN'T DO IT! I WON'T DO IT!






alright, alright, just let me get the axe out.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# What, if I may ask,
is the axe in?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:19, archived)
# my hand currently
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:21, archived)
# indeed
but if Science suddenly came up with a mathematical answer to the cause of the big bang that said it seems to be a massive water buffalo with omnipresent abilities and startling control over matter, then they would possibly describe it as "godlike".

However, while religion jumps up and down and says "I worshipped the water buffalo all along, you people with your beardy bloke were always wrong and now we must have a war", the scientists would be wondering where this God thing came from in the first place and who it's creator was.

Or similar
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# I recall reading of one scientist
who was working on Big Bang theory and had worked out that matter appeared in the Universe before the Big Bang. Not very long before though. He calculated that the period of time between the appearance of this matter and the Big Bang it sparked off, was about the same amount of time to say, "let there be light," in hebrew.

It means nothing.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:25, archived)
# hahahahahahah
It's also the same amount of time as it takes to say "I fancy a wank" or "that curry I had last night is really messing with me innards, hang on a sec, I'm just going to the loo" in ancient Maori.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# I don't think it's possible to prove the existence of anything, ever.
But it's possible to disprove things, that is, to come up with better theories than the ones that say those things exist.

(Now I have to go somewhere, I'm late. *vanishes*)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# I think you've got that the wrong way round.
You can prove something does exist by finding it. You cannot prove that something doesn't exist until you've looked absolutely everywhere for it (and are sure that it isn't just behind you or moving away every time you get close).
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# Yes.
It's not the job of science (or philosophy) to prove things, but to produce better theories.
www.amazon.com/Retreat-Commitment-William-Warren-Bartley/dp/081269127X
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:19, archived)
# I would love to get into this conversation more
but I feel my knowledge of the various theories is too shallow.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:23, archived)
# Meh, I bet you know it all already
after years of exposure to me and Leigh and Rob and other Popper fans. Gotta go, anyway, bye.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:28, archived)
# You can prove something DOES exist
however it is impossible to prove that something DOESN'T. It's known as falsifiability.

For example, the statements, "All ravens are black" and "No ravens are white" are not proveable - even if you gathered up all the ravens currently in the universe, you cannot account for all the possible ravens that might spring into existence between now and the end of time, or even those that have already ceased to exist.

However, the statement "Some ravens are black" is proveable, obviously, you just have to see a black raven.

Hence I agree entirely with the sentiments above about Dawkins being an unremitting twunt.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# I disagree.
I don't think science shows that at all. Not without needlessly complicating things itself to make it seem that way. It doesn't necessarily follow that there must be a God, but science is a LOOOONG way from showing that everything could have just happened like this anyway.

check out some M-theory. It just takes it back past the Big Bang still without answering any questions.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:21, archived)
# He's not claiming that science can disprove the existence of god.
It's philosophy that can disprove the existence of god.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:07, archived)
# Erm...?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:10, archived)
# Utter utter shit
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:30, archived)
# oh
extreme "scientists" like Dawkins are pretty much the same as extreme religious types.

Probe a little and the theories tend to be equally flawed.

EDIT: Why couldn't I think of the word philosophy? Ta Felix.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:07, archived)
# *looks at you funny*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:09, archived)
# I felt the need to say scientist in quotes
when philosopher would have worked better.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:11, archived)
# I'm aware of the somewhat depressing shrillness of proselytising atheists.
But that's not typically due to using weak arguments. It's more to do with the failure to realise that they're attempting to saw through people's psychological crutches, and that very
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# Oh Felix
you're so erudite! *swoons*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:22, archived)
# Pfft. My post was cut off at the word "very", but that doesn't seem to bother you.
It was something about ... very strident attacks by evangelistic atheists being pointless, but The God Delusion seeming to have some positive effect in comparison.

I have to go now, anyway. Heh.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:26, archived)
# BUT HE DIDN'T FINISH!
very what??
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:26, archived)
# I know
but I imagined the rest. And it was good. SEXY good.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:29, archived)
# Yep.
Exactly.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:09, archived)
# Dawkins isn't just a scientist
He's a scienceist.

I respect him for his work on evolutionary biology, but he should stick to what he's good at. Going after religion in general is at best psychology (not his field of expertise) and at worst bigotry.

For the record, I think that "Intelligent Design" is a load of crap, and Darwin's description of evolution is the only thing that really fits the facts.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:13, archived)
# Meh.
I reckon Darwinian evolution is on it's way out. I think it's, at best, a decent rule of thumb (like the sultana pudding model of atomics or the 2,8,8,8 etc. electron shell theory).

I have no idea how it really works though. I'm more of a chemist than a biologist.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# I think he's got a better head on his shoulders than
the majority of people that the masses look up to.
He just has to be careful not to turn in to one of the ranting people he's objecting to.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:05, archived)
# FAR too late for that.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:07, archived)
# Indeed
He's a frothy-mouthed egotist with, ironically, a god complex.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:31, archived)
# Hahahaha!
This^


either that or he's a closet Christian.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:37, archived)
# he just
amuses the hell out of me
which is as good a reason as any to be a supreme being.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:11, archived)
# nice
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:00, archived)
# Hahahaha!
Who would have guessed that Alfred Hitchcock was the supreme being?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:00, archived)
# It is Ralph Richardson.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:05, archived)
# ah!
Of course. I knew it looked familiar. I just couldn't place it.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:06, archived)
# super!
these improve every time
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:02, archived)
# I'm too tired for this to make sense.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:06, archived)
# Epic
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:08, archived)
# I absolutely love these.
In the face. Inspired stuff :)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:11, archived)
# the last panel says it all
Pffft!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:25, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:48, archived)
# I've never thought that much of lennon
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:49, archived)
# This^
Lennon = overated
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:49, archived)
# Lenin = best
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:50, archived)
# Lenin played for Man United???
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:52, archived)
# you got there before me!
*pouts*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:52, archived)
# Trotsky = Donkey Dick
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:52, archived)
# i love trotsky
that man knew how to party
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:53, archived)
# he was THE party
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:55, archived)
# lemon = better again
lemon party = heaven
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:52, archived)
# I'm Lenin on the lamppost
at the corner of the street
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:53, archived)
# i'm hanging from the lampost at the corner of the street
/mussolini
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# i'm crashin into the lampost at the corner of the street
/Keeley Hazell
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:57, archived)
# in case a certain revolution comes by
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# I choose to dissagree.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:53, archived)
# you would ;-)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:59, archived)
# No I wouldn't.
Oh.

Bugger.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:10, archived)
# if you've not got anything nice to say...


then say something not nice. :)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:53, archived)
# Your mother is a hamster
and your father smells like a cheap elderflower cordial substitute*.







*piss.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:55, archived)
# I hate him
But i'm not a big Celtic fan anyway
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# that fucker
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:55, archived)
# that fucking fucker!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:01, archived)
# Leicester, years ago
my home town. He was a cunt.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:02, archived)
# Awww
him and Izzet were a great team under Martin O'Neill :(
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:10, archived)
# O'Neill's Leicester
Savege, Izzet, yes Lennon, Heskey... grand team.

Shame about the fight with him and his brother :|
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:13, archived)
# Heskey was unreliable though
always falling over - best thing was the money we got for him from Liverpool :)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:32, archived)
# and the man of the match performance
v Aston Villa in the league cup QF..... ah, I was at Filbert Street for that.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:36, archived)
# christ
i very nearly lolled then

hahaha *click*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:50, archived)
# yes
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:50, archived)
# Mcartney still lives!!!!!
TJ:

Right... A news paper article has a headline at the top (in big bold), then another few paragrpahs (in smaller bold), then it continues with the rest of the article

What's that second bit called (a tagline perhaps) i'm havin no luck wiv google as i dunno what i'm searching for.. :-/
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:50, archived)
# why do you want to know?
(i used to know, as i studied that sort of thing, but i've forgotten)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:51, archived)
# a website i'm 'designing' has a news section
but the headlines are too long and are fucking me off.... i'm trying to explain that they are confusing the headline with the *insert word here*...
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# aha
yeah, subheadings will do
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:55, archived)
# Snippet.
I'm just completing a news section if you want to see my front end code?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:56, archived)
# the coding part is fine... its just the fact that THEY are in charge of content...
... if they keep overdoing the headlines, I'm gonna have to truncate to keep the design intact, which they wont like. HURRUMPH!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:58, archived)
# SHOW US YER FRONT END CODE, YA SLAG!!!


get 'em out for the lads!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:59, archived)
# Sub-head
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:51, archived)
# foot long or six inch?
want single or double cheese?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:52, archived)
# about 9" actually

yeah, double please. Wrap the cheddar around it.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:53, archived)
# Toasted or microwaved?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:55, archived)
# *winces*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:58, archived)
# *dreams of veggie patty with jalepenos and onion sauce*
*drools over keyboard*

I KEEP DOING THIS!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:56, archived)
# ask santa for a waterproof keyboard
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:58, archived)
# aha!
word!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:59, archived)
# subheading?
highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0072407611/student_view0/glossary.html


It's always worth puttin gthe word 'glossary' into Google when you know the subject but don't know the word you're looking for.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:51, archived)
# I was under the impression that there was an 'industry' word for it...
... like tagline or summat (but a tagline is used in advertising, yes?)

i'm a bit useless outside of my remit :(
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:55, archived)
# Yea taglines are used in films
To kinda lure you in with promise of wonders
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:57, archived)
# According to that glossary
subhead is it (or near enough).
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:01, archived)
# charse..
:)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:03, archived)
# Standfirst.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:00, archived)
# ooh that's good
woo
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:53, archived)
# Thanks Milkie!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:04, archived)
# Ant Rider......

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:40, archived)
# Insects with tits!
Great stuff
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:41, archived)
# tit insects?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:49, archived)
# titsects
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:24, archived)
# damn you and your artistic licence
IT WAS NORMAL SIZED PEOPLE WITH NORMAL SIZED ANTS!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:42, archived)
# *Flashes Artistic Licence*
*realises it expired 1997*

Uh oh......
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# oh no the A.R.T.Y.S.H.I.T
are after you

artist retreival tactical yellowy spongey horrible indigo team!

granted it's a great picture, still a bit pseudo naughty though, but very well done
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:45, archived)
# could you make a sexy trilobite?
glabella, occipital lobe, facial sutures... THE WHOLE WORKS!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:48, archived)
# Slime moulds with tits!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:56, archived)
# Single celled organisms
WITH TITS
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:07, archived)
# cayke?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:10, archived)
# Don't be silly
cake with tits would be RIDICULOUS!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:11, archived)
# no, no, no
it would be the best thing EVER!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:14, archived)
# sexeh ants?
whatever next?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:42, archived)
# It goes along the food chain
So either sexy anteaters,
Or sexy grubs and multch
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:46, archived)
# inSEX
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:17, archived)
# insectalicious
woo
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# WOO!
i like to get my mandibles on her.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# I challenge you to make a sexeh mollusc.
Any species of mollusc will do.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:44, archived)
# limpets with tits!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:45, archived)
# Yes!!
Mussels, Cockles (double entendre potential?), sea slugs, and snails all with breasts!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:47, archived)
# What about sea cucumbers?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:49, archived)
# Brilliant!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:50, archived)
# I'm thinking: a female variant of one of Davy Jone's crew.
(Dead Man's Chest)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:49, archived)
# Squids with tits?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:50, archived)
# Squits?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# Snails are molluscs
and they can be drawn to be quite cute. And besides, apparently this is a mollusc. (NSFW: Contains human nudity for some reason.)

I want a sexy one of these!

/edit - Is it me, or is this squid actually a hippo?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:00, archived)
# lovely
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:45, archived)
# Ace!
Giant insects are the future!
(shame about the lack of robots, but you can't have everything!)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:45, archived)
# Eww!
Wouldn't.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:48, archived)
# All your 'girls'
...have excellent posture.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:50, archived)
# They do don't they?
Maybe they wear them posture bras that you see advertised in granny pamphlets.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:57, archived)
# I wonder what the insect equivalent of 'Yiff!' is
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# Scradge
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:58, archived)
# Super
duper
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:58, archived)
# yay
!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
# mini budget on Wednesday
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:39, archived)
# Woo to this!
Woo!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:41, archived)
# they should really stop covering old songs by other politicians
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:41, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:42, archived)
# hahahahaha!
I remember that song...even David Cassidy covered it..
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# I think you better wait a minute....
go now! Go now, go now...ad nauseum.

and 'woo!' of course
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:02, archived)
# I'm gonna open a 6-pack of woo
*opens*

woo woo woo woo woo woo woo

*breaks up plastic rings*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:03, archived)
# B6GOF?
Bargain!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:39, archived)
# Hehehehe
Fantastic hummus! WYH!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:35, archived)
# if that doesn't bring the government down
I don't know what will
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:55, archived)
# santa klaus

a festive gift from kss
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:36, archived)
# klaus?
klaus? Where did klaus get to?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:36, archived)
# Klaus is the proper Nordic name.
EDIT: I think...

Sinterklaus, or something was the original name...
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:41, archived)
# I was referring to Klaus
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# There is no such thing as a sanity clause!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# But there is a sanity clause.
It means that if at any point something doesn't make sense, I can claim insanity
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:48, archived)
# That's not a gun.
/autocomplete.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# Marred somewhat by technical (and other) crapness, but here goes anyway.
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:30, archived)
# Is he doing sex on them?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# If you like. It's your mind.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:33, archived)
# I like!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:34, archived)
# This is you isn't it?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:36, archived)
# Where did you find that?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:39, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# No!
*whistles innocently*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:55, archived)
# Letting fourdam's imagination run wild
Is like leaving a rapist unattended in a Teen Coma ward
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:35, archived)
# coma coma coma coma COMA
CHAMELEON, HE COMES AND GOES
HE COMES ON GIRLS!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:36, archived)
# SEXIST!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:58, archived)
# With his reputation?
What were they thinking?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:41, archived)
# Oi!
did you get my message?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:39, archived)
# hahaha fantastic
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# hahahahaha
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# hahahaha
woo
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:32, archived)
# wonderful!
hahaha
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:32, archived)
# BIG shout for
Hoodlum Priest!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:35, archived)
# eh?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:43, archived)
# this is the lyrics from "rev"by hoodlum priest
based on a film "Taxi Driver"
google for more
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:54, archived)
# What will you be doing?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:30, archived)
# Do i have to read all those words?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# If you squint and put your head to one side
It looks like a load of tower blocks
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:33, archived)
# Ooh pretty!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:33, archived)
# Or a black and white screenshot of the matrix code
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:36, archived)
# I'm only going if it's grass skirts
woo for wordy ones today!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# hahaha
'sixteen hundred and phwoar' pffft
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:32, archived)
# vagitarians...medievial?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:34, archived)
# Uh, well spotted.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:38, archived)
# i thought a vagitarian was a lesbian
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:40, archived)
# Can be a man
who only eats hairy pies, fish suppers, badly-packed kebabs and the odd vertical bacon sandwich
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:42, archived)
# ...and
Personell?!

/go-buy-a-dictionary blog :D
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 17:26, archived)
# WORDS
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:41, archived)
# ..
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:26, archived)
# oooh
nicely done
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:27, archived)
# super stuff!
:)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:27, archived)
# Top shoppage there
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:28, archived)
# The P,M,
is good at conning
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:28, archived)
# topshop
woo
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:29, archived)
# hahahaha, nice one!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:30, archived)
# Ooooh
I like it!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:33, archived)
# Hahahahaha!
Although it shouldn't be a conning tower. I still want Her Maj to storm into Parliament and send Blair to The Tower.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:39, archived)
# horsie



Tell me what to shop! I've run out of ideas.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:19, archived)
# fuck her sideways!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:21, archived)
# *fucks sideways*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:36, archived)
# shop
daleks and cybermen
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:28, archived)
# hmm
I'm not sure I can
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:35, archived)
[challenge entry] Blackmail, it's all they understand
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:07, archived)
# why is that apostrophe there?
/although nice entry sir!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:08, archived)
# hahah
also woo to the pic
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:10, archived)
# Because
You are virginity
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:12, archived)
# Archue:
Virginity in a can.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:21, archived)
# you have to get your finger under the top and flick it open....
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# Virginity Lasts
is the new Bond girl.

Oh hang on...
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:19, archived)
# bollocks, because it said something else originally
I'll change that sharpish
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:21, archived)
# ;-)
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# super stuff!
Are you Virgin Credit in disguise?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:09, archived)
# they weren't giving away anything anywhere near that cool.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:10, archived)
# refering to the ps3 or the wii?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:13, archived)
# PS3 I hope
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:15, archived)
# oh, that's right. you're a 'tendo hater.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:16, archived)
# not true!
/owns / has owned GB micro, Gamecube, Snes, NES...
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:17, archived)
# will you be owning a wii?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:19, archived)
# will I bollocks.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:20, archived)
# wii not?
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:23, archived)
# cause they look shiit
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:23, archived)
# Yea, I can see it getting tiresome.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:24, archived)
# ^This
new zelda looks the bees knees.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:24, archived)
# i've decided that the only game I want to play in the forseeable future is GTA 4
I'm not going to buy a console again until that comes out.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:26, archived)
# i can't be arsed with the GTA series anymore.
just the same, sandbox, do what you like gameplay in different settings.
i'm getting a wii to play games differently. like wario ware smooth moves.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:27, archived)
# meh. I don't really have the patience for playing games thesedays.
The only game I have really really really loved over the past few years has been GTA: Vice City (or San Andreas possibly) I still play that now. Every other supposed brilliant game hasn't lasted more than a week or so before i'm bored of it. With the possible note of Half Life 2 on the PC which I only played for the first time a couple of months ago, and thought it was amazing.

EDIT: And it's the 'do what you like' aspect of the GTA series that makes them so utterly btrilliant. I have never played the games through - I let my housemate unlock everything, then I spend hours and hours just messing about and exploring etc.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:37, archived)
# ^this
Don't forget Rayman Raving rabbids, that looks more fun than burning a bucket of kittens.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:37, archived)
# hmmmm
looks like a game for kids
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:40, archived)
# You're all gay
:P
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:09, archived)
# arf
maybe they could make a game for the wii where you strap the 3d controller to you pants and thrust away
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:10, archived)
# I would buy it
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:10, archived)
# really?
*sends idea to nintendo*

*waits for cheque*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:12, archived)
# there's a market there!
*gets copyright*
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:12, archived)
# Super Fwap Bros
starring all your favourite Nintendo stars

only on Nintendo Wii

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:18, archived)
# Shake the controller up and down
to Fwap off your favourite nintendo characters.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:24, archived)
# *selects Donkey Kong*
ROUND 1!

Donkey Kong VS Princess Peach


Oh my! Oh My OH MY!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:33, archived)
# On a similar theme
We were discussing USB powered vibrating fannies at work the other day. That pulsate depending on what's going on on the animal porn film your watching.

Surely these should exist by now....
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:15, archived)
# *Thinks*
Surprisingly, I think you could actually make money out of this one.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:17, archived)
# *Copyrights*
"The 4dam value vibrating flange"
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:24, archived)
# Complete with sample library of goat pr0n
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:26, archived)
# i fear where you work has more disturbed people than you...
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:17, archived)
# haha
Your fears are justified. And perhaps ancient. And maybe even driving an ice cream van.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:29, archived)
# hahaha
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:20, archived)
# there is a thing
called Sinulator...

Also: you missed my arse.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:20, archived)
# he could probably smell it
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:22, archived)
# Whose arse am I in then?
*looks*

Damn you Mugatu!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:23, archived)
#
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:25, archived)
# *dies from overspluffing*
You're bringing sexy back!

You've become quite the board whore again too, I see from the stats....
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:27, archived)
# Weasel told me this morning that I'm number one
I shall have to slow down a little.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:28, archived)
# seems to be bit of head-to-head today
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:30, archived)
#
head-to-head Fight to the death!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:33, archived)
# SEXY!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:35, archived)
# I think once I get to number 1, I'll actually do some work
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:31, archived)
# you'll be telling yourself that in two years...
incidentally.... THIS is number one:

www.b3ta.com/board/profile.php?id=4134
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:34, archived)
# you don't want to mess with the ancients, do you?

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:39, archived)
# no, they might Yorke-ify you
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:41, archived)
# Oi!

(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:45, archived)
# what?
I call Rik a cunt many times a day!
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:46, archived)
# 65,000 posts!
I suppose at a thousand posts a week its possible
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:42, archived)
# there was a time when I did just that
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:44, archived)
# how often does this thing refresh?
seems not to be real-time...
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:34, archived)
# erm
weekly. Or daily. Not sure.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:36, archived)
# Daily
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:45, archived)
# that's what i thought
:(
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:37, archived)
# I think you spend a few weeks in the spotlight
and then fizzle like a moth to a flame
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:44, archived)
# i won't pass up the offer of a free ps3
there'd be no way i'd actually pay for one.
(, Mon 4 Dec 2006, 16:15, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds