...but nicely done sir
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:18,
archived)
Kevin Spacey played Bobby Darin....Mmmmmmm
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:22,
archived)
I almost slid off the sofa. He's the perfect age now as well.
Phwwwwwwwoooooar, says I.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:29,
archived)
Phwwwwwwwoooooar, says I.
He used to make me feel very wrong things too. He still does in certain roles, but I just have to gloss over some of his other ones
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:31,
archived)
You know how John Hurt's the sexiest thing ever now he's in his 60s? It's like that.
I'm not sure if it's online, but it's all over the telly.
Mmmmmm.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:32,
archived)
I'm not sure if it's online, but it's all over the telly.
Mmmmmm.
Sometimes I tune into some of the comedy channels on Virgin (just because it's there and we're paying for it!) but mostly we just watch dvds
*goes to search*
Edit: Hrmmghhmmmm. Oh yes.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:33,
archived)
*goes to search*
Edit: Hrmmghhmmmm. Oh yes.
Venerable, that's what he looks like.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:36,
archived)
It's just you men, you get better as you get older.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:38,
archived)
Not all men, by any stretch, but a special few.
Our dear friend JPG here, he's sexier everytime I see him, helped along by my drooling over the Spacey, and his many shared features...and of course the gentleman thing because I'm a sucker for a character to fantasise over.
Edit: Oh, look at me getting all sleazy again, hate campaign here we come!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:41,
archived)
Our dear friend JPG here, he's sexier everytime I see him, helped along by my drooling over the Spacey, and his many shared features...and of course the gentleman thing because I'm a sucker for a character to fantasise over.
Edit: Oh, look at me getting all sleazy again, hate campaign here we come!
;-)
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:47,
archived)
Oh dear, JPG. David Miliband was looking quite hot on telly this morning.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:18,
archived)
Say it isn't so, pickle.
You can't - You just can't!
It's pronounced 'MilliBlair' anyhow...
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:19,
archived)
You can't - You just can't!
It's pronounced 'MilliBlair' anyhow...
That would be the only excuse!
:D
*hugs*
:D *hug*
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:25,
archived)
Although amyl is pretty bad. Apologies.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:28,
archived)
Rape's out of the question. You're going to hit me, aren't you?
I'll hit you back. I'll hit you in the thorax.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:33,
archived)
I'll hit you back. I'll hit you in the thorax.
also, I thought this was Spike Milligan in drag at first
uk.imdb.com/media/rm687185664/nm0906048
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:35,
archived)
uk.imdb.com/media/rm687185664/nm0906048
Also, what I love more is that fucked-up 42 day bill got kicked out on it's arse.
\o/
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:21,
archived)
\o/
-- it's the politicians -- they got SMART!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:21,
archived)
to mop up as it were.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:37,
archived)
;-)
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:27,
archived)
...that has WOOOOO written all over it. Was just about to post, but shall leave it a bit so this is rightly on top! *Clicks*
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:27,
archived)
it just makes him look retarded.
Sorry, I meant more retarded....
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:35,
archived)
Sorry, I meant more retarded....
'tard that he is....
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:38,
archived)

Haven't people got legs and public transport any more?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:00,
archived)
and would have to give up my job, due to not being able to afford to get there. Public Transport does not facilitate my getting to work
I could do it, but it would take 2 1/2 hours a day, and cost more than my monthly fuel bill
:(
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:03,
archived)
I could do it, but it would take 2 1/2 hours a day, and cost more than my monthly fuel bill
:(
and rosy cheeked buxom lassies carry me to work on a throne while they take it in turns to vigorously fellate me. It normally takes between 20 and 25 minutes.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:20,
archived)
... aside from the underclass of rosy cheeked buxom lassies
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:25,
archived)
It wouldn't affect me *that* badly, but there are plenty of people it would. It's nowhere near as clear cut as a lot of people think it is.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:12,
archived)
I bloody hate it but it's the cheapest way to get in.
:(
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:17,
archived)
:(
I'm a busdriver - you'd think we were the most evil people in the world anybody think we had a right to drive down a "Bus Lane" and park safely at a... wait for it... "Bus Stop" or even dread of dread actually go through a (what scientists like to call) "Bus Gate" without having to avoid hitting some idiot short cutting in the opposite direction...
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:05,
archived)
I use them very often. Lovely, it is.
Well done to you for being a bus driver, I've seen some of your lot deal with some right pricks.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:07,
archived)
Well done to you for being a bus driver, I've seen some of your lot deal with some right pricks.
I was assaulted twice in 2 weeks by these pricks simply because I refused to turn the other cheek and let them ride for free and because I dared to challenge them I get them throwing punches at me. The first threw an out of date daysaver at me then ran upstairs then 2 weeks later a man who made a big deal about where he was getting off - decided to over ride - I simply informed him that to go further will cost him more money he punched me with a tin of beans in his hand. After all this what did my company (First) say to me - "Don't challenge passengers!" well excuse me that is my job or do you expect people to ride free because that is fine by me.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:12,
archived)
Sure, some of them are cunts, but you get that in all walks of life.
I have no problem with using public transport, it's just the methods that Greater Manchester Future Transport have used to promote this.
Impartial? My fucking arse.
If they listened to all the other ideas that people had put across for improving public transport, then perhaps we'd have had a yes vote today.
Anyway, I've blabbered on about this enough in the past few months. Just going to enjoy the result now.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:11,
archived)
I have no problem with using public transport, it's just the methods that Greater Manchester Future Transport have used to promote this.
Impartial? My fucking arse.
If they listened to all the other ideas that people had put across for improving public transport, then perhaps we'd have had a yes vote today.
Anyway, I've blabbered on about this enough in the past few months. Just going to enjoy the result now.
nonsence clearly the buss lane is for people who eat crunchy nut
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:15,
archived)
people saying get'im while pointing at a screen.
however there are no bus lanes near me as I am a rural type. but if there was one, I would not park in it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:22,
archived)
however there are no bus lanes near me as I am a rural type. but if there was one, I would not park in it.
yeah time goes three times as slow of me cause i am from jupitur. so i get fthree cakes
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:23,
archived)
And the conjestion charge is a great concept. Unfortunately environmental issues are not what it's ther for. It's ther to generate profit. I'm slap bang in the middle of the London CC.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:17,
archived)
Since the congestion charge I refuse to drive into London because of the congestion charge.
So it hasn't really affected me. Really.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:22,
archived)
So it hasn't really affected me. Really.
The idea is great, the people profiting from it isn't.
Unfortunately I'm slapbang in the middle of the extention, except the extention ingludes the entire area except my street. The traffic and the accidents have quadrupled since it's advent.
The secret if you're approaching from the west of London is to drive into Acton with is relatively safe for parking and free to park and just get the tube in the little way from there.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:26,
archived)
Unfortunately I'm slapbang in the middle of the extention, except the extention ingludes the entire area except my street. The traffic and the accidents have quadrupled since it's advent.
The secret if you're approaching from the west of London is to drive into Acton with is relatively safe for parking and free to park and just get the tube in the little way from there.
more accidents per mile than any other road user and responsible for a whopping 74% of motor vehicle related bicycle accidents might not mean that YOU are a bad driver, but does kind of point at bus drivers generally being cunts.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:36,
archived)
But it was obviously going to have nothing with the voters and everything to do wit the corporations what would benefit from it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:00,
archived)
Who in their right mind would pay every time they got a blocked nose?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:00,
archived)
in order to persuade me to be more careful not to catch colds, since I don't know what's best for me.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:04,
archived)
your really don't want a cold, you should be aspiring to 'flu at least.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:09,
archived)
I'm my own worst enemy, that's why I must be thwarted and slain.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:25,
archived)
and I don't want to appear ignorant, so I'm going to say that I think it's appalling. Either that or it's long overdue. Or perhaps, let's wait and see how it turns out before we judge it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:04,
archived)
although i've not quite made up my mind.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:08,
archived)
Co-ordination problems and all that economic speak, innit? Although, I do hear tales that Manchester doesn't have a congestion problem. I would've voted 'Yes' given the choice.
EDIT: Woo to picture!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:05,
archived)
EDIT: Woo to picture!
I am fed up and exhausted from pointing out the positives to all the nobs that voted no.
Urgh. I'm going to bed.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:20,
archived)
Urgh. I'm going to bed.
The thing is, the "No" voters:
- Don't think the plans were justified
- Don't think it's fair that drivers should have to pay a third driving-related tax to subsidise a service that they won't use
- Don't trust GMPTE not to almightily fuck up as they usually do
- Don't trust the fact that it was a proposal and therefore open to change
- Don't like the fact that they're pushing more money into the knickers of Stagecoach when they're rolling in money as it is
- Hate those fucking awful adverts with the tenuous "MY BABY WILL DIE OF AIDS IF YOU VOTE NO" statements on them.
I am fed up and exhausted from pointing out those points to all the nobs that voted yes.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:18,
archived)
- Don't think the plans were justified
- Don't think it's fair that drivers should have to pay a third driving-related tax to subsidise a service that they won't use
- Don't trust GMPTE not to almightily fuck up as they usually do
- Don't trust the fact that it was a proposal and therefore open to change
- Don't like the fact that they're pushing more money into the knickers of Stagecoach when they're rolling in money as it is
- Hate those fucking awful adverts with the tenuous "MY BABY WILL DIE OF AIDS IF YOU VOTE NO" statements on them.
I am fed up and exhausted from pointing out those points to all the nobs that voted yes.
to drive 6 miles into Manchester city centre at 8.30am, why should i pay £1200 a year so that the chavs can have more buses to piss in?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:35,
archived)
that has really, really annoyed me is the Arrogance of Lucy Powell. ( Labour, Withington ) Who has decided that the reason the public have voted no on this issue is simply because it was too complicated for us to understand why getting out of our cars and onto council run public transport schemes was for the greater good.
Well forgive me for being too damn stupid to understand why forcing me to pay more to use my car so that I may subsidise a continually failing ( and in the main, privately operated ) public transport system ( failing despite having more and more public money thrown at it despite yearly worsening performance ) is in the greater good.
Here's why the public said no. We'd rather sit on the A57 or the M62 for an extra 10 minutes and pay no more stealth taxes than sit on the roads with no notable change except that we are paying so some chav can drag her brood to the precinct on a bus.
We can only learn from London. Yes it worked to an extent for the city but the reasons were mainly that it became financially impossible for private motorists to continue to drive in congestion charge areas. That of course did have a positive effect on the vehicles on the road. So what did they do? Rest on their laurels at a job well done? No, they made the congestion charge area even greater ( practically outside my front door in my London address ) and stretched it out to the suburbs. Why?
Finance. There has only ever been one reason for congestion charges and that is because it is an unavoidable tax and props up local governments who have been unable to balance books due to them being unable to collect council tax.
I'll tell you who should feel stupid. Whoever thought having a referendum would work in the favour of stealth taxes.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:21,
archived)
Well forgive me for being too damn stupid to understand why forcing me to pay more to use my car so that I may subsidise a continually failing ( and in the main, privately operated ) public transport system ( failing despite having more and more public money thrown at it despite yearly worsening performance ) is in the greater good.
Here's why the public said no. We'd rather sit on the A57 or the M62 for an extra 10 minutes and pay no more stealth taxes than sit on the roads with no notable change except that we are paying so some chav can drag her brood to the precinct on a bus.
We can only learn from London. Yes it worked to an extent for the city but the reasons were mainly that it became financially impossible for private motorists to continue to drive in congestion charge areas. That of course did have a positive effect on the vehicles on the road. So what did they do? Rest on their laurels at a job well done? No, they made the congestion charge area even greater ( practically outside my front door in my London address ) and stretched it out to the suburbs. Why?
Finance. There has only ever been one reason for congestion charges and that is because it is an unavoidable tax and props up local governments who have been unable to balance books due to them being unable to collect council tax.
I'll tell you who should feel stupid. Whoever thought having a referendum would work in the favour of stealth taxes.
West Ken and Shepherd's Bush road. Not any future plans they might have to see if they can stretch it from Paris to Glasgow without anyone noticing.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:29,
archived)
No VAT on them and instead of scanning cars ,scan bikes and give a bonus per bike, per household for those cycling.
That was not only do you solve, partially, the problem with those on low income but those on low income that suffer from obesity, or the ones with a poor diet not the lazy bastards.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:30,
archived)
That was not only do you solve, partially, the problem with those on low income but those on low income that suffer from obesity, or the ones with a poor diet not the lazy bastards.
We don't need a congestion charge. We need a baby charge so that people stop churning out sprogs that grow up unable to afford a car and only see the inside of the one they nicked or the one they get transported to jail in.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:35,
archived)
Had a few technical issues though. Do you mean "unable to afford a Range Rover"?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:40,
archived)
I said make it cheaper for people to cycle!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:00,
archived)
Private roads are what we need, if we're ever going to have perspex tubes in the sky and other pleasing ideas.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:31,
archived)
We have a flat in Hammersmith because she still works down there during the week.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:33,
archived)
I hope that £8 to drive a distance it'd be quicker and cheaper to cycle, or to cover by tube, doesn't wipe you out completely.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:39,
archived)
When I was last there I had to be in Mayfair every morning for 8am. I could drive it in 15 minutes or take the lottery of the tube and get from Hammersmith to Green Park in a random 45 minutes to an hour and a half.
Cycling in London is dangerous at the best of times but when you have heavy baggage it is not viable.
Don't talk to my like you know my traffic habits and can assume that all London car journeys are easier by cycle or tube because that's simply not so.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:45,
archived)
Cycling in London is dangerous at the best of times but when you have heavy baggage it is not viable.
Don't talk to my like you know my traffic habits and can assume that all London car journeys are easier by cycle or tube because that's simply not so.
Or I would if they extended the congestion charge zone and built a few more bus lanes. Otherwise it'd take ages.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:54,
archived)
They're almost public transport, and don't seem to charge you for the C-Charge anyway.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:01,
archived)
so he's got somewhere to park his ship.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:34,
archived)
Complaining about a 'stealth tax' that's about as stealthy as an elephant, painfully snobby ranting about 'chavs', saying the congestion charge worked and still whining about it..
...do you work for the Mail?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:37,
archived)
...do you work for the Mail?
I said that the congestion charge in London had the effect of reducing traffic in certain areas and I qualified that with further statements.
Stealth taxes don't have to be 'hidden' They are designed to be a way of income generation without being a state ratified national taxation.
The term stealth tax refers to a levy that you pay that is a tax in all but name. Not your definition of a payment that is obvious.
fuck you and the Daily Mail.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:41,
archived)
Stealth taxes don't have to be 'hidden' They are designed to be a way of income generation without being a state ratified national taxation.
The term stealth tax refers to a levy that you pay that is a tax in all but name. Not your definition of a payment that is obvious.
fuck you and the Daily Mail.
you should do less of that, chavs are people too, I'm almost sure of it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:44,
archived)
meant to subsidise their being? I'm happy for all people to do their own thing. Just to have them pay for it themselves.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:47,
archived)
If it were a tax ratified in parliament then all well and good, but it's not. It is a revenue gaining scheme aimed at the wealthy or business that has done nothing in London for the public transport system ( which I believe was meant to be the big carrot )
If local councils want more money for public transport then ask the government for it as they are supposed to. If the government need more money for it then ask the country as they are supposed to.
I'm not adverse to paying taxes. I'm adverse to being forced to give money to local councils that don't manage things any better with or without the funding.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:53,
archived)
If local councils want more money for public transport then ask the government for it as they are supposed to. If the government need more money for it then ask the country as they are supposed to.
I'm not adverse to paying taxes. I'm adverse to being forced to give money to local councils that don't manage things any better with or without the funding.
10% off bus fares came in very handy.
As did the reduced prices on the Oyster system.
New buses on my route this month too.
You're talking from a standpoint of ignorance I'm afraid.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:27,
archived)
As did the reduced prices on the Oyster system.
New buses on my route this month too.
You're talking from a standpoint of ignorance I'm afraid.
for those that use it by charging those that don't is not my idea of useful. It has not made it any easier or quicker to travel around london by public transport. We were promised quicker travel. In my experience of London, for the most part travel by bus has grown longer in time on the same routes and I have no idea what the figures for tube travel are but it's clearly now operating way beyond capacity.
The fact is that if I finish work at 6pm in Central London I can leave for home on public transport or I can go to the pub for an hour and a half and still get home at the same time.
I'm not ignorant of public transport. It's simply not an option for me due to the amount of time it takes to get anywhere. Because it is cheaper for you does not in any way mean that the infrastructure has benefited from the congestion charge.
The idea was to free up roads and make journeys quicker. making it cheaper to sit on a bus longer is just taking the piss. Especially for those that don't sit on the bus.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:39,
archived)
The fact is that if I finish work at 6pm in Central London I can leave for home on public transport or I can go to the pub for an hour and a half and still get home at the same time.
I'm not ignorant of public transport. It's simply not an option for me due to the amount of time it takes to get anywhere. Because it is cheaper for you does not in any way mean that the infrastructure has benefited from the congestion charge.
The idea was to free up roads and make journeys quicker. making it cheaper to sit on a bus longer is just taking the piss. Especially for those that don't sit on the bus.
had been used produced a cheap, efficient public transport system, then all would be well. But it hasn't, I desperately want to support it but it's such a half-arsed measure
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:39,
archived)
the people of Manchester saw sense, living outside Manchester and travelling in is where this scheme would of made most of it's money yet those people (i.e. me) didn't get a vote. Well done the people of Manchester.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:54,
archived)
HERE'S YOUR FUCKING CHAINSAW, ALRIGHT? ;-)

I shouldn't have made this as a new thread, on second thoughts. Sorry, b3tans. Set fire to me or something.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:56,
archived)

I shouldn't have made this as a new thread, on second thoughts. Sorry, b3tans. Set fire to me or something.
grrrRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!
Hold me Captain. The bad man in the newsletter made me feel horrible.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:57,
archived)
Hold me Captain. The bad man in the newsletter made me feel horrible.
*snuggles* what's happened? I haven't looked at the newsletter yet.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:58,
archived)
There then follows many excruciating minutes of clinking noises and pouring blood as he tries to retrieve the shards
:(
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:02,
archived)
:(
Made me feel sad and a bit teary, actually. Silly, silly, panicky man.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:03,
archived)
I had a friend at college who called me up from his girlfriends house to say he'd half inserted a tampon up his bottom and was about to get in the bath 'to see what it felt like'.
He insisted I stay on the phone, and I did. He was disappointed that it didn't feel as exciting as he thought it might, till I pointed out just how far in his prostate was.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:07,
archived)
He insisted I stay on the phone, and I did. He was disappointed that it didn't feel as exciting as he thought it might, till I pointed out just how far in his prostate was.
I've seen the first 10 seconds then turned it off.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:14,
archived)
as I've been meaning to start doing these for AGES.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:19,
archived)
Now I have some weeds in my back garden. I say weeds but I mean giant redwoods...
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:58,
archived)
Chainsaws are scientifically proven to be better than most things.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:59,
archived)
With a new chain, it's about as close to a lightsaber as you can get.
Edit: And a scarily intoxicating experience it is too. Steady now... :-|
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:11,
archived)
Edit: And a scarily intoxicating experience it is too. Steady now... :-|
I think they must be something to do with her blood pressure, she never lets me in the room while she uses them and always comes out sweating like a pig?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:09,
archived)
You?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:49,
archived)
haven't seen you in quite a bit. But that was probably because I was away most of the time ;)
That wasn't you celebrating with the glass jar in the newsletter was it?
That was the singularly most horrendous thing I have ever seen on the internet.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:48,
archived)
That was the singularly most horrendous thing I have ever seen on the internet.
NSFW: www.blink-182.com :WFSN
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:50,
archived)
What stuff can you shit?
On that note I'm going to stop posting. Finito.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:53,
archived)
On that note I'm going to stop posting. Finito.
what a pile of crap it exposed my pc as!
And the game weren't much better.
:(
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:20,
archived)
And the game weren't much better.
:(
that as we move forward into the 1950's, this may start to look slightly racist.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:41,
archived)
the right one's meek and kind like a lovely little vole with a bonnet on.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:45,
archived)
but the image was releally old and vaded, so i cleaned it up
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:44,
archived)
I never ever posted this after I did it...
If anyone is into WWII History and more specifically the Battle of Britain The Chutney Wife & I produced this website: www.rafhornchurch.thehumanjourney.net/history.htm
It is primarily about RAF Hornchurch, Part of Sector 2 air defense. It is a little dry, but included amongst it is this gem... www.rafhornchurch.thehumanjourney.net/Fun_Stuff/Hornchurch_Trumps.pdf
Aircraft of WWI and WWII TOP FLUCKING TRUMPS!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:48,
archived)
If anyone is into WWII History and more specifically the Battle of Britain The Chutney Wife & I produced this website: www.rafhornchurch.thehumanjourney.net/history.htm
It is primarily about RAF Hornchurch, Part of Sector 2 air defense. It is a little dry, but included amongst it is this gem... www.rafhornchurch.thehumanjourney.net/Fun_Stuff/Hornchurch_Trumps.pdf
Aircraft of WWI and WWII TOP FLUCKING TRUMPS!
edit: the trumps, I mean... not War in general... err...
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:52,
archived)
(, Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:33, archived)
I thought there was meant to be a sale on?
Most stuff was only 10% off so its much much cheaper to buy it all from Play or Amazon still!
It's almost like its a conspiracy to make people spend money now without thinking. But that would never be the case.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:39,
archived)
Most stuff was only 10% off so its much much cheaper to buy it all from Play or Amazon still!
It's almost like its a conspiracy to make people spend money now without thinking. But that would never be the case.
is that those stores are shit, and have always been shit, and would have continued to be shit, and the only reason everyone seems sad to see them go is because they're familiar from youth.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:43,
archived)
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/russellbrand/2008/01/living_la_vida_bagpuss.shtml
Odd pairing? Fortunately Olly phoned him.
P.s. For extra hilarity click the link on the page that says 'Who is Russel Brand?'
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:39,
archived)
Odd pairing? Fortunately Olly phoned him.
P.s. For extra hilarity click the link on the page that says 'Who is Russel Brand?'
I wasn't sure what to expect. Yes, that's genuinely funny :)
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:45,
archived)

you guys got any good propeganda images, its for a history thing, can be anything!
I should know- I tried and look where it got me
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:34,
archived)
* These slices of bread are well fucked now!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:37,
archived)
and that's some very subtle breathing :)
I believe this might be for the win
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:27,
archived)
I believe this might be for the win
I been thinkin the same of yours so that means summat to me! :D
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:33,
archived)
brilliant
even better now it animates, downloading sound killed my machine for a second.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:28,
archived)
even better now it animates, downloading sound killed my machine for a second.
do you think I should add a little warning that it's a download? It's from Smallfilms.co.uk so I'm pretty darn sure it's safe from any nasty diseases like, but I just found them all on the afore mentioned site and I went all gooey, so I wanted to share: www.smallfilms.co.uk/bagpuss/intro.htm
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:36,
archived)
also had a few other things running as well and my poor old machine got a bit tired
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:53,
archived)
This wins everything.
*hands over everything*
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:46,
archived)
*hands over everything*
they take batteries and purr when stroked, imagine making one in Bagpuss form! Man, I bet that'd sell!
God I wish I had people I could tell when I have good ideas like that...
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:09,
archived)
God I wish I had people I could tell when I have good ideas like that...
They are freaky and horrible.
(,
Sat 13 Dec 2008, 16:06,
archived)
what a lovely thing to see on first looking around the board.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 19:06,
archived)
What a great idea, and flawless execution.
You do realise this raises the bar so far now us commoners have no chance of beating this much win? But y' know what? I don't care, because this is fantastic :)
My click is yours
(,
Sat 13 Dec 2008, 2:57,
archived)
You do realise this raises the bar so far now us commoners have no chance of beating this much win? But y' know what? I don't care, because this is fantastic :)
My click is yours
what a marvellous thing to see first thing in the morning with a hangover
(,
Sat 13 Dec 2008, 10:54,
archived)
Have yourself a damn hard click sir.
(,
Sat 13 Dec 2008, 20:53,
archived)
*wanders off to dye my cat pink and white*
(,
Sat 13 Dec 2008, 22:06,
archived)
These modern toungue twisters are great!
.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:23,
archived)
.

Can you hear that just in the distance? I think it's the Too Late Drums!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:21,
archived)
and still you didn't say anything funny, you have a promising career in the IT crowd ahead of you
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:07,
archived)
here
Also, I was once in the newsletter and Rob didn't give me props where due! So balls to you doubly!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:08,
archived)
Also, I was once in the newsletter and Rob didn't give me props where due! So balls to you doubly!
but wheres my friday game, and things that make you go awww
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:12,
archived)
the most confusing explanation is probably the right one
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:03,
archived)
It's an expression of anger, or severe dismay
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:04,
archived)
Mor on this subject can be found in the B3ta dictionary B3ta tribute site.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:09,
archived)
Pooey goodness.
EDIT: On further inspection it is obviously a fake (from Turkey or somewhere?). Also racist.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:03,
archived)
EDIT: On further inspection it is obviously a fake (from Turkey or somewhere?). Also racist.
Rob, can you do these as podcasts so I don't have to distract my eyes?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:06,
archived)
just the thought of someone describing websites with their voice...how much to hire stephen fry?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:18,
archived)
but in my profile it still says I have a day to wait. But I digress, its time to get my squirrel girl manufacturing kit operational once more.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:47,
archived)
Got a double chortle when I noticed it though
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:42,
archived)
i was going to post it in it's full glory, not even i could mistake that for porn. i think last time that phil image had an outing, as it were, it wasn't shouted down as nsfw.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:47,
archived)
and i think you could post it in all it's glory.
I just wasn't prepared for... it
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:49,
archived)
I just wasn't prepared for... it
sometimes i scare myself also, the old chap puts me to shame.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:52,
archived)
are you under my desk again?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:27,
archived)

Image courtesy of the very excellent Dave the Hat
my image has appeared on the board far to much for most folk's liking
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:53,
archived)
Love it Bilbo
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:26,
archived)
EDIT: Sorry, what I meant was "Well Done!"
I made a this but it wasn't worth its own thread

blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/seattle911/archives/156578.asp
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:33,
archived)

blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/seattle911/archives/156578.asp
the sticker on the alarm, but fuck me if I can read what it says...
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 15:39,
archived)
I thaught it would make a funny jape in a shop if people tried the smoke alarms... because they are loud... its not funny :(
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:07,
archived)
Tops!
TJ: I hope you don't mind beefy, but I have a problem.
I need to put an ISO flie onto a CD, but it is 2meg too large. Does anyone know of a way of shrinking this? Or would that render it unusable?
And it has to be a CD, not a DVD or external USB thinymajig.
Many thanks in advance to anyone who helps :D
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:35,
archived)
TJ: I hope you don't mind beefy, but I have a problem.
I need to put an ISO flie onto a CD, but it is 2meg too large. Does anyone know of a way of shrinking this? Or would that render it unusable?
And it has to be a CD, not a DVD or external USB thinymajig.
Many thanks in advance to anyone who helps :D
in the options
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:38,
archived)
Jeez, you're getting some of my best work here
and I'm getting bubkis
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:45,
archived)
and I'm getting bubkis
but I think people must get tired of me posting 'hahah!'
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:49,
archived)
« Older messages | Newer messages »






























