
Coke have been using the Koala bear nose-bubbling properties for decades! It's reverse Scientology! You obviously haven't studied A-level Pie-ology?
( ,
Tue 18 May 2010, 0:14,
archived)

FAKE science people! ;)
Nice one Elvis :D
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:12,
archived)
Nice one Elvis :D

The sums still make my head hurt and my soul despair.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:13,
archived)

.. cheers, Elvis.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:16,
archived)

to the windmill and it will produce enough power to run the wind turbines = profit.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:17,
archived)

*headslaps*:)
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:21,
archived)

it's on my facebook if you're interested
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:05,
archived)

ta
edit: christ, a massive thread of nutters
thaough "stop repeating messages thats spamming, your making us cool muslims seem like assholes" made me laugh
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:07,
archived)
edit: christ, a massive thread of nutters
thaough "stop repeating messages thats spamming, your making us cool muslims seem like assholes" made me laugh

Standing up for free speech is the right thing to do
Standing up for free speech with a bunch of people who think "camel-fucking sand-niggers" is the height of satire, not so much
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:28,
archived)
Standing up for free speech with a bunch of people who think "camel-fucking sand-niggers" is the height of satire, not so much

free speech is obviously massively important
but if all we use it for is for jokes that aren't even funny then i dont see the point. at least south park was funny, putting mohammed's head on a dog or dressing him as a terrorist is just retarded, if you're going to be offensive at least be funny.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:08,
archived)
but if all we use it for is for jokes that aren't even funny then i dont see the point. at least south park was funny, putting mohammed's head on a dog or dressing him as a terrorist is just retarded, if you're going to be offensive at least be funny.

but weren't the Danish cartoons used to highlight the Freedom of Speech angle, and not to be used as comedy at all?
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:11,
archived)

any excuse to have a pop at the Muslims
no wonder they're all out bombing embassies
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:17,
archived)
no wonder they're all out bombing embassies

got confused and blew up the World Snooker Championship.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:17,
archived)

Dude's really hit the big time ;)
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:44,
archived)

I mentioned him when grilling a Google exec over free speech on the internet a while back :)
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:46,
archived)

never really listened to his stuff.
I'm sure he isn't the same, but as you said up there, there are too many ill informed morons who attach themselves to these groups. I know plenty of muslims who are lovely people, I know plenty of atheists are fuckwads. I think it is a dangerous thing to start attacking "Islam" when it isn't strictly Islam that is the problem, but the way that certain fundamentals preach and practice it. Same as any religion.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:50,
archived)
I'm sure he isn't the same, but as you said up there, there are too many ill informed morons who attach themselves to these groups. I know plenty of muslims who are lovely people, I know plenty of atheists are fuckwads. I think it is a dangerous thing to start attacking "Islam" when it isn't strictly Islam that is the problem, but the way that certain fundamentals preach and practice it. Same as any religion.


that the world was created 6,000 years ago?
It doesn't mean that all Christians believe that though.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:03,
archived)
It doesn't mean that all Christians believe that though.

I imagine it is the same rule as in Judaism.
It's all down to interpretation at the end of the day.
You can argue that it is a fundamental of Christianity to believe that the world was created in 6 days by God, that Eve was created from one of Adam's ribs, that Moses parted the red sea and saw someone with thrush or something like that, burning bush etc.
However, you don't have to believe that to be a Christian as far as I am concerned.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:29,
archived)
It's all down to interpretation at the end of the day.
You can argue that it is a fundamental of Christianity to believe that the world was created in 6 days by God, that Eve was created from one of Adam's ribs, that Moses parted the red sea and saw someone with thrush or something like that, burning bush etc.
However, you don't have to believe that to be a Christian as far as I am concerned.

I'm with Doug Stanhope on this one. When someone says "I'm a Catholic but I don't believe in all the bad stuff", then they're not a Catholic. It's like saying you're a heroin addict, having never taken heroin.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:31,
archived)

That's like saying that you're not a rational person if you've ever been in love, or danced, or put yourself in harms way for someone else.
If you can't see a grey area, you're just as extremist as the extremists on the other side of the coin.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:34,
archived)
If you can't see a grey area, you're just as extremist as the extremists on the other side of the coin.

surely the argument is that if you believe the bible (say) to be the word of god, you have to accept *everything* in the bible -- who the fuck are you to try and tell god what he should and shouldn't have told you? by extension, if you believe a part of the bible to be the word of god, what makes the rest of the bible *not* the word of god? if i believe the ten commandments to be from god, what makes me believe that the rest of the laws in exodus and deuteronomy *not* to be from god? what gives me the utter arrogance to do so?
nothing -- if i believe any of it i have to believe all of it. if i cast doubt on any part of it, by arguing it's been filtered through the imperfect understanding of man or any other such apologetics, then i have to cast doubt on *all* of it.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:40,
archived)
nothing -- if i believe any of it i have to believe all of it. if i cast doubt on any part of it, by arguing it's been filtered through the imperfect understanding of man or any other such apologetics, then i have to cast doubt on *all* of it.

but I couldn't really give a fuck if anyone else thinks I'm rational or not, in all honesty.
However, anyone who professes a religion and then cherry-picks the bits that they like -- I don't consider them to be thinking rationally about that religion. That doesn't mean that they're not perfectly rational about everything else, I'm not suggesting that, just that they're not being rational about their religion.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:44,
archived)
However, anyone who professes a religion and then cherry-picks the bits that they like -- I don't consider them to be thinking rationally about that religion. That doesn't mean that they're not perfectly rational about everything else, I'm not suggesting that, just that they're not being rational about their religion.

The words "rational" and "religion" rarely co-exist
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:49,
archived)

That's scientific. It has science in the name and everything.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 13:09,
archived)

Do you consider yourself to be a rational person?
The reason I ask is that by your logic, if you've ever done anything vaguely irrational then clearly your ability to think rationally must be in doubt. According to you, you don't get to pick and choose.
I'm sure you can see what a retarded argument this is.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:52,
archived)
The reason I ask is that by your logic, if you've ever done anything vaguely irrational then clearly your ability to think rationally must be in doubt. According to you, you don't get to pick and choose.
I'm sure you can see what a retarded argument this is.

to compare my opinion about myself with what GOD is meant to be telling us. I'm not God, so who gives a wet fuck about me? Everyone's irrational at times and most people are rational most of the rest of the time. But if this book is God's word then we should take every word of it extremely seriously. My logic hangs on a belief that the Bible is God's word. Since no-one in their right mind thinks that anything I say is God's word the logic doesn't even begin to apply.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:55,
archived)

It seems to me that you just don't see the bible for what it is - a 2000 year old self-help book. The only people that run into problems are the people that take the stories literally. The vast majority of christians don't take it literally. Start treating it like aesop's fables and you'll probably find some life lessons that you agree with.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:03,
archived)


I'm a quaker so my definition might not be the same as yours.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:10,
archived)

Mainly because they don't preach, they keep themselves to themselves and yet they do good and charitable things without having to tell everyone about it.
If all religionists were Quakers, I wouldn't have a problem with them.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:12,
archived)
If all religionists were Quakers, I wouldn't have a problem with them.

of the man who prays in silence, and of the man gives charity in secret; and he condemned the man who prays loudly on street corners and makes a show of how much money he gives away.
I wish the wee frees in St Andrews had heard of that. No idea what charitable work they do but they don't half shout loudly on the street corners.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:14,
archived)
I wish the wee frees in St Andrews had heard of that. No idea what charitable work they do but they don't half shout loudly on the street corners.

( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:20,
archived)

If by "beliefs" we're meaning "religious beliefs". (This isn't a criticism at you, you've not done so.) But I believe I should have the right to say that I don't believe in their beliefs and feel that they're wrong, and they have the right to say that I'm wrong and they're right all they like. (I probably won't listen but hey, they most likely won't either so everyone's even.)
There is a distinction there but it may have been lost...
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:24,
archived)
There is a distinction there but it may have been lost...

In my mind the most important thing society can do is just accept that there are people out there who are their polar opposites and just move on. Not tolerate, accept.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:29,
archived)

Didn't mean to sound like I did. But that's not taking it as God's word in the way I meant -- I meant people who take it literally. And cherry-picking the bits to take literally is a horrible thing to do because I feel that's an inconsistent way of thinking. That doesn't say that there aren't things to take from it that can be helpful for your life -- but it probably does say you shouldn't sit there and memorise the books of Law and stick to them all.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:06,
archived)

but then can't explain why eating shellfish isn't evil when it's just as clearly written, then they're a fuckwit using an ancient text to prop up their own prejudices and bigotry. That's what picking and choosing gets you.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:58,
archived)

Why is it that Atheists take the bible so seriously?
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:05,
archived)

For every "love thy neighbour" in there there's a whole lot of nasty shit that I wouldn't want anyone to take to heart
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:07,
archived)

unless you live next door to Fred West. 'Murder the raped woman because she can't scream loud enough' clearly isn't. The problem comes, I think, if you take the Bible to be God's revealed truth to humanity -- if you believe that, then who are you to pick which to follow?
Clearly, a normal human being will tend to take "love thy neighbour" and reject "murder the rape victim". That's absolutely fine by me. What gets my goat is when people will then justify it not so much by pointing at the Bible but by pointing and the Bible and saying that you should love your neighbour because God tells you so.
Also, why can't I just love my neighbour anyway...? If it takes God hitting me over the head with the Bible to stop me acting like a tit then I'm probably a lost cause...
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:10,
archived)
Clearly, a normal human being will tend to take "love thy neighbour" and reject "murder the rape victim". That's absolutely fine by me. What gets my goat is when people will then justify it not so much by pointing at the Bible but by pointing and the Bible and saying that you should love your neighbour because God tells you so.
Also, why can't I just love my neighbour anyway...? If it takes God hitting me over the head with the Bible to stop me acting like a tit then I'm probably a lost cause...

But some people do and that's been my point all along. If it helps someone, then no-one should have the right to tell them they're wrong provided they aren't harming anyone?
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:16,
archived)

Free speech and all that.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:18,
archived)

Where I feel people go wrong -- so to speak -- is by then elevating the Bible above, say, "Overcome Bad Self-Esteem" or, to use gronkpan's more pertinent example, Aesop's Fables. Even that doesn't actually matter, except the distressing tendency of *some* people who do so to go around telling everyone else how wrong they are and trying to influence not just our lives but the laws of our nations on the strength of their ancient life-guide. When it gets to the point that they'll want to murder me for suggesting that Jesus quite possibly didn't exist in the form we believe he did, or that Mohammed might have been power-mad, or that Abraham almost certainly didn't exist and Joseph was a myth based on a long-dead Jewish chamberlain in Egypt -- or, more farcically, that the world is older than 6,000 years, that's the problem.
And I believe you agree with me on that one...
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:21,
archived)
And I believe you agree with me on that one...

Having grown up in a religious household, gone to a religious school, and consequentially, most of my friends being religious, I can say that not one single one of them has ever preached or told people how to live their lives according to the bible. It's a choice that people make, barring the few who are truly indoctrinated, and they are few and far between in my experience.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:26,
archived)

Perfectly decent people in all other respects (well, naturally; I'd not be friends with them otherwise) but trying to convert me and pushing the Bible as absolute proof -- or ducking the question of literalism -- when it arose. But far more of my friends who were religious didn't do it.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:34,
archived)

but that's not the whole story, it's often "women and gays are inferior" and "nonbelievers will go to hell"
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:23,
archived)

but surely it is down to interpretation? That is exactly the reason why some Muslims believe that it is their duty to kill in the name of Allah, and some Muslims don't believe that. They're all reading from the same book and getting a different outcome.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:36,
archived)

And it's really cool, because if anyone disagrees with it I just pass the blame onto my imaginary friend.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:38,
archived)

( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:42,
archived)


It has fuck all to do with their religion ;)
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:43,
archived)

Until the conversation turned to Salman Rushdie, who "deserves to die for what he said"...then he tried to impress me with the story of how he and his brother hospitalised a "poof" with pool cues
I wasn't sorry when he was fired
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:44,
archived)
I wasn't sorry when he was fired


Certainly you can't touch a woman for a week a month around her period because at that point she's unclean. Also every time you shoot your wad you're unclean till sundown, too. (Don't know what happens if the sun's already set. The Bible/Torah don't specify.) Also, you're fully entitled to invade an enemy's territory, kill all the men and abduct (or kill) all the girls. You can then have one of the woman as a "slave" in your tent but if you want to keep her after a year you have to marry her. Result! Eleven months of free rapeage!
Blah blah blah women not allowed to talk in Church blah blah blah widows should remarry because they won't be able to control their lusts blah blah blah stone homosexual men blah blah blah kill a woman if she was raped in town because she could have shouted for help and obviously didn't blah blah blah men should have short hair because I the great Paul the Apostle who Never Met Jesus am going bald blah blah.
Feel free to dig around in the great holy books of all three religions -- and probably most others but I know squat about them. You can find crazy shit in the lot of them that fucking psychos and retards believe.
edit: Check Leviticus 15:16-33 for the original point. That's part of the Pentateuch/Torah and in both Jewish and Christian dogma -- and is almost certainly the root of the Islamic restrictions too.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:22,
archived)
Blah blah blah women not allowed to talk in Church blah blah blah widows should remarry because they won't be able to control their lusts blah blah blah stone homosexual men blah blah blah kill a woman if she was raped in town because she could have shouted for help and obviously didn't blah blah blah men should have short hair because I the great Paul the Apostle who Never Met Jesus am going bald blah blah.
Feel free to dig around in the great holy books of all three religions -- and probably most others but I know squat about them. You can find crazy shit in the lot of them that fucking psychos and retards believe.
edit: Check Leviticus 15:16-33 for the original point. That's part of the Pentateuch/Torah and in both Jewish and Christian dogma -- and is almost certainly the root of the Islamic restrictions too.

This is why I hate anyone stupid enough to be religious.
They're like politicians - they're all the same. All religious people are judgemental, holier-than-thou idiots. The teaching of all religion is that it is right and anyone who believes otherwise is wrong and therefore a sinner. So anyone who tells me that they follow that religion is automatically telling me that they perceive me as a sinner and that I think incorrectly.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:26,
archived)
They're like politicians - they're all the same. All religious people are judgemental, holier-than-thou idiots. The teaching of all religion is that it is right and anyone who believes otherwise is wrong and therefore a sinner. So anyone who tells me that they follow that religion is automatically telling me that they perceive me as a sinner and that I think incorrectly.

is that they're immediately telling me that I'm wrong and stupid -- except that they're the ones who have swallowed something written in a book by a goatherder 3000 years ago and then will warp their interpretation of everything they encounter to force it to fit their beliefs. The sheer lack of critical thought depresses me much more than it angers me these days. I used to try and put forward what I saw as reason to people but I just gave up in the end. :(
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:28,
archived)

I have another meeting with the Tony Blair Faith Foundation today
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:29,
archived)

It's not so hard to find a buyer for you
When money talks you're under its spell
Ah, but what do you have when there's nothing left to sell?
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:51,
archived)
When money talks you're under its spell
Ah, but what do you have when there's nothing left to sell?

( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:30,
archived)

next it'll be "Atheism is just another religion"
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:00,
archived)

I was minding my own business when all this came along.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:07,
archived)

just reliving almost every online religious debate I've had
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 12:13,
archived)

There are probably a lot more people who practice Christianity that believe in Science than don't. It depends how you apply your religion that is the issue. I have as much of an issue with miltant atheists shouting at people who may believe the teachings of a religion for being fools, despite not knowing why they practice their religion. Some people need guidance, and like the lessons that some religions teach. There is absolutely fuck all wrong with that. If you need a book written 2,000 years ago to help you deal with life, who the fuck is anyone to tell you you can't?
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:33,
archived)

I tell my wife to shut the fuck up in Church and that I'm her head because she's the descendant of Eve and sinned first and was born of ME, whereas I am a descendant of Adam and was born of God and am her head just as God is MY head. I'll also divorce her if she ever fucks around on me and she'll be left to starve by the street so long as everyone else is a good Christian, but I'm perfectly free to fuck whoever I want to.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:43,
archived)

I want to find out how 24 and Lost end
/priorities
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:13,
archived)
/priorities

Hugo wakes up covered in sweat and realises it was a spicy chili burrito nightmare

there will be a sniper/clocktower scenario involving Me, Abrams, Cuse and Lindelof
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:20,
archived)

when she said at the start "every answer will only lead to more questions" she wasn't kidding...
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:30,
archived)

it seemed a bit of a 'cop out' episode introducing the whole 'mysterious Mother' character, who will now (probably) never get explained herself
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:33,
archived)

Jack estimated Adam and Eve's bodies to be about 40 years old in S1, now they're 2000...something something island special powers something...I'm also a bit pissed off with all this "I've arranged it so you can't ever die" stuff. How? Why? When?
Gaaah
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:36,
archived)
Gaaah

haven't been gripped by this series
It's taken the term 'contrived' to unexciting new levels
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:22,
archived)
It's taken the term 'contrived' to unexciting new levels

the first 'act' wasn't particularly well handled, although from episode 11 or so onwards, the whole pace has changed, and it really is heading towards a 'hopefully' satisfying, if somewhat 'not happy' ending.
There's been a few 'shocks' and 'JB of old' moments that have sprung up over the past few weeks.
/spoiler free
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:26,
archived)
There's been a few 'shocks' and 'JB of old' moments that have sprung up over the past few weeks.
/spoiler free

As I trust your judgement, I shall endevour to clear the back log forthwith
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:29,
archived)

Or On The Buses.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:30,
archived)

it was good, and engaging, but that's all done and dusted now
/much like 'The Shield' as well - grrr.
So, just 24 and Lost to finish up on now
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:32,
archived)
/much like 'The Shield' as well - grrr.
So, just 24 and Lost to finish up on now

If such frivolity is of any interest.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:36,
archived)

gah, could be an expensive monday :)
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:43,
archived)

*pulls a Mephistopholes face*
You can't take it with you (etc) !
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:46,
archived)
You can't take it with you (etc) !


and Heroes couldn't save themselves from the axe

It was like every single character had their memories erased, then underwent a lobotomy
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:38,
archived)

I stuck with it, and despite a gash start, actually developed into an intriguing show,
that ends next week as well, same as 'V'
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:39,
archived)
that ends next week as well, same as 'V'

Why do people think Jo Fiennes is a credible leading man?
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:40,
archived)

I might have to watch Ultraviolet again, though IIRC he was the weakest link in that too
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:41,
archived)

I really enjoyed it, but the missus didn't fancy it.
We've got the first series on DVD, so I'll get round to it eventually, once I'm done with 24, V, Strike Back (which is apparently quite bad), The prisoner (which is undoubtedly dreadful), Deadwood, The Sopranos, Battlestar gallactica... and all those other shows that I'm constantly told I just have to watch
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:37,
archived)
We've got the first series on DVD, so I'll get round to it eventually, once I'm done with 24, V, Strike Back (which is apparently quite bad), The prisoner (which is undoubtedly dreadful), Deadwood, The Sopranos, Battlestar gallactica... and all those other shows that I'm constantly told I just have to watch

keeps getting told to watch BG, but not sure, I still have memories of the camp old series
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:40,
archived)

And it hides behind its own slow grimness in an attempt to disguise its poverty of imagination.
And it takes several series of unremitting slowness for the viewer to finally realise this.
Wasted far too many hours with BG. Boooooolsheeeeeeet !

What could possibly go wrong?
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:40,
archived)

having clicked the wrong blue bit. So if you can remember your showstopper, feel free to post it just up there.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:27,
archived)

BG and not The Wire ;)
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:37,
archived)

not enough time to spend watching em - I still have stuff on my Sky+ from 2008 that I haven't watched yet
the only thing I've kept up with is True Blood, though it was a bit of an anti-climax this season
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:45,
archived)
the only thing I've kept up with is True Blood, though it was a bit of an anti-climax this season

All the reviews I have read have been very positive. But I guess it is one of those things that you have to completely ignore that there was ever a precious show.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:07,
archived)

"Yeah, it's great, if you forget it's a remake of something that was much better"
Actually, I'd love to see that quote on the poster for the next 're-imagining' of some classic film.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 11:53,
archived)
Actually, I'd love to see that quote on the poster for the next 're-imagining' of some classic film.

I have to tut and shake my head at the execution
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:04,
archived)

Maybe Rob needs to take some vitamin C. Protects against free radicals.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:13,
archived)

Crash Bang Wallow, a comedy about a suicidal stuntman.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMVRQIR2oQs
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 9:56,
archived)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMVRQIR2oQs

( , Mon 17 May 2010, 10:06, archived)

And, while we're on pedant territory, 'ypu' is more usually spelt 'you'.
Me, I lpve making minor mistakes while pointing out other peoples' minor mistakes.
*EDIT* You minor-error-correcting-and then re-unamending cunt!
*ANOTHER EDIT* hahahaha
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:09,
archived)
Me, I lpve making minor mistakes while pointing out other peoples' minor mistakes.
*EDIT* You minor-error-correcting-and then re-unamending cunt!
*ANOTHER EDIT* hahahaha

*plays dead*
(while pretending not to be undergoing the symptoms of severe sleep deprivation)
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:17,
archived)
(while pretending not to be undergoing the symptoms of severe sleep deprivation)

I'm sure there was a guy with that on Embarrassing Bodies
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:15,
archived)

btw, got a showreel here if anyone's agent is interested.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:20,
archived)


I see the BBC has swiftly changed its Budget headline from "Osborne vows to halt 'fiddling'" to something slightly less sniggery
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 9:38,
archived)

Although I admit it's a tad specialist.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 9:47,
archived)

www.smh.com.au/nsw/man-held-over-attack-on-couple-20100515-v5dy.html
He has been in my house. I'm a bit taken aback right now.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 2:17,
archived)
He has been in my house. I'm a bit taken aback right now.

my neighbors got killed a few months back by some dickhead they knew.
fucking world is total balls sometimes :(
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 2:43,
archived)
fucking world is total balls sometimes :(

Apparently the old couple he stabbed were his old next door neighbours from when he was a kid.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 2:49,
archived)

then buried them in shallow graves in the woods near here.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 5:34,
archived)

my brother went to school with a guy who took out his own mother and brother with a hammer and set fire to the house, only about sixteen
ISSUES
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 3:15,
archived)
ISSUES

www.neave.com/strobe/
now I'm going to see if I can walk straight
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 4:50,
archived)
now I'm going to see if I can walk straight

Until I looked away I thought it was just some cool lines that made me wish this kind of thing existed when I was doing Psilocybin. Then I looked away, and everything was breathing.
Meanwhile, I'm plumbing in the dark! It's totally awesome. I just saved two baby bumble bees. They were trying to commit suicide.
Speaking of flashbacks- I just realized I hadn't heard this in about 30 years. www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxNi-0A1VxM
PLUMBING!!!!!
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 5:12,
archived)
Meanwhile, I'm plumbing in the dark! It's totally awesome. I just saved two baby bumble bees. They were trying to commit suicide.
Speaking of flashbacks- I just realized I hadn't heard this in about 30 years. www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxNi-0A1VxM
PLUMBING!!!!!

I THOUGHT THAT WAS JUST A FAIRY TALE

They wrote a song about it. But they forgot the part about the ants. And plumbing.
Now I'm off for my horrible daily sleeping episode. And then it's more plumbing tomorrow.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 6:32,
archived)
Now I'm off for my horrible daily sleeping episode. And then it's more plumbing tomorrow.



and shit.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 1:34,
archived)

"I'm sure that's not the poster for Alien, and that egg and tagline certainly seems suspect. In fact, I suspect an allusion to a certain sexual act is contained within this image."
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 1:00,
archived)

I have no idea why this is so funny, but HAHAHAHAHHA!
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 23:24,
archived)

( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 23:43,
archived)

just trying an evaluation copy of PS5. it's still a bit beyond me at the moment though
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 22:36,
archived)

Or is that more semantic than pedantic?
*shivers at the naughtiness of starting a sentence with 'or'*
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 22:34,
archived)
*shivers at the naughtiness of starting a sentence with 'or'*

because it's ridiculous, insane, outdated, freudian garbage. Waht's wrong with "obsessively neat?" A much more sensible phrase than one which implies you like to store objects in your rectum.
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 23:09,
archived)


(Not worth its own thread ;-) )

loving, attentive, assertive, grumpy, drunk and wife-beaty.
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 21:49,
archived)

( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 23:01,
archived)


Is that why it's melting? All this 'global warming' hype is actually a sophisticated cover-up engineered by Hoover and Siemens?? :)
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 22:08,
archived)

I think don't think enough people are aware of how strongly this is effecting the global climate. Lets hold an event.
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 22:20,
archived)

they do seem quite at home but they won't let me near the ice cubes

oo that reminds me, I got some FAB lollies in the freezer
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 23:05,
archived)

oo that reminds me, I got some FAB lollies in the freezer

why don't I have tiny penguins in my freezer?
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 23:46,
archived)

I was convinced it was real until I saw the penguin.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:24,
archived)

does this mean I should get a new refrigerator that displaces with the South Pole, since the one I have will probably stop working soon?
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 23:35,
archived)

stupid.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:25,
archived)

( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 1:19,
archived)

One must have got inside.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:25,
archived)

This is actually more beleivable than the other global warming theories.
So if I boil more kettles will that cool down the north and south poles?
Presuming kettles work on the same principle.
( ,
Mon 17 May 2010, 10:18,
archived)
So if I boil more kettles will that cool down the north and south poles?
Presuming kettles work on the same principle.

when the fridge door is open.
( ,
Wed 19 May 2010, 0:43,
archived)

( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 21:28,
archived)

No heterosexual can possibly be as obsessed with gay sex as he is!!!
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 21:31,
archived)

gone to see Brokeback Mountain. He probably thought it was a happy ending.
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 21:34,
archived)

but then his wife said no, he isn't dead. Now he really is dead.
Shitters :(
Was hoping to see him at the High Voltage festival until heaven and Hell cancelled.
( ,
Sun 16 May 2010, 21:23,
archived)
Shitters :(
Was hoping to see him at the High Voltage festival until heaven and Hell cancelled.
« Older messages | Newer messages »
