b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 32097 (Older | Newer)

# Apologies

This has been on my mind for a while, so I had to get rid of it.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# Dawkins is a fucking cock.
100%FACT.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:29, archived)
# Whereas he really likes you.
Quite a lot. He wants to involve you with his fucking and cock, if it pleases you.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# agdogstic
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:38, archived)
# that's profound
100% fact
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# i've never read it but im inclined to agree just because of the fuckin
title of the book
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# read the book
he isn't a cock at all.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# I read it too
and I still think he's a cock.

Selfish Gene was pretty good. Blind Watchmaker wasn't bad either but recently he seems to have turned into the polar opposite of the Intelligent Design nutters - all rant and not much else.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:51, archived)
# He speaks very highly of you
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# You always say that but where's your evidence for the existence of Dawkins' fucking cockness??
Faith's not enough for me - I want SCIENCE!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# He is somewhat blinkered
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
# by the search for truth?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:37, archived)
# Yes
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:38, archived)
# Science, fables, religion
they are all just ways in which we shape the world which is beyond our understanding.

An element of what is scientific fact today WILL be proved wrong in the future. Science is justified opinion, but it is opinion.

His intolerance of others is bordering on religious bigotry. The man is a fundamentalist and causes hurt to others.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:40, archived)
# he is a bit of a twat when he talks to people with different views
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:41, archived)
# Yes.
He is guilty of every trait he demands be wiped out by religious nutjobs.

He is overzealous and of no use to humanity.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:43, archived)
# ^This
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:54, archived)
# here he explains why
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:44, archived)
# I give him the finger when he's on the telly
safe in the knowledge that I can see him and he can't see me

this gives me a feeling of IMMENSE POWER

then I have a custard cream
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:44, archived)
# hahahahah
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:45, archived)
# I sometimes feed the sparrows too
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:47, archived)
# oi!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:49, archived)
# a fine reward
for giving that prick the finger.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:47, archived)
# The possibility that the scientific view of things may change in the future
is exactly what makes Dawkins the opposite of a fundamentalist.

Science is constantly re-evaluating itself as new evidence is discovered. It is open to criticism and discussion. Fundamentalism is not.

If anyone found even the slightest bit of credible evidence that a God exists, I am sure Dawkins would be fascinated to see it and would alter his stance accordingly. As things stand, no such evidence is available.

Science may not be able to explain everything, but that does not mean we have to fill the gaps with God.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:04, archived)
# THIS EXACTLY!!


but wouldn't it be ironic if Dawkins was actually the son of God.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:06, archived)
# True
but that doesn't disprove the original point that Dawkins is a fucking cock.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:10, archived)
# We indeed do not have to fill the gaps with God
but if people want to have theories about what fills the gaps then only a cock will not let them.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:11, archived)
# why is fighting ignorance
being a cock?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:14, archived)
# Assuming that belief in a creator = ignorance
is being a cock.

Unless of course you actually have proof that God doesn't exist?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:15, archived)
# No. You don't need a proof of good existence (or non-existence)
you are an ignorant because you ignore that the gaps are integral part of the scientific method and that there is no need for a creator to fill them.
Besides, is impossible to "fill the gaps" withouth "destroying" the rest of the house
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:23, archived)
# Utter drivel.
There's no need to fill the gaps with God but it's just as ignorant to assume that's the only possible place he can be or to assume that just because science can quantify something, it can explain it.

I have just as much problem with the Intelligent Design fuckwits as I do with Dawkins.

Nobody can prove that God does or doesn't exist. Assuming that one or other belief = ignorance makes you an arrogant cock.

And that destroying the house sentence doesn't actually make sense.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:31, archived)
# This.
I have a massive problem with religious fundamentalists, but Dawkins has gone from being a fairly rounded scientist to being a man who says 'you like God! you are an idiot!'.

His crimes are identical to those of the religious bigotry brigade.

Tolerance is required and he doesn't have it.

Nor do I always, but I don't set myself on a pedestal.

Scientific assumptions ARE belief.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:34, archived)
# the house analogy is the whole point
is not about the existence of god or not. Is invoking god (without any evidence for its existence) to to explain natural phenomena.

The house analogy is to clarify that gaps have already existed (and will already exist). Until 400 years ago, the creator was used to explain planetary motion. Now we have a scientific theory for it. So either invoking god at that point was incorrect, or our current scientific theory for planetary motion is incorrect. But we can track back the planetary theory to other scientific theories, which must be now wrong as well (otherwise our planetary motion theory would be correct) and so on and so forth, until we are left with no scientific theory at all.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:45, archived)
# Yes BUT
we have stories to fill the gaps in knowledge.

zealots who cannot accept that they might be wrong and someone else might be right are idiots.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:11, archived)
# yes
but see Mistery Bob's below.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:17, archived)
# Not wanting to fill the gaps is ignorant.
Accepting that it is a task which can never be completed does not make the search for knowledge any less valid.

Deciding which elements you are assuming and which you are casting aside is equally valid. Occam's Razor is an excellent machination.

Deciding that those who choose different assumptions are ignorant is bigotry.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:32, archived)
# As I have said elsewhere
I think Dawkins is happy for people to believe anything they like. It's human nature for people to believe in any number of a million different things and I doubt he believes he can stop that (in fact, he writes about possible ways such belief systems may have arisen).

However, why should he not be vocal about his views and try to convince others to take them on board? Isn't that what religion does constantly?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:27, archived)
# There would be no problem if he didn't mind religion doing it too
but he says that they should be stopped whilst his message be preached, for example, in schools.

I am not in favour of either camp, but the support for Dawkins by people who are pleased to see fundamentalists shouted down appalls me, since he IS a fundamentalist.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:37, archived)
# It always eems to come back to the word "fundamantalist"
but a fundamentalist is somebody who cannot change his view. He has a belief system that will not alter, regardless of whatever anyone else says.

Dawkins position is not one of fundamentalism. He says, "I have looked at the evidence and this is what I conclude." His conclusion is that the likelihood of there being a God is very small.

He may argue this passionately and articulately, but that does not make him a fundamentalist. Hey may offend and annoy people along the way, but that is not fundamentalism.

Should new evidence be uncovered that throws his argument into doubt, he would amend his conclusions and possibly change his mind. That is not fundamentalism.

He lays out his reasoning and explains why he thinks what he thinks and invited others to debate with him - that is not fundamentalism.

I'd love to continue debating more, but unfortunately I have to get to the shops before they close.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:00, archived)
# A religious belief is generally "I have looked at the options and this is what I conclude" also.
Dawkins is NOT open to a God - have you not read the book? Sometimes he says he is, but he is not.

The problem I have is not that he states his conclusion, but that he says that anyone with a different conclusion is wrong.

Any religion, and one who questions the idea that we are a God free society is, in his words, ignorant.

This is fundamentalism.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:22, archived)
# Not all religions are evangelical
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:38, archived)
# No
but often it is the evangelical religions that have most mass influence.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:01, archived)
# this^
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:17, archived)
# This.
His opinion is not a bad one, but his single minded ingnorance of anyone else's opinion smacks of the zealot.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:38, archived)
# Your
single minded ingnorance of anyone else's opinion of him smacks of the zealot, zealot.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:43, archived)
# He believes that if you believe in anything except science then you are wrong and should be forced to listen to reason and abolished from society.
I believe that everyone can believe what they want.

The only thing I am intolerant of is intolerance.

And the Dutch.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:47, archived)
# I agree that everyone should be allowed to believe what they want
as long as they do what I say.

This system is not quite in place but it will be, oh yes.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:51, archived)
# I don't think he wants you to be abolished from society
he doesn't want you to believe in science either. Science is not something you can believe in or not (the only things you really have to believe in are the assumptions), but forms a logical and consistent construct to investigate the world.

The thing he's intolerant of is ignorance.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:53, archived)
# so you havent read
the "The God Delusion" then?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:01, archived)
# All religions
are intolerant. To believe in one god requires denying the existence of all the others.

I would love the pope to stand up in St Peters square tomorrow and say to the crowd:
"Lets get this straight once and for all. Muslims, you are going to hell. Scientologists? Gonna burn. Hindus? Eternal damnation."

The Christian church tried to fudge around with this in Vatican II, but essentially the unbelievers still go to the hot place.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 19:31, archived)
# No, not ahh!
Consider the lily
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:54, archived)
# hahahaha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:59, archived)
# I have done
I've considered it a lot.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:01, archived)
# Richard Dawkins
wants to be Daniel C. Dennett!

FACTOID!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:36, archived)
# Unfortunately, a counter-argument book
entitled 'The Dawkins Delusion' is an even bigger pile of cock.

True b3tans should be tucked up in bed with a copy of 'The Raw Shark Texts'. Now that's a cracking headfuck. A memetic shark that can come at you out of a book, or your TV, or the pattern on a floor - that's just fucking brilliant.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:53, archived)
# He comes across as arrogant sometimes, yes
But it's nice to see someone getting angry for a change about all the wrongness
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:54, archived)
# Tghe anger IS tghe wrongness.
Believing in God (or Father Christmas) hurts nobody.

Getting upset about what others believe is what causes the problems.

Ever assumption amounts to a belief. Whatever he says, Dawkins believes there is no God, he doesn't know, yet he vehemently accuses those who are willing to suggest that there might be one of ignorance.

I have no idea what there is. I'd be interested in discussing it, but just saying 'I don't like your way, so it's wrong is cock behaviour.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:10, archived)
# Those who believe in a God,
at least those who believe in a mainstream interpretation of a God, have large organisations to back them up. They have many articulate and convincing people constantly speaking on their behalf and reassuring them that they are right.

This has led to the belief in a deity as the default position in most societies.

If nothing else, at least Dawkins provides an equally articulate and convincing voice for those that do not believe there is a God. Especially for those in places like the American Midwest, where there are precious few like-minded folks. He may give the impression of being intolerant towards religious beliefs, but no more so than religion is intolerant of atheism.

Also, Dawkins accepts that nobody knows if there is a God or not His arguments come from the fact it is highly unlikely that there is a God (for reasons he can articulate far better then me) and not from a stubborn refusal to believe in one.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:21, archived)
# If this were true it wouild still make him a cock.
His position, as a self appointed high priest of atheism, is just as valid as that of fundamentalist religious leaders.

That is 'not valid at all'.

People don't need to be told, ever, for any reason, that they are not allowed to believe what they want to, be that in no God, in God or in the flying spaghetti monster.

Sadly he does argue that there is no God in this book. He argues that there is no God because it doesn't fit in with his idea of what science is.

This is bigotry and cultural hatred and, to be honest, is identical to the behaviour of the zealous religious leaders.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:30, archived)
# So your point is
that there is no objective reality?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:32, archived)
# I would have thought that there is clearly no defined objective reality.
To claim that there is is the height of conceit.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:36, archived)
# you're not very self-consistent
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:48, archived)
# No, I just do not accept that any theory is fact.
I always doubt.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:13, archived)
# but that's a different question
I also don't believe that any theory is fact.

But I believe in the existence of an objective reality and that this reality has structure. Some parts of it are self evident and cannot be proved and disporved (e.g. 1+1=2) whereas for some other we need more elaborate techniques. Science (or the scientific method) provides a framework to develop and evaluate tools to construct a representation of this reality.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:29, archived)
# new compo?
or am I missing something?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# ^this
Was just thinking that, but I canne see anything..
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:08, archived)
[challenge entry] Im already in hull...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:27, archived)
# Hahahahahahaha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# Hahahaha
so is the guy "doing the goatse" in the background!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# pffft
well spotted
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:33, archived)
# pfff!
those are some huge earrings!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:30, archived)
# Hahahahah!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# arf!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# 'ningles all
I only had one pint
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:27, archived)
# 'cheaper'
but otherwise, pffft
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# ah cheers
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:29, archived)
# Maybe his beer
makes bird noises.

Speckled Hen perhaps?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:29, archived)
# And also
countdown is not on till 3.30
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:29, archived)
# Now that IS just being Pedantic
:P
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# ^this
should have said Loose Women

happy b3taday!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# Students get up
late, their schedule is pushed back...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# Hahaha
Nice.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# ha ha
yay - ver' noice... bloody students, I don't pay my taxes, but if I did!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:29, archived)
# I'm a Jock, I pay all my own tuition fee's and loans
Your (and my) taxes support me in no way.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# ... Scots in Scotland shouldn't pay tuition fees
and Universities receive a Unit of Teaching Resource for every (most) 'home' student from the Scottish Higher and Further Education Funding Council. ... but public money given to Universities pays my wages, so I really was just taking the piss. I'd have students better supported by government if I could.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
# My tuition fee's for this year where £1734
I know you're not having a go mate, I paid taxes and complained jokingly about students once too, ah those were the days when men were men and sheep were wary.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:38, archived)
# oh - sorry - this has kind of got out of hand...
£1734 seems like an odd number... is it a UG programme you're on or a PG one...?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:41, archived)
# UG
Yeah thats without the pennies added on, dunno how they work it out, you have to pay £250 squid of it on your first day, if SAAS don't give you a loan.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:43, archived)
# Well - I'm stumped
you might want to look into it... a Scot in Scotland shouldn't pay tuition fees... unless you've already done a degree...

I'm sure there's a reasonable explaination, but you might want to ask why you're paying fees.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:11, archived)
# they changed it a couple of years back
we still get great student loans though and bursary's, well the kids get the Bursary's. DAMN KIDS TAKING ALL THE FREE MONEY!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:19, archived)
# haha!
very good, sir.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:08, archived)
# I wouldn't use it on my eyes, ears, mouth or nose though..


Remember my image challenge is in my sig...

Please vote.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# HAPPY BIRTHDAY
and woo and yay and this:

(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# I do love this
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
# voted No 1 beauty product by the readers of New Wookie
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:27, archived)
# fwappy b3taday
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:27, archived)
# I like this
and your image challenge.

As such I have clicked both in the appropriate places.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:46, archived)
# Hahaha
Nice one!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:47, archived)
# The sage and onion finally take revenge.


Apologies, I had chicken for lunch and this was on my mind..
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:23, archived)
# :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:25, archived)
# haha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# I don't trust you any more
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# This is a real one.
And it's quite good too.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:27, archived)
# ha ha ha
yes yes it is

:D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:29, archived)
# Haha
I was wary clicking that link =P

But it was worth it, wootastic =]
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# *nods sagely*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:43, archived)
# Some more Ted's
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:20, archived)
# haha Ted rocks.
and he gives me an pearoast op:
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:21, archived)
# COR!
ace
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:22, archived)
# tah!
this was only a small snippet of a work in progress, then i made the huuuuuuuuuuuge mistake of splitting up aith my girlfriend and leaving my external hard-drive at her house with AAAAAAAALL of my vector work to date stored on it.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# why can't you get it back off her?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:25, archived)
# i did last night, for the first time. then realised that i moved to holland to be with her, and i have absolutely no possesion i can call my own, including a computer.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# this has the makings of a great film

have your people call my people and we'll do lunch. k? Bye.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
# oh piss
still, musn't grumble, eh?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:39, archived)
# Is that me?

It sure looks like me
(, Mon 8 Oct 2007, 13:37, archived)
# HA HA HA
they're brilliant

Woo yay
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:21, archived)
# Ha ha!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:21, archived)
# youcuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucunt
youcuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucunt
youcuntyoucuntyoucunt
youcunt
youcuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucunt
youcuntyoucunt
youcuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucunt
youcunt
youcunt
youcunt
youcuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucuntyoucunt
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:22, archived)
# :O

I beg your pardon?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:23, archived)
# sorry, love you really.
just fell for the oldest trick in the book.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# not enough "youcunt"s
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:23, archived)
# I can only assume it is not what it proports to be
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# Hahaha
I had to click this just to see if you'd managed to link a gif to horses :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# It's an easy and simple thing to do.


I don't know why people haven't done it before now, instead of resorting to tinyurl tricks.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# murdering children is also easy and simple

/McCann blog
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# and fun for *all* the family!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# this sort of thing should result in a naughty stepping
it really is a cunt's trick.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# nah, linking to mantrain is a cunt's trick
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:25, archived)
# mantrain?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:27, archived)
# I'd rather that
than that cunting Rick Ghastly one that completely takes over your computer and fucks everything you've been doing the last hour or two.

Unless you're on a PC.

Seriously considered ignoring the fuckwits who've been using that one.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:39, archived)
# *googles*
*doesn't really*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# Hahahaha!
I love you.

Hard.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# git!!!!!!!
also, i've been trying to record the music, but none of my streaming recorder things seem to work anymore, i want it as a ring tone.it's not as bad as it sounds because i have only used the phone once since aug 2004.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:25, archived)
# where it says: Looking for the jingle? Click here
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# brilliant
thank you.

i never thought i'd have cause to say that.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:41, archived)
# hahahaha
ted rogers next
or ted bovis
or bill and ted
erm...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:22, archived)
# super ted
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# dawn of the ted
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# Dracula: ted and loving it
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:28, archived)
# ted dwarf
the hunt for ted october
ted sonia
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# haha bless his wee socks :D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:25, archived)
# wee socks?
someday, he will be old enough to progress to fucksocks ;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:27, archived)
# yay for ted
he's the new mike yarwood.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
[challenge entry] hello all
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:05, archived)
# chello
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:06, archived)
# Dhouble Bass?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:10, archived)
# Vhiolin?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:12, archived)
# Fhlute?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:14, archived)
# Thrumpet ftw
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:15, archived)
# edit/ Saxomophone
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:16, archived)
# tubamaba
obomoboe
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:19, archived)
# Shaxomopone...
...yesh?

/Sean Connery blog

(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:19, archived)
# Chornet?
Thuba?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:53, archived)
# yeeeeeeaaaaas!! Thrumpet
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:16, archived)
# Bha soon!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:18, archived)
# (Bhermuda) Thriangle.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:20, archived)
# chlarinet?
thriangle?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:20, archived)
# I piss in your mind
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:22, archived)
# on the newspaper! on the....oh, feck!
it's leaking out of my ears now!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:25, archived)
# As ancient philosopher once said
New broom sweeps away many enemies.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:07, archived)
# if your enemy is dust...
or perhaps bits of glass... certainly nothing bigger than a cat or small dog.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:08, archived)
# Dust is the enemy of a clean floor!
And domestic animals are the enemies of sandwiches left on the table while you go to the fridge to get a drink.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:12, archived)
# my dog once ate two dozen hash cakes i left cooling on the table
he slept for day gently whimpering, but came good after that. it proved to me you can't OD on pot because there was a couple of plants worth in that hound
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:24, archived)
# that he did
probably :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:08, archived)
# Norty norty
Veeery Norty, Muhahahahaha!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:09, archived)
# BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:15, archived)
[challenge entry] Death By Sporking


*Edit - just wanted to Animate them
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:51, archived)
# But they're dead.....

You killed them
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:53, archived)
# They are not real!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:04, archived)
# !?!!!!
*calls Ofcom*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:06, archived)
# It was in the smallprint
*Quickly adds smallprint*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:08, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:11, archived)
# <|:O)|=¦
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:13, archived)
# Death of a thousand cuts!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:53, archived)
# Use the spork, luke!
Best of all the implements!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:54, archived)
# at w*rk :(
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:14, archived)
# I was thinking of sporks at the weekend.
If a spoon and a fork combined is a spork, is a knife and a fork combined a knork?

And would two be a pair of knorks?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:57, archived)
# If you like
but I wouldn't recommend a titwank
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:59, archived)
# *winces*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:59, archived)
# *spluffs*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:01, archived)
# Yay for sporks!
/shameless pearoast time

(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:05, archived)
# *Spits*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:12, archived)
# I can hear a barrel being scraped...


Not sure why I did this - I love this show!
EDIT: Anti-RIS... "FARSCAPE"
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# Need to see more of them
I like Gigi whatserface
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:50, archived)
# Allin?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:51, archived)
# No idea - the grey one
Edit: Edgley, apparently
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:54, archived)
# Edgley
www.gigiedgley.com/

I find her rather attractive painted blue as Chiana, but unattractive otherwise.

Go figure. I'd never have guessed I had a thing for blue chicks.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:55, archived)
# you'll be buying a new freezer then
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:57, archived)
# And what size freezer would you like, sir?
*looks at wife*
About 5'4''
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:59, archived)
# Heh - never seen her unpainted!
She does look better that way....
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:58, archived)
# Replies here to put it nearer the top of the thread
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:39, archived)
# what is the original
is that a hippy wookie?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:50, archived)
# oh, right...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farscape

EDIT: Not so much hippie wookie as grumpy fleshy-haired failed klingon
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:51, archived)
# ooh
so a sort of updated buck rogers *intrigued*
i hope there's a suitable equivalent for colonel wilma dearing
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:54, archived)
# Bloody hell - Wilma Dearing is now Superman's mum!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:56, archived)
# really?
fuck

are you SURE? i don't think i believe you
cos bo duke is his dad
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:58, archived)
# Eva Marie Saint
Martha Kent in the latest filum
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:14, archived)
# oh thank god for that
i thought you meant the one in smallville

i may now get round to watching the new superman film if that's the case
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:18, archived)
# when was she Wilma Dearing?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# Uh?
Wilma Deering was played by Constance Moore (with Buster Crabbe) and Erin Gray (yummy) with Gil Gerard. Who the fuck is Alice Eva Marie Saint?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:42, archived)
# Ah right, she's from a 1950 live-broadcast TV series on ABC.
No recordings seem to exist of it though.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:47, archived)
# Ha ha
You're turning into me!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:53, archived)
# *feels breasts*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:56, archived)
# i've no idea what this is
i'll also take a bleedin' liberty and dump this here.

spent ages faffing with pics of sugar et al, but gave up in the end.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:00, archived)
# eeef!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:06, archived)
# Alan Sugar!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:09, archived)
# Needs more Scanners.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:13, archived)
# i've just started watching it
who are all those chicks and where the fuck is the blue one gone?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:10, archived)
# errrrmmm...
...they keep adding new characters every season.

The blue one quits after season 1 I think.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:22, archived)
# Not as good as earlier
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:46, archived)
# Not bad, tho,
needs more fluffeh!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# i've got a console thing that looks like that
it's got galaxian and tetris and triathlon and duck hunt on it (among many others)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# I have an atari 2600 at the mo, it was a freebie.
's all about the old school.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:52, archived)
# coooooooooooooool
i would be jealous, but having played some old atari games recently, i'm actually not
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:01, archived)
# nope nowhere near as fun as they shoulda been.
miss pacman FTW tho.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:18, archived)
# A generic 'games that look muchly like old '90s stuff but with the graphics changed' all in one
where the batteries go in what appears to be a rumble pack but isn't market stall special, perchance?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:08, archived)
# I'll tell you how to make it better....
Take drawing off JJ's site, open in PS, adjust curves to pick out the lines and fade pencil squiggles. Print at 10% opacity, ink by hand and scan in at 600dpi grayscale. Save as PSD then open in Adobe Streamline. Convert to ART and save as an AI, open in Illustrator, fix any line problems and export as TIFF into PS. Select black colours, invert selection to delete everything but lineart. Lock layer and colour each area in a new layer underneath the lineart. Using the inked version, plot where shadows go in pencil, then use that as a guide with the pen tool and drop the selections brightness by 25 twice.

Then you look at your pencilled/inked paper and scan that in,adjust curves, stick on a surface blur, set layer to overlay, stick a flat colour lightish blue underneath, set that to darken and use the brush tool to roughly fill in a layer under that in the colours. Once finished, just play with gradients until you get one you like.

Turns out that the picture you see up there was actually a byproduct of what I was actually doing. Came out far better though.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:13, archived)
# should we ask Rob to add a colouring in board?

(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:19, archived)
# Be sure to mention
I want the option of painting by numbers.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:39, archived)
# OR
A bit simpler:

Open in PS, adjust levels/curves till nice and solid B&W, use the Magic Wand or any cut out tool to select an area to be coloured, make a new layer, on this layer use the paint tool to put a colour swash down in this selected shape, slightly blur it to mush edges, and use a layer effect such as Overlay or Multiply to add the colour to the background, continue in this fashion until it is all coloured in, then use the Picker set to Auto Select Layer to choose each section and the Dodge and Burn tools to add shades to the block colours. Finally, take the original background, duplicate it, and move it up the layers over everything you've done so far and use Darken or similar to make the inked edges solid black again.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# Seems cheap to me!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:40, archived)
# hahaha
they have to put flags on the tanks?

they should have 'yanks we r ur friendz' a la Pachey
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:43, archived)
# Thats a boob on my part
I missed the number 10 on it when I exported it but the system kept falling over when I tried to upload so I just let this one stay :-)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:45, archived)
# Pffft...
"tried"
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:47, archived)
# it's not about you
it's about me.

RIS?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:44, archived)
[challenge entry] Teenage Mutant Ginger Fuhrer
Before you ask, his weapon is a slightly amusing viral flash animation.





Besides it's my B3taday, so vote for my image challenge suggestion:

www.b3ta.com/questions/imagechallenge/post91525


(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:38, archived)
# Happy b3taday!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:38, archived)
# harpy b3taday
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:39, archived)
# happy b3taday
and nice try, but nah
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:39, archived)
# merry b3taday!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:39, archived)
# Happy B3taday!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:40, archived)
# I voted
I broght you cayke
I wished you happy b3taday.

The least you could do was to vote for my image challange suggestion
;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:42, archived)
# Ok that's fair
*writes thank you note*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:44, archived)
# happuy b3taday!
now, vote for mine!
\/\/\/\/\
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:47, archived)
# happy b3taday!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:43, archived)
# Happy B3taday
TJ: anyone got any audiobook download site recommendations? I will pay money.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:44, archived)
# i get my music from emusic.com
and they are now advertising audiobooks. But I haven't checked (the music is cheap)
www.emusic.com (100% horse free)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:47, archived)
# Thank you
You can't look at the catalogue before you sign up though.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:51, archived)
# they are a bit cuntish.
They just hid it
www.emusic.com/audiobooks/index.html (still horse free)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:53, archived)
# It's not very user-friendly that, is it?
Ta again. :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:58, archived)
# When you say you will pay money,
Is rhat for the audio books or the recommendation

As I have the mind of a child, I downloaded the Alex Ryder audio books from

www.audible.co.uk

but the usual illegal methods also work (mininova etc)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# Thank you
(and you down there)

They seem to have a good selection.

And the money's for the books, not the recommendation, though you can have a gift-wrapped snog.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:52, archived)
#
www.audible.co.uk looks ok

not that I've ever used it
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# happy b3taday
not a chance of me voting for your challenge though, i have no idea what it means, and i'm also afraid of the increase in geek posts it would cause.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:48, archived)
# Are you not aware of the 2 popular items
Star Wars


and


Adverts?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:51, archived)
#
i know of adverts, i'm told they have them on the commercial radio and television channels.
i've only seen 1 star wars, the first one, when it was first shown at our local picture house.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:02, archived)
# Double click from me
And Happy B3taday!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:52, archived)
# I've got Mansickness
But I had to get up to make this!


Excuse sloppyness

Noon all!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:37, archived)
# WAIT!
that's no crop circle
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:38, archived)
# Is that the famous pirate:
One eyed Zippy?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:39, archived)
# no mate, that's the name of my trouser snake
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:40, archived)
# ouch
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:40, archived)
# whoops! sorry.
*steps back*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:41, archived)
# hehe
T'is what I thought
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:40, archived)
# heheh
ello tan
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:39, archived)
# Ello
:D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:41, archived)
# Ha ha!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:40, archived)
# Hahahaha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:41, archived)
# hahahahahahahahSPANG
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:42, archived)
# hhahahahaha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:26, archived)
# I believe
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:45, archived)
# noooooo
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:48, archived)
# sheep go to heaven
goats go to hell
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# heheh
I never decided if the sheep were being beamed up or beamed down
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:51, archived)
# hehehe
that was my first thought: "That's where sheep come from!" (but then I realized it was silly, because I know sheep have been domesticated from dinosaurs)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:55, archived)
# That's fucking cooooooooooooool!!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:53, archived)
# Excellent
Little do they know they're all prolly diseased

:D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:57, archived)
# hahahahahaha
this is beautiful. I wanna click it!

Are those fossil saber toothed tigers' skulls?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:48, archived)
# Kat in her old Super Hero duds.

Long before SA, Kat was a character in a super-hero comic I never finished.
(No; she doesn't have powers in SA, nor will she get them....unless maybe Art draws a comic staring her.....)
Edit: Two posts in a row? oooh. Board's slow the'day.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:37, archived)
# poers?
EDIT: how rude of me, it is fecking ace, i like it.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:37, archived)
# The long fringey things

She had to chop them off when she got regular work though, too much grooming for early morning starts
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:39, archived)
# It's the Scottish pronounciation
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:41, archived)
# Poers?
Huh?

Are you drunk? Am I? Do I like this?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:38, archived)
# What were her powers?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:38, archived)
# coughing up mutant hairballs.
Woo. for the nice super-powered-Kat
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:44, archived)
# They were mostly electricity based.
Plus nigh-on indestructibility.
Any time she used ‘em, her hair (and fur) would go white (and her fringe would get longer for some reason).
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:45, archived)
# Cool - I'd like to see this one day
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# YAY
also - it's a brave boarder who'll post after Spider and Scorpion...

:D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:38, archived)
# Is it a bird? Is it a plane?
No, it's "She-woman cat type thing!"

(From Harry Enfield c.1992)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:39, archived)
# Ha ha!
*remembers*

The Palace of Ultimate Justice! HURRAH!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:43, archived)
# :D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:48, archived)
# Yay Soopacat!
She's great :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:21, archived)
# Did Scarlet have super powers too?
Or just a fine pair of tits?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:36, archived)
#

(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
# yes, but cubes don't roll away from you.
ps: how's my *ahem* "order" coming along?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:06, archived)
# Should be finished this evening.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# SHIFTY GOINGS ON
I LIKE IT =]
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# :)
*turns up collar*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# have you been 'saving up'?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:10, archived)
# "Saving up" for
"making the picture"?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:16, archived)
# yes
with special ink
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:17, archived)
# ning Rocky
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:19, archived)
# Intriguing!
wonders what it can be...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:18, archived)
# I'm guessing Pr0n
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:21, archived)
# With squirrel tails?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:22, archived)
# of course
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:26, archived)
# And big knockers?
Good.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:30, archived)
# You need to ask?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:45, archived)
# I'm just checking
Sometimes people go funny and do strange things.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:49, archived)
# i hate it when that happens.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# It's even worse when they burn your toes
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# After we met the Pope, the Archbishops and I went to a strip club for the evening.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# Are you Gerry McCann?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:20, archived)
# *splutters*
hahahahhahahaha!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:22, archived)
# Might be.
Might be.


*leaks rumour of Maddy being spotted in pleasant holiday location to the press*

*receives funding from millionaires to spend a few weeks in pleasant holiday location 'looking' for Maddy*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:25, archived)
# hahaha
MADDIE: SIGHTING IN PRESIDENTIAL SUITE OF BURJ AL ARAB HOTEL, DUBAI
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:28, archived)
#
in the minibar.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:54, archived)
# Haha - he's lost his marbles!
Sorry
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# I just love Spider's veil in the last frame....
*clicks*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# hahaha!
REMORSE!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# They died doing what they loved
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# Heehee
I like that, sir. More of this kind of thing!

*clicks*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:10, archived)
# I like this
If only there were some sort of button I could press to signify my approval...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:11, archived)
# but wait!
.... there is!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:12, archived)
# There IS?!
GLEEDOM
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# yes
... so I'm told.

It's your job to go on a quest and find it. It's going to be devilish dangerous... but there will be rewards!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:16, archived)
# Quest? There's a quest?
Can I join?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:17, archived)
# yes
you'll need your own sword and sarnies... probably a change of underwear.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:19, archived)
# Sword - check
Sarnies - check
Underwear - meh, why bother?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:25, archived)
# they only chaffe
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:34, archived)
# And ultimately get in the way
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:35, archived)
# too true!!
*discards undies*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:36, archived)
# Found it
*eats cookies*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:29, archived)
# *pouts*
But there was a quest!

Just cos you've had some today...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:31, archived)
# okay
new quest... you'll still need your sword and your sarnies...

break into my house and tie yourself to my bed... GO!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:32, archived)
# Right, play the mission music!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:34, archived)
# *presses play*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:36, archived)
# *attempts to get in through half-open window*
*gets stuck*

Bugger.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:37, archived)
# That sounds like jealousy
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:33, archived)
# Hell yes
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:34, archived)
# Aww, I'm sorry :(
Your quest sounds fun though? and...and not whorish either?

um...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:37, archived)
# *points towards JJ's tummybutton*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:16, archived)
# You'll have to dig out the lint first....
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:20, archived)
# But it's so velvety-soft
Like unnecessarily-expensive toilet paper.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:21, archived)
# Yes.
The hazard light button in any car is well adapted for this purpose. It's best to use it when parked on double yellow lines whilst buying a newspaper.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# Ah, park anywhere lights.
Fitted as standard in all BMWs and Mercs.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:25, archived)
# It's the only time the indicators get used
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:44, archived)
# Spider and Scorpion are among my most favorite things ever
they make me so very happy!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:11, archived)
# This.
My current phavourite fraze is "Appears gay."
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# I like the question
"Are you literally gay?"
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# that equals true!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:14, archived)
# My favourite is the one that ends
"DEATH & TAXES"
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:15, archived)
# Hahahaha yeah
Blummin JJ and his genius. I want fame and accolade for my amusing and surreal cartoons!

Sadly, I have all the artistic ability of seven blind hedgehogs in a bag.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:19, archived)
# That's quite a few scrapings of talent
It's more than I have.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:26, archived)
# On an unrelated note,
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:12, archived)
# clearly under age
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# It looks simultaneously scaly and furry, with a hint of feathery.
Nothing should look simultaneously scaly and furry, with a hint of feathery. It's not natural.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:14, archived)
# I thought feathery too.
Especially on the, ahem, breast.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:16, archived)
# Snigger
you said breast.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:18, archived)
# Christ!
The meme is spreading. Quick, flood the interweb pipes with tar!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:14, archived)
# 8\
........those are scary.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:21, archived)
# Scary,
but strangely arousing?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:26, archived)
# Not in the slightest.
Well, not for ME at least.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:28, archived)
# Yes.
Yes they are.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:28, archived)
# Holy Christ!
*fears*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:23, archived)
# This is most
it always snows at funerals...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:28, archived)
# At my funeral
it will snow cocaine. This I swear.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:29, archived)
# Then
I shall be attending, straw in hand!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:35, archived)
# Yay!
More of this.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:44, archived)
# Orange squash?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# I'm just imagining the sound that would make
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:56, archived)
# 'Ssssssssshhhhhhh
-aft'
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)
# Ssssssssshhhhhhh
-are!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:02, archived)
# :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:03, archived)
# *frantically searches for Shaft or share anim*
*cant find*

*shafts*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
# It would probably sound like "Shhhhhhh...
"I'm a complete wankerrrrrrrrrr"
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:01, archived)
# top tubage!
woo
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:58, archived)
# wowsers
nicely done

the girl at the desk behind me did not know what 'hibernate' means, she is 22
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:58, archived)
# Hit her with something
Then bury her
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:59, archived)
# then dig her up in the spring
that'll teach her
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:00, archived)
# ha!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:01, archived)
# then tell her family she's
hibernating
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:01, archived)
# it's tempting
but she is so ignorant, and is aware she is ignorant, that she is quite amusing

she just asked what 'under offer' meant relating to housebuying...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:01, archived)
# Kill her with stones.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:03, archived)
# Oh good lord!
Does she know who Red Rum was?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:03, archived)
# I don't like when people take pride in ignorance
It's not a badge of honour.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
# I have no idea why they do it either!
;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# pfft
I see what you did there
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:19, archived)
# shhhhh
how does this fine holiday finds you?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:34, archived)
# no she's not proud of it
more that she realises that she is ridiculous
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# bet she can
practically recite the contents of Heat! or Hello! or whatever celeb-crap-mag she subscribes to though.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# there's really no comparison between Heat and Hello!
headlines run thus:

Hello!: "Kerry Katona shows us round the inside of her enchanting new freezer"
Heat: "Kerry!"
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:10, archived)
# Heh!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# hahaha
it's all true
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:15, archived)
# apologies
i have no idea what i'm talking about as i've never looked inside any such magazine
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# you lucky person
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:16, archived)
# Is it mandatory for 22 year olds to know the meaning of 'hibernate' now?
Still, young people are remarkably uneducated these days. I blame the teachers. Quite a few of my friends are teachers, and they don't know the stuff they teach.
*sigh*

Just ask your colleague to read Wikipedia when she gets home. Not just the page on hibernation. All of it.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:00, archived)
# But don't take it as gospel
Other books are useful too.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:03, archived)
# For example,
"How to read all of Wikipedia" by Arnold Enticingbullock.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:04, archived)
# well, the hibernate question is merely indicative of a general lack of knowledge
rather than a specific issue.

it is related to her leaving scholl with no qualification, but i feel that someone would have to be deliberately avoiding the world to be quite this unaware
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:04, archived)
# so you work in show biz?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:06, archived)
# i used to
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:09, archived)
# but then there was that business with the dead guy in the pool
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:11, archived)
# that video of you singing in your undies?
;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# in 20 years, the word will be redundant anyway
polar bears are fucked
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# I think you mean useless


/pedantic prick blog ;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:11, archived)
# or redundant, either works.
is this board made up exclusively of 22 year olds today?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:14, archived)
# Nope, I'm 24
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:16, archived)
# want to see some puppies?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:17, archived)
# nope
redundancy and usefulness are different things.
Redundant would imply that the concept is still used, but another word is chosen to express it.

edit: 29
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:17, archived)
# then surely redundant fits well enough to make no difference.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:37, archived)
# haha are you a 22 year old?
it's not just polar bears that hibernate shirley?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# George off of Blue Peter
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:22, archived)
# Walt Disney
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:23, archived)
# Christopher Reeve
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:34, archived)
# She left...
...a job at an insole factory with no qualifications?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:43, archived)
# didn't know the word?
or didn't know of the concept of hibernation?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
# i assume didn't know either
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# *estevates*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:36, archived)
# heh hehe
nice
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:04, archived)
# lovely
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:06, archived)
# pfft!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:15, archived)
# No title


I'm running out of ideas...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:48, archived)
# compo it!
good afternoon all
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:52, archived)
# 'noonz
=]
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
# thought i would post this..... didnt think i could show my boss!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:48, archived)
# post what?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:49, archived)
# Your 'boss'?

You mean your great big hairy man lover, don't you?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:50, archived)
# i'm not hairy...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:51, archived)
# 'lo son!
I got paid to have sex today, it was surprisingly unwhorish ;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:52, archived)
# wtfboya?!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:53, archived)
# but that does technically
make you a whore doesn't it? or am i missing something about the definition of a prostitute here?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:53, archived)
# ^ this
Like that American case where the newspaper paid a woman to have sex with someone called Frank.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)
# ^That
/Frank blog
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:00, archived)
# ooooooo k...
are we telling dad?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:53, archived)
# O_O
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
# Hahah, read that carefully for facts rather than assumptions
;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
# But seriously, what?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:56, archived)
# ^ what she said
/stunned blog
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)
# oookay
the facts seem to indicate that you're the prostitute mother of ivesb .. is that right?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:56, archived)
# 0_o
you what?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
# 'Got paid to'
or 'paid to'?

I just want to make sure we're singing from the same balcony here.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# Theeeere we go
Gold-star-sticker for the gentleman

Yeah, I was being paid, and also happened to sneak in a bit of sex. Mmmmmm.

Edit: you guys crack me up! you all seem genuinely worried that you have a prostitute in your midst!
...or you were just wanting to check before you asked for rates
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)
# well , i still don't get it.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:58, archived)
# I had to nip home
I only live round the corner from work, still being paid, had sex.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:00, archived)
# ahhh!!
isn't dad at work?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:02, archived)
# it's starting to make sense now.
you got home early from work, even though you where not supposed to quit, and had sexyteim with your lover during this time. is that it?
;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:02, archived)
# this is how Nigel Havers would explain it
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:04, archived)
# i am nigel havers.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
# trying new condoms?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:58, archived)
# I want your job
Where do you work, and do they have any -ahem- positions?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:58, archived)
# Hahah, welcome back Mrs. T
Nah, my job is shit, but it has quiet moments and these can sometimes be used to advantage
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:01, archived)
# It would still be nice if there's was anyone here worth 'procastinating' with....
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:02, archived)
# That must be quite a feat.
You know that if they caught you, McDonalds would downgrade you a star, don't you?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:59, archived)
# At least two!
But at least I'd be taken off the grills for a bit
/risk assessment
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:03, archived)
# Perhaps I'm being dim (more than likely), but I'm still not really with you.
don't mean to be an idiot, sorry....
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:59, archived)
# she was fucking during work time
and therefore was still being paid whilst having sex.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:02, archived)
# It's a bit like having a dump at work and saying you are being paid to lay cable
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:03, archived)
# haha!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:04, archived)
# Well Deserved. :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
# mwahahaaha :D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:07, archived)
# She was having the sex during work time
While she was technically being paid.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:03, archived)
# That's sick that is!
I'm so not letting you babysit again
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:02, archived)
# Awwwww!
He still owes me oral
*sulks*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:05, archived)
#
l c
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:08, archived)
# He still owes her orac?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:12, archived)
# I always wondered what happened to him
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:13, archived)
# how much?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# only because
i shaved you
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:53, archived)
# You missed a bit
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
# no, no i didn't
that's a mirkin :D
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# WHAT?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# sorry .. didn't i tell you?
i gave you an arse mirkin
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)
# dammit zed!!
*goes to the mirkin clinic*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:59, archived)
# My Word!
What's going on with you today?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:56, archived)
# haha!
numpty!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:50, archived)
# Come on Captain, don't let us down now!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:50, archived)
# yer maw!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:50, archived)
# YOUR A SPASTICK LOL
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:51, archived)
# oi!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:51, archived)
# Sorreh
I, of course, meant 'Scope Lord'.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
# 'Scope Lord'
that's bloody fantastic!!


*collapses on floor laughing*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:00, archived)
# The Scope Lord of Firetop Mnnntain
Er, what?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:06, archived)
# pssst!
try to include an image
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:51, archived)
# sorry! the big hairy lover was close...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:51, archived)
# i have something like that stealing apples from my garden...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:52, archived)
# Grrrr! *gargle*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:53, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:52, archived)
# Ted the Churchill Years


(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
# this is quite disturbing
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# ...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# i'd vote for him!!
if i voted.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# hahahahah
too cute!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# Ted for P.M :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:58, archived)
# Pffffttttt!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:55, archived)
# have a heart shat!
he didn't posted the image in the thread instead of starting a new one!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)
# :)
subtle
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:59, archived)
# i was going to post this also....but I didnt
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 15:17, archived)
# Boing ...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:45, archived)
# almost made it to the moon!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:46, archived)
# Needs more:
"that's no moon"....
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:48, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:38, archived)
# haha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:39, archived)
# pffft
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:39, archived)
# Hi, sorry I was on the phone
*waves to everyone who said hello and woo down there*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:41, archived)
# hahaha
all is forgiven
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:44, archived)
# Please would you be so kind as to re-edit your post?
I don't want bollocks in that thread.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:44, archived)
# why?
are you going to show it to your mum?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:50, archived)
# No, I just don't want it there
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:54, archived)
# just keep posting!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:44, archived)
# *obliges*




438
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:45, archived)
# *rips trousers off*
FASTER!!!!!!
;)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:47, archived)
# nice
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:44, archived)
# haha
is that just after he's done the double rimmer salute?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:46, archived)
# Ha ha ha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:47, archived)
# Chortle!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:52, archived)
# Hahaha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:52, archived)
# hahahahahaha

S M E G H E A D !
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 14:57, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds